Why Do Fanboys Turn Into Bigots When It Comes to CBM's?

Why Do Fanboys Turn Into Bigots When It Comes to CBM's?

Last Tuesday, I posted a fan cast for Sgt. Fury & the Howling Commandos. In that cast I suggested that one of them, Isadore, be cast as a woman. Of course, like suggesting anything different within the comic book community, the response was pretty negative.

Editorial Opinion
By canadianturd - May 18, 2010 04:05 PM EST
Filed Under: Other
Source: canadianturd

This isn't news to me or anything, I even joked to my buddy before posting that it was going to get negative responses. Like most people on here, I've read and posted on multiple forums like AICN and SSH. Also, I have been running a facebook Avengers page for the last two years (ever since The Incredible Hulk) so I knew what I was walking into when I made that post.

Back to my point, most of the out cry was over the fact that women didn't serve as soldiers during World War II and how dare I make such a historically inaccurate suggestion. First of all, yes, I am fully aware that women didn't serve in WWII, but we're not talking about THAT World War, we're talking about a fictional war LOOSELY based on the one that inspired Captain America. If you want historical accuracy, watch Band of Brothers or Saving Private Ryan because you're going to be sorely [frick]ing mistaken when you find out even Hitler won't even be in the movie. I realize he's a fan favourite for some of you.

Why couldn't it be plausable to have a few women who obtained superpowers much like their male counter parts? This is a comic book movie is it not? If I'm going to suspend disbelief to buy into Norse Gods, android human torches, Atlantean Royalty and Super Soldier Serum, I think I could stretch my imagination enough to see a woman serving her country in a fictional 1940's.

Yes, I've read some of the early Captain America comics (I'm a Brubaker man, myself) and no, I wouldn't expect to see Miss America is he bulky, pink, star-spangled costume or Whizzer's yellow spandex from head to toe. I'm saying, have at least a few nods to those characters who were popular back in the day. Make them first run S.H.I.E.L.D. agents with powers or something. Marvel doesn't have to cover the origins of every character they have!

Another thing that's bugged me since Daredevil is the stink people put up when regarding a race change and they usually always start off with "I'm not racist, but... (and then continues to ramble on about what if they made Blade white)" Guess what? You probably are racist. Michael Clarke Duncan was an awesome Kingpin, it's just too bad they had a hack director and a sh*tty studio behind it. I do hope that with Tom Rothman out of the picture, that Fox will successfully pull it's head out of it's ass. Probably not though. Sorry, I felt like I had to throw that in.

Most comic book fans had known about 8 years before Iron Man that Samuel L. Jackson was likely going to be the movie version of Nick Fury, so I don't understand how some people can still be up in arms about this. It's not a big deal. He's playing the exact same character from the comics. Nothing has really changed other than that one arbitrary thing. He is Nick Fury! Granted, I will say that Nick Fury in Iron Man 2 didn't blow me away but in all honesty, it's easy to criticize when we haven't seen him in action yet.

But no matter what colour Nick Fury is, it's still unfathomable as to why he would be given a gun. The man's lack of depth perception should automatically disqualify him from active duty, let alone leading an entire squad. Forget the fact that he's black the mother[frick]er has ONE EYE!

I guess the point was to say, in this universe anybody can do anything. It just needs to look plausable when they do it. There is nothing reality-based about these movies, people should not take everything so seriously and calm the [frick] down when it comes to changes in comic book movies. Especially before anything is even announced, let alone filmed.

Holiday Gift Guide 2024 - Essentials From Disney, Jakks Pacific, LEGO, Universal, & More
Related:

Holiday Gift Guide 2024 - Essentials From Disney, Jakks Pacific, LEGO, Universal, & More

A BARBIE Sequel May Be In The Works At Warner Bros. - Will Margot Robbie And Ryan Gosling Return?
Recommended For You:

A BARBIE Sequel May Be In The Works At Warner Bros. - Will Margot Robbie And Ryan Gosling Return?

