THE FANTASTIC FOUR: Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige Reveals What The "Focus" Of Upcoming MCU Reboot Is

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige Reveals What The "Focus" Of Upcoming MCU Reboot Is

Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige has talked more about The Fantastic Four reboot, confirming it has a very specific focus and that, by the time the cast was signed up, "90% of the work was done."

By JoshWilding - Jul 22, 2024 04:07 AM EST
Filed Under: Fantastic Four
Source: CinemaBlend

The Fantastic Four begins shooting in the UK later this month, though whether we'll eventually get to see Marvel's First Family in set photos remains to be seen.

Still, the door is open to the cast showing up for Comic-Con this weekend, even if it's far too early for any footage. Marvel Studios is bound to do something to hype the reboot up in Hall H, anyway, and Kevin Feige just shared some new comments about the project with CinemaBlend.

"Matt Shakman is very, very good at utilizing visual effects," he started. "The most important thing for us...the stretching's gotta look cool, the rocky exterior of The Thing has got to look cool, the flames have got to look cool. [But] it's all about the characters. It's all about the family. It's all about [those] dynamics."

"So the minute we got that cast that we've announced signed up, 90 percent of the work was done," Feige added. "That is what the focus is of the movie."

Tim Story's Fantastic Four movies from the mid-2000s weren't great, but something they did get right was that family dynamic (whether it was Reed and Sue's love for each other or Johnny's constant pranks on Ben). The fact Marvel Studios is also focusing on that is very good news. 

In another recent interview, the executive confirmed that The Fantastic Four takes place in an alternate-reality 1960s and hinted at the team's importance to the wider MCU.

"Yes, yes, very much so. It is a period," he revealed. "There were a lot of smart people, who noticed that that cityscape didn't look exactly like the New York that we know, or that existed in the '60s in our world. Those are smart observations, I'll say."

"I'm extremely excited by it because I think [the Fantastic Four] are mainstays, are legendary pillars of the Marvel Universe that we've never gotten to play with or explore in a significant way outside of Doctor Strange: Multiverse of Madness and a few fun teases before, in the way that we're doing it in that film," Feige added. "So I'm extremely excited for that."

Marvel Studios has announced that Pedro Pascal (Reed Richards/Mister Fantastic), Vanessa Kirby (Sue Storm/Invisible Woman), Joseph Quinn (Johnny Storm/Human Torch), and Ebon Moss-Bachrach (Ben Grimm/The Thing) will lead The Fantastic Four cast. Julia Garner has also joined the reboot as Shalla-Bal/Silver Surfer.

Recent additions to the cast include Paul Walter Hauser, John Malkovich, and Natasha Lyonne in mystery roles, along with Ralph Ineson as the villainous Galactus.

Director Matt Shakman worked with both Avatar: The Way of Water co-writer Josh Friedman and WandaVision's Cam Squires on The Fantastic Four's screenplay, with Eric Pearson (Black Widow) recently coming on board for a final polish.

The movie is set to be released in theaters on July 25, 2025.

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Rumor Reveals The Personal Link Between The Team And Galactus - SPOILERS
Related:

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Rumor Reveals The "Personal" Link Between The Team And Galactus - SPOILERS

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Gets An Intriguing New Synopsis As Silver Surfer Actor Is Confirmed
Recommended For You:

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Gets An Intriguing New Synopsis As Silver Surfer Actor Is Confirmed

