THE ESSENTIAL COMIC BOOK MOVIES

THE ESSENTIAL COMIC BOOK MOVIES

The following is an editorial based on personal perception of the CBM's that are essential in expanding the genre.

Editorial Opinion
By MarVell - Aug 03, 2013 09:08 AM EST
Filed Under: Other
Source: ComicBookMovie.com

DISCLAIMER: This is not a top ten best CBM list. The films listed in this article are not in order by favorite. They're in chronological order.

SUPERMAN THE MOVIE (1978): The first in it's genre, Superman The Movie directed by Richard Donner set such a high standard of quality, even it's numerous follow-ups couldn't hold a candle to the original. No other CBM could compete with it's success for over a decade. Christopher Reeve delivered a legendary performance in the duel role, balancing physical comedy as Clark Kent with physical prowess as Superman masterfully. Reeve was as tailor fit for the role as the tight spandex out-fit he dons as The Man of Steel. Superman The Movie has the right blend of humor, drama and action that many films in the genre, new and old tried/try to achieve. Some more successful than others. Not only is Superman an essential part of CBM history but an important piece of cinema history as well and deserves to be respected as such.



BATMAN (1989): Eager to get out from under the looming shadow of the campy 1960's Batman television series. Director Tim Burton's dark visual sense was perfect for the more serious approach taken to re-introduce The Dark Knight to modern film audiences. The new approach paid off. Resulting in a phenomenon which rivaled the success to the original Superman film. Though initially fans were reluctant to accept Michael Keaton (a comedic actor) as Batman. Keaton managed to deliver a multi-layered performance, wining over most skeptics. Veteran actor Jack Nicholson is no stranger to being dealt roles that require him to play with less than a full deck (The Shinning). But his performance as Joker really personifies the expression "the bad guy you love to hate." Nicholson also succeeded in making the Clown Prince of Crime even more popular than ever before. Batman re-kindled an interest in a genre that was in danger of extinction.



X-MEN (2000): Before Fantastic Four and Avengers, the first ensemble cast to grace the silver screen in a superhero team film was X-Men. Director Bryan Singer's realistic take on mutant outcasts attempting to overcome persecution and prejudice, through peaceful co-existence was well received by audiences and film critics alike. An accessible socially relevant topic which successfully expanded the genre beyond it's core of fans. Professor Xavier's (Patrick Stewart) peaceful approach vs Magneto's (Ian McKellen) militant agenda is in essence the equivalent of Martin Luther King vs Malcolm X. Two men fighting for equality but choose different methods to achieve similar goals. Australian actor Hugh Jackman's spot-on performance of Wolverine has made him an international super-star. A role he recently reprized for the sixth time. Jackman has become as recognizable as his popular comic book counterpart. X-Men also paved the way for one of the best sequels in it's genre, X2: X-Men United.



SPIDER-MAN (2002): Marvel comics trademark character laid dormant in Hollywood hell for over a decade. But the turn of the century brought the success of X-Men. So the prospect of Spider Man becoming a fully realized cinematic experience was closer to fruition. Under the helm of visionary director Sam Raimi, Spider Man exploded onto theater screens, creating a big-bang, which currently continues to expand the genre. Though many films in the genre preceded Spider Man, it was a movie going experience that hadn't been achieved in the genre since the original Tim Burton directed Batman or director Richard Donner's Superman The Movie. Marvel comics film adaptations really started to snowball, building on Spider Man's momentum. Spider Man also laid the ground-work for it's superior sequel, which set the bar even higher than it predecessor.



SIN CITY (2005): Director Robert Rodredgeze's Sin City is the truest adaptation of a comic book ever produced on film. Also benefiting from the assistance of director Quentin Tarantino and Sin City comic book creator, writer/artist Frank Miller. Retaining all the dialog and visual tone of the graphic novels on which it's based, the film adaptation looses nothing in translation. The perfect transition from page to screen, Sin City is without a doubt the closest a comic book has ever come to coming to life. Sin City was essential in paving the way for direct adaptations such as director Zack Snyder's 300 and Watchmen. Though few film studios have attempted to translate page to screen, it's an endeavor that may prove to be box office gold. If studios such as Warner Bros produced a direct adaptation of one of the most revered graphic novels of all time,The Dark Knight Return (Frank Miller) they might revitalize the Batman franchise yet again. Or if 20th Century Fox produced a direct adaptation of Writer Chris Claremont & artist Frank Miller's Wolverine limited series, X-Men fans may actually rejoice and finally get the Wolverine film they've been waiting for.