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
Scarface
Scarface - 5/18/2010, 5:25 PM
Yes your right changes in CBM,s are great remember
X-Men origins wolverine.
I,m racist for not liking Deadpool too or is that OK cause you probably did not like it either.
I like my characters the way they were meant to be, not the way you think they should be or what directors and writers think they should be.
If that makes me racist then so be it.
For the record african americans were not allowed to fight in war, they built roads and bridges, fed the troops and did pretty much every menial job there was.
Women were not treated with a whole lot more respect then either.
So your scenarios to me are not plausable,so to you I,m a bigot.
Well to me you have a communists attitude, agree with me or I,ll punish you.
Be careful when you start calling people bigots and racists, I am neither but by your logic I am
TheDurkinKnight
TheDurkinKnight - 5/18/2010, 7:56 PM
Okay Canadianturd...are you Canadian? Just curious. First let me say that I agree with you to an extent. When changes are made to peripheral characters such as gender and race, then people really need not lose sleep over it. Diversity is good where the opportunity exists to provide it. That said, when a central character is arbitrarily changed by their gender or more recently race there are at least two reasons I can think of as to why it may anger some.

1. Because people don't like any more change to a character than absolutely necessary. For instance when Spider-Man got the organic web shooters in the first film, people were angry, because they felt the change unnecessary. If a formula is proven there is very little reason to stray. It's only when movie makers first started to realize this did we see a sustainable comicbook movie industry, with Blade and then X-Men. Respect the source material.

2. As far as race goes (and this is partly why I asked if you were from Canda) the topic is highly divisive in America. It is the unofficial policy of our society to perpetually say we're sorry for wronging minorities, primarily blacks. The slightest mistake of wording leads to accusations of racism (look at what YOU just said for instance).

The ugly secret is this: America has risen to a point of racial tolerance. It's probably as good as it will ever get and the pendulum is begining to swing the other way. Not all whites will give all blacks/hispanics a fair shake, and vice-versa. However We have a black president, affirmative action, black holidays and scholarships, and we have a whole [frick]ing STATE being condemned for trying to do something about it's influx of illegal immigrants.

One of the sad results of all the apologies are to try to make things more "black-oriented" and for me, that is not acceptable if it's merely done for its own sake. You're right, Michael Clarke Duncan was GREAT as Kingpin, however he was simply the best man for the role, no questions asked. But when movie makers begin talking about casting Will Smith as Superman (yes they did) that's outright ridiculous. You have to understand both sides.

Btw, Scarface, blacks did fight...Tuskegee Airmen dude.
TheDurkinKnight
TheDurkinKnight - 5/18/2010, 9:02 PM
Ugh, Gtrman...dude!
SHHH
SHHH - 5/18/2010, 9:37 PM
wouldn't wanna hurt anyone felings...

@scarface: For the record african americans were not allowed to fight in war, they built roads and bridges, fed the troops and did pretty much every menial job there was.

That is wrong Heard of tuskegee airmen...
Upupandaway
Upupandaway - 5/18/2010, 9:44 PM
@TheDurkinKnight's first post- Agreed. I think it's, also, a good idea to dig into the mythology for diversity. (i.e. include Battlestar in a Cap movie or Goliath in an Ant-Man movie) But, really, it's all about the end product. A good movie is a good movie no matter what.

@Scarface-Even if African Americans didn't fight in WWII (which they did), neither did a super soldier in red, white, and blue tights. I think that's kind of @canadianturd's point.
selinakyle
selinakyle - 5/18/2010, 9:48 PM
oh boy...im not touching this one. not in the mood to be called racist.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 5/18/2010, 9:49 PM
I'm too tired to get into this.. good article though!
ZombieOverEasy
ZombieOverEasy - 5/18/2010, 9:54 PM
@TheDurkinKnight
I agree with some of what you said, but you used Blade as an example of respecting the source material. There were more liberties taken with Blade (improvements in my mind) than many of the comic book movies that followed. Unless I'm totally mistaken, which is possible.

Seems everyone's more focused on the "racist" comment of this article than what Candianturd is really trying to get-at. Fanboys are so afraid of change (minor and major) that they damn a movie/character before they've even seen what the change may bring or what can be brought to the table by it.

I understand people want the source material honored as much as possible, but sometimes you find that certain changes work out for the better in the long run or even short run if people would have open minds.

The movie industry isn't in this game for fan service, they're here to make money. So if changing the race of a character might put more asses in the seats or if giving Peter Parker organic web-shooters will save the complications and general confusion of explaining non-organic web-shooters, then that's what will be done.

