Daredevil: Born Again Star Vincent D'Onofrio Reveals Why Kingpin Can't (Currently) Appear In MCU Movies

Daredevil: Born Again Star Vincent D'Onofrio Reveals Why Kingpin Can't (Currently) Appear In MCU Movies

Daredevil: Born Again star Vincent D'Onofrio has revealed more about why the Kingpin of Crime can't appear in a movie and explains why he always knew the Netflix series would eventually return.

By JoshWilding - Apr 15, 2026 05:04 AM EST
Filed Under: Daredevil

Vincent D'Onofrio has been playing the Kingpin of Crime for over a decade, and while the Daredevil and Daredevil: Born Again star has made appearances in Hawkeye and Echo, he's yet to bring Wilson Fisk to the big screen.

Charlie Cox made a cameo appearance in 2021's Spider-Man: No Way Home, and the hope is that he might show up in this July's Spider-Man: Brand New Day. As for the soon-to-be former Mayor, we've heard repeatedly that complicated rights issues are keeping him trapped on streaming.

During a recent career retrospective with GQ, D'Onofrio was asked about a potential big-screen appearance for his larger-than-life villain and revealed what's currently keeping the door closed in that. 

"Right now, they don’t have the rights," the actor claimed. "They have a bit more rights than they did a couple of years ago, but it’s tough right now. They have the rights to a lot of characters from the Spider-Man series, but they don’t have mine, not completely. So I think that’s holding them back a bit. But I hope to be able to do it, we’ll see."

This sounds somewhat similar to the situation with The Hulk. Marvel Studios can use the Green Goliath as a supporting character in the Avengers, Spider-Man, and Thor franchises. However, a complicated rights deal with Universal means he can't currently headline his own blockbuster.

D'Onofrio added, "I hope Kingpin is in the movies someday. We’ll see, I don’t know. Maybe it will be me, maybe it won’t."

Elsewhere in the conversation, the Daredevil: Born Again star opened up on the show's return after Netflix pulled the plug on Daredevil following a third season that many still consider its best. 

"Charlie [Cox] didn't [expect to return], but I did," D'Onofrio reaffirmed. "Every time Charlie used to say we're not coming back, I used to say, 'I think we're coming back,' and he used to think I was just being delusional."

"I just felt there was no reason other than them starting Disney+ that we were pulled from Netflix. We were at the top of our game on Netflix when we were pulled. People were loving the show," he added. "Somebody like [Marvel Studios president] Kevin Feige is not going to not know that. He and his people are gonna know what we did, we kicked butt. I just couldn't imagine them not seeing dollar signs."

Marvel Studios had to wait two years before being able to utilise any Daredevil characters, but once that time had passed, Feige got straight to it. In the space of a few weeks, The Kingpin showed up in Hawkeye and Matt Murdock was revealed as Peter Parker's lawyer in Spider-Man: No Way Home.

In the latest episode of the Daredevil: Born Again Official Podcast, Ayelet Zurer (Vanessa Fisk), Arty Froushan (Buck), and Michael Gandolfini (Daniel Blake) discuss last night's episode, "The Grand Design." You can watch that below.

About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
Comic Book Reader. Film Lover. WWE and F1 Fan. Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and ComicBookMovie.com's #1 contributor.
Does The Daredevil: Born Again Season 2 Finale Have A Post-Credits Scene? Here's Your Spoiler-Free Answer
Related:

Does The Daredevil: Born Again Season 2 Finale Have A Post-Credits Scene? Here's Your Spoiler-Free Answer

Daredevil: Born Again Star Charlie Cox Reveals Tom Hiddleston's Scrapped Role In Pre-Overhaul Season 1
Recommended For You:

Daredevil: Born Again Star Charlie Cox Reveals Tom Hiddleston's Scrapped Role In Pre-Overhaul Season 1

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

MonkeyBot
MonkeyBot - 4/15/2026, 6:40 AM
Re-re-repost!
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 4/15/2026, 7:57 AM
Who owns the rights to The Kingpin?
theprophet
theprophet - 4/15/2026, 10:36 AM
@SonOfAGif - sony cause he’s considered a spider man villain
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/15/2026, 6:26 PM
@SonOfAGif - Mostly Sony does as primarily he is and started out as a Spider-man related IP with some exception clauses such as Disney able to use him in DD shows/films and some more grey area stuff alongside other Marvel controlled IP's he appeared with prior to the date Sony got the rights to all things Spider-Man (bar again an exception clause for animated shows of up to 30min per episode duration).

Appearing in a Hawkeye show was grey area exception clause but made more on solid ground by it revolving around a DD story, as in that of Echo's origin and Echo being a DD character and adopted daughter of Fisk course him being in her show fell well within that exception clause.

Long and short of it being when it comes to films he COULD appear in some select non-Spidey films legally but Disney wouldn't wanna risk loosing Parker pushing their luck. IN an actual Spider-man film that would be down to Sony allowing it which they easily could do if Disney/Marvel asked or Sony pushed for it but it IS complicated and Vincent KNOWS it's complicated even if he doesn't have a firm grasp on the specific legal clauses (or if he uses them to avoid answering questions directly that could be spoilers) and how in practice they could work to allow him being in SM 4, 5 or 6 VERY easily.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 4/15/2026, 8:59 AM
Sony and Marvel are already working together a lot, so shouldn't be too difficult to get their shit together right?

Amyway, I kinda hope so we get to see Kingpin be the one that assembles the Sinister Six against Spider-Man and Daredevil in the sixth Spider-Man movie.
KennKathleen
KennKathleen - 4/15/2026, 10:56 AM
@bkmeijer1 - That'd be too good to be true.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/15/2026, 6:30 PM
@bkmeijer1 - It isn't as complicated as Vincent makes it out to be, he knows technically it is complicated but increasingly feel he is avoiding questions on film appearances as an easy way to avoid potential spoilers when he inevitably will be. Sony can give permission whenever they want for him to be in anything AND Disney has some exception clauses they can use in order to use him in film or TV even without the greenlight from Sony (just don't wanna risk pissing Sony off by pushing those clauses too far and loose Spider-man as a result again).
eagc1995
eagc1995 - 4/15/2026, 6:40 PM
@bkmeijer1 - I think one of the issues is that Sony doesn't own this specific version of Fisk and that may be what complicates things.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 4/16/2026, 2:41 AM
@eagc1995 @Apophis71 - yeah. Shouldn't be too difficult for Disney to lend this Kingpin to Sony though.
eagc1995
eagc1995 - 4/16/2026, 4:17 PM
@bkmeijer1 - The only thing that i can think that could make sense as to why Sony ain't taking it is if maybe they want their own version of Fisk with an actor of their choosing, one that they could take with them should the Marvel deal fall apart again

Outside of what i said earlier about them not owning this Fisk since they had no input, this is really the only other thing that makes sense in my head, since you'd think this would be something easy to solve given their current partnership
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 4/16/2026, 5:01 PM
@eagc1995 - I can definitely see you being on the right track here. They figured out getting Spider-Man in the MCU though, so this doesn't seem like a hard nut to crack
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 4/16/2026, 6:29 PM
@bkmeijer1 - If Disney have some rights and Sony has the rest then there are no rights issues for the Spider-Man films at all. It would simply be a matter of creative agreement or disagreement. They have all the rights between them. There's no issue for the Tom Holland Spider-Man movies to not use any character from Spider-Man or the MCU.

@eagc1995 - If you read D'Onofrio's comments here he seems to be talking about non-Sony MCU movies. I think this is where his confusion has come from. He probably doesn't realize that the the MCU Spider-Man films are done in collaboration with Sony and therefore don't have the same legal drawbacks as the rest of the MCU.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 4/17/2026, 1:30 AM
@ObserverIO - they can even figure out how to get Hulk in a Spider-Man movie, so Kingpin should be no issue rights-wise. Only opposition is probably creative
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 4/15/2026, 12:08 PM
I think it’s moreso a case that Marvel has the TV rights for Kingpin while Sony might have the movie rights…

Since D’ Onofrio is technically the TV Kingpin , maybe he can’t be the movie version hence they would have to cast someone else?.