THE DARK KNIGHT (2008): Batman Begins deserves all the credit for successfully rebooting the Batman franchise after the massive failure of director Joel Schumacher's ridiculously campy, Batman & Robin (1997). However, Batman Begin's sequel The Dark Knight, directed by Christopher Nolan would go on to be revered (arguably) as the greatest comic book movie of all time. It's main-stream accessibility along with it's Oscar worthy performance from The Late Great Heath Leadger, as Joker (Batman's arch-nemesis), drew attention to the genre like never before. The Dark Knight is essentially the God Father II of comic book movies! Not only is it one of the best in it's genre but also one of the best sequels to ever hit theater screens.



IRON MAN (2008): Under the helm of director John Favruea, Marvel Studios first official comic book movies jump-started the Marvel cinematic universe. With an after-credits scene featuring a cameo by an eye-patch sporting Sam Jackson as S.H.I.E.L.D Director Nick Fury, informing Iron Man of the Avengers initiative. Future Marvel films all strategically followed-suit with cameos, Easter eggs and after credits teasers. All accomplishing there goal. To excite and build anticipation of a big screen Mighty Marvel team-up! Tony Stark/Iron Man played exceptionally well by Robert Downey Jr. not only revitalized the actors career but breathed new life into one of Marvel comics second-tier characters. Catapulting shell-head into icon status, among fellow Marvel trade-mark heroes such as Spider-Man, Hulk and Wolverine.



X-MEN: FIRST CLASS (2011): The poor reception of X-Men III: The Last Stand and X-Men Origins: Wolverine seemed to be the end of what started out as a promising franchise. X-Men: First Class seemed like a lost cause. Early promotional footage didn't help fans from being skeptics either. However, upon it's release a buzz began to spread like wild-fire. Pessimists became optimists. Fans who condemned the film before it's release had to retract their negative, premature judgement. Despite it's two predecessors failure, director Mathew Vaughn and company successfully revitalized the X-Men franchise. Paving the way for future X-Men projects such as director James Mangold's The Wolverine and First Class' highly anticipated sequel, Days of Future Past, which will mark the return of original X-Men & X2: X-Men United director Bryan Singer.



AVENGERS (2012): Marvel Studios: Iron Man, Incredible Hulk, Thor and Captain America collectively laid the ground-work for assembling Earths mightiest heroes on the big-screen. The success of director Joss Whedon's Avengers brook new-ground, not only in the comic book movie genre but in cinema as well. By successfully translating the Marvel comics formula of heroes all existing in a shared universe to film. Other film studios such as 20th Century Fox (X-Men/Fantastic Four), are attempting to do the same. Though Marvel Studios was already giving DC/Warner Bros a run for their money against their power-house Batman franchise, the competition from Avengers kicked Warner Bros rears-into-gear to fast-track the prospect of a Justice League movie. A project that's been put on the back-burner due to box office flops such as Superman Returns and Green Lantern.



MAN OF STEEL (2013): Director Zack Snyder & writer David S. Goyer's modern, darker approach to DC Comics' most iconic and most recognizable Superhero, stirred-up quit a bit of controversy. The films third act is jammed-pact with scenes of excessive violence, leading-up to the films shocking end-game. Whether you agree with Man of Steel's final action sequence or not, by putting him in a no win scenario the film pushes the boundaries of one of the themes most commonly associated with Superman. His value and respect for all life and what he's willing to do in order to protect the innocent. Although, if you consider the devastation caused to Metropolis in the wake of Superman's battle with Zod and company the films message is a big contradiction. The main reason Man of Steel is featured on a list of essential comic book movies is it's success being essential to the foundation of the DC cinematic universe. Green-lighting the Batman vs Superman sequel to Man of Steel and hopefully the much talked about and anticipated Justice League film.



If I missed any films that you think are essential to the expansion to the genre, please feel free to sound off below. As if you need my permission. Thanks for reading.
LORD OF THE RINGS Filmmaker Sir Peter Jackson On Teaming With Colossal To Resurrect The Giant Moa (Exclusive)
Related:

LORD OF THE RINGS Filmmaker Sir Peter Jackson On Teaming With Colossal To Resurrect The Giant Moa (Exclusive)

X-MEN: AGE OF REVELATION Tie-Ins Reveal First Look At New Sabretooth, The Future X-Men Team, And More
Recommended For You:

X-MEN: AGE OF REVELATION Tie-Ins Reveal First Look At New Sabretooth, The Future X-Men Team, And More