It's just not realistic to expect an exact adaptation, close, but never exact. It's NOT just our precious funny books that get changed, every source material is altered in some way to broaden the audience. If we're given a good picture regardless of change, I'll go see it.

Will Smith as Superman? He's a good actor. I'd watch that any-day over Superman: "Watch Superman stalk Louis and lift heavy things for 3 hours".

I think fans should head more who's at the reigns instead of who's playing their favorite hero. If you have a shit director or a shit writer even if they cast it perfectly, it'll still suck hard. I felt Wolverine had the perfect cast walking in, but it was the story that failed us, not the performances or casting.

I suppose I understand both sides of the coin, but I have more of an open mind than most. To each his own, but I think people could stand to at least give things a chance from time to time instead of instantly damning it.
Upupandaway
Upupandaway - 5/18/2010, 9:57 PM
@MsKyle08- Racist! ; )
SHHH
SHHH - 5/18/2010, 9:57 PM


contrast
contrast - 5/18/2010, 10:00 PM
I feel that since I was the one who brought up the historical inaccuracy, quite a bit of this is directed at me. However...I loved Michael Clark Duncan as Kingpin (You're right about the director being a hack)

If you'll recall, I didn't say that Nick Fury shouldn't be black, I just said it's sort of historically problematic (oh, but excuse me, you don't care about history...because there are robots. Yeah, that makes sense. because if one thing about the world is somewhat fantastical, everything has to be just as peculiar.) I even went so far as to say that the best way to maintain continuity (by allowing Fury to be in WWII and be played by Sam Jackson) was to make the Howling Commandos a Tuskeegee Airmen-type group, meaning they would all be African American. Yeah...clearly that's racism.

In all honesty, I'm not a big fan of Fury being "immortal" in the films, as I think that's somewhat of a needless stretch. I wish they'd just take a page from THEHAWK's Nick Fury fanfic and set the escapades of the Howling Commandos in a more recent (but still not current) war. That way we could have a fully integrated force without there being anything to complain about history-wise.

On a final note, regarding historical accuracy...within the existing movies, we are led to believe that the things these people do (i.e. Tony Building the arc reactor "IN A CAVE...

WITH A BOX OF SCRAPSSSSS!!!!")

...are not normal occurances, meaning that their world at least somewhat resembles our own.

Ah, well, I may not agree with your article, but at least it's well-written. So, you've got that going for you. (I'm sure you're so glad you got my ringing endorsement... heh)
selinakyle
selinakyle - 5/18/2010, 10:05 PM
:( @ Upupandaway
SlurpeeGuy
SlurpeeGuy - 5/18/2010, 10:05 PM
1) If you want a woman with powers fighting in the war why not go with Spitfire as a part of the Invaders? It fits the movie and marvel history.
2) And why can't Hitler be in the movie? He is a marvel character after all. He just goes by the title "Hate Monger" now.
3) Since people want more racial diversity in CBMs, I always thought they should have cast a minority as the Joker. No one could argue too much on that one.
4) would you back people wanting to cast a white actor as a black character? It has to go both ways, otherwise its just as racist.
5) If anyone is keeping count...I AM CANADIAN!
Upupandaway
Upupandaway - 5/18/2010, 10:06 PM
@contrast-I don't think this is directed at you. I've seen some posts at other sites (some that he mentions) that are downright horrible.

@MsKyle08- I'm just joking based on your last post. No harm meant.
selinakyle
selinakyle - 5/18/2010, 10:09 PM
LOL i know dude. :)
contrast
contrast - 5/18/2010, 10:23 PM
Also, I will admit, I did laugh out loud when you pointed out that Fury should have never been given a gun because he's got no depth perception... And for some reason, I'd never thought about that before...
Upupandaway
Upupandaway - 5/18/2010, 10:24 PM
See what happens when we all get along:

Shadowelfz
Shadowelfz - 5/18/2010, 10:39 PM
good article, Canadianturd. It takes alot of gumption to step out and say something like that. I used to make these kind of points before, but over time got tired of arguing with people. Truth is, people just dont like change. They hate it. Even small, menial changes can cause controversy. But... not everyone is like that. Some people dont care about a characters race/ gender/ species ect. Some just like a good, well-written character with a good story regardless of changes from source material. After all, the Ultimates were very popular (until all the writting and plots went to shite), and for everyone who hated Fury or Kingpin being black, there are just as many who thought they were well done.

