The Avengers, The Dark Knight Rises and The Justice League (A Trilogy) 3 - The Search For Spock

The Avengers, The Dark Knight Rises and The Justice League (A Trilogy) 3 - The Search For Spock

Will DC finally grow a set and make a Justice League movie?

Editorial Opinion
By rcw91 - May 12, 2012 10:05 AM EST
Filed Under: Other
Source: Hero Complex Article on Man of Steel

For part 3 of this editorial, I examine the possibilities of a Justice League movie and further examine the challenges of creating the world of this superhero team-up. Part 1 can be read here and part 2 can be read here. Don’t you just love trilogies?

Don’t forget to read the disclaimer from the first article so you don’t inadvertently start a nuclear flame war. Like a lot of threequels, this will probably let you down and make you mad.

Will DC finally make a Justice League movie?

Who cares? The Avengers kicked ass! End of editorial.

Or not.

I would say that the answer to the question would be extremely likely now that The Avengers has changed the game. At least, I think Warner Bros. will definitely be moving in that direction. Regardless of whether or not such a film would work, they would be foolish not to seriously explore it.

Of course, exploring it is one thing. Executing it is another. DC would be foolish not to explore a Justice League film, but they would be just as foolish to make one just because Marvel made an Avengers film.

Marvel defied the odds and spent the better part of a decade building the world of the Avengers and putting all of the pieces together. Just the cost of making the movies that lead to The Avengers, which could be viewed as development costs, is pretty staggering itself. They spend $140 million on Iron Man, $150 million on The Incredible Hulk, $200 million on Iron Man 2, $150 million on Thor and $140 million on Captain America: The First Avenger. Throw in the $220 million budget for The Avengers and Marvel has spent $1 billion just making these films. And that doesn’t factor in the cost of marketing and distribution. The films have grossed over $3 billion worldwide and counting. And of course, we already know there will be the next wave in Iron Man 3, Thor 2 and Captain America 2. Presumably, that will be followed by The Avengers 2 and probably a new Hulk solo movie. Add to that the possibilities of films for characters like Hawkeye and Black Widow and the growing of the roster with characters like Ant-Man and the Marvel Cinematic Universe is just getting larger. With these characters plus X-Men, Fantastic Four, Daredevil, Elektra, Punisher and Spider-Man among others all getting films at one time or another, Marvel has made every effort to bring its characters to the silver screen.

Meanwhile, in the modern era (starting with the release of Superman in 1978), DC has essentially done nothing but release Batman and Superman films. There have been five Superman films, with a sixth forthcoming and two loose spinoffs: Superman (1978), Superman II (1980), Superman III (1983), Superman IV: The Quest For Peace (1987), Superman Returns (2006), Man of Steel (2013) plus Supergirl (1984) and Steel (1997). There have been six Batman films, with a seventh forthcoming and one loose spinoff: Batman (1989), Batman Returns (1992), Batman Forever (1995), Batman & Robin (1997), Batman Begins (2005), The Dark Knight (2008) and The Dark Knight Rises (2012) plus Catwoman (2004). Other than a couple of Swamp Thing movies in the early 80s (not produced by Warner Bros.), DC has only ventured outside of its big two with the 2009 release of Watchmen, the 2010 release of Jonah Hex and the 2011 release of Green Lantern with fairly mediocre results. Granted, not all of Marvel’s films have been juggernauts, but they can say they’ve been successful with Spider-Man, X-Men, the Avengers as solo films and the Avengers as a team. DC can only say Batman and Superman. And really, there hasn’t been a truly successful Superman movie in 30 years.

Both the Spider-Man and X-Men franchises were entering (or on their way) reboot/prequel phases when Iron Man was released in 2008. But they had both had recent success. Marvel knew that those franchises were still very much viable as they entered into the Avengers phase of their cinematic plan. In short, they had enough experience to know what worked and what didn’t with more than one franchise.

DC’s cinematic universe, on the other hand, at this point in time really only has Batman as a recently proven franchise. It’s all on you, Dark Knight.