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
tb86
tb86 - 7/22/2024, 4:41 AM
Still not so sure about them not being natives to the MCU’s Sacred Timeline.
WhateverItTakes
WhateverItTakes - 7/22/2024, 5:37 AM
@tb86 - because of history over rights they don't fit
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 7/22/2024, 6:51 AM
@tb86 - I wouldn’t be surprised if in SW if the universe sift reboots that it has them there as if they have been there all along.
Itwasme
Itwasme - 7/22/2024, 9:14 AM
@tb86 - I don't know how you could make Richards be both as smart as he is within the current timeline. We would have already felt his impact on the world had he been there otherwise he's just a smart scientist. The current MCU timeline is Tony Starks and it's built around his tech, I'd like to see a world build around Richards' tech.
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 7/22/2024, 9:55 AM
@tb86 - I think we'd get the best of both worlds (pun intended) if the whole reason they were in another universe was because they originated in the main MCU timeline during the 1960s and when their infamous space exploration mission went awry they were not only imbued with cosmic powers but transported to an alternate universe. And that's why they were missing this whole time and instead living out their lives in a retro-futuristic alternate reality of Earth.
kider2
kider2 - 7/22/2024, 4:43 AM
I thought the "Focus" was making money like all for profit companies?
MarioT1000
MarioT1000 - 7/22/2024, 9:13 AM
@kider2 - lol not for profit companies are focused on making money too..
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 7/22/2024, 10:02 AM
@kider2 - This is not the mentality of MOST anyone that has seen success. Anyone that knows how to make money will tell you it's a byproduct of a good product or service. And with that comes a lot of ups and downs. Wins AND losses.
The1st
The1st - 7/22/2024, 1:00 PM
@Tonic24k - Exactly. It's when the stock options roll out that you have a problem.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/22/2024, 4:53 AM
You're all about to get a front row seat to why Kamala Khan's actual power set was stolen from her.
Matchesz
Matchesz - 7/22/2024, 4:57 AM
@McMurdo - Mr Fantastic had it first but i still think if they cant adapt her powers properly they shouldnt’ve tried. The glowy purple lantern effect gives cw vibes
Izaizaiza
Izaizaiza - 7/22/2024, 8:37 AM
@McMurdo - One of my few complaints with the Miss Marvel show. Even worse that they made the power swap so they could tie all the "light based" Powers together in what might be Marvel's worst movie
GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 7/22/2024, 9:26 AM
@Izaizaiza - It's "Ms." Marvel.

User Comment Image
Izaizaiza
Izaizaiza - 7/22/2024, 9:29 AM
@GeneralZod - Yes, damn voice to text
GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 7/22/2024, 9:48 AM
@Izaizaiza - Just jerking your chain on a Monday morning.
Izaizaiza
Izaizaiza - 7/22/2024, 10:41 AM
@GeneralZod - Hey, few things I like more than a Monday morning chain jerk! ✊🏻🙂
TMW1987ProudProWrestlingFan
TMW1987ProudProWrestlingFan - 7/22/2024, 4:57 AM
As much as I love Pascal, I still just can't get behind him as Reed, so I really hope he wins me over in the final product.

Kirby's gonna have to win me over as well as I was really hoping for Jodie Comer to be our new Sue.

I like Ebon & Quinn though so hopefully they have a good dynamic & chemistry together as Ben & Johnny.
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 7/22/2024, 5:09 AM
The focus now is to be desperate
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/22/2024, 5:15 AM
@vectorsigma - You mean like trying to launch an entire cinematic universe by cramming every character and the bathroom sink into your first movie because your last cinematic universe was a total bust?
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 7/22/2024, 6:03 AM
@FireandBlood - if anyone can do this and be successful, it is Gunn. He is practically using his strengths to kick off his universe. Shows he is in charge of the crearive stuff

On the other side, it's all business people mostly in charge now with no or little creativity when it comes to comic book movies.
cubrn
cubrn - 7/22/2024, 7:05 AM
@vectorsigma - If it weren't for Marvel, James Gunn would still be making Scooby Doo movies
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 7/22/2024, 7:38 AM
@cubrn - true, it was a symbiotic relationship, Gunn helped the mcu hype from c listers.

Now Marvel has no one to get back the hype and Gunn using his knowledge and lessons learned from Marvel to build his own universe.
Vigor
Vigor - 7/22/2024, 8:34 AM
@vectorsigma - get off marvels dick
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 7/22/2024, 10:11 AM
@vectorsigma - Desperate? Lol. That's not how successful organizations move. They didn't make Loki 2 or X-Men '97 under desperation. They didn't make GotG 3 under desperation. Success always comes with wins and losses. Especially at this level. They can play with new ideas and see what works and what doesn't. See what broadens their audience and what narrows it.

Some of you really have to find something better to do than complain and fixate on the things in life you don't enjoy.
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 7/22/2024, 10:31 AM
@Tonic24k - superhero fatigue is real and marvel is obviously desperate to get those audiences back.

Loki s2, xmen 97 and gotg3 were exceptions to their mediocre offerings after endgame. They were not desperate back then because they didnt see the performance of quantumania and the marvels yet when those projects were in production.

The D&W production shouts of desperation from the initial greenlight until now.

That will be the mantra moving forward. And good luck to next year's cap 4 and thunderbolts.
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 7/22/2024, 11:32 AM
@vectorsigma - Fatigue with anything is real. But Marvel Studios, despite any and all missteps, is still, BY FAR, the best to ever do it. There is absolutely no desperation here. It's really quite dramatic to think that. And to dismiss their recent successful projects as "exceptions" is really just a weird excuse to complain more. It's also ignoring the other projects I didn't mention that performed well.

Maybe give credit where it's due instead of ignoring the good just to dwell on what you didn't like. It's a wildly unreasonable expectation that every single project has to appease everyone in the world all the same.
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 7/22/2024, 2:29 PM
@vectorsigma - Enlighten us how a movie that was pitched by Ryan Reynolds himself after countless denied attempts and that almost didn't have Wolverine in it cause Hugh decided to come back as a last minute decision, is a desperate movie on Marvel's part? Why do you hate Marvel and Feige so much? How did they hurt you? If you are not interested in what Marvel has to offer then just don't watch it. Why the need to bitch in every single Marvel related article? Stick with DC and let the people that like Marvel enjoy it in peace. You speak like Gunn's DC is a sure success, guy hasn't even started yet.
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 7/22/2024, 10:44 PM
@Urubrodi - The Marvels and the recent "flops" basically gave them that desperation. Aside from the financial aspects, the audience is not that interested anymore with low Disney+ viewings. There was a reason the pitch from Reynolds got pushed back multiple times and all of a sudden it was greenlighted? And what you get as follow ups to it, cap 4 and thunderbolts. Doesnt sound enticing.

These comments sections are a place of differing opinions, not everyone will share our thoughts so if it is just "bitching" for you, id say this is not a good place for you. Ive had a lot of disagreements with some here but the respect is somewhat there and we just consider it as looking at different perspectives. We try to back up each others' claims and let time decide who is right or wrong. Id admit i can be annoying at times, even i get annoyed at myself too, but i try my best to defend my points.

Anyway, im all set to see it tomorrow. Im still a marvel AND dc guy, just lost some confidence with marvel due to the recent outputs.
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 7/22/2024, 10:58 PM
@Tonic24k - tbh, i only liked gotg3 because it is made by Gunn. Loki s2 not much and xmen 97 is animation and might not be that impactful in the wider mcu

These are not missteps anymore. You might dismiss my reasons because it is taboo to say here, but the msheu, dei, woke stuff they are shoving in are part of the problem for me. Gone are the days of marvel where storytelling is the main focus. They lost audience because of it and felt it financially.

Now they are trying to bring it back in a haphazard way by rushing this movie, put all the nostalgia and fanservice, create headscratching "milestones" like "highest ticket sales for 2024" for clout, market it like hell and show the first 30 min around the world, etc. Doesnt those feel desperate?

