EDITORIAL: 5 Reasons Daredevil Should Run Back to Marvel

EDITORIAL: 5 Reasons Daredevil Should Run Back to Marvel

An obsessive Daredevil fan looks at why The Man Without Fear should be spending his time at Marvel Studios.

Editorial Opinion
By BattlinMurdock - Aug 14, 2012 12:08 PM EST
Filed Under: Daredevil

Now, I've been fairly vocal about Daredevil before on this site, and it's entirely possible that my obsession is unhealthy. But I'll say this; Marvel, as a company, has done everything right within the past few months. They selected the director of my favorite movie (Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang) to reunite with Robert Downey Jr. and helm and write Iron Man 3, they selected one of my writing inspirations to direct and helm The Avengers, and they even nabbed my second favorite comic writer for the newest Daredevil run in Mark Waid.

Needless to say, I've been feeling like Marvel has been making their stuff especially for me, lately.

However, the icing on the cake means that Daredevil should return to Marvel Studios for more reasons than one. Here is what I have to say about the current standings on the newest Daredevil film.

1. Does Anyone Really Know What This Movie Is?



Is it a reboot or a continuation? I've heard from one source that it recognizes the events of Mark Steven Johnson's film, and from another saying that it's a completely original and new take. I've heard one source say that it's a reboot a-la Punisher: War Zone and Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance, and then I've heard one say that it will be more of a gritty 1970s take on the hero, to fall more in line with Frank Miller's run.

Right now, I think the movie is too unstable to be successful. No, I haven't read the script, but as I'll point out in the next reason, I know that it will be the wrong script. The general audience was confused enough about The Amazing Spider-Man starring the British kid and the Easy A girl instead of Seabiscuit-boy and Kirsten Dunst. Obviously, one can say that Raimi's Spider-Man run had a wider audience than MSJ's Daredevil, but his film didn't paddle around at the box office and did pretty well. At this point in time, and with the script provided, a lot of people are going to be scratching their heads.

2. Born Again is an Awful Storyline...To Start With


Born Again is a fantastic read. It's one of the greatest graphic novels ever written and I implore you to sit down and give it a whirl...if you're a die hard Daredevil fan and know the history up to that point in time, that is. Because the thing about Born Again that makes it so impacting and heavy is the fact that you already know so much about the characters.

The storyline follows lawyer Matt Murdock (Daredevil) a few months after his ex-girlfriend, Karen Page, (love of his life in a relationship that took years to write) sells his secret identity out for a hit of drugs. Then, Daredevil's greatest enemy, The Kingpin, systematically destroys Matt Murdock's life bit by bit. All in all, it's something that Nolan tried doing in The Dark Knight Rises (which would probably be a tough sell after that film's success) and a storyline that falls heavily on the fact that relationships between characters are not only what makes the story work, there's literally so much put in them that a single "reboot" couldn't get the job done.

Even if movie-goers went with the knowledge of the first film, they'll probably have no idea who Karen Page is (she has, maybe two minutes of screentime in the original movie as Matt's secretary) and the fact that Born Again opens with Karen selling Matt's identity for drugs might be a bit hard to swallow. That, and the Kingpin from the first movie was incredibly underdeveloped. I, myself, have written a Daredevil movie trilogy with three complete screenplays, and I ended the trilogy with Born Again and was still worried that the relationships I made in the first two installments weren't developed enough for the end to make the desired impact.

3. Kevin Feige Gets To Learn From His Mistakes


A co-producer on the first Daredevil, Feige understands this character pretty well. If the film rights revert, he gets another shot with a more complete vision to take this character into the right direction. Feige got a second chance before with Hulk and from his more encompassing vision, we got the direction we saw in both The Incredible Hulk and The Avengers. I, for one, would like to see what Feige has with bigger plans for Daredevil, rather than see him being thrown out into a loveless production.

4. It Has the Ability to Start a New Marvel Cinematic Universe


As some of you know, Daredevil is now a part of The Avengers. And while his initiation into the group spawned an awesome image of him firing a machine gun turret at Nazi robots, I'm still sitting back wondering just what the hell Matt Murdock is going to do on the Avengers. He's not a major power player by any means, and he's normally not my first choice (though he's my lifelong favorite) to fight in an intergalactic space battle with the likes of Iron Man and Thor.

However, he is a part of the Marvel Knights team, and should Marvel be so bold, they could easily use Matt's character to start a "new" universe, while also still sharing it within the universe already created. While I don't see it in the cards, Black Widow (a member of both the Marvel Knights and The Avengers...and a love interest of Matt) can be the one who ties these universes together. Start with Matt's story, go to Heroes for Hire with Luke Cage and Iron Fist, add some Moon Knight, and then use Black Widow to call the four in as they go hunt down Frank Castle in The Punisher's introduction to the Marvel Universe.

Big, bold plans, and not a direction I see Marvel taking. But, at this point, why not dare to dream?

5. "R" Does Not Constitute a Better Film


A lot of the "pro-Fox" arguments I've been hearing is that Marvel Studios will not put out an "R" rated Daredevil story. But I've never understood why that matters.

Obviously, Daredevil deals with incredibly thematic issues (cancer, AIDS, prostitution, drug and alcohol addiction, etc. etc.) but it's the themes that make Daredevil so dark. The violence and language of the comics never really gets past a PG-13 level, and Mark Waid's current run is devoid of a lot of those dark elements (although, there is an incredible increase in sexuality). Because of this, Daredevil is a character who can be successful both ways. Matt Murdock is sort of the culmination of Peter Parker, Tony Stark, and Bruce Wayne, and any studio would be a fool to miss out on that.

Daredevil is a character who kicks ass, but he's not just about kicking ass. He's an incredibly developed and strong character with incredible stories thanks to Frank Miller, Brian Michael Bendis, Ed Brubaker, and Mark Waid. There are so many elements in Daredevil runs that to just pick and choose one for the "I wanna see a 'mature' Daredevil film" is absolutely absurd. I would ask that Daredevil's fan base ask that a rendition of the character be true rather than him become a makeshift Batman knockoff that will be forgettable to the general audience.

So, what do you folks think? Stay, or go? What do you want to see in a Daredevil movie?
DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN Said To Be As Problematic And Scary As The World Of GAME OF THRONES
Related:

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN Said To Be As "Problematic And Scary As The World Of GAME OF THRONES"

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN & IRONHEART Trailers Screen At Disney Upfronts - Here's A Breakdown Of What Was Shown
Recommended For You:

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN & IRONHEART Trailers Screen At Disney Upfronts - Here's A Breakdown Of What Was Shown

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

BarnaclePete
BarnaclePete - 8/14/2012, 1:21 PM
If Marvels offer for a trade with Fox is true then it sounds like maybe they don't have a whole lotnf interest in making a Daredevil movie themeselves. Might be better off sticking with Fox.
marvel72
marvel72 - 8/14/2012, 1:50 PM
i agree with your 5 reasons,you can get away with making daredevil as dark as nolan's the dark knight trilogy,they were all 12a.

you could even base it on the current daredevil comic by mark waid which is not as dark as frank miller's or ed brubaker's run on the title.
ralfinader
ralfinader - 8/14/2012, 3:25 PM
I hope DD escapes Fox in October. I personally think that if Marvel is planning on a TV show to take place in the MCU (Marvel Cinematic Universe) that DD is a better choice than almost any other. Daredevil is the type of hero that can support a weekly series, and reach more than just comicbook fans with the courtroom drama and street level justice. I would love to see a DD movie done by Marvel, but want to see DD sooner than 2016 or 2017, and that can happen on television.
95
95 - 8/14/2012, 4:26 PM
L O L
GreenHalJordan
GreenHalJordan - 8/14/2012, 4:56 PM
I hate to do this to you BattlinMurdock, but: (in terms of this article being written and the recent news of the rights going to marvel) Speak Of The Devil! :P
kong
kong - 8/14/2012, 5:24 PM
I think they should have a marvel knights phase 1 going on during phase 3 of the Avengers films. With a Daredevil and Heroes for Hire movie along with a Moon Knight tv series and Black Widow already in the universe I think it could work.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 8/14/2012, 8:15 PM
Always awesome when your wish is granted :)
I hope they do right now - no excuse not to.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 8/14/2012, 8:46 PM
If it is made into a tv show, it will be extremely difficult for the studio to film in Hell's Kitchen. One or two days of filming, maybe, but obviously not enough to carry at least 12 episodes. More often than not, Los Angeles doubles for NY, with stock imagery used for landscaping purposes.

Daredevil needs to be in his respective neighborhood, otherwise you might as well put Wakanda in the Antarctic.
MatioShack
MatioShack - 8/15/2012, 12:34 AM
I agree that Daredevil should go back to Marvel, but I don't see how that means he has to be an Avenger. There are tons of characters in the comics that aren't Avengers. You could still have Matt Murdock as a Black Widow love interest. He could just show up in a cameo scene as a lawyer or something. It's enough for this fan to know that he exists out there somewhere without having to see him suit up with the Avengers.
kong
kong - 8/15/2012, 3:53 AM
I was reading this graphic novel of 4 or 5 daredevil issue's from the 70's or possibly 80's called Mark of Death. I realized how many other heroes show up in the books. Hulk, Captain America, Thor Scarlet Witch, Black Widow, Vision, The Thing, Mr. Fantastic and Invisible women were in it. This movie could have a lot of cameo oppurtuinty. Maybe not that many cameos, but maybe a few.
comicb00kguy
comicb00kguy - 8/15/2012, 6:39 AM
Let's review this by addressing each point individually, if I may:
1) I would also like some clarity as to just which direction this movie is going, and whether it is a true "reboot" or a sequel to the previous film.
2) Born Again is NOT a graphic novel! In its reprinted form, it is a trade paperback! There is a BIG difference. A graphic novel is a self-contained story that only appears in that format. It is not a reprint of a story that has originally appeared elsewhere. A trade paperback is a compilation of a story that originally appeared in several comic books. Born Again is a trade paperback, as is the Watchmen.

I do agree that Born Again would work better as a sequel to this upcoming film. Viewers will indeed be lost on the significance of Karen Page's actions if they don't know who she is. The Kingpin should also be properly developed in this upcoming movie so that the impact of his actions in Born Again could be properly understood by the mainstream audience.

3) Feige has shown an ability to learn from his mistakes before, and I'm willing to grant him another shot at Daredevil.

4) Why not dream? Daredevil doesn't tie in much with the Avengers, but he could cameo in any New York-based adventures, and he sure could bump into Spider-Man, which would be the basis for another group of crossed-over films, and building a larger united universe. What Marvel fan wouldn't want to see that?

5) A PG-13 rating allows the film to be marketed to kids and teens, a large and VERY important marketing segment for this kind of movie. This allows selling toys, shirts, maybe an animated series (THAT would be seriously cool- Daredevil has a rich universe of his own that would make for a fun and unique series- not just Spidey or Batman and trot out the same villains again and again).

All in all, I agree with many of your points, and truly hope that we get a movie worthy of a character as interesting as Daredevil. Sorry to run so bloody long.
View Recorder