If that’s the reason then I can understand it being as complicated as it seems…

I hope it works out though since Vincent is great in the role and want him to be on the big screen facing off against Spidey aswell!!.

User Comment Image
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 4/15/2026, 1:40 PM
It may alsoo just mean that Kingpin rights were specific too the Daredevil deal. He can appear in those projects but not in anything that doesn't involve DD. Echo may have been a loophole... or even the reason they stuck the DD cameo in there.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/15/2026, 6:42 PM
@Patient2670 - Echo IS a HUGE Loophole as she IS fully a DD IP thus works the same as being a DD show legally speaking esp as he is her adopted father thus falls into the grey area loophole of characters he has interacted with beyond DD IP's (like Hawkeye) prior to a set date in print.,

However, yeh, during one of the hacks of Sony the legal rights were leaked out and Sony owns Kingpin across all media BUT Marvel retained an exception clause specific to DD and DD IP's such as Echo along with a grey area where he can have a minor supporting role in show/films of other characters whose comics he appeared in prior to I think 2002 or 2004 if memory serves.

I DO recall it is NOT specific to film, TV or animation and ONLY related to what titular character films and shows Disney Marvel has the exception clauses for. With DD and Echo Disney has full exception clause be that film, TV or animation and others like Hawkeye it is more nuanced which is likely why they revolved his show around Echo's origin story putting it on firmer legal grounds.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 4/15/2026, 6:54 PM
@Apophis71 - I'm sure you're right. I'll be honest, I forgot about Hawkeye. That may have very well have been a seperately negotiated deal. On the one hand, it serves Sony to allow it, as Disney/Marvel incurs all the production, distribution and publicity costs, and Sony simply collects money. Rather the same deal they have for Spider-Man himself, or even like the one with Universal, for Hulk. Fascinating stuff, above my pay grade.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/16/2026, 10:03 AM
@Patient2670 - I mean I suspect out of courtesy they discussed using Fisk with Sony every time they did so (to not mess up the Spider-man deal) but legally according to the details in the deal they didn't need to for DD or Echo shows at least and wouldn't need to give anything to Sony doing so.

The ONLY legal question is IF the IP sharing/loan deal with Peter Parker added any clauses or not as the specifics of that contract haven't leaked yet. If so that COULD have prevented this version of TV Kingpin being in films but even then Sony could waive that any time they want.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 4/16/2026, 1:14 PM
@Apophis71 - I have no doubt that they discuss Fisk every time they use him. Less out of courtesy than Sony likely gets some sort of right of approval for scripts, in case they don't like the manner in which the character is going to be portrayed or used (including whether or not it interferes with their own plans for the character).
I also have no doubt that Sony's TV and Feature departments are run seperately, requiring negotiations with each individually. Thnegotiate as much profit as possible ink of it less as a sharing or loan deal, more like a licencing deal. Same as they do foor merchandise - toys, tee shirts, etc. And yeah, Sony could waive that, but before they ever did, they'd do all in their power to negotiate as much profit for themselves as possible. Remember, Spider-Man is a much better deal for Sony than it is for Disney.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/16/2026, 4:13 PM
@Patient2670 - True but Sony, as per the existing IP deal, doesn't get a penny from Kingpin on the Netflix or D+ shows and if they greenlit using him in one of the Spider-man movies they already have the big cut of that. Not getting in the way of Marvel using Fisk in their TV shows, as per the exception clause, helped make him a bigger sell as a villain for them in the first Spider-verse movie and when the time is right a bigger sell as a villain in one of Tom's upcoming films.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 4/16/2026, 4:57 PM
@Apophis71 - I'm not arguing, and I haven't seen the Sony leaked deal.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 4/16/2026, 6:33 PM
@Patient2670 - I think Marvel can use him on TV but not in movies.

They can however use him in a Sony-produced Spider-Man movie and could negotiate permission to use him in a non-Sony MCU movie if they felt it was important enough.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 4/16/2026, 7:37 PM
@ObserverIO - That sounds about right.
BlackStar25
BlackStar25 - 4/15/2026, 7:28 PM
I dont get it....Just cut a deal with Sony already....

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder