The Case For Jon Hamm As Bruce Wayne

The Case For Jon Hamm As Bruce Wayne

Five reasons why Warner Bros. should cast Jon Hamm as Bruce Wayne.

Editorial Opinion
By JohnJoeWalsh - Aug 17, 2013 08:08 PM EST
Filed Under: Batman

Now that San Diego is in the rear view mirror for 2013, one can't help but wonder what the thought process was at Warner Brothers in the days that followed. They made a big splash to be sure with the Superman/Batman announcement. They also raised the stakes considerably on their next DC film: it is going to feature DC's (and perhaps Warner's) most important franchise: Batman. Casting a new solo Batman film would be tough enough. The job is made trickier by the fact that he must blend into the new Superman franchise.

Look, WB and DC can not afford to get this wrong. Blow it (and, oh yes, it can be blown - see Clooney in Batman and Robin or Reynolds in Green Lantern) and you waylay not only the newly minted Superman franchise, but also your chances to do anything with Batman or the Justice League for the foreseeable future. Which brings us to Jon Hamm.

1. Bruce Wayne must have gravitas. Hamm has it in spades. He can do dark characters. He has tragedy in his own life he can tap into. Of all the actors who have been speculated on to play this part, Hamm is the only one who can truly bring the presence that playing Bruce Wayne requires. Choose a lesser actor and you really run the risk of going down the Batman and Robin road. Two guys running around in capes is not going to be as easy as Joss Whedon made it seem.

2. Based on the reviews of Superman the consensus seems to be that it could have been a little more fun. Note to screenwriter David Goyer: this script is going to have to take itself a little less seriously. Hamm can do humor. He's hosted SNL fabulously. He has that twinkle in his eye and could make Cavill into a great straight man. (That didn't come out right.)

3. Whoever plays Bruce Wayne is going to have to make us forget Christian Bale. Not completely, but you know what I mean here. He is going to be in his shadow, so you need someone with the supreme confidence and the stage presence to take command of the role and make it his own. Watch Hamm work if you haven't already, and you'll see that he can hit some of the same beats that Bale did, but will always bring his own stuff to a character. Someone is going to have the unenviable task of figuring out how to talk while wearing the cowl without aping Bale's trademark growl. Hamm is up to that task.

4. Viewers of Mad Men are, generally speaking, discerning, cerebral types. The show requires a certain investment from its viewers, which they willingly give. These folks tend to be quite vocal fans of Hamm and are, in a word, tastemakers. Hamm is also well respected in Hollywood, with the LA Times running a piece titled The Case for Jon Hamm, pleading not that he should be cast as Batman, but that he should get his long overdue Emmy! Casting Hamm will create big time buzz and give the film some serious credibility which, let's face it, is sorely needed considering its a sequel to a movie that got a rotten tomato.

5. Finally, and least importantly, he looks the part. He actually may look more like Bruce Wayne than Christian Bale. Sometimes he looks like Wayne as done by Neal Adams, sometimes by Frank Quietly.

Somewhere in Hollywood, there are casting folks making the single biggest decision about this film, and in many respects, about Warner Brothers future with DC films. Get this wrong, and the whole ship sinks. Cavill can not save a film with the wrong actor cast opposite him. No offense to him, but he is not that guy. This has to be just right. And Jon Hamm is the right guy for the job.

Jeffrey Dean Morgan Confirms He Was Supposed To Play The DCEU's FLASHPOINT Batman
Related:

Jeffrey Dean Morgan Confirms He Was Supposed To Play The DCEU's FLASHPOINT Batman

DC Studios Taps DRIVE And OBI-WAN KENOBI Writer To Rewrite Mike Flanagan's CLAYFACE Script
Recommended For You:

DC Studios Taps DRIVE And OBI-WAN KENOBI Writer To Rewrite Mike Flanagan's CLAYFACE Script

