Super 8 Review

J.J. Abrams' latest sci-fi effort is a love letter to Spielberg and classic 70/80's flicks of the same genre, but how does it stand on it's own?

Review Opinion
By SupermanEchols - Jun 08, 2011 03:06 PM EST
Filed Under: Sci-Fi

If you are a child of the 80's, a die-hard Spielberg fan, or a religious zealot after J.J. Abrams' work, then you'll probably be hard-pressed not to find something to enjoy with SUPER 8. It is after all a combo platter of E.T., War of the Worlds, The Goonies and a side order of Stand By Me. What's impressive about Abrams' newest creation though is that he was able to take bits and pieces that made those films click and focus them into a fairly condensed narrative that works on many levels.

Without going into an overly wordy summary of the plot, what you have essentially is a group of young kids on summer break who's primary goal is to get their homemade zombie flick completed and entered into the local film festival. On a particular night of shooting some scenes, they witness a horrific accident with a train derailing and the Super 8 mm film camera they were using manages to capture more than just the explosions from the crash, but instead the revelation that something beyond human was being kept inside the train, and that something is now loose. After an army investigation into the disaster begins, the kids are swept up into their own discovery of just what was hidden aboard the boxcars and how deeply it will impact their city and lives.

Without the group of young actors assembled in this, I really don't think SUPER 8 would work as well as it does. The banter back and forth between the young boys is quite humorous and quick-paced, but it's the twitterpated expressions by Joel Courtney and Elle Fanning that bring back the memory of what it was like to have that first crush and the feeling you could move mountains to impress that person. The scenes with Courtney and Fanning really give the movie its heart and soul, and thankfully Abrams' was able to direct them to some fairly honest performances that don't come off as cheesy or overly melodramatic.



As a tale of suspense, the first 2/3 of the film really work. The creature on the train is kept in the dark, attacking like a character in the original Jurassic Park...vicious, quick and out of sight. The camera doesn't give away too much early on and the use of sound editing is smartly used to ramp up the impact of the attacks. It's heading into the wrap up of the storyline where things start to loose steam and it feels like a very lighthearted way to cap off an otherwise fairly intense work. I'm not sure if the ending was how it was originally planned, but I couldn't help but think this could have had a different closure that left things a bit more ominous. I wasn't unhappy with the direction it took, it just didn't knock me off my socks like the first half did.

As I walked out of the film, the first comparison I could make to this was E.T., but it's kind of like an Elseworld's tale where E.T. has fangs and is none too happy about his current predicament. A child of the 80's myself, I was glad to see Abrams' use all these influences he's so obviously felt from Spielberg's previous works. While not yet the craftsman that his mentor is, I think this puts J.J. much more on track to be a force to be reckoned with in this genre. I thoroughly enjoyed his Star Trek reboot, and think he really does have a voice all his own when it comes to film making. This is like a kid growing up after watching a master at work, and one day when he finally gets his tools and shop up and running, SUPER 8 is Abrams' way of saying "Thanks".

Bottom Line: J.J. Abrams' throwback to the 80's sci-fi genre is worth checking out, but not an instant classic
David Koepp Teases Emotional Beat Of Steven Spielberg's Upcoming Untitled Sci-Fi Film
Related:

David Koepp Teases Emotional Beat Of Steven Spielberg's Upcoming Untitled Sci-Fi Film

Arnold Schwarzenegger Shares How Glen Powell’s Running Man Remake Could Surpass the Original Sci-Fi Classic
Recommended For You:

Arnold Schwarzenegger Shares How Glen Powell’s Running Man Remake Could Surpass the Original Sci-Fi Classic

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

superbatspiderman
superbatspiderman - 6/8/2011, 6:10 PM
Cool review I think this movie looks pretty good and it is getting great reviews so I will check it out.
SupermanEchols
SupermanEchols - 6/9/2011, 5:59 AM
There are definitely some intense moments that would make small children afraid. The comparison the the original Jurassic Park comes to mind again...especially how intense the T-Rex jeep scene would be for a kid the first time he/ she saw it.
Dmon
Dmon - 6/9/2011, 3:42 PM
My buddy that went to an advance screening said it was pretty boring. His exact words were "Wish I had more thumbs. I'd give 3-thumbs down." I was interested in seeing it, the trailers reminded me of the 80's show Amazing Stories. Oh well I might sneak in to see it after watching Green Lantern next week.
SupermanEchols
SupermanEchols - 6/9/2011, 7:37 PM
I can understand your friend thinking it was "boring" in the sense that it is unlike other summer films like Transformers where the explosion to dialogue ratio is 4 to 1. This is truly a tribute to an older style of filmmaking that just doesn't exist anymore. Look back at stuff like Jaws...compared to today's thrillers it could be considered boring bc of the build up it takes to get to the action beats, but the in between moments of character development made the times the shark appeared all that more impactful. Not saying this is up there with Jaws, but this is definitely more of a slow burn instead of flash in a pan.
Dmon
Dmon - 6/9/2011, 8:17 PM
@SupermanEchols my friend tends to not care about whether its fast or slow. And he actually has pretty good taste in movies he just felt there was a build up to the monster and was a real let down.
SupermanEchols
SupermanEchols - 6/9/2011, 9:06 PM
Dmon I see where you're coming from. The only problem with a film like this(or Cloverfield for example) is that when so much of your marketing is built around a mystery monster, it's bound to disappoint some once it's finally revealed. The main issue I have with the film still involves the resolution towards the end of the film...just too convenient and uncharacteristic for how the rest of the film had portrayed the threat up until that point.
cgrass5150
cgrass5150 - 6/10/2011, 6:33 PM
"Super 8" is a boring, schmaltzy, anti-climactic, unoriginal, disposable sci-fi/action movie. If you like this genre, save your money and go see "Thor" and "X-Men." "Super 8" is simply "Goonies," "ET," "Close Encounters," and "Cloverfield-lite" lumped together. It drags on for well over an hour before you get to see "the monster," which is so obscured by darkness and frantic movements that you can hardly make it out. Only until the very end do you get a head-shot which is a giant let down because "it" is a wimpy version of "Cloverfield" monster.

Even worse is that Spielberg, as usual, makes the gaggle of cutesy kid geniuses save the day and makes the adults look like nudniks without the grey matter to figure out wants happening right under their noses. I could go on but it would only frustrate me over the money I lost.

Movie critics nationally gave this crap good reviews (3 stars). Most were the same folks who over-criticized "Thor" and "X-Men." Makes no sense unless you consider the "Spielberg" money, power, and influence factor. This guy's had it. It's about time he retires on the billions he's bilked from hardworking movie fans. Also, the overrated "Abrams" should be flogged for riding the coattails of this drivel.
SupermanEchols
SupermanEchols - 6/11/2011, 4:03 PM
Cgrass, I don't agree on all your points, but will say that both Thor and First Class are better movies than Super8.
View Recorder