Two Legendary Comic Creators Proud of X-Men Origins: Wolverine!

Two Legendary Comic Creators Proud of X-Men Origins: Wolverine!

Here is a Newsarama interview with Len Wein and Chris Claremont where they give their thoughts on the characters that they created featured in the film...

By JoshWilding - May 09, 2009 04:05 PM EST
Source: Newsarama

At the premiere of X-Men Origins: Wolverine last week, there were two people sitting in the audience who had a little more interest in the characters on the screen than everyone else. After all, they created most of them.

Len Wein and Chris Claremont, two legends in the comic book industry, were the minds behind the creation of many of the mutants gracing the screen in the Wolverine movie. And according to them, the filmmakers did a good job of getting it right.



"Hugh Jackman is such a delight to watch on the face of it, but then when you throw in Liev Schreiber as Sabretooth and Taylor Kitsch as Gambit, it was just amazing," said Claremont, who created both Sabretooth and Gambit during his 17-year run on Uncanny X-Men in the '70s and '80s. "The bringing to life of characters that I've worked on, and doing it so well, was just an incredible treat."

"I was thrilled. I had a terrific time at the movie," said Wein, who created Wolverine in 1974. "I thought, and it was my wife's point too, that it was very much my Wolverine."



Wein, whom Jackman publicly thanked during last year's San Diego Comic-Con for creating Wolverine, explained that what he means by "my Wolverine" is that the movie captured the character's struggle with his humanity, which he always felt was at the heart of Wolverine's character.

"I've always felt that Wolverine became more popular when he started to become a killer. And I'm one of those old-fashioned guys; my heroes are heroes," Wein explained. "I always felt what made Wolverine heroic was that his natural inclination was to gut you like a fish, but that he'd stop when he was a fraction of an inch from your belly before he'd actually do it. And there's more of that, I think, in the film. God knows there's enough hacking and slashing and leaving bodies strewn across the landscape. But I think the heart of it was the type of guy he was, and he was more of the human than the animal, although he was always battling that animal side of himself."

Claremont agreed that the conflict between humanity and animal instinct is important to the character's story, but he added that the movie not only showed the internal battle, but echoed that struggle in the relationship between Wolverine and Sabretooth.

"They parsed it out between Wolverine and Sabretooth," Claremont said of the movie. "They set them up as equals, but while Wolverine struggles with his animal side, Sabretooth doesn't. Sabretooth thinks he's an idiot. Sabretooth looks around and it's like, I am what I am because I'm the best I am at what I do. And I don't really care. The rest of you guys are all prey. They're the flip sides of the same coin, and the difference is that Sabretooth knows he's right, but Wolverine has doubts. The doubts are what makes him human."



Claremont said Schreiber's portrayal of Sabretooth was surprising to him because he didn't have the size that the character has in the comics. "Liev is not as huge as Sabretooth from the first X-Men, but on the other hand, his movement is just wonderful. The sort of leaping across the floor and tackling," he said. "Liev is a tremendous actor, and from a totally different approach and perspective from Hugh Jackman. So it was really neat watching the two of them go at each other through this whole thing."



Claremont's other fan-favorite creation that played a large role in the film was Gambit, the charming card-thrower with a Creole accent who eventually joined the X-Men team in the comics.

"My kids thought he had the best stunt in the movie, when he leaps off the building down into the alleyway and just brings down the house, as it were. But then I remember thinking, gee, the New Orleans police department must be as bad as they say," Claremont joked.

"And his accent seems to come and go," Wein said with a laugh.

"Well, it's always easier to write those accents than it is to portray them," Claremont said. "You need a true Cajun for the role, but then if you had a true Cajun, nobody would understand a word he said! But what was important about Gambit was you ended up liking him, and that was a really good thing. And the actor really stole the show when he was on screen."



The two writers said the only thing they didn't like about the movie was that they wanted more.

"We got to the end and I was thinking, OK, now we've had that chapter; can we get the hour-and-a-half that comes next?" Claremont said.

The creators may not have to wait long. As Newsarama reported this week, not only is a Wolverine sequel in development, there's already a spin-off Deadpool movie in development starring Ryan Reynolds.

"From what I read so far, it's pretty much your and Frank [Miller]'s samurai story they're developing for the next one," Wein told Claremont as they discussed the movie.

"Oh, I've heard that before. They've been playing with that for years. I'll believe it when I see it," he said with a laugh.

Claremont said if filmmakers do end up adapting the story he did with artist-turned-filmmaker Miller – a story that focused on Wolverine's time in Japan and the character's courtship of a woman named Mariko Yashida – the key to making it work will still rely upon that internal struggle "between the monster and the man" that makes Wolverine's character so compelling.

"The thing about Frank's and my story is we take it right to the edge," he said. "We get him right to the moment where he said I do, and Mariko is about to say I do, and it's all there. He's almost got his Holy Grail. And then... bam. The challenge for him as a character is what comes next. Does he just keep falling and let himself turn into a monster, or does he pick himself up, dust himself off and try again to embrace his humanity? Ideally, from a writing standpoint, the goal is to keep the audience guessing until he actually does it. But to have him come back. The human part of him has a will to not give in to defeat, but just keeps coming back and trying and believing that some way he will find a way to win, to achieve what he wants most in the world."

