Ror Revisits: Hellboy

Ror Revisits: Hellboy

Taking a break from the Marvel/DC movie universe for this one. How does Guillermo Del Toro's adap of Mike Mignola's popular comic series hold up after 6 years and a (better?) sequel?

Review Opinion
By MarkCassidy - Aug 25, 2010 12:08 PM EST
Filed Under: Hellboy
Source: Ror Reviews

I caught this on tv last night having only actually seen it the one time back in 2004 when it was released. I remember really enjoying it, which I did again, but noticed a few things that kind of annoyed me second time around.

I have to admit to only reading Mignola's great comic after I had seen this. And even then I didn't read everything there was to, but I still see why its so popular, why director Guillermo Del Toro was such a fan, and why he chose to make this movie and its sequel. For the uninitiated, this first movie follows the comic arc Seed of Destruction and sees Hellboy as an infant, adopted by Professor Broom(John Hurt) during WW2 as Rasputin(Karel Roden) and his clock-work Nazi henchman Kroenen attempt to open an inter dimensional portal and free a giant squid deity in the hope that it will aid them in defeating their enemies. They fail, but fast forward 60 years and Hellboy(Ron Pearlman) is now an adult and works for Broom's Bureau of Paranormal Research and Defense (BPRD). A young FBI agent John Myers(Rupert Evans) is transferred there and is quickly thrown into the deep end as he, Hellboy, amphibious Abe Sapien(Doug Jones) and Pyrotechnic Liz Sherman(Selma Blair) have to stop a resurrected Rasputin from finishing what he started back in 1944.



Sound insane right? And it is, but brilliantly so. Mignola's incredibly imaginative comic couldn't have got a better director for its big screen adaptation. Del Toro clearly loves the material and it shows. The costumes, sets, make up; all top notch and really succeed in drawing you into this strange world. The film strikes that difficult balance between action, comedy, drama.. there is even a bit of romance(that actually works). When it goes for funny, you laugh, when it goes for tragic, your sad. Its a mix many directors struggle with maintaining but Del Toro seems like he could do it in his sleep. Granted the actual plot is a bit all over the place at times. It could be a a hard sell for non fans of the comic or just folks that aren't a huge fan of the extremely far fetched. Also, things veer towards cheesy at times but the cast are so good(most of them) that they get away with it. Pearlman is a joy to behold as Hellboy. Acting from underneath a tonne of prosthetics he makes this creature from Hell one of the most likable characters to ever cross over from a comic book. Jones also does a great job as Sapien(although its David Hyde Pierce providing the voice) and John Hurt is as reliable as ever as Broom. Blair is ok, I'm not a huge fan of hers but she does her job in this, even though I can't help but feel her character would have worked better with a stronger actress. That being said, her scenes with Pearlman as Liz and Hellboy grow closer intimately are surprisingly effective. Evans as Agent Myers is meh..veering on bad at times. Some of his dialog towards the end is actually delivered pretty cringe worthy. Sure, thats the script, but the rest of the cast have to deal with the crazy dialog too and they pull it off! Kroenan makes a great physical baddie but as main villain Rasputin, Roden isn't nearly as..well, villainous as he needs to be. The CG effects are good, although they might have dated a bit now, and the action comes fast and furious as Hellboy lays the smackdown on various beasties.

Unfortunately last 20 mins don't work nearly as well as the previous hour and 40. It all descends a bit into CGI meltdown and that great mix I talked about goes out the window a little. Don't get me wrong, its still a damn good movie. Its great fun without being silly and its just the right side of dark not to take itself too seriously. But I think the ante was really upped on the sequel and Del Toro delivered a better movie overall. Lets hope he is able to bring us Hellboy 3 at some point.



Does HELLBOY: THE CROOKED MAN Have A Post-Credits Scene? Here's What You Need To Know
Related:

Does HELLBOY: THE CROOKED MAN Have A Post-Credits Scene? Here's What You Need To Know

HELLBOY: THE CROOKED MAN Clip Dials Up The Scares As U.S. Digital Release Dates Are Finally Confirmed
Recommended For You:

HELLBOY: THE CROOKED MAN Clip Dials Up The Scares As U.S. Digital Release Dates Are Finally Confirmed

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 8/25/2010, 12:42 PM
WTF, the sequel was pretty weak????

Still gr8 HELLBOY I review!

Classic movie, one HOLLYWOOD actually did right!

Bring on HELLBOY 3!!!
Denn1s
Denn1s - 8/25/2010, 12:45 PM
both great movies. i don't know if 2 was better. they were quite different but great as well. can't wait for 3
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 8/25/2010, 1:01 PM
Worked better for me. Yeah there was a lot of CGI but it was just mixed in better. It didn't bombard us. Plus, the silliness was funny! Your not supposed to take Hellboy very seriously. Also, we had a MUCH better villain and over all better fight scenes and action as well as performances. So, I preferred it.

They also came to Ireland at the end:)
superbatspiderman
superbatspiderman - 8/25/2010, 1:11 PM
When I first saw this movie I thought it was goin to be dumb but it was surprisingly good.
TANKGIRL
TANKGIRL - 8/25/2010, 1:14 PM
LEEE777 SHUT YOU PIE HOLE DUDE JK? THE SEQUEL WAS AWESOME
AshleyWilliams
AshleyWilliams - 8/25/2010, 1:15 PM
I loved Hellboy! I havent seen the sequel,but I plan to.
InTylerWeTrust
InTylerWeTrust - 8/25/2010, 1:16 PM
I prefer Golden Army to the first, too. Both are very good, but I had more fun with the second and it just felt a bit more rounded-out, I guess.

I want Hellboy 3 dammit >:(
ShadowMan
ShadowMan - 8/25/2010, 1:18 PM
I liked Hellboy but The Golden Army is the superior movie, Gillermo is a great director, I just want him to get to work on HB 3 and npn of that "I'm gonna kill Hellboy" crap he's been sayin' in interviews
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 8/25/2010, 1:20 PM
Ok, well since you used caps I guess you've changed my mind! Dude, I just thought it was a better movie. I'm not talking about the comics. Cooler? How about just outright better performed and developed than the bald plank from the first one. I loved that scene when they get drunk and sing! Like I said in the review, a lot of directors would have [frick]ed something like that up but Del Toro made it work.
jman1977
jman1977 - 8/25/2010, 1:22 PM
Another awesome accurate review from Ror! Keep em coming!
Hawksblueyes
Hawksblueyes - 8/25/2010, 1:36 PM
Man, oh man, I thought the singing scene in HB2 was flippin genius in it's absurdity. When you can take a demon from Hell, pair him up with a water breathing sea mutant and have them sing drunkenly along with GODDAMN Barry Manilow, you have shown pure genius. LOVED THAT SCENE!

Great reveiw Ror. You're absolutely correct. This movie was just enough over the great side that we had to watch it's incredible sequel. ;D
MassExecutions
MassExecutions - 8/25/2010, 2:17 PM
Both movies are fantastic. Del Toro is one of the greatest living directors.

That being said, the second one was visually superior but the characters didn't keep me engaged as well as in the first one. The first one had some plot holes, but was still great.

MarsAmbassador - The Golden Army would have just marched across the ocean floor. Also, they demonstrated that if you destroyed one they just reassembled, so I'd say they were a real threat. Also, we just saw a slice of the elves political scene. How much of there no doubt dispersed society did you want the movie to waste time showing you? I can kind of agree with your character comments.
USAgent
USAgent - 8/25/2010, 2:20 PM
I enjoyed the first and the second. I recently watched the two animated ones and they are done by Del Toro and Mignola. All the voices are by the actors from the 04 film. Both were great to watch, imo. The animation artwork was very Mignola based. So, if you're a Hellboy fan check them out.
CRITIC17
CRITIC17 - 8/25/2010, 3:01 PM
Great review!!!

I loved both movies. Though I did like Golden Army a little better than 1. We need HB3 though!!!!!
thetrubatman14
thetrubatman14 - 8/25/2010, 3:04 PM
HELLBOY 1 AND 2 WERE GOOD MOVIES, but Guillermo Del Toro licks a dirty asswhole!!!
AverageCitizen99
AverageCitizen99 - 8/25/2010, 3:14 PM
@RorMachine
Nice review man! :)
Both movies are spectacular and I hope Guillermo and the rest of the cast get to revisit this world someday for a third outing. When I first heard and saw the film I never really read about him or had even known he was a comic book character. I was 10 and I probably thought comics mostly dealt with superheroes. I wasn't really familiar with the character or this world until I saw it a year or so later on FX and loved it! I especially enjoyed the Golden Army as it was alot more fun than the previous. Hope to see more tales about this red guy soon on the big screen again.
BillyBlack
BillyBlack - 8/25/2010, 3:55 PM
I'd pay to see a third one.

Both of them were better than most of Marvel or DC's flicks, so what's the hub bub?
TheDemonHunter
TheDemonHunter - 8/25/2010, 4:53 PM
The first movie was brilliant. The second one was nice eye candy but the story was just too far from the feel of the original for me. I didn't particularly like it, to be honest.

To me, it just felt like too much of a stretch from the world they showed in the first movie to be part of a series of stories.
marvel72
marvel72 - 8/25/2010, 5:11 PM
i think both hellboys were good,very underated most of the time.

they've got fantastic special effects,del toro for dr strange.
josebonifacio
josebonifacio - 8/25/2010, 6:32 PM
I agree with @deadpool72, Del for Strange.


jttrainer45
jttrainer45 - 8/25/2010, 6:39 PM
I loved this movie. #1 or 2 on my comic movies list. I thought the first was much better than the sequal
Upupandaway
Upupandaway - 8/25/2010, 7:40 PM
I enjoyed both films very much. Del Toro has endeared himself at the same level as Jim Henson in terms of imagination, storytelling, etc.

@della- If fidelity to the source is your only measure of a good movie, I think you're going to be a very disappointed person. But, in the end, you can't change a person's opinion (even though I'm right). >: )
ASSASSIN666
ASSASSIN666 - 8/25/2010, 8:30 PM
Pearlman nailed this role as well as Mickey Rourke nailed Marv in Sin City. Whenever you have an actor who makes a role his/her own it's a true sign of talent. Nobody can ever follow Ron as Hellboy, nobody! Bring on part three!!!
Upupandaway
Upupandaway - 8/25/2010, 9:18 PM
@della- I was just kidding about the last part and saying that we can have different opinions and it's cool. I was actually meaning that I'm not trying to change your mind. No worries. : )

Also, if Del Toro is not available for Strange, I'd like Darren Aronofsky in the director's chair.
armageddon
armageddon - 8/25/2010, 9:58 PM
lmao@thankgirl "LEEE777 SHUT YOU PIE HOLE DUDE JK?"
well said hun lool you made me laugh
great review dude
Shaman
Shaman - 8/26/2010, 6:32 AM
Good god Ror, you are such a life saver on a slow news week! LOVE THIS review :))

Even though i don't agree with you about the sequel, i pretty much agree with everything you said about the first! Only i'd give it a full four stars mark ;)

This comparison of both chapters reminds me very much about the Blade 1 vs 2 comparison. And i have the exact same stance on them for the exact same reasons. I prefered Norrington's Blade over Del Toro's sequel as much as i prefered Toro's first Hellboy chapter over his Golden Army. Although i still enjoyed both sequels very much, i still had to watch both of them several times before truly appreciating them as singular tales since they were both very different from their previous chapters. I much much more prefer a dark and gritty mystic cult film over an up front colorful action packed sci-fi/fantasy setting. Both sequels seem to go fantasy overboard with the creation of news species which were very well done but IMO not necessary.

It all goes down to preferences but i like it simple and putting in so much more creativity is overkill for me, no matter how well done it is. Its as if the film's atmosphere takes a backseat to its details which makes it more of an awesome looking cartoon for me than a captivating & tangible live action motion picture. Don't get me wrong though, vampires and nazi sand filled assassins are very much fantasy oriented but on their own, the don't seem to push the envelope as much as a fast spreading vampire eating menace or a whole fantasy creature society living under the Brooklin Bridge. As cool as those concepts can be, it doesn't sell it for me as much. It would have been the same for me if Del Toro had shot a sequel to Pan's Labyrinth, this time being an entire tale from the fantasy kingdom the princess was from. It would have lost that intriguing mystery factor for me. I prefer my fantasy films to have a lot of rough and a little diamond sparkle at the end rather than to show the whole gem on a silver platter. IMO the highlight of the Golden Army was defintiely the Angel of Death but the rest of it was just too much syrop in the squishy for me. Was still very good but only on a binge night. But to each's own :)

As for the comparison to its source material, i can't really comment on that because the Hellboy comics never caught my eye. A comic's art makes it or breaks it for me and no matter how well written they can be, i'll never read a comic that's drawn by someone like Mignola or John Romita Jr. It really blows it for me and takes me right out of it.

Awesome review as always, Ror!!! :))
countrymadness
countrymadness - 8/26/2010, 7:39 AM
hurry up del toro Im gettin impatiant :(
MassExecutions
MassExecutions - 8/26/2010, 12:20 PM
@Shaman - On Hellboy I agree with you, and on Blade I totally get what your talking about, however the raw coolness of Blade 2 always makes it win out for me. The fight scenes were great, and Reapers are the greatest vampire derivatives to ever be invented. Man, I love that movie so much.
dancingmonkey08
dancingmonkey08 - 8/26/2010, 12:38 PM
As usual awesome and interesting review, Ror! Ireland cameo was awesome even though it was shot on a greenscreen. And do you want to go find and activate the Golden Army, they arent that far away from us lol

And Ron Perlman was born to play Hellboy!

Hellboy sequel for 2013! It would be the 20th anniversary of Hellboy's first appearance in the comics and everything so what better way to celebrate it by finishing the awesome Hellboy movie trilogy. Please Guillermo and Ron do it!

It wouldnt make sense to put Hellboy up against Green Lantern, Cap and Thor next year and in 2012, he would be up against Batman, Superman and the Avengers! Leave it until 2013 when Hellboy can actually get a chance to be the best at the box office

oh and make another animated movie in the meantime, they were great
Shaman
Shaman - 8/27/2010, 8:52 AM
Well Mass, i actually felt the opening of Blade 2 was awesome and i did enjoy the reaper species "concept" but not so much the plot itself. And they lost me with the fighting sequences the second i saw their shoddy CGI with the "godlights" swordfight. After that, it went a bit downhill. The first fight of Blade vs Nomak was great but the end fight sucked IMO. And the whole film seemed devoid of society where as in the first one, human society had a fair part in it. It was as if they were in a world of their own and it's just not what i find fascinating about the vampire lore. Also, as cool as the blade hunters appeared, they were very cartoonish to me. Way much more than Frost's lackies in the first. It was a bit too... i dunno... fake. So there are many details as to why i much more prefer the first Blade. The sequel was still pretty good though ;)
RedKnight
RedKnight - 8/27/2010, 1:54 PM
Yo Ror I'm from Ireland too!! Disappointed never showed the proper Giant's Causeway hexagon stones even tho' they did film here??!!! Happy Arthurs Day to Ya!!!
1 2
View Recorder