Everyone here is just expressing their opinions, and until someone says something that really is racist, or attacks another poster for their own opinions, theres nothing wrong with that, know what I mean?
Blackcat14
Blackcat14 - 5/18/2010, 10:48 PM
There are some racist on this board, and they all showed up and put on their white hoods and sheets when posting about Idris Ebla taking that part in Thor. There has been other instances of racist talk on this board concerning casting in some post.
Gose
Gose - 5/18/2010, 10:59 PM
its not about being a bigot, its really after all those years reading all these comic books since your 1st copy when one learns to read, its just not what ones expectation in their movie versions .....
Ranger14
Ranger14 - 5/18/2010, 11:17 PM
Blackcat14@ Umm....just because someone wants Heimdall in Thor being cast as a white actor as opposed to black does not make them racist. I am so tired of people playing the race card, just because they disagree with a casting decision based on their interpretation of the source material.
blankofthedead
blankofthedead - 5/18/2010, 11:21 PM
ITS JUST MOVIES!!!
people arent racists or biggots.. theyre just fans.. its wanting the source material to match the movie.. unfortunatley if someone complained about a race change,.. they are suddenly a racists, but if the race change if from black to white.. well then you can complain all ya want and its ok. Equality will never exist unfortunately
MisterD
MisterD - 5/18/2010, 11:46 PM
1) I hesitate to call anyone racist. I know they are out there, even if they don't realize it, but it is also, I think, poor form to lump a group of people into that category without first checking to see if there are less heinous motives at play.

2) Comic fans have waited a long, long time for this. I've been waiting over 3 decades to see a Green Lantern film, or Captain America, or Iron Man, etc. Hollywood is only just getting to the point where they can bring these characters to the screen, and as such we really, really want them to do it right.

Now you must know that fans of ANY body of work tend to have fits when even minor changes are made. There are still LOTR fans who hate the fact that the movies omitted any material and ran less than 40 hours. These may be the minority, but they are a very vocal minority. Most of us understand some changes are needed, and indeed, I think Iron Man and XMen and made some significant improvements on the comics. However, in the end, comics are a visual medium. We want our characters to look like our characters. No one would have been happy to see Iron Man in blue and white armor, and its not because we're anti-semetic.

Similarly, its hard to justfiy a change of ethnicity as something that is actually necessary, save for marketing or political purposes. If a change is going to be made, please for the love of God have a good rationale for doing it.

For example, Michael Clarke Duncan was a great idea for Kingpin, and he could epitomize the character better than most fat white guys (or skinny white guys in a fat suit). Now if they tried "pimping up" Kingpin, that's another matter.

Similarly 6'+ Hugh Jackman was terrific in the role of 5'3" Wolverine. Not a change in race, but fans bitched anyway. But he could do the role, and brilliantly, and so the issue of size was quickly forgotten.

Along these lines, I love the idea of Daniel Dae Kim as Namor. Other than the eyes and skin tone, he looks the part - muscular body, but not overly so, and strong chiseled features. Best of all, he can actually act. I can picture this Namor more than one played by Shia Labouf, Jet Li, or Will Smith. None of them look the part, no matter their race.

At the same time, there are some characters that would be changed if the race was altered. That is especially true for the "ethnic" characters (Luke Cage, Black Panther, Shang Chi etc) because they were specifically created around their ethnicity.

Most of the white characters (Peter Parker, Bruce Wayne, etc), ethnicity wasn't an issue, but in some cases the change would matter.

Look at Frank Miller's Batman screenplay - he changed Alfred to "Big Al" a black, urban, auto mechanic. Clearly that completely changes the character as fans know him. One day, we may be more open to such changes, but for now, leave the Elseworlds and AllStar stories in the comics.

Another example is Iron Fist, a character many (clueless) fans say could be Asian. But that misses the pointof the character, who was supposed to be an "outsider." Technically you could do that with an asian, but thematically and visually it will work better if the character is white, or black or just plain "not asian."

Captain America is another one. As long as one is sticking with the WW2 origin, no one will believe that the US was using a black man (or Asian, Jewish, etc) as their poster boy. Blue eyes and blonde hair are more negotiable.

I don't even want to touch on the gender issue - I think it is blatantly obvious thata change in gender is even greater than a change in race. If you are completely reimagining the franchise, ala Battlestar Galactica, and changing almost every thing, that's another matter.

And this brings me to

3) Suspension of Disbelief. SoD is a fragile thing. It is a contract between artist and audience. The audience will have some preconditional expectations walking into the theater, things that they set aside the moment they bought the ticket. But that is very limited in scope - it doesn't give the filmmaker carte blanche.

Walk into a Superman movie, you are accepting flight, super strength, etc. But once you have "turn back time" and "amnesia kiss" powers, the audience rolls its eyes.

We'll be fine with aliens in an alien invasion film, but will raise holy hell if the green men find their way into a Bond film.

We'll accept giant transforming alien robots, but won't accept that a giant battle in downtown LA was not seen, recorded, and YouTubed, allowing a near complete government cover up.

Similarly, we'll accept a man wrapped in a flag and chainmail beating the Nazis armed only with a shield. But we won't accept that a woman stood by his side, or that people of that time accepted blacks as their equals. We know what things were like then. It is too ingrained in too many of us. Ignore those ugly issues, and you may as well toss in a cell phone and a lap top.

Now you bring up the idea of a super powered woman. That's a different thing. We saw several female superheroes in WW2. You want to toss in Spitfire and Miss America fine. Beggars can't be choosers and super powers aren't easy to come by, so one can believe a powered female would be used. But that's not the Howling Commandos,who were just soldiers.
MisterD
MisterD - 5/18/2010, 11:47 PM
BTW - I love Idris Elba, so I'm really curious to see him as Heimdall. But its going to be very hard for Brannagh to convince me he's nordic.
contrast
contrast - 5/19/2010, 12:00 AM
@MisterD-- You know, it would be absolutely wonderful if you would just minorly expand on the ideas you posted in your comment, and turned it into a counter-article.

I think you're the first of us to actually voice all (or if not all, then most) of the logical reasons for fan displeasure at changes such as these. I also applaud you for figuring out a way to explain why just because a film has "Super Soldier Serum and Android Human Torches", we shouldn't throw reality out the window entirely.
loki668
loki668 - 5/19/2010, 12:01 AM
I have no problem with them creating interesting ORIGINAL characters for actors of all colors but, by and large, simply changing an established character into one of another race is lazy. Nick Fury was already established as an African-American in the Ultimate line of Marvel and I thought that Daredevil was so piss poor that Michael Clarke Duncan was the only bright spot in that crapfest. My problem is taking an original character like Blue Beetle, Wildcat, and Firestorm and killing them off just to change their ethnicity. I realize that I'm talking about comics but this is just a cheap token gesture towards diversity. Rather than creating an interesting and original character, an original character is killed off and turned into a caricature of another ethnicity (complete with *in*appropriate slang). It's not bigotry to call attention to this and to argue against it. It is, however, asinine to make a blanket statement about an entire category of people simply because your idea was not immediately embraced. That kind of generalization lacks maturity and/or intelligence. I'll leave you to decide which.
Scarface
Scarface - 5/19/2010, 3:37 AM
DurkinKnight I stand corrected. I hate not heard of the tuskegee airmen. I will look it up tonight after work, you sir have caught my interest with this.
I am from canada and very little of the americans part in the war was taught to us.
I apologize for this, but other then these airmen what I said is not real far from the truth.

SHHH way to regurgitate what DurkinKnight said a few comments earlier you are indeed clever.

I just don,t like being called a bigot for not agreeing with something or someone.
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 5/19/2010, 3:52 AM
Well written article but I dont think that people wanting to see these characters portrayed as they are in the comic books makes them either a bigor or racist!

Personally, I dont have a problem with SLJ as Fury because it's at least based on a comic book version of the character.

