THOR 2: Natalie Portman Reportedly Furious Over Patty Jenkins' Firing

THOR 2: Natalie Portman Reportedly Furious Over Patty Jenkins' Firing

Well it seems Jenkins and Marvel may not have parted ways as amicably as was first reported. And it has ruffled the feathers of Natalie Portman (Jane Foster) who was apparently a factor in Jenkins' hiring in the first place..

By MarkCassidy - Dec 14, 2011 01:12 PM EST
Filed Under: Thor
Source: THR

THR have just posted an in depth article detailing what they reckon really went down with Patty Jenkins' dismissal as Marvel's director for Thor 2. According to their sources thing may not have been as simple as "creative differences", and Jenkins may have been let go because they felt that she wasn't moving things along fast enough - despite not even having a finished script to work from yet. They also say that one returning cast member was not best pleased with this decision. Word is that Natalie Portman was "deeply upset" as she had urged Marvel to take a chance on Jenkins. Portman was considering not returning to the sequel as she had only recently given birth to her son and was actually considering quitting acting for a few years. But she was "re-engaged" in Thor 2 when Jenkins took the reigns.



Here is an excerpt from THR's report..

While the parties spun the Dec. 6 parting as an amicable split over creative differences, sources say Jenkins was fired without warning from a job that would have made her the first woman to direct a superhero tentpole. The news was out before anyone had told Portman, who had strongly urged Marvel to hire the director of 2003’s Monster (a film that won Charlize Theron her Oscar). According to sources, Portman had begun to question whether she wanted to continue acting at all right now -- possibly for several years -- because she wants to spend time with her baby boy, who was born last June. Portman was said to be re-engaged in Thor 2 because of Jenkins' involvement and especially proud that she would have played a role in opening the door for a woman to direct such a film. The Oscar winner is contractually obligated to stay with the project and Marvel studio is now said to be working overtime to smooth over the situation by including her in discussions about whom to hire as a replacement.


They also say that in an effort to calm Portman down Marvel are including the actress in discussions on who may replace Jenkins. There is much more to the report, including some more insider info/speculation as to the reasons for Jenkins being taken off the project. Be sure to click the link below to check out the full article.




By: TwitterButtons.com

By TwitterButtons.com



RUMOR: Marvel Studios Developing A Mysterious Project Known As THOR QUEST
Related:

RUMOR: Marvel Studios Developing A Mysterious Project Known As THOR QUEST

RUMOR: Lucasfilm Planning A Mandoverse-Style Slate Of STAR WARS Movie Set Post-THE RISE OF SKYWALKER
Recommended For You:

RUMOR: Lucasfilm Planning A Mandoverse-Style Slate Of STAR WARS Movie Set Post-THE RISE OF SKYWALKER

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
Frecks
Frecks - 12/14/2011, 2:16 PM
:D
ksommer
ksommer - 12/14/2011, 2:18 PM
Awesome!! Cut her!! Didn't want Jane Foster in Thor 2 anyway. Expand Sif's role!
superman7
superman7 - 12/14/2011, 2:24 PM
superman7
superman7 - 12/14/2011, 2:25 PM
yo don't piss her off!
headlopper
headlopper - 12/14/2011, 2:27 PM
I AM TOO!!! Nat, let's talk about it over a bottle of Pinot grigio.

We'll kill the bottle and have sex. Everybody goes home happy!
blvdnoise
blvdnoise - 12/14/2011, 2:28 PM
This casting/contract trickery is obviously the work of Loki..
StrangerX
StrangerX - 12/14/2011, 2:29 PM
Sorry Natalie, but i wasn't hip on you returning anyway. .
ForceOfLegend
ForceOfLegend - 12/14/2011, 2:41 PM
Agree with Froggy. I would like Portman to return.
NeoBaggins
NeoBaggins - 12/14/2011, 2:41 PM
Kevin Fiege must walk around the office drunk with shit-stained tighty whites and a Burger King crown, dishing out his iron rule.
MassExecutions
MassExecutions - 12/14/2011, 2:43 PM
@Froggy - We can accept them, we just don't want them to have more than say,oh, 15 minutes of dialogue. If we wanted more than that, we'd watch a movie from another genre.

Seriously though, Portman's a winner in my book ever since The Professional, but I vote for NO HUMAN CHARACTERS in Thor 2. Non-earth realms only. The only exception I might make is for a plot that heavily features the Wrecking Crew.
Bodwulf
Bodwulf - 12/14/2011, 2:43 PM
Marvel did Patty Jenkins Just like they did Grace Randolph!
marvel72
marvel72 - 12/14/2011, 2:46 PM
yeah keep portman out,set thor 2 on asgard more sif & introduce hela & the enchantress.
nuck82
nuck82 - 12/14/2011, 2:46 PM
@mASS absorbing man!!!!
vtopa
vtopa - 12/14/2011, 2:48 PM
Well, I think its important that she return for a few reasons. First off i HATE it when an actor appears in a movie and then is replaced in the sequel. Didn't like it in The Dark KNight, didn't like it in Iron Man 2, didn't like it with Hulk and Avengers, and don't like it now. I prefer Sif as a love interest, but the plot of the 1st movie was heavily tilted toward the relationship between Foster and Thor. The end of the movie portends her trying to find hima nd vice versa. If the second movie does that then has them split up for Sif, then fine I guess. But, keep the continuity. Also, doesn't this seem to be a pattern with Marvel? They are heavy-handed to a fault.
OtakuPapi
OtakuPapi - 12/14/2011, 2:51 PM
No one wants her in the movie anyway honestly... she has no clue if Marvel listened They would give her the Axe and Make Sif more prominent and bring in The Enchantress and keep the movie in Asgard
sarahsatire
sarahsatire - 12/14/2011, 2:52 PM
I think they avoided a potential train wreck here. Punisher: War Zone comes to mind. Unless she is a closet comic geek who respects the source material, but from everything i've read it doesn't look like that's the case.

