Scarlett Johansson Says "Timing" Is Key For That Long Rumored BLACK WIDOW Movie

@Origame - I Think Your Kinda Stretching. Black Widow and Hawkeye Dont Need Solo Like The Other Big 4. Scarlet Witch and Widow Were Main Heroes, There Arnt A Lot Of Other Race Main Avengers That Would Work At This Point That They Have Rights To. Ant-Man Showed Up Because Thats His Story. Panther Showing Up In Civil War Is Because The Story Literally Revolved Around Him Quite A Bit And He Was A Main Character, Im Black And I havn't noticed any abscence or any kind of lack of diversity becaues it hasn't really been a big deal

@SpittingKrypton - Ok, I'll break this down one at a time. 1) Let's be real right now, none of these heroes really needed solo movies. You could have easily made Avengers by just adding a few bits of backstory and it alone would have been fine. But since they had solos, why not one with the only female on the team?

2) They have the rights to literally all of the non mutant characters with the exception of Fantastic 4 right now. That is a lot when it comes to diversity with Black Panther fans have asked for since the very beginning.

3) The story did not revolve around Black Panther. You make it sound like he was the main character when his story is a subplot that could have been removed.

@SpittingKrypton - 1) Again, none of them needed them. And yes you can make the same argument with Hawkeye though in the case of Black Widow it's about just having a movie with a female lead.

2) That would work for any studio except Marvel who brought Guardians and Ant Man, two little known properties that became hugely successful. Heck, few people heard of Iron Man before that happened but it's the big name from them now. And Black Panther has the potential to be their Batman.

3) The terrorist attack could have been put in without Black Panther being involved. It could have been a UN meeting that didn't include Wakanda. See, pretty easy to write him out.

@SpittingKrypton - 1) More like that's something Fox did try with the first X-men movie and it worked great for them. By that logic none of these movies should ever be attempted because Batman and Robin happened.

2) Even fans thought a Guardians movie wouldn't work. Heck, the only reason the studio even greenlit the movie was with the clause that they would scrap the prison set to reimburse the cost. And why should an Ant Man movie be made? Also, considering the villains are a huge issue already with the MCU, I don't see why that should factor in. Or better yet, just make up some villains if that's a problem.

3) Half of what you said only factors into the credit scenes, which aren't a part of the story. And you could have just written that Zemo wanted to stay alive to see his plan out and how it continues to torment the Avengers. His suicide attempt was really only there for the sake of Panther stopping it.

4) thanks for the respectful nature of your conclusion. But for the sake of curiosity, how do you believe they attempt diversity in their movies?

@SpittingKrypton - Half of those are sidekicks and bit players in the movies. The rest are TV characters which isn't as big. It's even a different division doing those. I'll give you Marvel's TV division is great with diversity. Movies...not so much.