Superman Returns was not a flop, but it was not successful enough to warrant sequel. Even Batman Begins was not a huge hit. It was just plain as daylight that the franchise had found its voice and its filmmaker. And add to that the fact that The Dark Knight Rises represents the end of that trilogy. Christopher Nolan may have some involvement with future Batman films in a producorial capacity, but his days as the visionary of the franchise appear to be at an end. Granted, Nolan has a key role in the DC cinematic universe outside of Batman as he is the producer of Man of Steel. But somehow, I don’t see Nolan wanting to become the Kevin Feige of DC movies and a Kevin Feige is what DC movies need. They need someone who can find the appropriate filmmakers for each character while at the same time maintaining the integrity of the DC cinematic universe as exactly that: a universe. A universe that encompasses all of these characters.

In order to take the journey that will result in a Justice League movie, DC/Warner Bros. must first begin the process of building the world that the Justice League film will inhabit. Whether or not Man of Steel can be the launching pad for this remains to be seen, but it would seem that that film would be the earliest that any seeds could be planted. And judging by Christopher Nolan’s many comments on the matter, Man of Steel doesn’t appear to be shaping up to be the start of a Justice League franchise.


“A lot of people have approached Superman in a lot of different ways. I only know the way that has worked for us that’s what I know how to do,” Nolan said, emphasizing the idea that Batman exists in a world where he is the only superhero and a similar approach to the Man of Steel would assure the integrity needed for the film. “Each serves to the internal logic of the story. They have nothing to do with each other.” - From Geoff Boucher’s The Hero Complex at LATIMES.com.


It would seem highly unlikely that Warner Bros. would reboot Superman and then reboot him again for a Justice League film, especially if Man of Steel is successful. That doesn’t leave a lot of wiggle room for any filmmaker tasked with creating the Justice League movie.

Green Lantern may be able to be retroactively included in this new Justice League universe, but the franchise has just as much chance of being rebooted given the mediocre box office results. Then, Batman will be rebooted after The Dark Knight Rises. In order for it to work in a Justice League universe, it would have to have at least a significant departure from the tone of Nolanverse, at least in terms of having more supernatural and science fiction influences. If you consider that it took 5 years to reboot Spider-Man, it would be difficult to see Batman having a significantly quicker turnaround. In the interim, you’d have to develop movies for the Flash and Wonder Woman, characters that have already been in development hell for a few years now. You’d also have to decide whether or not characters like Aquaman, Cyborg or Martian Manhunter can have their own films or go the way of Hawkeye and Black Widow (at least in the first phase).

And in all that time of DC developing a Justice League world, Iron Man 3, Thor 2, Captain America 2 and probably The Avengers 2 will all be released.

One of Marvel’s advantages in making The Avengers was that they essentially started from scratch. With the exception of a direct-to-video Captain America film and Ang Lee’s forgettable Hulk, they virtually had a blank canvas on which to paint. With The Dark Knight Rises, Man of Steel and Green Lantern, DC currently has no such luxury, the end of the Nolan trilogy notwithstanding.

To sum up, Warner Bros. has to develop each character’s individual world on its own with an eye towards the larger world of the Justice League. In doing so, they must make each character relevant in their own right (not to mention successful). Then, they have to make these characters relevant together. They will have lost the audience the first time someone says “Can’t Superman just spin around the world and turn back time?” or “Batman’s a human being. How can he make as much difference as these other superhumans?”

Personally, I don’t see how they’re going to do it. But I dare them to prove me wrong. I hope they do.

But for now, we get to bask in the glory that is The Avengers. Marvelites, enjoy the moment. DC-ites, let the Marvelites enjoy their moment. You may be getting yours on July 20. If not, another one is bound to come along. It certainly looks like comic book movies are here to stay and I’d think we could all agree that that is a great outcome.

THE 4:30 MOVIE Interview: Filmmaker Kevin Smith On How His Passion For The Theater Shaped New Film (Exclusive)
Related:

THE 4:30 MOVIE Interview: Filmmaker Kevin Smith On How His Passion For The Theater Shaped New Film (Exclusive)

THE FRANCHISE: Trailer For Max Series Starring Daniel Brühl Reveals Chaos Inside World Of Superhero Filmmaking
Recommended For You:

THE FRANCHISE: Trailer For Max Series Starring Daniel Brühl Reveals Chaos Inside World Of Superhero Filmmaking

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

GreenHalJordan
GreenHalJordan - 5/12/2012, 10:40 AM
It all started in 2000 with spiderman and from there studios finally understood that CBMs are where its at! Now with avengers, we are going to get another decade and with more and more that are going to be pumped out, this is going to be a never ending cycle of fangasm epicness!
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 5/12/2012, 10:45 AM
I say the opposite. Instead of the Avengers assembling to save the planet from Loki, how about a supervillain group assembling to form a protection racket against the supervillains who "bully" them?

I truly do believe if DC had the balls, they could work on this project without introducing any of the superheroes outside World's Finest, and reverse it. Tell the story from the bad guys' perspective. Have the members of the Justice League as a force of nature, like super cops.

THEN make a Justice League movie. Or from there, work on the solo films to expand on the characters introduced in the supervillain movie.
golden123
golden123 - 5/12/2012, 10:59 AM
DC-ites? What is with this new trend of putting the prefix "-ite" after something or someone that signifies you are a big fan of whatever the root word is?
golden123
golden123 - 5/12/2012, 11:01 AM
@GreenHalJordan: Spider-Man came out in 2002. X-Men came out in 2000 although you are correct, Spider-Man was the movie that proved superhero movies could be megahits.
GreenHalJordan
GreenHalJordan - 5/12/2012, 11:15 AM
srry bout that, i got it mixed up.
awesomem131
awesomem131 - 5/12/2012, 3:50 PM
Nice write-up but,honestly i think a World's Finest movie seems more likely because a)DC doesn't have enough balls to do any films with characters they deem not popular enough(The Flash) b)They would probably play it safe milking Superman for the next couple of years.
Madmex93
Madmex93 - 5/12/2012, 5:40 PM
Something i noticed watching the Avengers is that the 5 films that led to it where really not that necessary. I had seen all the Marvel films to that date, but many people i know went into the Avengers and hadn't and didn't have a difficult time following the film. Obviously the five films did a good job at establishing individual characters and an expanded universe, but i think it would be just as easy to follow if it was the first in the series.
I guess where I am going with this is that DC doesn't need to make 5 lead in films, the individual characters are already well known by the public (remember the Justice league TV was pretty popular). I think DC can do it successfully by making a JL movie first and then branching out with the best received members.
Madmex93
Madmex93 - 5/12/2012, 5:51 PM
I think I would prefer a Batman Superman team up film over the justice league, or green arrow/green lantern team up.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 5/12/2012, 8:00 PM
@fangz
"people aren't that stupid. granted, people are stupid, we just aren't stupid in that way. even in Superman 2, no one was wondering during the movie why Superman just didn't reverse time. cuz Superman 2 was a pretty tight movie, at least my recollection of it."


Weeeeeellllll.......
I knew this woman who was actually disappointed because The Dark Knight didn't feature some resurrection of the Joker and didn't understand why they would cast someone so young in the role. Yeeeeeaaaaah.

I think trying to manipulate a massive audience isn't the brightest idea, and to try to hammer these characters in with their backstories in separate movies is expecting everyone to "geek-out". Granted, it worked on the Avengers, but these are different characters, and as often as the comparisons are made between the Justice League and the Avengers - the two teams are nowhere near the same.