"That's true of almost any hero, that heroic journey," Wein added. "What makes Logan's journey different from other heroes is that battle within himself, between the man and the animal. That constant struggle to stay a man despite the fact that the animal dominates."

As for the film based on Deadpool – one of the few mutants in the Wolverine movie not created by one of the two – both were enthusiastic about more of that character as well.

"I love Ryan Reynolds in anything he does, so I think he'll be terrific. It's the right guy in the right role," Wein added. "I want to see what happens next with all these characters."



Both creators said that although they aren't involved in the filmmaking and don't actually own rights to the characters anymore because they created them for Marvel, they feel lucky to have their creations portrayed in the movies.

"I've been very fortunate with the actors who have played my characters. Alan Cumming was the perfect Nightcrawler. The guy who played Colossus was terrific. It's just all been amazing, the people who have played those characters," he said. "I have worked in so many different mediums over the years. It's always fascinating to me to see how people working, especially, in film take what started out as a static, two-dimensional story and move it to the screen, where suddenly you have the advantage of actors and the nuance they can bring to the role. And I couldn't be happier with the way it's all turned out."
X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE Star Kevin Durand Reveals Plans For The Blob In Scrapped Sequel
Related:

X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE Star Kevin Durand Reveals Plans For The Blob In Scrapped Sequel

DEADPOOL Creator Rob Liefeld Shares Horrified Reaction To Resurfaced X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE Concept Art
Recommended For You:

DEADPOOL Creator Rob Liefeld Shares "Horrified" Reaction To Resurfaced X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE Concept Art

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

SupahPhreak
SupahPhreak - 5/9/2009, 6:06 PM
Oki doke.
TucsonRican
TucsonRican - 5/9/2009, 8:08 PM
Interesting...
loganaspatch
loganaspatch - 5/9/2009, 9:28 PM
i agree the ACTORS portrayal of there characters was pretty damn good notice not alot is said about the other aspects of the movie

yeah.. still bashing it

- dont tell me how to hurt lol
Betty
Betty - 5/9/2009, 10:48 PM
What if Miller had a hand in the next wolvie movie. And drop the "origins" crap. Give it its own title.
TheMyth
TheMyth - 5/10/2009, 1:33 AM
Oh so what do you fanboys have to say now that the creators of these characters enjoy the portrayal of their creations? Chris Claremont is the final stop in the X-Men universe. He created a majority of the characters in this franchise, making his word gold in regards to the X-Men. Sorry folks, but this is one of those occasions in which someone elses opinion IS more important than yours, and that some one else is Claremont himself.
JamesH
JamesH - 5/10/2009, 8:45 AM
agree with you loganaspatch... everything they both said about the film was correct but all they said were about the actors and their portrayals.

If one says a girl is pretty, then clearly her looks is good. Although the same couldnt be said about her brains, her humor, her body, her conduct....
OriginalPhysco
OriginalPhysco - 5/10/2009, 10:55 AM
I agree with them, they did the movie right. But the thing that made me laugh is Deadpool being Wolverine's son. I mean wasnt weopon X1, wolverine's son Daken. The only character that could kill Wolverine bacause of his blades. One thing they left out the movie, isnt the blades suppose to hurt everytime he ejects and opens them
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 5/10/2009, 2:02 PM
WTF RecoSwaVa? Deadpool isnt Wolverines son! Daken isnt Weapon XI either!
Supermike
Supermike - 5/10/2009, 5:38 PM
That where your wrong TheMyth
Betty
Betty - 5/10/2009, 6:28 PM
Yeah, why would they say anything negative about their creations at all? The movies is the 1st place gold medal last stop for their creations. Probably just glad their still alive to see it.
OriginalPhysco
OriginalPhysco - 5/10/2009, 7:09 PM
I really didn't mean to say Deadpool was Wolverine's son; I know he is not his son but in the comics, Romulus intends for Weapon XI to be capable of killing Wolverine, and therefore he thinks Romulus' plan is to turn Wolverine's son Daken into Weapon XI by fusing the Muramasa blade (which is the only blade that could kill Wolverine) onto Daken's skeleton. Daniel states in the Wolverine: Marvel Spotlight "Now, that's very different from Daken, who is allowed in the house. He's like the next generation. He's Weapon XI."

LEEE777
LEEE777 - 5/11/2009, 8:34 AM
Claremonts a sell out and probably got payed too!!! : D

The movie was hairy donkey ballz!!! ; )

LEEE777
LEEE777 - 5/11/2009, 8:36 AM
The actors was the only good thing about it!!! ; )
longbowhunter
longbowhunter - 5/11/2009, 9:33 AM
I agree, I said the same thing. "The actors were the only good thing about it". But, what the hell happened to Gambit's accent. Could the actor not pretend to fly a plane and fake an accent? Like, he had it in the bar scene then after that BOOM...gone.
GUNSMITH
GUNSMITH - 5/11/2009, 11:28 AM
I THOUGHT IT WAS GOOD BUT I WISH THEY GOT HIM IN THAT WEAPON X HELMET AND TECH..THAT WAS ONE OF THOSE LANDMARK LOOKS..
ironknight27
ironknight27 - 5/11/2009, 11:41 AM
@Gunsmith- