Mortal Kombat II Producer Blasts Critics For Negative Reviews... Despite Sequel's High Rotten Tomatoes Score

Mortal Kombat II Producer Blasts Critics For Negative Reviews... Despite Sequel's High Rotten Tomatoes Score

Mortal Kombat II has been met with a mostly positive reception from critics, but producer Todd Garner has decided to call out some of the negative reviews...

By MarkCassidy - May 07, 2026 02:05 PM EST
Filed Under: Mortal Kombat

The full review embargo for Mortal Kombat II lifted yesterday evening, and so far, the majority of critics seem to have been won over by the sequel's violent charms (it's currently sitting at a not-too-shabby 73% on Rotten Tomatoes).

This makes MKII the most positively received live-action film in the franchise, but producer Todd Garner wasn't about to let the negative reviews off the hook.

Taking to X, Garner wrote: "Some of these reviews are cracking me up. It’s clear they have never played the game and have no idea what the fans want or ANY of the rules/canon of Mortal Kombat. One reviewer was mad that a guy 'had a laser eye!' Why the [frick] do we still allow people that don’t have any love for the genre review these movies! Baffling."

When a follower pointed out that most of the reviews have been positive, Garner clarified that he was only referring to a couple of specific quotes he picked up on. Another noted that he really shouldn't be "tossing any stones" at people who don't know the lore, since the movies "invented Cole Young, Arcana and couldn't even get the simple lore of Mileena and Kitana correct." To which he responded, "Fair."

Garner is clearly very passionate about the sequel, but some feel that it's not a good look for a producer to blast critics on social media like this - especially when most of them enjoyed the movie!

In related news, star Ludi Lin (Liu Kang) has revealed that the movie will screen in China without any edits or modifications.

"Mortal Kombat II is releasing in China with no cuts. This is a first,” Lin tells Variety. “This is why it’s trending internationally, rather than just focusing on domestic."

This should result in a significant box office boost for the film, which is expected to take in close to $80 million worldwide this weekend.

From New Line Cinema comes the latest high-stakes installment in the blockbuster video game franchise in all its brutal glory, Mortal Kombat II. This time, the fan favorite champions—now joined by Johnny Cage himself—are pitted against one another in the ultimate, no-holds barred, gory battle to defeat the dark rule of Shao Kahn that threatens the very existence of the Earthrealm and its defenders.

Karl Urban stars as Johnny Cage, alongside Adeline Rudolph, Jessica McNamee, Josh Lawson, Ludi Lin, Mehcad Brooks, Tati Gabrielle, Lewis Tan, Damon Herriman, with Chin Han, Tadanobu Asano as Lord Raiden, Joe Taslim as Bi-Han, and Hiroyuki Sanada as Hanzo Hasashi and Scorpion.

Director Simon McQuoid returns to helm the follow up to his explosive 2021 cinematic adventure, from a screenplay by Jeremy Slater, based on the videogame created by Ed Boon and John Tobias. The film is produced by Todd Garner, James Wan, Toby Emmerich, E. Bennett Walsh and McQuoid, and executive produced by Michael Clear, Judson Scott, Slater and Lawrence Kasanoff.

Joining McQuoid behind the camera are director of photography Stephen F. Windon, production designer Yohei Taneda, editor Stuart Levy and costume designer Cappi Ireland, with casting by Rich Delia and music by Benjamin Wallfisch.

New Line Cinema Presents an Atomic Monster/Broken Road Production, a Fireside Films Production, Mortal Kombat II.

About The Author:
MarkCassidy
Member Since 11/9/2008
Mark Cassidy is a writer, photographer, amateur filmmaker, and Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic from Dublin, Ireland.
Mortal Kombat II's Most Shocking Fatality Was Originally Much More Gruesome - Spoilers
Related:

Mortal Kombat II's Most Shocking Fatality Was Originally Much More Gruesome - Spoilers

Mortal Kombat II: Lewis Tan Breaks Silence On Cole Young's Shocking Role: Nobody Wants To Get [Spoiler]
Recommended For You:

Mortal Kombat II: Lewis Tan Breaks Silence On Cole Young's Shocking Role: "Nobody Wants To Get [Spoiler]"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
ModHaterSLADE
ModHaterSLADE - 5/7/2026, 2:53 PM
I mean, this just further proves some reviewers talk out of their ass before doing their actual homework.
dragon316
dragon316 - 5/7/2026, 4:10 PM
@ModHaterSLADE - maybe also proves never reviews , rotten critics score, people choose what they want to see no matter what reviews say about think for yourself don’t let strangers tell you what’s should like in life sad way to live do so
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 5/7/2026, 5:56 PM
@ModHaterSLADE - They have to justify their existence...to someone.
Ryguy88
Ryguy88 - 5/7/2026, 10:05 PM
@ModHaterSLADE - was that Mark that was upset about the laser eye?
Wahhvacado
Wahhvacado - 5/7/2026, 2:55 PM
"Why the [frick] do we still allow people that don’t have any love for the genre review these movies! Baffling."