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
aresww3
aresww3 - 8/3/2013, 9:43 AM
TASM is better than the old spiderman films, sorry.
Highflyer
Highflyer - 8/3/2013, 9:48 AM
I'm not sure about the avengers but I agree with everything else.
Highflyer
Highflyer - 8/3/2013, 10:03 AM
The Incredible Hulk movie is underrated as hell!
LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 8/3/2013, 10:05 AM
TASM sucks.
SCOURGE
SCOURGE - 8/3/2013, 10:21 AM
Superman 1
Batman 1
Blade 1
X-Men 1
Spiderman 1
Iron Man 1
Avengers 1
marvel72
marvel72 - 8/3/2013, 11:17 AM
superman the movie
batman
blade
x-men 2
spider-man 2
sin city
iron man
the dark knight
watchmen ultimate cut
the avengers
Lindsey35
Lindsey35 - 8/3/2013, 11:59 AM
TASM is better than all three of the Raimi movies.
no ha8, just the truth :3
TheRaven20
TheRaven20 - 8/3/2013, 12:05 PM
I like TASM better than Spider-man 1 but the vibe I got from this article is that they're essential cause they were ground breaking at the time so from a TASM fan's perspective I can see having Spider-man on the list and not TASM.
marvel72
marvel72 - 8/3/2013, 12:19 PM
right i'm gonna try this,now bare with me,here goes......

THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN IS BETTER THAN THE RAIMI SPIDER-MAN TRILOGY....

XD HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA sorry i tried but i just couldn't hold it in HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
tonytony
tonytony - 8/3/2013, 12:46 PM
Nice write up.agree with all this. You get a thumbs up.
r3negade
r3negade - 8/3/2013, 12:53 PM
You all can say what you want... But I agree with aresww3. The Amazing Spider-Man was better and I can't wait for number 2.

LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 8/3/2013, 12:59 PM
People think TASM is the best Spider-Man film?



LOL at people proclaiming that Batman Begins copycat film as the best Spider-Man movie. Yea a film where Spidey never comes out during the day is clearly the best Spidey film. A film with the Twilight romance is clearly the best Spidey film.

r3negade
r3negade - 8/3/2013, 1:07 PM
And you prefer this...

Ryagan
Ryagan - 8/3/2013, 1:13 PM
Aw, crap. I actually agree with Levi--again.

I have to ask, why do people think TASM was better than the original? Saying "it's closer to the comics" is a load of crap. And, sure, its tone is more serious, but that doesn't make it better or more mature.

Also, the villain's plan is laughably bad. A lizard cloud? Seriously? And let's not forgot that the movie is essentially a remake of the original, as opposed to the promised reboot. And being part of a new saga of movies is no excuse to have dangling plot points. The movie was advertised as "The Amazing Spider-Man," not "The Amazing Setup."

Good frick. Upon further analysis, TASM is a crap film.
r3negade
r3negade - 8/3/2013, 1:13 PM
You prefer that, over this?!?

LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 8/3/2013, 1:13 PM
Well certainly. At least you can hear and understand Peter unlike Andrew's mumbling.
LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 8/3/2013, 1:16 PM
No anthonyEstark

I prefer this over the crane scene:



In TASM, Peter only and only saves 2 people. Spider-Man saves 2 people in a [frick]ing film. That guy's kid and Gwen. Seriously?

I mean hell you have to admit, Peter in Spider-Man 02 saved way more people than Peter in TASM.
Ryagan
Ryagan - 8/3/2013, 1:16 PM
@anthonyEstark

That line may be ridiculously cheesy, but it's not as bad as this.

LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 8/3/2013, 1:19 PM
My only problems with the Spider-Man films is really the lack of originality. The 2 most groundbreaking CBMs in terms of solo are Batman Begins and Superman 78. No other origin CBM has been inspired by anything but one of those films.

Raimi used Donner's Superman influence which wasn't bad. Spider-Man does fit Superman more than Batman.

Webb used Nolan's Batman influence which has so far been terrible. I mean hell as much as I love Emma Stone, Gwen in TASM was terrible and hell Rachel in BB had a better and more interesting relationship with Bruce than Gwen and Peter did.

We need the next Spider-Man reboot to just drop everything and come up with something new.
Highflyer
Highflyer - 8/3/2013, 1:20 PM
@Levi, I don't think TAS is great either but I don't see how its like twilight. Peter doesn't stalk Gwen or watch her sleep. I don't see any similarity. And when Peter declares that he cant see gwen anymore, she doesn't jump off a cliff. I know you don't like TAS but come on.
Highflyer
Highflyer - 8/3/2013, 1:24 PM
@SpiderDan, REALLY? 'Its you who's out gobby... out of your mind!' (something only a power ranger would say) is better than 'But those are the best kind.'? I mean I love the first two spidey films but... seriously?
LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 8/3/2013, 1:28 PM
highflyer

Let me explain by the Twilight comparison. In TASM there is nothing deep or meaningful about Peter and Gwen's relationship. Why are they together? Because really the script calls for it. Rachel and Bruce were together in BB because they were childhood friends, Superman and Lois were together because Lois investigated and interviewed Superman (78 version), Peter and MJ were together because they were neighbors and knew each other.