However, I dont think it would be good to start a trend of changing sex and race with the characters in these movies because I know that I dont want to end up seeing a white Luke Cage or female Iron Fist! ;)

Scarface: Hey genius, before you start being rude to people (something that I know you're a fan of) did you consider that SHHH didnt see TheDurkinKnight's comment before he replied to you?
Blackcat14
Blackcat14 - 5/19/2010, 3:55 AM
It wasn't just disagreeing with the change in a character it was the content in comments that showed it was a little deeper than that. No one was is playing the the race card, just calling a spade a spade, anyone reading those post would have thought those were racist views.
Most of those comic books were created during a time when everyone was not viewed as being created equal and the comic books reflect that by the characters. And when someone tries to show some diversity by reflecting change in the time, people are stuck in time and their true colors come out.
contrast
contrast - 5/19/2010, 4:35 AM
@Blackcat14-- but the thing is, at least in regards to this, it's not that people are "stuck in time", but that the events and characters are set in a racially insensative time... Not saying you couldn't have a Captain America movie with a diverse cast, but you'd certainly have to stretch a little more to explain why a margenally above average military unit was fully integrated at least twenty years prior to any other military unit.

I'm aware of there being other occasions when people make statements that could seem racist (although, about Heimdall, though I'm sure Elba will do a good job, Heimdall is actually described as being the "whitest" of the gods...which makes it seem like Ken Branaugh was just being hilariously sarcastic when he made that casting choice) But this article actually came about, as CT mentioned, because of a fan cast of the Howling Commandos he did. I commented about the lack of integration during that time period, and that something should be done in order to explain/fix it, and also complained about the fact that he changed the gender of a character without giving any explanation (and when he did, it wasn't really that informative. It essentially added up to "because I wanted a woman on the team.") After that, he commented back that I was being ridiculous because I wanted the films to be at least somewhat grounded in reality (to the extent that the previously released Marvel Studios films have been.)

The reason I bring this up is to explain why it wasn't really racism, in that instance, that even sparked the argument, because, as I said above, it's not that people are "stuck in time", it's because the characters they're arguing about are in a time that wouldn't allow such a thing.
jazzman
jazzman - 5/19/2010, 4:45 AM
@Scarface

African Americans fought in WWII do your research.

@blankofthedead

some are racist not fans in the thread "Vincenzo Natali Shows Interest in an Alpha Flight Movie" the username Canknucklehead was attacking Native American. even MultiPurposePoni had to step in.

even another thread "Captain America casting - No Need to Fret!" another user said some racist comments about John Krasinski when he was rumored to be Cap. the user was attacking him saying Cap should not be Jewish. these type of people aint fans but racist and bigots.

@contrast

Howling Commandos does not have to be a all African American unit cause they are a integrated unit in the first place in the comics. it had a African American, Jewish American, defector from Nazi Germany soldiers part of Howling Commandos.

Kevin Feige from day one said about WWII its going to be Marvel version of WWII so it wont be historical accuracy at the end of the day.

we seen movies that aint historical accuracy in cinema already i.e. Churchill: The Hollywood Years, Inglourious Basterds, etc.

contrast
contrast - 5/19/2010, 5:01 AM
@jazzman-- I'm fully aware of all of the members of the Howling Commandos, including Gabe Jones, who is both African American, and a member of the WWII team. Two things to note, however, are that Howling Commandos weren't created until the 60s (and was somewhat more open to a multicultural membership due to it not actually being published in the 40s). The other thing to note is that I actually responded to these things on CT's fan cast... I could see Jones being in the unit, because he's the best there is at what he does...but there is no way in high hell that the 1940s U.S. military, fictional or otherwise, would allow a black man to lead a predominantly white unit at that time...

Also, about your Inglourious Basterds comment, I actually mentioned them, as well. I said that I enjoyed the movie, and wasn't looking for 100% historical accuracy, but that it would be idiotic to do a movie set in WWII and ignore any of the things we know about it. I mean, "Basterds" is a fictional story that kills Hitler in a non-historically accurate way, but the movie doesn't ignore the other aspects of the time. In fact, doesn't it deal with racism? If I'm remembering correctly, the only one that doesn't hate the projectionist because he's black is Shoshana (sp?)...

And in all honesty, I really hope Feige was kidding about the Marvel version of WWII, because the Marvel (Timely) version would piss so many people off with its buck-toothed and fanged Japanese... No, I'm not kidding. Look it up. That's what they printed in WWII...

also, funny side-note about Krasinski... he's not even Jewish, so that antisemetic mouth-breather shouldn't have had any problem... Also, ironic that this anti-semite (sp?) in question was a fan of Captain America's, considering that Joe Simon and Jack Kirby (Cap's creators) were both Jewish...
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 5/19/2010, 5:28 AM
so i'm a bigot for wanting my Captain America white, and my Luke Cage black??? huh, thats interesting...i thought it was because i wanted the movies to resemble the characters they're based off of.

thanks for shedding some light on the fact that i am, indeed, a racist. i guess you're never too old to learn things about yourself, huh?
jazzman
jazzman - 5/19/2010, 5:32 AM
@contrast

actually Feige was not kidding about the Marvel version of WWII cause he did say it in a interview on Comingsoon.net. he only mean that the History will not be the same since we have superheroes in WWII.