Because review sites are for general audiences not target demographics.
dragon316
dragon316 - 5/7/2026, 4:13 PM
@Wahhvacado - why frick should we care reviews , rotten tomatoes and critics think about movies they get paid reviews movies they know what acting cgi is and writing not us we should see what we want to see what we like who cares what strangers think get paid review them they check not us we choose how well movies perform not reviews look at positive reviews and positive movie score transformers one had fans like critics hate it it sucks same with thunderbolts people decide stop live life as 4 year old make your choice what you like
Lucasberg
Lucasberg - 5/7/2026, 4:42 PM
@dragon316 - it is useful to find film critics that you sense have similar taste to you and express why different movies work, or do not work.

You can look to people to give you a sense of what to expect in a movie, and then still watch the movie ready to make up your own mind about the movie as to whether you think its good or fails.
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 5/7/2026, 5:10 PM
@Lucasberg - Honestly, I think what you said is kind of an oxymoron. Critics are taught what to look for while we kind of feel it. You’re using someone else to help make up your mind when watching would do just that.

I don't think reception is a good barometer. It's just something that influences our perception.
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 5/7/2026, 5:58 PM
@Lucasberg - That or do what the GA does...find a drinker that thinks critically.
movieguy18
movieguy18 - 5/7/2026, 6:53 PM
@Wahhvacado -This is quite baffling coming from a producer…
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 5/7/2026, 9:25 PM
@Wahhvacado - I can understand the GA having this kind of a problem with most DC movies (like Justice League, Black Adam, Superman 25 and the Suicide Squad flicks to name a few), but Kano and everyone else's special powers were actually explained in the first movie as being their 'Arcana' gifts.

Reading the comics or playing the video games shouldn't be required homework for the GA critics, but at the very least watching the first movie that the movie your currently reviewing is a sequel to should be standard practice.
Lucasberg
Lucasberg - 5/8/2026, 10:42 AM
@MyCoolYoung - hmm. I don’t think that’s true. Many critics are just nerds who love movies. For those critics, they’ve spent time trying to understand the rules and forms in movies that make them good or that make them suck. It can be immensely useful at times to find critics who are able to explain the things about a movie that work and why they work… or to explain why a movie sucks and what went wrong.

It’s a popular sentiment that art is subjective when this is clearly not true. There’s a reason why certain movies almost universally are loved. Critics can help provide clarity about the qualities in movie.
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 5/8/2026, 12:50 PM
Art will always be subjective. Nobody can tell me what qualifies as an enjoyable experience for me, nor what I should look for. A universally loved movie means absolutely nothing to me.

I love hearing what went into a movie, but technical aspects and all that are for them, not me. What it boils down to for me is, was I entertained? And no, I don't mean in an action, "turn off my brain" type of way.

A critic can't explain what sucked to me. They can explain what sucked to them. Just look at any movie; they're rarely at 0% or 100%, which means everybody's opinion is different.

Also, critics have biases and agendas all the time.
Lucasberg
Lucasberg - 5/8/2026, 5:52 PM
@MyCoolYoung - yes I figured based upon your initial post that you imagined art was subjective. It’s also a very post modern viewpoint to imagine that the most important perspective is our own.

The Sisteene Chapel is not subjectively good in form and appearance, it is objectively so. Even better, Yosemite Valley is not subjectively beautiful, it is objectively so. For those who deviate from acknowledging these realities, they do well to learn what it is about their perspective that is skewed. Like why are they missing something that human eyes universally respond to in awe and praise?

If someone in 2026 watches The Godfather and concludes the movie is not good, they should want to try to understand why they deviate from the whole planet in their tastes (lol). Maybe their tastes are more developed than the entire cosmos, but it’s doubtful.

The best way to learn how to drive a car is to observe and then mimic other people driving. And so it is with basically every sport, and profession… if you want to enjoy good art it’s useful to try to understand the knowledge (even if you disagree with them) that people who have consumed this stuff en masse, have to share.


MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 5/11/2026, 11:52 AM
@Lucasberg It’s not about having “higher taste.” I think using that to shame people’s opinions is wild to me.

I don’t care why people like the Mona Lisa. To me, it’s just a plain picture. The Godfather is filled with gratuitous violence that isn’t fantastical in any way, and I don’t enjoy movies like that. I grew up around violence. I’ve lost a lot of friends and acquaintances, so that movie doesn’t hit the same for me.

At the end of the day, I live for me. I watch for me. I think for myself. Nobody’s going to tell me what I’m supposed to enjoy or what I should consider “good.” There will never be a time where I put someone else’s opinion higher than my own.

There’s so many pieces of art that was panned at some point and called a masterpiece later. That in and of itself is indicative of the subjectivity of it.

One battle after another was not good. Idc what the themes, thematic mirrors, foreshadowing or anything else was
Lucasberg
Lucasberg - 5/11/2026, 4:13 PM
@MyCoolYoung - I wouldn’t call it higher taste but developed. It assumes that there are worthwhile standards to judge the qualities of things by that go beyond our subjective experience. It’s not shaming someone for trashing a great movie to say that they probably have underdeveloped taste in food if they think Top Ramen is better than a Michelin star rated restaurant. These things are not all just puffery. There is basis to identifying in food smarter and more coherent ingredients, texture, presentation and erm, taste (haha).

A person may prefer Top Ramen over Nakiryu Ramen (I just googled that 😂) for any number of reasons but it’s worth trying to discern why we diverge from something universally praised… cuz that is a thing. Why are some food places almost UNIVERSALLY praised when others are not? Is it just a bunch of sheeple? Do we imagine that we are the only truly authentic people and everyone else is beneath us in going along with the masses or is that near universal praise actually reflective of something about the food consumed? And if so, what is it that I’m missing that others taste and see? I’ve had some instances with food where I disagreed with the overall consensus about a place and then over time after being exposed to other ingredients and things about the food, my palette literally changed and some of that stuff became some of my favorite (sushi and cheesecake come to mind). With other things however, this has not occurred for me (goat cheese - I HATE it) - and that’s okay… I’ve tried and so far I’m very comfortable in just disliking it. All the foodies can suck a fart as far as I’m concerned when it comes to goat cheese.

Art, music, movies etc operate in the same way. Your taste and enjoyment will increase and improve if you try to understand the merits people argue for those things called great… if you just live inside your own thoughts, feelings, and subjective experiences, you will have less to enjoy and will live in a much smaller universe.

Lucasberg
Lucasberg - 5/11/2026, 4:18 PM
@MyCoolYoung - this reminds me of an art exhibit that sold I think for 1 million and it was a literal banana taped to a canvass. The buyer purchased the “art” and ate the banana on the spot. The point obviously is that there is nothing inherently good or bad about art. That a Rembrandt is just as good as a banana taped to a canvass. This is obviously completely false and honestly destroys all motivation for trying to make great pieces of art but it is where we are as a culture quite sadly.
Irregular
Irregular - 5/7/2026, 3:02 PM
LMAO yeah because every critic must know the ins and outs of Mortal Kombat. And if they don't and don't like said movie then their opinion is invalidated

Yeah.......not DUMB at all!!!
Vigor
Vigor - 5/7/2026, 3:57 PM
@Irregular - so wait. If a reviewer complained about captain america the first avenger, because it had a shield ... you think thats fair?
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 5/7/2026, 4:06 PM
@Irregular - but it’s a movie made with a Mortal Kombat fan in mind lol of course anyone can watch it but the target audience obviously is the people who are familiar with the games, so yeah someone who couldn’t even be bothered to do some research complaining about that a character from the game has a laser eye is indeed ridiculous.
FireGunn
FireGunn - 5/7/2026, 4:11 PM
@Vigor - No. That's a dumb criticism, but reviewers don't have to know every part of the lore to review the film. Hell, I'll take it a step further and say they don't even have to like the genre or the games
Irregular
Irregular - 5/7/2026, 4:13 PM
@Vigor - To quote the critic who called out Todd Garner who said this beautifully...

"You can make something for the fans without excluding the opinion of those who aren't. I don't think playing the games or knowing the lore should be a prerequisite for viewing. Films should be reviewed on how they function as… films, not as a piece of fan service."
Irregular
Irregular - 5/7/2026, 4:20 PM
@Urubrodi - "so yeah someone who couldn’t even be bothered to do some research complaining about that a character from the game has a laser eye is indeed ridiculous."

Why do I need to do homework and "research" a specific character to understand something? I'm watching for entertainment, I'm not prepping a thesis statement for a college report.

You can still make a movie for fans, but if it's only for "FANS" then wtf is the point if you're not going to try to bring in new fans? If a critic doesn't understand why Kano has ONE EYE that shoots out a laser then the movie probably just uses him as a set piece and NOTHING ELSE.

If the only excuse is "Well Kano in the game has a laser for an eye" but miss out the biggest reason why which is it's "cybernetic" then CLEARLY....there is reason to critique!

No need to be so hard on critics, they are not masters of pop-culture or geekdom. I don't expect them to totally 100% understand the lore of Mortal Kombat nor do I think they will 100% love it.
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 5/7/2026, 6:00 PM
@Irregular - I get your point, but over at Marvel lately that sounds more like...

