Avatar: James Cameron Breaks Silence On Making Sequels "In Half The Time For Two-Thirds The Cost"

Avatar: James Cameron Breaks Silence On Making Sequels "In Half The Time For Two-Thirds The Cost"

Filmmaker James Cameron has broken his silence on reports that Disney wants to make future Avatar movies "cheaper and shorter," and seems surprisingly open to the idea of changing his approach.

By JoshWilding - May 16, 2026 10:05 AM EST
Filed Under: Avatar
Source: Empire (via SFFGazette.com)

Avatar: Fire and Ash grossed $1.4 billion worldwide last December. However, after the record-breaking success of Avatar ($2.9 billion) and Avatar: The Way of Water ($2.3 billion), the threequel was deemed to have underperformed.

After all, the third chapter cost $350 million to shoot and an additional $150 million to market. Fire and Ash did turn a modest profit, but we've since learned that Disney is concerned about continuing to invest in the sci-fi franchise due to potentially diminishing returns. 

Last month, it was reported that, while the House of Mouse isn't giving up on Pandora, conversations are ongoing about how to make future Avatar movies "cheaper and shorter." 

The idea is that, by doing so, they would be a less risky investment. Everyone has been wondering how filmmaker James Cameron feels about it, and we finally have our answer.

"You know, I’ll be doing some writing. I’ve got a number of projects that I’m cooking," the filmmaker told Empire (via SFFGazette.com). "And 'Avatar 4' and '5' are still floating out there. We’re going to be looking at some new technologies to try to do them more efficiently. Because they’re hideously expensive and take a long time."

"I want to do them in half the time for two-thirds of the cost. That’s my metric," Cameron added, suggesting he's on board with Disney's plans for the franchise. "And so it’s going to take us a year or so to figure out how to do that."

So, the creative clash many felt would lead to the director parting ways with Disney isn't currently on the cards. That will come as a relief to Avatar fans, but the fourth chapter arriving in theaters on December 21, 2029, doesn't seem likely. Whether shorter runtimes are a possibility is TBD.

It's previously been reported that around 22% (a surprisingly specific number) of the fourth chapter is already in the can. And, while Cameron enlisted Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver to write the second and third movies, he tasked Josh Friedman and Shane Salerno with shaping the fourth and fifth chapters.

Despite that, it sounds like Cameron is taking Pandora back to the drawing board, and that's going to take some time. Previously, it's been said that the next instalments are "said to be as radically different from 'Avatar: Fire and Ash' as 'Star Wars' was from 'The Empire Strikes Back.'" 

Last year, Cameron shared his take on the Avatar franchise's future when he said, "This can be the last one. There’s only one [unanswered question] in the story. We may find that the release of Avatar 3 proves how diminished the cinematic experience is these days, or we may find it proves the case that it’s as strong as it ever was — but only for certain types of films."

"It’s a coin toss right now. We won’t know until the middle of January," he continued. "I feel I’m at a bit of a crossroads. Do I want it to be a wild success — which almost compels me to continue and make two more Avatar movies? Or do I want it to fail just enough that I can justify doing something else?"

Right now, it seems Avatar and Cameron are at a crossroads. Stay tuned for updates.

About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
Comic Book Reader. Film Lover. WWE and F1 Fan. Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and ComicBookMovie.com's #1 contributor.
James Cameron & Disney Are Being Sued By Actress Q’orianka Kilcher For Unauthorized Use Of Her Likeness
Related:

James Cameron & Disney Are Being Sued By Actress Q’orianka Kilcher For Unauthorized Use Of Her Likeness

Avatar 4 Will Be A Whole Different Story And Feature A Time Jump - If James Cameron Returns To Helm It
Recommended For You:

Avatar 4 Will Be A Whole Different Story And Feature A Time Jump - If James Cameron Returns To Helm It

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

MrDandy
MrDandy - 5/16/2026, 10:28 AM
Half the time? Way of Water and Fire and Ash both were shot back to back and took over a decade to make. How much time did he want??

Off topic, just realized when you put the two sequel titles together like that, they sound like a Pokémon game.
JonAwesome
JonAwesome - 5/16/2026, 9:56 PM
@MrDandy - I kinda like that! The Way of Water, Fire & Ash.
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 5/16/2026, 10:29 AM
so like most industries, he'll bee using more AI

User Comment Image
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 5/16/2026, 10:29 AM
I got off the Avatar train after the first one didn’t move me, but you have to hand it to James Cameron, he’s always looking to push the envelope when it comes to his craft and technology. He really seems to be a forward thinker and innovator. Or maybe he’s Steve Jobs and just tells people what to do. Idk.
LSHF
LSHF - 5/16/2026, 10:49 AM
@MyCoolYoung - I saw the first one five times at the theater, but it was ONLY because of how good the 3D looked.

If the rest of the industry had made 3D films look that good, that "gimmick" would have been more successful.

I had seen about thirty movies in 3D at the theaters, but most of them didn't look good enough to be worth the extra ticket cost.
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 5/16/2026, 10:50 AM
@LSHF - lol I only saw it once in theaters. I don’t remember the 3d but I definitely don’t understand 3d as a whole. I’m so glad my imax theater separated from making us see imax 3d movies.
LSHF
LSHF - 5/16/2026, 12:55 PM
@MyCoolYoung - For me, in the beginning of the film when that sleeping pod opened up with the Marine character in it, and behind his pod was a a long tube of more sleeping pods, it looked liked the screen was actually a giant (this was an IMAX screen) opening that I could just leave my seat and walk through.

It didn't look flat, it looked instead like a giant window that made everything seem more real (as opposed to a flat screen).

When 3D is done properly (like James does), it makes everything seem more realistic, thus drawing me into the story even more.

A so-so comparison might be the difference of listening to the movie in mono at the front of the theater as opposed to surround sound, with planes flying over your head and sounds coming from different angles (which makes it sound more realistic, thus drawing a viewer into the story more).

But most directors didn't film in 3D (which is millions of dollars cheaper and far less time consuming than doing 3D after filming), so it was RARELY impressive looking and wasn't worth the extra money for millions of people, who gave up on it.

I'd seen more than fifty 3D films, and only about a dozen of them was worth it.

I hope that helps explain it some.

Hollywood failed the entire plan to draw more people into the theaters. Failed.
LSHF
LSHF - 5/16/2026, 2:29 PM
@MyCoolYoung - In short, if done properly, 3D looks like I'm watching it in real life instead of a flat screen.
philinterrupted
philinterrupted - 5/16/2026, 9:44 PM
@MyCoolYoung - I got off the avatar train during the first one…
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 5/16/2026, 11:32 PM
@LSHF - lol which ones were you impressed with?
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 5/16/2026, 11:58 PM
@philinterrupted - that’s insane lol
LSHF
LSHF - 5/17/2026, 12:53 PM
@MyCoolYoung - In no particular order (except for Avatar), these are the ones I've seen that made the best use of the 3D technology:

- Avatar
- Immortals
- Doctor Strange
- Guardians of the Galaxy
- Guardians of the Galaxy 2
- Dredd
- Gravity (IMAX)
- Godzilla (IMAX)
- Creature From the Black Lagoon
- Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets
- Ghostbusters (2016)

There are others that are probably better (from the 3D reviews I've read), but I haven't seen them.

Only two or three of these were actually filmed in 3D, and those are the best looking ones (that look more realistic). The list didn't include animated films.
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 5/21/2026, 8:45 AM
@LSHF - I’m going to see more movies in 3d
LSHF
LSHF - 5/21/2026, 2:28 PM
@MyCoolYoung - The trick is, most of them aren't impressive because they don't film them in 3D (which is quicker and MUCH less expensive), but since Hollywood has almost stopped making them, hopefully the ones they do will be done correctly.
If Toy Story 4 is in 3D (and you plan on seeing it), I would suggest seeing that one in 3D, as animated films are easier and cheaper to do than live films.
If Cameron does another film in 3D, would recommend seeing that, as he knows how to do it better than anyone, and he actually films in 3D (which hardly any other director did).
There is a website I can find for you (if you wish) that reviews the 3D aspect of movies in theaters, meaning the reviews only pertain to the various aspects of the 3D parts of that particular film.

MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 5/21/2026, 2:54 PM
@LSHF - I am. My daughter is excited for toys story so I’ll be in attendance. I’ll also look to see if it’s converted for 3d in post
LSHF
LSHF - 5/21/2026, 9:59 PM
@MyCoolYoung - It will probably look really good.

Per some research;

"Natively 3D (CGI) Animations: Movies from studios like Pixar, DreamWorks, and Illumination are created entirely inside computers. To achieve a 3D effect in theaters, animators simply set up two virtual cameras within the software to capture the action simultaneously from slightly different angles (simulating human eyes). This renders a true 3D image right from the start."
LSHF
LSHF - 5/21/2026, 10:03 PM
@MyCoolYoung - And...

"Converting animated films to 3D in post-production is generally easier and less expensive than converting live-action films. While live-action footage requires meticulous manual labor like rotoscoping (cutting out characters from the background) and digitally repainting the empty space left behind, animated films can bypass much of this work by utilizing existing digital layers and 3D wireframe data."
LSHF
LSHF - 5/21/2026, 10:04 PM
@MyCoolYoung - And ...

"Animated films—even those originally designed to be "flat" or 2D (like traditional hand-drawn styles)—are much more 3D-friendly in post-production for several reasons:Asset Availability: The original 3D animated films (e.g., from studios like Pixar or DreamWorks) are constructed in a digital 3D space. Instead of a difficult post-conversion, studios can simply re-render the film using two distinct "virtual" cameras (mimicking the left and right eyes), which provides near-perfect, native 3D without the need to artificially paint depth.Layered Files: For 2D animation, the characters and backgrounds are created on separate digital layers. Post-production studios can simply separate these pre-existing layers and apply a depth map to them, completely eliminating the need for the painstaking rotoscoping and background repainting required in live action."
LSHF
LSHF - 5/21/2026, 10:06 PM
@MyCoolYoung - I thought I might owe you that information since I tried to talk you into seeing Toy Story 5 in 3D.

Happy reading, and I apologize if it's too much (or more than you wanted).
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 5/27/2026, 6:31 PM
@LSHF - I’m always down for info lol no apologies necessary. I’m just glad you’re back commenting
LSHF
LSHF - 5/29/2026, 9:38 PM
@MyCoolYoung - Thanks!
dragon316
dragon316 - 5/16/2026, 10:44 AM
Fail just enough he don’t want make no more stop making them that simple don’t make them hoping there will suck
Nolanite
Nolanite - 5/16/2026, 10:52 AM
In other words, it was a flop.

Cameron should move on and get going on some of his other projects, like Terminator or anything sci fi related

#DCAlliance

Nolanite out
JusticeL
JusticeL - 5/16/2026, 10:56 AM
First movie was okay. Second movie was technologically amazing. Third movie didn't offer anything new technically or narratively. Movie 4 and 5 needs to progress the story otherwise, it's pointless.
JonAwesome
JonAwesome - 5/16/2026, 9:58 PM
@JusticeL - the 3rd was a waste of time, it covered the same ground as the 2nd one and didn’t really move the chess pieces.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 5/16/2026, 11:04 AM
I guess his comments about making a book for the sequels is not going to happen. What a shocker. We're never going to get ghosts of hiroshima. This is bullshit
IAmAHoot
IAmAHoot - 5/16/2026, 11:59 AM
I know the movies would be good; but I would much rather see a new original (standalone) James Cameron story.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 5/16/2026, 12:00 PM
There was another article that said Cameron is trying to make a "run and Gun" type movie with Robert Rodriguez. He wants to shoot it fast and lean. Maybe this is the reverse of Alita? Instead of Cameron taking a smaller type of director into the stratosphere, he's wanting Rodriguez to help him relearn how to work more efficiently.

At one point, I believe he mentioned the final one taking place on Earth. The main complaint I've heard from audiences is a lack of real story progression. So maybe #4 becomes the Na'vi losing the war for pandora or connection to Aiwa and 5 becomes bringing the fight to earth. Drop the metaphysical connections to the past, force them to focus on the present.

Make them both concise, tight, fast paced scripts without repeating or retreading the things we've already seen in the first 3 movies. and boom, shorter, cheaper (especially the 5th) and addresses the fans desires.

Point is, it is absolutely doable.
XenoJazz
XenoJazz - 5/16/2026, 12:06 PM
Just stop. Fire and Ash was so disappointing. I'll always love Cameron but move onto something else my dude.
ThorArms
ThorArms - 5/16/2026, 12:44 PM
I liked Fire and Ash, but the movies are appointment viewing because they're so damn long.

Make a 2 hr 20min Avatar film and pack the showings in
Batmangina
Batmangina - 5/16/2026, 5:30 PM
The first one was a great IMAX gimmick in 3D but that was 100 years ago.

I can't be arsed to watch any more of that giant blue eco warriors bullshit.

I'm rooting for Stephen Lang at this point.
CAPTAINPINKEYE
CAPTAINPINKEYE - 5/16/2026, 5:57 PM
Avatar is still make money so they’ll do a 4th and a 5th.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder