MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE - FALLOUT Star Simon Pegg Talks S.J. Clarkson Directing STAR TREK 4; Reflects On BEYOND

MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE - FALLOUT Star Simon Pegg Talks S.J. Clarkson Directing STAR TREK 4; Reflects On BEYOND

Mission: Impossible - Fallout's Simon Pegg has been talking about Jessica Jones director SJ Clarkson helming Star Trek 4, while also sharing his thoughts on fandom and Star Trek Beyond. Check it out...

By FromACertainPOV - May 11, 2018 01:05 AM EST
Filed Under: Star Trek
After a period of uncertainty, we are now getting not one but two new cinematic outings for Gene Roddenberry's science-fiction franchise; the Mark L Smith written film based on a story pitch by Quentin Tarantino, and a Star Trek 4 to be helmed by the franchise's first female director, SJ Clarkson.

The film will reunite the Kelvin Universe crew of the previous three films in an adventure that is said to see James T Kirk come face-to-face with his deceased father George, as played by Avengers: Infinity War star Chris Hemsworth. While Pegg doesn't have any further plot details regarding the film, he did reveal his excitement about Clarkson coming on board.

There's so much more to do with those characters. I'm very excited about SJ Clarkson being hired. JJ e-mailed us about that just before it was announced, everyone was so excited. I think Zach [Quinto] has actually worked with her. I've seen stuff she's done, and I think it's a great choice - and it's about time. The script is being done by Patrick McKay and John Payne, and I'm not sure what the status is at the moment. SJ just came on-board, so it feels like we've turned a corner toward production but I have no solid information.

Pegg also spoke about the milestone of Clarkson being the first woman to helm a Star Trek film, becoming only the third woman to direct a film budgeted at over $100 million following Patty Jenkins' Wonder Woman and A Wrinkle In Time's Ava DuVernay.

Obviously, the gender of a director shouldn't be important, but it is a nice change of energy. It feels good, because it feels less conventional in some respects - it shouldn't do. But with SJ being attached to Star Trek 4 it's something and it also means we've geared up again in terms of making it. That is another step towards us getting on set as well. I am super excited. I can't wait to hang out with her.

While looking ahead to future outings in the franchise Pegg also reflected on Star Trek Beyond, the last cinematic outing on which he also served as co-writer. Speaking to JoBlo Pegg spoke about what it was like for him and Doug Jung to write the film, specifically in the aftermath of 2013's Star Trek Into Darkness.

The thing with Beyond, I think the time is sort of born that out in terms of its popularity and the constant feedback I get from the Star Trek community, which seems very grateful, and that's who we...'Cause I felt they were done a slight disservice, maybe with Into Darkness because it was quite... It was divisive, I think... And so Doug and I tried to sort of pull it back to almost a giant episode, that was our agreement that we came up with.  

The Hot Fuzz actor has no ill thoughts toward those fans who were less than enthused with Into Darkness, howeveror indeed any project, as he went on to defend those who are sometimes derided for sharing their strong opinions.

People love their stuff and have their specific opinions, and now they can rally those opinions with people who feel the same way. It's the almost inevitable consequence of social media, really. It's always been like that - they just haven't had the ability to find each other and moan collectively. Well, it's not moaning; one of the things I find to be reductive is when there's a complaint about something, and it's dismissed as moaning or butt-hurt fanboys. In fact, people's opinions are valid. If someone doesn't like something, it doesn't mean they're being spoilers or ruining the fun. That's their opinion.

What do you think? Are you excited for Clarkson to direct Star Trek 4? What would you like to see for the film? And how did you feel about Star Trek Beyond? Leave your thoughts below.

Quentin Tarantino Finally Explains Why His R-Rated STAR TREK Movie Is Never Going To Happen
Related:

Quentin Tarantino Finally Explains Why His R-Rated STAR TREK Movie Is "Never Going To Happen"

STAR TREK: Colm Meaney On Possible Miles O'Brien Return And What He REALLY Thinks About Trekkies (Exclusive)
Recommended For You:

STAR TREK: Colm Meaney On Possible Miles O'Brien Return And What He REALLY Thinks About Trekkies (Exclusive)

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

ChangAlang
ChangAlang - 5/11/2018, 2:23 AM
I’d have to guess Tarantino’s version will not have these characters in it depending on when either is scheduled to start production.

Absolute speculation on my part because I can’t predict which boxers I’ll wear each day🤷🏽‍♂️
TheUnworthyThor
TheUnworthyThor - 5/11/2018, 2:56 AM
Wow, I love that perspective about fans and their opinions. But my opinion is I have loved these last three Star Trek films. Now though I wasn’t a Star Trek fans growing up though so they couldn’t really ruin the essence of Star Trek for me. But they did succeed in their mission to get someone like me who was never seeing Star Trek films to begin tonlove the franchise.
R2D2Darknight
R2D2Darknight - 5/11/2018, 3:00 AM
i loved loved LOVED the 1st film, after that its been a steady decline. is it that they just need JJ back? wait after episode 9? Though I do want to see his version with chris hemsworth returning
Stealthduck
Stealthduck - 5/11/2018, 3:41 AM
Obviously, Simon, you don't have a CBM account.
Although I do very much agree with his point that not all fans who complain should be tarred with the moniker of 'butt-hurt', or the likes, but I would argue the delivery of said complaints leave a lot to be desired.
Polemic over provocation, I think is the key.
thewanderer
thewanderer - 5/11/2018, 4:12 AM
I don’t get the hate for Into Darkness. I think it’s a great film and Cumberbatch’s Khan is one of my all-time favorite villain performances. Easily my favorite role of his, and he’s had a great career.


Is it just people being upset that they re-did Khan and were secretive about it?
FromACertainPOV
FromACertainPOV - 5/11/2018, 4:38 AM
@thewanderer - I can’t speak for everybody but for me it was a few things; with the Khan switcheroo, it was one of those reveals that doesn’t really mean anything to anyone in the context of the film. Like Blofeld in SPECTRE, there’s this big moment where he reveals his name but it means nothing to those characters, its solely for an audience who more than likely knew it going in anyway. Or if they didn’t, they probably didn’t know him anyway.

The film then proceeds to re-tread the third act of WRATH OF KHAN, but without any of the earnt build up or weight of the character’s history. Kirk and Spock are only just forming their friendship, Khan isn’t a shadow from his youth confronting him in his old age and then we have the death of Kirk which while a good scene by itself it’s not earnt in the film, and any affect it has is immediately undermined by a quite frankly poor tv show deus ex machina fake out 2 scenes later.

Also 2009 STAR TREK did a great job at wiping the slate clean in a smart and bold way (and in-continuity no less) setting up endless possibility to go and do something different and then to just do Khan, but not do too much different with him seemed like a missed opportunity.

For me if it was a truly radical re-interpretation of Khan, I’d like that more than a veiled covering of his character and then a arbitrarily switched replay of his other film.

Now this isn’t to say I hate the film, on the contrary I really enjoy it. And it deserved nowhere near the vitriol it got within the Trek community. Having INTO DARKNESS voted the worst Trek film, when INSURRECTION exists is barmy.

On the whole I found it to be a fun, breezy and entertaining film.

And all the Admiral Marcus / Section 31 stuff being a post-9/11 allegory of the US with a questionable and amoral militaristic expansion in response to the destruction of a landmark (this case Vulcan), culminating in a loss of ideals in the pursuit of security is solid. Even if it did come a number of years too late to be genuinely affecting.
FromACertainPOV
FromACertainPOV - 5/11/2018, 4:49 AM
@thewanderer - that answer ran a lot longer than I thought it would, sorry...
thewanderer
thewanderer - 5/11/2018, 5:28 AM
@FromACertainPOV - fair enough on the Khan stuff. I never watched any Star Trek stuff pre-2009, so I'm coming from a different perspective.

IMO if you just take the movie on it's own ignoring the original, it's a damn fine movie.

Like I said, Cumberbatch was amazing IMO. He'd be in my top 5 villains all time.
FromACertainPOV
FromACertainPOV - 5/11/2018, 5:33 AM
@thewanderer - Well that's always bound to happen when you've either stayed with a franchise or entering one.

And I think its a technically well made, and really entertaining movie. JJ knows how to keep things moving along in a way that can't not be fun to enjoy.

Cumberbatch's performance is great, I don't have a problem with anyone's acting in that film I just found some of the material lacklustre and disappointing. The film's still pretty high up on my Star Trek ranking though, and has gotten better on repeat watches.
HubbleFunk
HubbleFunk - 5/11/2018, 4:36 AM
So she has zero experience dealing with a big budget film... having spent 15 years on tv shows.... but she’s a woman so, ‘yeah’!?

I hope she delivers but this is the best / most experienced person they could get for the job?

FromACertainPOV
FromACertainPOV - 5/11/2018, 4:40 AM
@HubbleFunk - Well JJ Abrams had zero experience dealing with a big budget film having worked for years in TV when he revitalised the MISSION IMPOSSIBLE franchise, and as he's the producer on these films I'm sure he's perfectly comfortable giving her that shot.
MrDandy
MrDandy - 5/11/2018, 9:20 AM
@HubbleFunk - The Russos didn't have any experience with a big budget film and were mostly know for TV comedies until Winter Soldier.
L0RDbuckethead
L0RDbuckethead - 5/11/2018, 1:44 PM
@FromACertainPOV - Mission: Impossible III is lowkey my favorite M:I film. Phillip Seymour Hoffman was an awesome villain.
MrDandy
MrDandy - 5/11/2018, 9:19 AM
I really enjoyed Beyond. I thought it was like watching an extended Star Trek episode, which was perfect for a 50th Anniversary send up.
case
case - 5/11/2018, 4:11 PM
Another day another Doug.
View Recorder