Neil Gaiman Discusses Joseph Gordon-Levitt's Decision To Walk Away From SANDMAN

Neil Gaiman Discusses Joseph Gordon-Levitt's Decision To Walk Away From SANDMAN

In a shocking development, Joseph Gordon-Levitt has walked away from New Line's live-action Sandman adaptation, citing creative differences. Sandman co-creator Neil Gaiman reacts.

By MarkJulian - Mar 06, 2016 05:03 AM EST
Filed Under: DC Comics

Joseph Gordon-Levitt has decided not to star and direct the live-action Sandman movie, releasing a statement just hours after it was seemingly confirmed that he would direct himself in the lead role.  Now, co-creator Neil Gaiman has make a few statements concerning Levitt's decision and answered a few fan questions.  Said Gaiman, "And, for the record, my respect for [Joseph Gordon-Levitt], is undiminished. Getting to know him was the best bit of the last round. He's special. "  

Gaiman echoed Levitt's previous sentiment that he hopes that the two of them can find a way to work together on another project.  Perhaps he'll star in another one of Gaiman's numerous comics or novels.  "I very much hope [ work together on something else]. I would love to work with [Joe] some more. He's smart, honest & really nice."

Gaiman reminded fans that he doesn't own the rights to Sandman and has nothing to do with decisions regarding the Sandman movie.  "Reminder for the curious: I don't own SANDMAN. DC Comics does. I don't choose who writes scripts, the director, producer or cast."  The deal was done when I was 26, long ago, & I figured it was  worth it...He's an original character, created by me, Mike Dringenberg & Sam Kieth, but done as Work For Hire for  DC Comics."


 

DC Comics Reveals New ABSOLUTE BATMAN, SUPERMAN, And WONDER WOMAN Details: No Money...No Family...No Island
Related:

DC Comics Reveals New ABSOLUTE BATMAN, SUPERMAN, And WONDER WOMAN Details: "No Money...No Family...No Island"

DC Comics Reveals First Look At The Absolute Universe's Trinity As Creative Teams Are Officially Revealed
Recommended For You:

DC Comics Reveals First Look At The Absolute Universe's Trinity As Creative Teams Are Officially Revealed

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
grif
grif - 3/6/2016, 6:12 AM
lmfao told yah
bl00dm4n3
bl00dm4n3 - 3/6/2016, 6:30 AM
Great Statement from Neil Gaiman, DC's Vertigo owns the properties (and he gets royalities) but knows the definition of "Work for Hire".
Lem1
Lem1 - 3/6/2016, 6:37 AM
"Facinating!"
Pedrito
Pedrito - 3/6/2016, 6:40 AM
Now would be a great time for Jollem to remind us again how WB cares about comics fans and Marvel Studios only cares about money.
AwesomePromoz
AwesomePromoz - 3/6/2016, 6:50 AM
@Pedrito - Also how Marvel interferes with directors and WB is a creators' studio.
bl00dm4n3
bl00dm4n3 - 3/6/2016, 7:16 AM
@Pedrito - Every business cares about money however in term of audiences care it between DC/WB and Fox.
SpideySupes94
SpideySupes94 - 3/6/2016, 7:50 AM
@TheFamousJMC - Oh you think WB is a "creator's studio:? The same studio that allowed debacles like Green Lantern and Jonah Hex? Sometimes, a little restraint is good an necessary. Not everyone is a Nolan (*cough* Zack Snyder *cough*)
SAMURAI36
SAMURAI36 - 3/6/2016, 8:04 AM
@Pedrito - Except this is New Line, technically not WB. Kinda like CN ruined DC animation, & TNT rejected Titans.

These are still separate companies, even though they are owned by WB.

People really need to do their research.
AwesomePromoz
AwesomePromoz - 3/6/2016, 8:09 AM
@StarkPool94 - Yeah, I mean it the way you mean it... WB "claim" they are a creators' studio.
SpideySupes94
SpideySupes94 - 3/6/2016, 11:02 AM
@TheFamousJMC - oops. Sorry man, my sarcasm meter usually works. My bad.
soberchimera
soberchimera - 3/6/2016, 7:03 AM
Well since Cumberbatch is off in Marvel Land, why not go with Eddie Redmayne?
thejackwagon94
thejackwagon94 - 3/6/2016, 7:08 AM
@soberchimera - that guy is [frick]ed up to look at.
soberchimera
soberchimera - 3/6/2016, 7:10 AM
@thejackwagon94 - Just give him a black wig and he'll be fine.
SpideySupes94
SpideySupes94 - 3/6/2016, 7:48 AM
@thejackwagon94 - Lol wut?
dubjon
dubjon - 3/6/2016, 7:55 AM
What's wrong with his face? is the mouth?
ogrodafloresta
ogrodafloresta - 3/6/2016, 8:28 AM
@soberchimera - This drawing looks like Jimmy Fallon. Would he be up for it?
Franshu
Franshu - 3/6/2016, 10:38 AM
@soberchimera - I always pictured Benedict Cumberbatch as Morpheus. The high cheekbones, the accent, the ceremonious way of speaking....He's Dr Strange now, so I don't see it happening any time soon, but he'd definitely had been a better Sandman than Strange, for me.
1 2 3
View Recorder