RUMOR: Some Massive Possible MAN OF STEEL 2 SPOILERS

If half of these are even true, then...David Goyer, ladies and gentlemen.

Pure speculation!!!!

Some of these sound real, others.....not so much...

Throw The Flash in that Bitch!

I don't get the "UN type deal" though... A deal with who? Batman wouldn't work with government. I smell bullshit right there. Some of the other stuff sounds cool but ummmm Mamoa as Aquaman? Really?

I knew it was that damn world-engine that [frick]ed up my fish n' chips...
I really do hope Aquaman makes an appearance, he can be a real bad-ass if done right!

@McNyagano "He's the bureaucrat Gotham deserves, but not the one it needs."

Stephan Amell better cameo.

So by the line: - Metallo “kills” Clark

I'm guessing that he kills Clark Kent but not Superman? Clark must have faked his death?

I could see some of this perhaps. Having Superman be exiled at the end of MOS2 and having the JL being a government program. Only in JL they ditch government protocol and bring in Superman to stop a bigger threat.

IDK though about Metallo. Superman is usually as weak as a kitten around him because of the kryptonite, so I would kind of like a more physical villain. Maybe they can make him imposing in some way.

I'm wondering what mad Bats and Robin mad though? And which Robin is this? I'm guessing either Dick or Jason. Sad that Tim and Damian probably will never get to be in live action. Crossed fingers though.

I also had a thought of who would be a perfect Batman after Affleck is finished.

Michael Fassbender! After 3 to 6 movies with Affleck, Fassbender make a good actor to take over the franchise from Affleck.

Maybe this is a list of reasons why the movie was delayed

"Batman forms a UN type deal to stop Superman from destroying another city."

It makes no sense. At all. Actually, it sounds like some fan-fiction storylines that I've read, so I hope it's false and not WB bowing to fans.

Although a lot of fans are upset with the destruction in Man of Steel, from a STORY POINT OF VIEW, it's absolutely ridiculous to have people in that universe blaming Superman for the destruction in Metropolis. WE can argue whether or not he was responsible because WE were watching a movie, because WE know the character as a character, because WE were seeing the fight in details. For the people in that universe, all they know is:

1) Zod showed up saying that he was going to attack Earth with an alien terraforming machine if that Kal-El dude didn't surrender.

2) The Kal-El dude surrendered.

3) Zod was lying and attacked Earth anyway.

4) Kal-El dude stopped the terraforming machine and sent the kryptonians back to whatever they came from with a little help from his military friends.

5) Zod was still alive and threatening Earth. Kal-El dude killed him.

It's ridiculous to assume that humans are thinking "Oh, Superman destroyed the city".

The true and COHERENT premise should be: "Ok, the guy fought by our side, but does it mean we should trust him? We know what he can do, we've seen his powers in Smallville and Metropolis, is it cool to let this dude fly around without someone to control him? What if he turns against us?"

Now, if that's the reason why Batman forms this "UN type deal"(?), then I'm cool with it. But if they come with the "preventing Superman from destroying another city" BS just to please angry fanboys, so [frick] off WB.

The rest of the ideas are interesting, although I really don't believe this rumor. Let's see what happens.

Some or should I say most of these...

"Aquaman is in it, but not called Aquaman"

What is exactly wrong with that? It's not his film, he will be used for a plot-device. His "name" not being mentioned won't make or break this film.

Also, isn't the script being rewritten by Chris Terrio? The guy who wrote Argo! This is in great hands

@MrBlackJack uhhh, he's writing MoS2 if you haven't heard...

@MrCBM56 Terrio's name wasn't in that WB press release, no?

IF this is true...why wouldn't Wonder Woman just break in and take the item that belongs to them? I don't mind the Aquaman part, I don't care if he isn't called Aquaman. I just hope he isn't a whiny bitch like "what happened to my fish?!".

As for the end of the it, that sounds like more of a conclusion to a trilogy than to something bigger.

Will Martha Kent see Clark in Italy with Lois Lane?

Most of these are no brainers or not very surprising.

Only one or two sound a bit controversial.