IGN's Joey Esposito & The Best Way To Go Into Comic Book Films

IGN's Joey Esposito & The Best Way To Go Into Comic Book Films

IGN's Joey Esposito writes a rather interesting article on how we as fans can better handle our own personal hype and over anticipation.

By JamesMan - Oct 05, 2013 08:10 PM EST
Filed Under: Other
Source: Hero Worship: Don't Ruin Movies for Yourself



Joey Esposito, a writer for IGN released an interesting article that more serves as a response to the buildup we as fans make for a film. This, of course, can lead to ridiculous expectations that will more than likely never be met and a disappointing view on future comic book/geek films. Take a look at what he has to say below!

One of my earlier Hero Worship columns was Are We Ruining Moves For Ourselves?, discussing the idea of overanalyzing early promotional material for the movies we are most looking forward to. Back then, I was talking about the first images of Henry Cavill’s Superman and Anne Hathaway’s Catwoman (I know, right?). But looking back at that piece, it’s sort of like stomping on a few random ants but never bothering to take out the ant hill. Over analytical fandom is just a symptom of a larger epidemic.

While I've expressed time and again how I love shared universes and the like, seeing Paul Giamatti talk about the Rhino’s role in The Amazing Spider-Man 3 and 4 (!) when we’re just over a year removed from Amazing Spider-Man 1 is just a little bit grating. That’s not a slight on Giamatti, either, as interviews are typically conducted in a fashion to try and land scoops about these big new franchises. Being a good interviewee, Giamatti answered as best he could. The larger issue is: were we better off knowing nothing about movies until we saw the trailer?

It’s hard to imagine, but there was a time, not all that long ago, that fans only became aware of certain movies when its trailer played before another flick they were seeing months before hand. Of course, movie marketing has shifted drastically with the dawn of the Internet Age and then again with the birth of YouTube and again with the onset of social media. But with those changes has come a higher level of fan expectation; we expect to know more not just about the finished product, but about every leg of its development.

A few decades ago, the only way to be “in the know” the way most fans are today was to follow the industry trades. Now, you can get the must minuscule casting rumors about these movies from nearly any entertainment site, despite the beats they typically cover. These movies transcend “geek culture” at this point, so it’s no longer just the fan base that’s clamoring for info, it’s the audience at large. It’s the way we've been trained for the last fifteen years or so, and thus, it’s the way sites operate to satisfy their readers.

Speculation is incredibly fun, and it’s part of the reason I love writing this column. At the same time, it’s possible we’re getting to a point where our expectations are becoming so astronomically outrageous that we've already filmed our versions of these movies in our head and screened them dozens of times before the actual movie hits. This is why you see filmmakers like Christopher Nolan and J.J. Abrams clinging to the secrecy of Old Hollywood, despite it being, for the most part, antiquated. Stuff is going to get out there, because that’s just how it works now.

So my proposal is this: if you find yourself disappointed by something because it simply doesn't live up to your expectations (I’m plenty guilty of this myself), let’s try a new approach. Let’s divorce ourselves from the production woes, the stops-and-starts, the casting changes, the writer changes, the endless rumor mills. Websites are going to report on this stuff, no matter what, because a majority of the audience clamors for these things now. And that’s great. But for some of us, who know that we’re better off going into a movie blind without preconceived notions, let’s take control of our own movie-watching destinies.

Is it going to be hard to not click that link? Of course. Is it going to take all of your energy to not engage in a Twitter discussion about a movie four years away? Maybe. But your restraint is building to greater satisfaction on the other end. Movies are art, be they summer tent pole action movies or limited-release character studies of existential crises, and we should enjoy them as such – as a finished product. -Joey Esposito


So what do you have to say to Mr. Esposito's writing? Do you feel it's the smart way to watch comic book films? Do you think it's just an excuse to say you like a bad film? Have you had any experiences were you overhyped a film in your head and were dissatisfied with what you got, no matter the quality? Tell me what you think below and please:

THE FRANCHISE: Trailer For Max Series Starring Daniel Brühl Reveals Chaos Inside World Of Superhero Filmmaking
Related:

THE FRANCHISE: Trailer For Max Series Starring Daniel Brühl Reveals Chaos Inside World Of Superhero Filmmaking

A MINECRAFT MOVIE Trailer And Poster Feature AQUAMAN Star Jason Momoa Like You've Never Seen Him Before
Recommended For You:

A MINECRAFT MOVIE Trailer And Poster Feature AQUAMAN Star Jason Momoa Like You've Never Seen Him Before

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

sanyaya
sanyaya - 10/5/2013, 9:21 PM
i promised you a god is my witness by the time 2015 comes well have more pornos parodies than ever considering all the movie that are going to come out that year
JamesMan
JamesMan - 10/5/2013, 9:24 PM
Avengers: Age of Anal and Batman/Superman: World's Widest!
Mrsinister
Mrsinister - 10/5/2013, 9:27 PM
Good article. The x-men movies still sucked though.
I DO think you should go into a movie with an open mind:)
TheGambitFreak
TheGambitFreak - 10/5/2013, 10:07 PM
Advice? Sure... IGN? Suicide now seems like a viable proposition. No thanks...

WhiteSAMURAI
WhiteSAMURAI - 10/5/2013, 10:10 PM
The only problem I have is watching the trailer too many times. I think that's what ruins it the most, if the trailer doesn't correspond with the movie.

I actually think looking at all the things in production is a good thing. Its vague enough that it doesn't give away the movie (most of the time) and also gets you excited. Nothing gets me more excited for a movie than seeing all these bits and pieces of the movie being made.

But the trailer is what it really hinges on. It gives you a glimpse of how you're going to feel while watching the movie. And a lot of times the trailer makes it seem cooler than it is so a movie that is good but not great can seem like crap because it didn't match your prerecieved notion from watching the trailer. I really don't start getting to excited for a movie until I see a trailer. That's what really sells me and that makes every other information about the movie excite me more.

At least that's how it works for me.
TheRationalNerd
TheRationalNerd - 10/5/2013, 11:31 PM
I've only seen two trailers for Thor: The Dark Workd and that's it for me so hopefully when I go in I'll be surprised and everything won't be given away (in certain cases) like Avengers.

Plus I wanted to mention that this site tends to post spoilers in both the titles and descriptions of their articles so if we could just keep it simple like "Rumor: Amazing Spider-Man 2 Secret Character Revealed" or "Revealed: After Credits Scene Details for ________" would make so much more sense and people will actually have a chance of being less spoiled.

That's why films such as Man of Steel and The Wolverine were both heavily liked because there weren't tons of articles featuring set pics, (Spoiler Alerts) and so many other unease scary main page spoilers.
TheRationalNerd
TheRationalNerd - 10/5/2013, 11:32 PM
*World*
TheRationalNerd
TheRationalNerd - 10/5/2013, 11:33 PM
*Unnecessary*
TheRationalNerd
TheRationalNerd - 10/5/2013, 11:38 PM
I think it's totally cool to theorize how you want certain franchises to
Branch out and expand overtime since 80% of the time our assumptions are wrong.
StrangerX
StrangerX - 10/6/2013, 12:48 AM
Yea, the good ol days.
sometimes I miss it when I would be surprised by a new trailer or only get tidbits from Wizard magazine. The shock value is def lessened more with cbms. This is why I praise Nolans camp so much when it came to his films. The Avengers did well with the trailer, and it was an ok film. The problem was it being released everywhere else but here first.

I also believe a few films would probably do a lot better if less was revealed in the trailer. In fact the bigger the movie the less should be revealed in the or else it comes off as though we've seen it all before.
Havenless
Havenless - 10/6/2013, 12:55 AM
Is it now considered a news article if you paraphrase someone else's editorial?
Brainiac13
Brainiac13 - 10/6/2013, 1:44 AM
Nice article with some real common sense. ......but its real hard........for the 'need to know more' emotions from us.
FirstAvenger
FirstAvenger - 10/6/2013, 7:27 AM
^ Then why are you here?
Luminus
Luminus - 10/6/2013, 8:54 AM
That's pointless. We live in a different age. Not clicking that link isn't going to save you from being spoiled, because everyone's discussing the rumors everywhere. I couldn't even avoid hearing about the Iron Man Mandarin issue, despite deliberately not clicking on any links pertaining to it. So here's what you do: don't take the first time you watch something as the definitive answer. Watch everything at least TWICE, before you make a decision. That way you can weigh your fanboy judgments against your layman judgments and come to a reasonable conclusion.
View Recorder