I like how Portman thinks she has enough pull to determine the director of the next Thor movie, and will throw a fit if she doesn't get her way. Hopefully this gives her a little dose of reality. I vote.. quit, and spend some time with your baby.
MaddMonkk
MaddMonkk - 12/14/2011, 2:55 PM
Froggy
ThaMessenger07
ThaMessenger07 - 12/14/2011, 2:56 PM
The Movie needs to take Place in Asgard and at most she has a small role
Bodwulf
Bodwulf - 12/14/2011, 2:59 PM
Article says Portman is still under contract. And that Marvel is trying to smooth it over with her. Marvel should learn you get what you pay for. Jenkins made one film six years ago. Did you think she was going to aggresively start preparing to do this movie?
BatSupe3
BatSupe3 - 12/14/2011, 3:05 PM
Personally, I don't mind if she returns. Do I like Siff more? Sure. Do I want them to introduce Enchantress? Of course! But for Marvel to bow down and let her have a say in who they get as a replacement is just dumb. They should either go with who they want, or let the whole cast help them decide. I can't think of his name, but the director of Game of Thrones, seems like the most logical choice to me. I can't be sure having never seen the show, but he seems to know what he's doing with it.
BatSupe3
BatSupe3 - 12/14/2011, 3:06 PM
*Sif
RunDTC
RunDTC - 12/14/2011, 3:09 PM
@MaddMonk: is that Channing Tatum and his bro?
MassExecutions
MassExecutions - 12/14/2011, 3:09 PM
Nuck - Yeah, but Ang Lee's Hulk kind a poisoned that idea for me. It would be nice to see Absorbing Man done right, though.
Ethic
Ethic - 12/14/2011, 3:10 PM
Any else think that it'd be a fair assumption to say that they clashed over the fleshing-out of the female side-characters?
There's never anything going on with them besides the stereotypical "hottie who can kick your ass" or the cheap love interest.
I imagine Jenkins thought the women came across as gimmicks and Natalie was probably loving the idea that she'd be bringing some integrity and layers to her character, and even Sif. Then Marvel were like Naaaa.

All assumptions but I'd put money on it.
golden123
golden123 - 12/14/2011, 3:10 PM
Wouldn't the ending of Thor be completely undermined if Jane didn't appear in Thor 2?
MercMatt
MercMatt - 12/14/2011, 3:15 PM
Midgard is not needed in the sequel. Show us the other realms, and prepare for the Thor/Sif relationship. If they "must" bring Jane back, have Enchantress kill her. I could get behind that. Then an epic battle between Sif and Enchantress. Either way... Just give us a damn good Thor 2.
golden123
golden123 - 12/14/2011, 3:19 PM
Also, I highly doubt a Thor movie where Earth does not appear would be affordable? I imagine the sets/computer generated backgrounds of Asgard and Jotunheim ate up a large portion of the budget. They already decided not to go the Star Wars route and shoot in different countries to strike authenticity. It would seem weird if the way the foreign realms appeared on screen was changed for the sequel to cut the cost. Time on Earth, in Thor 2, is going to happen.
NoAssemblyReqd
NoAssemblyReqd - 12/14/2011, 3:28 PM
Let Portman go too. Jane Foster was one of the weak links of the original, anyway. Let Thor be with Lady Sif.
NeoBaggins
NeoBaggins - 12/14/2011, 3:30 PM
"Wouldn't the ending of Thor be completely undermined if Jane didn't appear in Thor 2?"-golden123

Absolutely. But as you can see, people aren't satisfied unless shit is [frick]ed up and without continuity.

I want a 9 realms film as much as anybody, but I dont want to sit there watching it with loose ends. Portman's Jane should be in the film in some capacity. You could almost get away with calling THOR; JANE FOSTER. She's not just the love interest, they're telling a whole story about her.

lol fans.
sarahsatire
sarahsatire - 12/14/2011, 3:38 PM
Jane can be recast. Just sayin'.
Jordanstine
Jordanstine - 12/14/2011, 3:40 PM
Rachel Leigh Cook!
Jordanstine
Jordanstine - 12/14/2011, 3:41 PM
Or the girl who played Natalie Portman's look-alike on Star Wars Phantom Menace... maybe.
marvel72
marvel72 - 12/14/2011, 3:42 PM
portman cameo only in thor 2,have her return in thor 3.

@ neobaggins

continuity it didn't bother the x-men first class fans,it was one of the many things that pissed me off with the movie.
Wildaniel
Wildaniel - 12/14/2011, 3:44 PM
@knossis That was well put! I couldn't have said it better myself!

Also I would hate to see a Thor movie with another actress playing Jane Foster.

I would love to see a love storyline between Thor and Sif, like the comics.
1 2 3
View Recorder