"fictional or otherwise, would allow a black man to lead a predominantly white unit at that time..." - it should not matter if a black man lead the unit cause it is fictional comic book movie that is based on WWII. Howling Commandos can be unit that History never want to mention who was lead by a black man.

also i guess you have not seen Churchill: The Hollywood Years it had a black man leading white soldiers. its was fictional comedy WWII movie but still.

i know Krasinski is Jewish that racist user was an idiot i could not believe that user at all.

heres the audio of Kevin Feige saying its Marvel version of WWII

Kevin Feige interview

@CorndogBurglar

he was not really talking about characters like Captain America and Luke Cage. his talking about supporting characters that have changed race i.e. Kingpin, Agent Zero, etc

jazzman
jazzman - 5/19/2010, 5:49 AM
@teabag

u like bollocks i thought u like boobs lol
DDD
DDD - 5/19/2010, 5:59 AM
This is ridiculous!

People were not contrary to a woman being a soldier.
Nowadays they are pretty much on equal ground in the
military. People, I was one, didn't like the idea of
rewriting history so badly as to make the truth of
WWII unrecognizable! There were absolutely no U.S. women in
combat in WWII! NONE, 0! To put a woman in
combat in WWII in a story is so wrong as to be a mean lie!
That is rewriting history too much!

It's not racism or bigotry! It is only a matter of the
facts! That is a fact that is too well-known and true
to change just so you could put a woman in the Howling
Commandos to be PC! It is a ludicrous idea because it
is against the persona of The Howling Commandos who had
to be all men because of the rule of no women in combat!

Don't screw with the truth! U.S. Men back in WWII felt
women should not be in battle because they bear children
and are mothers who should stay with the kids
while the men fight the enemy! That was an American
attitude back then! It was quite chauvinistic but it is the
absolute truth and fact!

In ancient times a lot of women were warriors. Wives and
sisters who fought along side their husbands and
brothers to defend their land. From the land of the Kelts
(Irish, Scotts, Welsh and Gaelic Bretons) to
the Norse country and clear in Japan and China.

But in WWII USA military women did not go into battle,
period! It's almost believable that a black man would be in
the Howling Commandos 'cause there were the Tuskegee
Airmen so in the 60's when Gabe was put in there
it slid by! But there were no women anywhere near anything
battlewise, not ANY COMBAT! It is just
absolutely moronic to try and say otherwise!

This was not and is not a racism or bigotry matter!
It's a screwing TOO MUCH with history matter!
WAY TOO MUCH!!! It's simply ludicrous!

The same with Nick Fury! It's screwing too much with
Marvel history to make Nick Fury African American.
The real Nick Fury is Caucasian! He took a serum that
extremely slows his aging so he is the same Nick Fury
of the Howling Commandos as the Nick Fury who heads
S.H.I.E.L.D. He has been that same Nick Fury for decades
until just recently when he was erroneously
made a totally different dude because of the stupid
Ultimates! DAMM I HATE THE ULTIMATES FOR THIS VERY
THING! SCREWING TOO MUCH WITH MARVEL HISTORY!

It's not a race thing or sex thing it's a Marvel
history thing! Making Nick Fury someone else is
a DAMM LIE! Making Steve Rogers a big goofy looking
guy with big ears and nose is a DAMM LIE! I HATE
LIES!

IT'S NOT A DAMM RACISM/BIGOTRY THING AT ALL!

DDD
DDD - 5/19/2010, 6:15 AM
It would be OK to have a U.S. woman who was a spy
in the Howling Commandos but to have a U.S. woman
soldier is just a damm lie! It's screwing too much
with history!

You could have a French woman fighting in the underground
or a German woman fighting against
the Nazis (there were a bunch of German women
who did that very thing) but not a U.S. female
soldier in the Howling Commandos. That is total
BS!!!!

1 2 3
View Recorder