DEADPOOL 2 Commitments Meant Josh Brolin Was Rarely On The Set Of AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR

DEADPOOL 2 Commitments Meant Josh Brolin Was Rarely On The Set Of AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR

It appears as if Josh Brolin's performance as Thanos was mostly isolated to a sound booth because it's now been revealed that his Deadpool 2 role meant his time on set as the Mad Titan was very limited.

By JoshWilding - Apr 17, 2018 02:04 AM EST
Filed Under: Avengers: Infinity War
Source: Radio Times
As you may recall, there were reports quite some time ago that Benedict Cumberbatch's scenes in Avengers: Infinity War would have to be shot with a stand-in because of his busy schedule. Well, in a very interesting turn of events, the actor has now revealed that it was actually Josh Brolin who was absent from the set of the Marvel movie and that a stand-in ended up doing much of his mo-cap work.

"They used a stand-in for Josh. Josh wasn't in there for much, he did his bit and then a lot of stuff with a lot of us and him was missing because, I guess, he was doing Deadpool 2 and I was doing Melrose and The Current War," Cumberbatch revealed before noting that he personally was actually on set for the majority of time despite reports of his face being painted over that of a stand-ins. 

"But we made it work," the British actor continued. "It's often the case you can act with other actors anyways, in certain scenarios because of the amount of additional stuff you have to fit in with the environment or the magic or whatever it is that's coming out of your hands or your ass."

While it's a shame to think that Brolin wasn't actually there, Bradley Cooper and Vin Diesel have never set foot on the Guardians of the Galaxy sets for shooting and that's never had a negative impact on their performances as Rocket and Groot. That's a point reiterated by Cumberbatch in regards to Brolin's work on Avengers: Infinity War (and let's face it, he probably knows better than us). "I don't feel robbed of the opportunity, and there's plenty of footage showing there's definitely all of us there."
 
What do you think about these remarks? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section. 
Marvel Fan Spots AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR VFX Blunder Which May Ruin One Of The Movie's Biggest Moments
Related:

Marvel Fan Spots AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR VFX Blunder Which May Ruin One Of The Movie's Biggest Moments

ABSOLUTE SUPERMAN #2 Preview Reveals The Crazy First Meeting Between The Man Of Steel And Lois Lane
Recommended For You:

ABSOLUTE SUPERMAN #2 Preview Reveals The Crazy First Meeting Between The Man Of Steel And Lois Lane

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
SKetCH
SKetCH - 4/17/2018, 3:07 AM
ChangAlang
ChangAlang - 4/17/2018, 3:15 AM
Because he was doing his own stunts
Boyle360
Boyle360 - 4/17/2018, 3:43 AM
@ChangAlang - Jeez his hair product must be very strong
Roodi
Roodi - 4/17/2018, 3:17 AM
Damn. I don't think I like how some of the things have been handled behind the scenes. Such as the actors not knowing the script, or them not knowing who they were acting with as explained by Tom Holland in some interviews. Kinda disappointed Brolin wasn't really there for the most part. I hope it lives up to the hype.
Origame
Origame - 4/17/2018, 3:28 AM
@Roodi - I doubt it will mainly because it has so much hype. It could be considered disappointing if it doesnt cure cancer.
Ragnarocknroll
Ragnarocknroll - 4/17/2018, 3:40 AM
@Roodi - As long as the movie's good, who cares what happens behind the scenes?
CaptainElrond
CaptainElrond - 4/17/2018, 4:48 AM
@Ragnarocknroll - Unless you want to study film for a job in the movie industry, or you are simply curious.
Tusky
Tusky - 4/17/2018, 3:18 AM
The hype train will be on us soon...
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 4/17/2018, 3:18 AM
Not surprising. Happens often. The Civil War airport battle was shot over a few weeks and many of the actors never even worked with each other in that scene. Plus, Brolin was the first one they were working with when production started, doing mo-cap work.
Equivocal
Equivocal - 4/17/2018, 11:27 AM
@MosquitoFarmer -

how nice
I'd like to have a "job" where I do not have to be present,
get the credit
and get the money
and yet be recognized as a good performance

wow......
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 4/17/2018, 11:58 AM
@Equivocal - Don't know what you're talking about. He still did the performance, just not with many of the other actors themselves. Ruffalo had a fairly short shoot on Ragnarok, but he was still a prominent character and played the part. Look at Benedict Cumberbatch playing Smaug in The Hobbit. He did his performance without working with Martin Freeman. It's Hollywood blockbuster film making. Robert Downey Jr. often barely works with the other actors since he is hidden within the Iron Man suit.
Equivocal
Equivocal - 4/17/2018, 12:25 PM
@MosquitoFarmer -

"They used a stand-in for Josh"

that's what I mean ↑
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 4/17/2018, 1:02 PM
@Equivocal - A stand-in is usually for the sake of another actor's pickup shot. Juggling a cast of this magnitude with all these huge actors' busy schedules requires that they can't always be available for the entire production.
dracula
dracula - 4/17/2018, 3:21 AM
neither was Benedict Cumberbatch
Roodi
Roodi - 4/17/2018, 3:28 AM
1 2
View Recorder