With Gwen and Peter it's just a casual asking out. Then when they are together they don't really talk about anything of importance. They mainly just look cute together but that's it. Their relationship is just cute and nothing more. There needs to be a certain depth to it.

Also even at the end of the film we see Peter break his promise to Gwen's father and it seems like she's just ok with it.

Their relationship never had any development or anything. The only time it seemed alright was the dinner scene.
r3negade
r3negade - 8/3/2013, 1:35 PM
Look, I'm not saying Raimi's Spider-Man films are bad. I enjoy 1 & 2, (I even liked 3 a little bit,) but I still really enjoy TASM. One thing on Raimi's side is Jameson. He was the best Jameson you could ever have.

But this is wayyy worse than those are the best kind.
Lindsey35
Lindsey35 - 8/3/2013, 1:35 PM
All i see is a load of bull crap, Levitikuz. Please. Just take your Raimi garbage else where.

Lol.
Raimi series is "ok" but just "ok" it's full of cheese and reminds me of Superman Returns.

Yep. I just said that.
LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 8/3/2013, 1:37 PM
Well anthonyEstark, let's see how TASM3 goes before we bring in Spider-Man 3.

Sure SM3 sucks but comparing it to TASM or TASM2 isn't all that fair.
r3negade
r3negade - 8/3/2013, 1:37 PM
@Levi Ok, so Spider-Man saves Mary Jane once or twice and they're in love. That doesn't work either.
LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 8/3/2013, 1:38 PM
Bullcrap?

Lindsay35,

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/SoHelpYouGod/news/?a=73900#comments
LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 8/3/2013, 1:39 PM
anthonyEstark

But there's a difference. MJ and Peter grew up as neighbors. She was the popular girl at school that Peter knew. She was the girl that Peter never thought he could get. You have to focus on Peter and MJ and not Spider-Man and MJ.

With Gwen he asks her out then 3 days later her father dies to a Goomba.
r3negade
r3negade - 8/3/2013, 1:42 PM
@Levi Hey, at least TASM will most likely have the Sinister Six, unlike Spider-Man 1, 2, or 3. Plus, Spider-Man is fighting a heckuva lot more villains in this, unlike Tobey Maguire.
LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 8/3/2013, 1:43 PM
Yes because more villains is the solution. Just ask Spider-Man 3 & Batman & Robin.
r3negade
r3negade - 8/3/2013, 1:43 PM
@Levi Gwen and Peter went to School together.
MrCameron
MrCameron - 8/3/2013, 1:45 PM
Did this REALLY have to turn into a dick-measuring contest between the Webbheads (as in Marc Webb) and the Raimi hipsters?
MrCameron
MrCameron - 8/3/2013, 1:48 PM
And @LEVI

Seriously with the criticism of Peter and Gwen's relationship; they're freakin teenagers. Of course they're gonna act the way they do. You obviously don't know how they act IRL.
MrCameron
MrCameron - 8/3/2013, 1:50 PM
And let me tell you that Tobey Maguire was STIFF AS [FRICK] as both Peter Parker and Spider Man. Andrew was way more expressive.
r3negade
r3negade - 8/3/2013, 1:51 PM
@Levi More villains can be good, you just have to use them in the right way. In Batman and Robin, Joel Schumacher was trying to appeal more towards children, and he used his villains in a more fun way, or so he thought. And Spider-Man 3 may have been good if the original writer, Stan Lee, had stayed. But he left, and good ol' Sam Raimi decided to write it, and it flopped.
LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 8/3/2013, 1:55 PM
How is this Webb vs Raimi?

I haven't even insulted Webb. All I said was he used Nolan's Batmans for influence (which is fact) while Raimi used Donner (again fact).

Also this just teenager excuse is really getting old and is the only real defense to TASM like how the defense to Batman beating anyone is his belt.

No one questioned Peter in SM1 because he was a teen. No one questioned Clark saving a bus of kids because he was a kid.

This defense is getting really old.
LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 8/3/2013, 1:57 PM
Stan Lee didnt even write SM1 or 2 so where is its his fault SM3 failed because he didnt write it?
MrCameron
MrCameron - 8/3/2013, 2:00 PM
@ LEVI

What I meant was that this article was about essential CBMs and that it totally went off topic into a flame war between the Webbheads and Raimiites.
LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 8/3/2013, 2:05 PM
That's because TASM fans complain why it's not up there and SM1 is even though TASM didn't do anything to change or improve or do anything different to the CBM genre. It's impact is the same as The Incredible Hulk.

Hell you didn't hear me complain about no Hellboy up there.
1 2
View Recorder