User Comment Image
Irregular
Irregular - 5/7/2026, 8:05 PM
@TheRevelation - Sounds more like "NO" what?
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 5/7/2026, 8:39 PM
@Irregular - That seems to be how they've handled things until pretty recently.

"You can make something for the fans without excluding the opinion of those who aren't. I don't think playing the games or knowing the lore should be a prerequisite for viewing. Films should be reviewed on how they function as… films, not as a piece of fan service."

I think it was exhausting to keep up with a lot of the shows movies etc. So it felt like, no, that's not what they're doing. I'm assuming that changes with Doomsday.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 5/7/2026, 9:28 PM
@Vigor - The shield is set up in the actual movie. They don't need to read the comics for that.
EscapeMySight
EscapeMySight - 5/7/2026, 3:03 PM
I’ll probably see it this weekend, however… “since the movies "invented Cole Young, Arcana and couldn't even get the simple lore of Mileena and Kitana correct." “

LOL! So true.

These are not the definitive MK films us fans deserve, but it’s what we’ve got and better than nothing I guess. I hope once it’s rebooted the next team take things a bit more seriously.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 5/7/2026, 3:35 PM
I do kinda understand where he's coming from, but he obviously shouldn't have posted it publicly. I've read a few very stuffy reviews. The movie is far from perfect, but it's doing exactly what it's setting out to do. Target audience should be factored in to a review. I didn't really care for Mario 2 but I appreciate that it achieved what it was going for.
dragon316
dragon316 - 5/7/2026, 4:20 PM
@MarkCassidy - I feel same with Mario 2 it was goood not as goood first one I never listen to reviews we since when do we live in sad world we ne need stupid strangers tell me s what should see and like in life that’s 4 year old way of living we don’t have reviews and critics tell us where to live who marry how many kids what job work at what car buy what clothes buy we make those decisions since when did helpless adults need be told what to like and watch in entertainment by reviews sad way live can’t think for yourself in life pathetic.,

One opinion that matters that’s your own no one else video game fans don’t need reviews they still play classic games dig dug , rampage Pac-Man and others if video game fans live there life have childish reviews tell them what to do in life they give up on classic games super Mario for nes , duck hunt, kaboom , tapper only play games for Xbox switch and PlayStation
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 5/7/2026, 3:59 PM
Honestly. It’s not surprising that a producer on Adam Sandler’s Jack & Jill would think this way…

That aside , I do think there are critics who are biased towards these type of films or even genre stories in general such as superheroes who I feel aren’t impartial enough to give a fair review about these type of projects.

However , most critics I feel do genuinely want to enjoy the stuff they have to/want to watch so if they do give a negative review (with valid reasons) of the film or tv show not working for them then that’s fair imo.

Anyway , i found the 2021 MK film to be mildly enjoyable but looking forward to the sequel since it seems like an improvement imo!!.

User Comment Image
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 5/7/2026, 6:04 PM
@TheVisionary25 - Yeah, I never understood the Cage casting hate. He's an action star, washed up...wouldn't that be a guy around Urban's age?

User Comment Image

User Comment Image

User Comment Image

If you don't like Urban that's one thing, but otherwise I mean...yeah.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 5/7/2026, 6:06 PM
@TheRevelation - to be fair , I don’t think he’s washed up in some versions and is younger in them aswell.

However going by what we have seen in the trailers , Urban works for this take on the character who’s still somewhat cocky but also just gruffer aswell.
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 5/7/2026, 8:34 PM
@TheVisionary25 - Probably. I admit I don't play them as much as I used to. I do think it's good casting for these films though, but we'll see in a few days I guess.
FireGunn
FireGunn - 5/7/2026, 4:12 PM
Insecure and unprofessional producer has a fit because his studio made a dogshit film.

Reboot the MCU and DCU
BlackStar25
BlackStar25 - 5/7/2026, 4:24 PM
Coming from the guy that producer MKI? LMFAOOOOOOO
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 5/7/2026, 4:48 PM
@BlackStar25 - I atleast give him credit for acknowledging that he shouldn’t throw stones at others given they also changed stuff & came up with new things (like any adaptation) in the first film.
BlackStar25
BlackStar25 - 5/7/2026, 8:58 PM
@TheVisionary25 - Yeah....but he the nerve to think the internet would not call him out on his own bullshit...which also let's you know that...he was okay with those changes
Irregular
Irregular - 5/7/2026, 4:40 PM
For anyone wondering....THIS is who Todd Garner is talking about
https://joysauce.com/mortal-kombat-ii-sucks-the-life-out-of-action-movies/
cheeseburger
cheeseburger - 5/7/2026, 5:22 PM
Couldn’t care less what people say about this movie, I’m seeing tonight because I want to. It’s Mortal Combat not Citizen Kane so I’m seeing it for what it’s worth
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder