THE INCREDIBLE HULK: Marvel Studios Initially Feared That Universal Was Not Marketing The Movie Well

THE INCREDIBLE HULK: Marvel Studios Initially Feared That Universal Was Not Marketing The Movie Well

The Incredible Hulk was famously plagued by production issues. Now, a new book has revealed that Marvel Studios was concerned that its distribution partner, Universal, would not market the movie well.

By DanielKlissmman - Nov 06, 2021 10:11 AM EST
Filed Under: The Incredible Hulk
Source: The Story of Marvel Studios

The Incredible Hulk is arguably a bit of an outlier in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Despite its outstanding take on Bruce Banner and his grumpy alter ego, the film was met with an underwhelming critical and financial reception. By now, it's been well-documented that The Incredible Hulk was plagued by development difficulties (some reportedly stemming from star Edward Norton, who became significantly involved with the movie's story).

Now, thanks to the new book, "The Story of Marvel Studios: The Making of the Marvel Cinematic Universe," we know that the movie's woes stretched beyond its core production team. For a while, in fact, Marvel Studios was concerned about its distribution partner, Universal. 

To provide some context, unlike fellow MCU entries like Iron Man and Iron Man 2The Incredible Hulk was distributed by Universal. And, as the book explains, the people at Marvel Studios were "[concerned] that the studio's deal with Universal had, to a degree, already hamstrung the movie."

This sentiment stemmed from the fact that, unlike Marvel's then-deal with Paramount, which involved multiple films (such as Captain America: The First Avenger and Thor), its deal with Universal was only for one Hulk film. As explained in the book:

"With no long-term benefits for their efforts, it became a concern that Universal was, for lack of a better phrase, phoning in the marketing of the movie. Pragmatically, they had no incentive to invest in Marvel Studios."

At the time, Marvel Studios was in a serious financial bind. The studio had a limited amount of cash to make its films (money that it needed to pay back), and an uncertain landscape in terms of how audiences would receive its products. So, the fear of a partner possibly not delivering on their end of the agreement — especially one as vital as marketing — was likely a stressful situation.

Having said that, the way it's phrased in the book, it seems that Marvel's concerns could have been a misunderstanding as opposed to it being a case of one company trying to jeopardize another. Of course, that's open to interpretation. It's also worth noting that, while some may argue that Marvel's worries were validated by The Incredible Hulk's financial results, the studio actually didn't expect the film to perform as well as Iron Man.

As the book reveals, Marvel Studios producer Stephen Broussard "knew The Incredible Hulk was going to place second [to Iron Man], so there was personal pressure about landing the movie that might lose money for the studio's risky two-picture launch." 

Ultimately, things worked out well enough. According to "The Story of Marvel Studios," The Incredible Hulk was projected to make between $150 and $170 million. The film ultimately took in $264 million worldwide, surpassing initial expectations.

The rights to the Green Goliath are a complex topic, but as it was last reported, Universal owns the distribution rights to Hulk films, while Marvel Studios owns the character's film rights themselves. Fans have long speculated that such restriction is what partly influenced the development of Disney+'s upcoming She-Hulk TV series, which features Mark Ruffalo's Bruce Banner as a supporting character. 

Rumors have been swirling regarding a Hulk standalone movie over the past year, but nothing has been confirmed aside from the hero's aforementioned role in She-Hulk

PREDATOR VS. SPIDER-MAN Comic Book Series Will Pit The Wall-Crawler Against A Rogue Yautja Hunter
Related:

PREDATOR VS. SPIDER-MAN Comic Book Series Will Pit The Wall-Crawler Against A Rogue Yautja Hunter

THE INCREDIBLE HULK Writer Reveals Some Of The Bizarre Changes Edward Norton Made To The 2008 Movie
Recommended For You:

THE INCREDIBLE HULK Writer Reveals Some Of The Bizarre Changes Edward Norton Made To The 2008 Movie

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
Conquistador
Conquistador - 11/6/2021, 10:22 AM
They definitly didn't market it well. I remember it being so last minute back in 2008, and finding next to nothing when look for any news related to it.

Fogs
Fogs - 11/7/2021, 6:57 AM
@Jaykay21 - Same here! Harmed the MCU in a way at the time, cause after that "avengers initiative" scene it would've reinforced how things were in motion if well-marketed.
mastakilla39
mastakilla39 - 11/7/2021, 9:15 AM
@Jaykay21 - Hulk just wasn't popular enough after the Ang Lee remake. I remember going in TIH and it was just a bunch of old people who watched the original Bill Bixby similar to when I saw No time to die. Just wasn't popular enough with kids/teens or the family crowd at that time. Marketing was everywhere where I was.
Conquistador
Conquistador - 11/7/2021, 9:36 AM
@mastakilla39 - I'd disagree there, especially when you compare it to push that Ang Lee's '03 take had. That had a hell of alot of promo and marketing with tie in stuff. TIH definitely didn't compare, and it makes sense now reading the article why.. they knew they weren't going to benefit too much so just kind of left it. I remember checking superherohype and other similar sites quite often looking for any kind of news or set pics and seeing there was more on iron man and even Jumper than hulk... the push only really came like a week or 2 after Iron man came out. Either way its still a highly underappreciated entry in the MCU.
TheRationalNerd
TheRationalNerd - 11/6/2021, 10:23 AM
Honestly one of the most underrated MCU projects.
OmegaDaGrodd
OmegaDaGrodd - 11/6/2021, 10:26 AM
@TheRationalNerd - Yeah, this is definitely the one I'll never get the hate for. I always see it at the bottoms of people's lists and for me it sits squarely in the middle.
The1st
The1st - 11/6/2021, 10:30 AM
@TheRationalNerd - Yeah, I loved that version of the Hulk. I know the physical changes over time can be attributed to recasting and inevitably making him more viewer friendly, but I loved the original design even if it was more CGI based. He looked nothing like Norton and was his own entity. Ruffalo's just looks like him with big puffy muscles, although it allows him to emote more in the MCU. Ruffalo's done great, but I just prefer Norton if I had to choose.


tylerzero
tylerzero - 11/6/2021, 11:28 AM
@The1st - That was actually my issue with Nort-ulk: that they looked nothing alike made it less believable that they were one and the same in my eyes.

(Chalk it up to my lack of familiarity with the comics, and how Banner and Hulk are drawn, as well.)
TheWalkingCuban
TheWalkingCuban - 11/6/2021, 10:25 AM
They wouldn’t let me and my wife in with my less than 13 year old nephew, the jerks. Not the theater, they were nice, my selfish wife shoulda taken my nephew home to an early bedtime, I have an endemic, eidetic, whatever memory, I could’ve told them the whole thing.
OmegaDaGrodd
OmegaDaGrodd - 11/6/2021, 10:26 AM
I wasn't following CBMs at all in 2008. I didn't know about Watchmen until I was seated for TDK. Had to get dragged to see TDK in the first place. Only saw Iron Man because of a date. Incredible Hulk was the only one I saw a trailer for and I was hooked immediately. I still to this day don't quite get the dislike for this movie. Feels solidly like a good Hulk film that ticks all the right boxes

I feel like that book is a good have for superfans, because it really gets into a deeper layer of their psychology when making and reacting to the reception of these movies
Fares
Fares - 11/6/2021, 10:27 AM
Shoutout to The Incredible Hulk for being an awesome movie. Teenage me spent way too much time having fun with that shitty tie-in video game and re-enacting the last fight of the movie with my younger brother.
Dredd97
Dredd97 - 11/6/2021, 10:28 AM
@Fares - haha my brother and I played that game til our Xbox burned. So much fun and all the versions of Hulk you could play
Fares
Fares - 11/6/2021, 10:36 AM
@Dredd97 - I hear ya buddy. Unfortunately for me I was stuck with the PC version which wasn't exactly on par with what came out on the consoles. AND IT DIDN'T INCLUDE THE HULKBUSTER SKIN!!!
Dredd97
Dredd97 - 11/6/2021, 10:57 AM
@Fares - aw that sucks! The Hulkbuster skin was great!
JFerguson
JFerguson - 11/6/2021, 10:27 AM
Had the burger king toys of chest flexing hulk, back spike abomination and some hologram Betty figure. Good enough marketing for me id say
Dredd97
Dredd97 - 11/6/2021, 10:27 AM
Still wish they would've let Norton do his trilogy of Hulk movies. I get why they couldn't, but sounds like he had some interesting ideas
Spawnnn
Spawnnn - 11/6/2021, 10:28 AM
Maybe I was too young when it came out, but I loved it just as much as I loved Iron-Man. Both felt fresh and exciting back then.
PantherKing
PantherKing - 11/6/2021, 10:40 AM
Any one catch the Celestials and Shang chi being added to the Marvel Studios intro in Eternals?
ScottSummers
ScottSummers - 11/6/2021, 5:51 PM
@PantherKing - Yeah, I caught ShangChi hanging around the M, right at the end.
CplHicks
CplHicks - 11/6/2021, 10:44 AM
Didn't like the way Whedon and Feige threw Norton under the bus when they talked about why they brought Ruffalo in. Norton had taken the high road. It was unnecessary.
ScottSummers
ScottSummers - 11/6/2021, 5:55 PM
@CplHicks - Dude, Norton talked A LOT of smack. He personally dragged Feige's name through mud, mainly because he didn't get to direct the movie he was in.

I'm all for being professional, and while I do agree that Marvel could have handled it a little better, Norton was also asking for it.
1 2 3
View Recorder