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

TheOneAboveAll
TheOneAboveAll - 8/17/2013, 8:36 PM
Too many negatives that outweigh the positives
maninfinesuit
maninfinesuit - 8/17/2013, 8:58 PM
Oh, I thought this was going to be one o' them parody editorials. Carry on.
CavEl
CavEl - 8/17/2013, 9:22 PM
Jon Hamm is Lex Luthor.
MBZ1993
MBZ1993 - 8/18/2013, 6:55 AM
Jon Ham or Scott Adkins or GTFO
GreenLantern519
GreenLantern519 - 8/18/2013, 7:15 AM
@SotoJuiceMan I think it's less about Jon Hamm changing his mind and more about him even being offered the role, or a combination of both. I'm kind of in the same boat as you, maybe closer to 70/30, he certainly looks the part, and would absolutely NAIL Bruce Wayne, but I just am not sure he could pull off scary and intense as Batman. He's a great actor though, so he could probably pull it off, he just hasn't had any roles that display that side of him yet.
GreenLantern519
GreenLantern519 - 8/18/2013, 7:15 AM
SCOTT ADKINS CAN NOT ACT. I REPEAT SCOTT ADKINS CAN NOT ACT. He can be the stuntman, that's about it.
Lhornbk
Lhornbk - 8/18/2013, 8:12 AM
No. Just no. I'm not even sure exactly what it is, but my gut instinct is that Hamm would not be a good Batman. I just can't see it. (Plus, I think a lot of the current push for him, as well as Gosling and some others mentioned, is just people wanting the current flavor of the month. That's what got us George Clooney, that at that time he was coming off ER and was the flavor of the month.) Find someone not quite as well known, someone who will become primarily known as Batman over any other character he has played. And preferably someone in his mid to late 30s (I don't believe these rumors of WB wanting a Batman in his mid 40s. I think 42 would be the absolute upper range.)
Lhornbk
Lhornbk - 8/18/2013, 8:34 AM
Oh, and once again it just cracks me up how people come on here and say "so-and-so or what's his name or GTFO." Fanboys can be so whiny. I don't think Hamm should get it, but you don't see me saying "Anyone but Hamm or GTFO." Lmao.
BIGDane42
BIGDane42 - 8/18/2013, 10:12 AM
All of you people fearful of his age are morons.

Anyways, I think Hamm isn't right because even though I do believe he could pull off a fantastic Bruce, I just don't know if I see him as Batman. Maybe not to some, but to me that is far more important this go around. Though, I totally see Luthor. I mean he's already performed as him on funnyordie.com lol:

http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/f26c4046b0/lex-luthor-bailout-with-jon-hamm
JorEllinator
JorEllinator - 8/18/2013, 1:23 PM
David Boreanaz is Batman to me.
Watch Angel, guys!
Jon Hamm would be a good Maxwell Lord!
Lhornbk
Lhornbk - 8/18/2013, 7:45 PM
I could see Boreanaz as Batman, but I don't think he'll get it.
MrCameron
MrCameron - 8/18/2013, 8:01 PM
Ehhh, Hamm should be Lex Luthor or Maxwell Lord IMO.
LoudNoises
LoudNoises - 8/19/2013, 1:41 PM
Why does everyone think Batman has to be young? We have seen young Batman. Lets get a fresh perspective. Someone who has been in the game for a while and is a seasoned crime fighter. Someone who has something Superman lacks at this point. Experience! I would not be opposed to Hamm, I think the prospect of Josh Brolin excites me a little more. But I could see a variety of actors in the range of 40-50 pulling off Batman brilliantly. The biggest concern people have with an older actor portray Batman is that he would not be able to play the character for the next 10 years. So what, recast. There aren't many actors out there who would be willing to commit to 3 or more films upfront before doing at least one film to see how it works out.
LoudNoises
LoudNoises - 8/19/2013, 2:52 PM
Their movies. They don't even have to address their age in a movie. They rarely do. They went from Keaton to Kilmer. I'm not sure what the age gap was there, but that's the point. I'm not saying you get Clint Eastwood to play Batman and then recast Leonardo Decaprio in the next film. But we are talking about movies that are going to potentially go on and on with this new expanded universe concept Marvel started. Recasts are inevitable. Let's just focus on getting someone who would be [frick]ing amazing as Batman, aka... Brolin. :) It's all pointless to actually think this would happen anyways. Executives probably think more like you do. Who is young and marketable? They will probably end up getting someone like Channing Tatum to play Batman, lol.
BIGDane42
BIGDane42 - 8/20/2013, 12:56 PM
@LoudNoises

Kudos to your logic! Aren't Karl Urban and Chris Pine supposed to be the same age in Star Trek? Isn't Mystique supposed to be the same age as Charles in First class?? I mean Andrew Garfield is [frick]ing thirty for God's sake!
View Recorder