We need a full immersion.
alucard365
alucard365 - 5/12/2012, 10:00 PM
I'll settle for a World Finest film, or even a Trinity film, a Justice League film is just to complicated.

fangz, i like your Wonder Woman being from another world, and not from earth idea, I always hated the paradise island on man's world idea.
beastwork
beastwork - 5/13/2012, 9:57 AM
All the Avengers lead in movies are pretty much disposable. They are summer popcorn fair, that's it. While enjoyable I feel no urge to watch any of them a second time around. Sure I've watched Iron Man a couple times on FX, but the tone of these movies simply makes them throw aways. I've watched TDK dozens of times and it never gets old to me. I would prefer to see more movies like TDK (or even the Spider man trilogy) than Thor or Captain America.

The Avengers movies have been essentially a series of wise cracks, flimsy love stories, and explosions. True story telling be damned
jayc1
jayc1 - 5/13/2012, 10:15 AM
@beastwork I agree with you about the marvel films. Although I liked them all I had no real desire to watch any of them a second time with exception to the incredible hulk. That is, until the Avengers came around. I think that's because of Josh Whedon more than anything.
DarthPrimus
DarthPrimus - 5/13/2012, 1:39 PM
Great editoral.

Since DC and WB are having trouble with introducing non-Batman and Superman characters to the silver screen, I suggest they do something that Marvel said they were planning on doing with lesser known characters (i.e. Luke Cage), and that's producing short films. DC and WB could make a 5 to 10 minutefilm of Wonder Woman, Aquaman, Flash, etc and feature those films before a Batman or Superman film. It would be a great way for them to introduce their characters, generate a buzz and get some feedback. This way DC and WB won't have to spend huge amounts of money on a full length film (low risk) and build a foundation for a huge pay out later.
beastwork
beastwork - 5/13/2012, 9:02 PM
@jayc1 I could be tempted to watch the Avengers again. I need a better look at the Hulk scenes. But what Avengers lacked in storytelling, it made up for it with its grand scale. It truly was an epic action movie. It had 3 acts and everything. My top 3 list is now Watchmen, TDK, Avengers
sikwon
sikwon - 5/16/2012, 2:19 PM
Im an admitted marvel fan, with the exception of batman (who i love) i just dont like many dc characters. My justice league issues are simple, super man is just to powerful. Seriously, its superman. Heros are ultimately judged by the threat that they overcome, the villan they defeat. Superman kind of takes that away. Hes friggen superman. Having said that i would absolutely love to see a justice league movie, because i enjoy sci fy, cbms, and just plain good entertainment. the xmen, while far from great (i personaly dont love any of the 3 and im a huge xfan) showed that you dont need single origin movies. they can follow a similar template and be succesful. The main thing, the absolute difference between a good cbm and a bad cbm is sticking somewhat close to the source material. Thats not for cbm fans, or comic fans, but because the material works and when you stray to far from it the audiance knows it. It dosent ring true. Thats true for casual fans, for people that go to the movie cause it looks cool as well as the hard core fans. Especially when it comes to dc most people are aware, on some level, of the heroes origins. To much change is bad. I mean look at the xmen, they watered wolverine down to the point ware he was unrecognizable to the comic beyond his hair and claws. I mean really, he got his name because hes short, hairy, wildly violent and unpredictable. Its a small thing, and while i like hugh jackman, the film removed many of the elements that make wolverine who he is. My thiking is this, if a character such as batman or wolverine is hugely popular for decades, theres a reason. Why mess with that reason? Something about that character connects with fans. Its when studios and storytellers start changing that, thats when they disconnect with the fans.
BlackPearl
BlackPearl - 6/14/2012, 3:59 PM

To allow The Justice League to stand out from the other excellent movies just made, "Avengers." One must take a reality check, knowing Batman Begins was excellent, Superman Returns and Wonder Woman played well in the 70's by Ms. Linda Carter, But a change is need in a positive direction, righteously speaking. I feel the chosen part for the The Justice League when it comes to Wonder Woman an "Amazon" should have an African American and/or and actress of African decent. She should be 5' 11" coco butter skin, jet black hair and of course Blue eyes, the reset of the packet will be express as Native African... This can bring Wonder woman to life Truly, That my reality check on this subject know go find her...

Enjoy!!!
View Recorder