Ror Reviews: Clash Of The Titans

Ror Reviews: Clash Of The Titans

Is Louis Letterier's remake of the 80s classic as bad as you have heard? Or are folks being a little harsh on a film so obviously geared to the popcorn crowd?

Review Opinion
By MarkCassidy - Apr 06, 2010 02:04 PM EST
Filed Under: Fantasy

As you know, I'm a firm believer that the "popcorn defense" is no defense at all. If your movie's target audience are special effects action fans then thats fine, no one will expect any awards in your future but those movies can still be entertaining or even awesome(Avatar). But bad film making is bad film making no matter what the circumstances. I'll try to keep any major spoilers out of this but there will be a few minor ones.

Unfortunately Clash 2010 is just a mess of a movie in practically every respect. The plot deviates quite a bit from the original movie, but thats ok, we knew that this version would put a different spin on the same story. But by changing character motivations and trying to cover every set piece base touched on in the original into a 90 minute film Letterier has completely hamstrung himself. Here Perseus(Sam Worthington) is motivated by revenge and not a desire to save Andromeda, although he will, yknow, do that anyway! After Hades(Ralph Feinnes) kills his family Perseus swears revenge and sets out on a quest with a bunch of much better actors(Madds Mickleson, Liam Cunningham, Gemma Arterton...the wooden dude) to slay Medusa and turn The Kraken to stone which will weaken Hades enough for Perseus to kill him. A God. KIll a God...sort of. Although he is the son of Zeus(Liam Neeson) and a Demigod, Perseus tells us and his men time and time again that he is doing this as a man and will not accept help from the Gods or use his gifts in any way because he would risk becoming like them. Noble stuff. Then he says [frick] it and accepts their help anyway. The film is full of contradictions and silly set ups like this. It jumps around from scene to scene, sometimes with barely any transition at all. One second Perseus is watching his family drown, the next he is a prisoner in the Kings court. We see Hades inform Zeus that his son is in Argos(not the shop, the city), next we see the citizens demand to know from Perseus if its true that he is the son of Zeus..without ever being told! I don't know if this was a problem with the editor or if Letterier simply didn't shoot enough footage but the result is shoddy stuff indeed. It could have been forgiven for this had it pulled its socks up in other departments but it fails to do that too. The performances range from meh(Worthington..fast proving that without a good director he's not worth a damn) to good(Mikleson, Cunningham) but still weighed down by the piss poor script and plotting. Gemma Arterton is probably the closest the cast has to a real highlight but she gets no where near enough screen time and her character Io is basically only there to provide exposition. The special effects are pretty good though, and the CG creatures interact very well with the human characters. But Medusa, who should have been the films high point, looks like something from a computer game..and indeed, the whole sequence in her lair plays out like one. There is ZERO tension. No time is taken to set up any sense of dread or danger its just straight in, cast decimation, "Don't look this bitch in the eye" crap. The original film was no masterpiece but the reason it has endured is because it handled these scenes the way they should be handled. Just watch the Medusa sequence from the original and compare it to the new one and you will have a fair idea what to expect from this.

The only real positive thing I can say about this is that the action scenes are done well. Letterier does indeed know how to stage a good scrap. But who cares? What does it matter when without a solid plot and a cast of characters we really care about its just noise and swords clanging? If thats all you want to see you can watch videos on youtube of battle reenactments and save yourself the 10 quid! Which brings me to the 3D issue. I saw it in 2D after being advised by practically everyone on here and elsewhere not to fork out for the gimmick, so I can't comment on that side of it.

Clash Of The Titans isn't a complete wash out, there are moments of excitement and entertainment..just, and if your all about the clash n smash you'l probably enjoy it. But it has to be one of the most disappointing movies of the year so far for me. Oh and LL for The Avengers? Sure, if you have absolutely no anticipation, expectations or desire to see it done well..bring it on!

RED ONE Looks Set For A Disastrous Opening Weekend After Taking In Just $3.7M From Thursday Night Previews
Related:

RED ONE Looks Set For A Disastrous Opening Weekend After Taking In Just $3.7M From Thursday Night Previews

RED ONE Star Dwayne The Rock Johnson Mocked For Sharing Bizarre Story About Watching OPPENHEIMER In IMAX
Recommended For You:

RED ONE Star Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson Mocked For Sharing Bizarre Story About Watching OPPENHEIMER In IMAX

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 4/6/2010, 3:21 PM
"I say YEE YAY!!!"



Can't wait to see CLASH OF THE TITANS!

Its gonna be awesome!

: P
valeriesghost
valeriesghost - 4/6/2010, 3:25 PM
these aren't the reviews i was wanting to hear. guess i'll be waiting for the dvd
DogsOfWar
DogsOfWar - 4/6/2010, 3:27 PM
We knew Louis could do action but I was hoping he would grow as a director to show real dram and tension. Doesn't sound like he has come anywhere near that yet. Maybe The Avengers short list got shorter.
HaloMan2002
HaloMan2002 - 4/6/2010, 3:30 PM
The movie was ok, but I would just wait for it to come to blu ray/dvd.
ecksmanfan
ecksmanfan - 4/6/2010, 3:43 PM
Great review Ror. Couldn't agree more!
jman1977
jman1977 - 4/6/2010, 3:46 PM
Nice Review Ror :P
JonF
JonF - 4/6/2010, 3:48 PM
To everyone that prefers LL's 2008 Hulk flick to Ang Lee's 2003 version:Told 'ya so! LOL! It isn't ALL about the action, even in an action movie!
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 4/6/2010, 4:04 PM
Cheers guys. Jman, dude we must have been watching different movies! I have honestly never been so disappointed by something that looked so great in the trailers before.
thwhtGuardian
thwhtGuardian - 4/6/2010, 4:11 PM
This is not good news at all, I've yet to see a single good review.
LuckyKyd
LuckyKyd - 4/6/2010, 4:21 PM
Great review Ror... I think I'm just two inches or so away from dropping this movie. Kick Ass comes out a week later here, so I might as well save the nickle and watch Clash on dvd.

Though I think it is a shame that both Joe Johnston and Louis Letterier go out and direct a remake shitfest(haven't seen either, so can't really comment, but thats what I've heard many people say) and now JJ is directing Captain America and LL is possibly doing Avengers. Doesn't look good.

But still if they get Edward Norton or someone like him who genuinely understands the characters to write, then I think we are good at least with Avengers. Captain America on the other hand is shaky ground, I really hope they get it right, because if not, you can kiss Avengers goodbye!
ecksmanfan
ecksmanfan - 4/6/2010, 4:24 PM
@tea- Shutter Island threw me off something fierce and I still can't decide if I liked it or not.
FistsOfJustice
FistsOfJustice - 4/6/2010, 4:26 PM
Ror @ You're right on Point! I saw a pre screening in 3D on tues and I was so disappointed. Back in the day, the original was only second to ESB. (Barely beating out Blade Runner!).

How can INH be so damn awesome and Titans be a piece of crap on a good day?

MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 4/6/2010, 4:29 PM
I was disappointed by Shutter Island too. It wasn't a bad movie or anything but I hate those type of "twist" cop outs. Also, it just wasn't very tense. Great acting though.

Luckykid I would definitely wait for Kick Ass. Clash is a rental..or even a netflix job!

Fists, I never thought THI was that awesome anyway. It had much better actors and a better script so along with the great action it was very enjoyable, but it was still not at all emotionally engaging..and thats down to Letterier's anti-dramatic direction.
ukboy28
ukboy28 - 4/6/2010, 4:48 PM
ror@ good review, agreed clash could of been something special and was massively disappointing :0
comicb00kguy
comicb00kguy - 4/6/2010, 4:50 PM
Sounds like this is the complete disaster I knew it would be.
InTylerWeTrust
InTylerWeTrust - 4/6/2010, 4:52 PM
Great review, but I think I disliked the movie even more. The action wasn't all that exciting and the CG wasn't anything great either.

The dialogue was the worst part of the film though. Awful. Simply awful.

I thought Arterton was average, certainly not bad and she seemed awesome when compared to Worthington's flat-out bad performance. The highlights were Mikkelsen, Neeson, and Fiennes for me though.

I've been against Leterrier directing Avengers for a while, this "film" just supported my stance even more. A truly bad film which could have been so much more.

Oh, and you're the best of both :)
ukboy28
ukboy28 - 4/6/2010, 5:14 PM
tyler@ agreed that Mikkelsen, Neeson, and Fiennes were defo the highlights in a movie that should of been epic and entertaining and fell flat on it's ass, people that were with me were stunned how bad this was.
Phinehas
Phinehas - 4/6/2010, 5:17 PM
I had Shutter Island figured out in the first 30 min. I had realized with resolution, that I don't like movies about crazies as the protagonist. I just don't.

Ror
I wasn't as hard on the review of CotT as you. Perhaps your expectations were higher (I now know anything with Worthington as a lead requires a low brow critique). I was disappointed just the same because I thought it would be clever in the very least. It wasn't. As I have said before, if you're a 13 year old boy, you'll probably have a swell time at the cinema. If you're a little older, and your hormones have plateaued, perhaps this movie isn't for the average moviegoer.
JonF
JonF - 4/6/2010, 5:26 PM
@teabag - I'll refresh your memory. For over a year, people who preferred TIH over the 2003 "Hulk" cited the action and SFX as the main reasons for their views, when clearly Ang's version was more original, layered, complex and dynamic--but NOT an action film!

While LL's 2008 TIH was faster paced, the story seriously lacked, as it was predictable and HEAVILY derivative of the old TV show! So in LL's failed attempt at re-making Clash Of The Titans (which did not NEED to be re-made!), I feel very vindicated in support of my broader arguement that it takes MUCH more than cool action sequences and SFX to make a great film even in the super-hero/sci-fi/action genre!
Phinehas
Phinehas - 4/6/2010, 5:29 PM
teabag
OOo Oooo Me! ME! ME!!! I did!!!
blabberingblatherskite
blabberingblatherskite - 4/6/2010, 5:33 PM
I 100% agree with you ror, i thought it was gonna be gladiator meets lord of the rings or something.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 4/6/2010, 5:35 PM
Yeah everything you say is true Jon, but don't forget, Ang Lee also had close ups of desert fungus..Tea doesn't like desert fungus!;)

Tea, nah I thought he was very good as always. The scene when he discovers the terrible stuff in his garden with his wife was the closest thing the film had to an emotional pay off because of his performance I thought.

Pine, my expectations were higher..I thought from the trailers that people must have been too harsh..they weren't!

Tyler, haha, yeah that was a cringer! Or what about..."I have known only one great man in my life. Now I know 4 more...and a woman..and whatever the Hell you are"..Next minute SPOILER ALERT... they are all dead and he doesn't give a flying [frick]! Thats character development for ya!

Uk, yeah Neeson and Feinnes were good but I have seen both of em 10 times better.
THEHAWK
THEHAWK - 4/6/2010, 5:37 PM
I agree completely Ror.

Worthington was "meh" at best.

The best actor of the movie Postalwait (Brother Gilbert) who played Perseus's father was killed off in the first ten minutes!

i HATED Medusa.

I swear it was like watching someone play God of War or Dantes Inferno. Actually THAT would have been better.

I don't really like Louis much. i felt Incredible Hulk was about this bad.

Hey everyone!

Check out my new story

X-MEN: ROGUE’S GAMBIT




in the Fan fic section!

A figure from Rogue’s past forces her to go to Gambit for aid as they embark on a journey to New Orleans that takes them on a trip through Gambit’s own tumultuous past.

This is a SHORT STORY tie in for my upcoming X-MEN 6: AGE of APOCALYPSE

>>> X-MEN: ROGUE’S GAMBIT <<<

HAWK out
antonio
antonio - 4/6/2010, 5:49 PM
HORRIBLE HORRIBLE SHITTY DIALOGUE!!!!! KRAKEN WAS A GUD EFFECT,NOTHING ELSE!!!UNFORTUNATE PIECE OF SHIT FILM.
@OSCURO YES,SHUTTER ISLAND IS AN AMAZING FILM.
I WOULDNT MIND SEEING THAT,AND IRON MAN 2 UP FOR BEST PICTURE
JonF
JonF - 4/6/2010, 5:50 PM
teabag - To each his own! Is there anyone that liked both!?! LOL!
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 4/6/2010, 5:55 PM
I did like both actually, but for very different reasons. Lee's lacked action..and in a movie about the frakking Hulk that is a major issue! But I like how he tried to invest a bit of emotion in it too and that side of it worked for me. The scene where we see Nolte's flashback of what happened to his mother had more real drama that every second of THI..but, that movie brought the Hulk smash in spades. So, I always say a combination of the two would be for the best.
Phinehas
Phinehas - 4/6/2010, 5:56 PM
teabag
LOL XD
selinakyle
selinakyle - 4/6/2010, 5:59 PM
Very good review. Couldnt have said it any better. Medusa looked like a cartoon and there was no dread at all. Hell Uma thurman's medusa was scarier. smeee.
antonio
antonio - 4/6/2010, 6:00 PM
I DID LIKE BOTH AND YEAH LEE'S LACKED ACTION,BUT LETTERIER'S(IN MY OPINION),DIDNT HAVE ENOUGH EMOTION.
ReillyParker
ReillyParker - 4/6/2010, 6:00 PM
Is it me or is it that whenever anyone tries to make an epic movie's sequel/prequel/remake MORE epic, they wind up falling on their asses?

Clash's story had so much potential for reaching more depth then the original but then Leterrier just filled it up with so much random BS it actually felt like it was rushed. I don't know though that could just be me.
ukboy28
ukboy28 - 4/6/2010, 6:16 PM
true ror so have i man but they were miles better than everyone else.
Ven0m
Ven0m - 4/6/2010, 6:34 PM
Nice review and dead on Ror. I give your review two thumbs up!
Ryguy88
Ryguy88 - 4/6/2010, 10:36 PM
Letterier's version of Hulk was the overly obvious one, Lee tried to do something different and less predictable and when that didn't go as well as planned they opted for the brain-dead route....it was decent action and an OK movie but nothing you wouldn't expect to see in a Hulk film.

I'm not surprised that "Clash" isn't getting the greatest reviews, nice write-up Ror!
1 2
View Recorder