Dont get me wrong, im watching this twice tomorrow, id still put money on it. But looking ahead, cap 4 and thunderbolts doesnt sound very enticing projects. D&W wasnt even announced in the past Feige timeline so this being sandwitched between these "bad" projects is telling that there was no concrete plan in the past for it.
cubrn
cubrn - 7/23/2024, 2:19 AM
@vectorsigma - C listers? You mean Joe Johnston, Oscar winner, creator of Boba Fett and all around bad ass? Or Kenneth Branaugh, Oscar winning filmmaker?
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 7/23/2024, 2:23 AM
@cubrn - what i meant was the guardians roster
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 7/23/2024, 4:36 AM
@vectorsigma - Respect gotta be earned not demanded. As for your points, what if the pitch was rejected multiple times for not being deemed good enough or not connecting properly to the wider MCU? What if Hugh Jackman's Wolverine is what tipped the scale? I can't speak for you, but the first Cap 4 trailer was really good. The news coming out of both Thunderbolts and F4 have been in my opinion positive (female Silver Surfer aside). You can give your opinion as many times as you want but when every single one of them is just you hating on Marvel while defending another cinematic universe that doesn't even exist yet it gets very very annoying, especially when it's an article filled with people looking forward to a project. But you do you.
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 7/23/2024, 5:37 AM
@Urubrodi - as annoying as I am, i can still defend my points.

This film wasnt a part of the timeline feige reveled way back 2002. Fast forward and we see the big flop with the marvels and disney+ shows not getting interest from the audience.

This movie is a reaction to those. Marvel is desperate so they shoved this movie in all of a sudden with full fanservice and nostalgia.

As for Cap 4, it was a good trailer i can say, with bad and unclean cgi. However, secret invasion did tell us a good trailer is not a good measure of the film's quality. Add to the fact it was directed by the Cloverfield paradox director.

Thunderbolts sounds good on paper, but i dont have good references on the writers and directors to look forward to it. F4 i can be hopeful. I liked what Shakman did with Monarch, but the female silver surfer is telling they are still on their dei ways.

And i am not defending the DCU, there is nothing to defend yet. I am just promoting it and everything i see is looking good, costumes be damned. Gunn has proven time and time again he can deliver. He is a great creative and learned a lot of lessons from Marvel.

So unless i see improvements from the Marvel decision committee, theyd still look desperate to me and continue waking guys up. Have you seen the article about leaking false rumors from the producer? If you dont feel insulted, i am. Another proof of my desperate claim
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 7/23/2024, 5:38 AM
@vectorsigma - lolz, 2022 i mean
redtom
redtom - 7/22/2024, 5:28 AM
Good, competent writing, acting and directing? Because then I'll go and see it.
TheManWithoutFear
TheManWithoutFear - 7/22/2024, 5:29 AM
The man still gets it. Forever the goat.

If i was gonna dig even deeper than the character and family dynamics, i think Ben is the real key to the FF. You get Ben right and the others sort of just fall into their roles.
WhateverItTakes
WhateverItTakes - 7/22/2024, 5:37 AM
@TheManWithoutFear - he said eternals was the best film they ever made
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 7/22/2024, 9:00 AM
@WhateverItTakes - A Snyder Cut would make that statement true.

I love Jon Snow, but if you just cut all the Black Knight stuff (all of it), the movie is seriously a lot better already. A couple of reshoots here and there, et viola; Masterpiece. fr.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 7/22/2024, 7:02 AM
User Comment Image

I was like yeah the VFX are important but not as much as the characters so I’m glad Feige realizes that (as I should I have thought he would).

I still need to be sold on Vanessa Kirby as Sue just because I have mainly seen her play cold characters and Sue isn’t that…

Pedro as Reed has grown on me and I already like Ebon Moss and Joseph in their roles.

However hopefully all 4 have chemistry (which I’m sure they will) since that is most important so fingers crossed!!.
FinnishDude
FinnishDude - 7/22/2024, 7:16 AM
A great Fantastic Four stories basically are "Spielbergian family adventure meets Star Trek TOS", which none of the previous attempts got right and this absolutely has to.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder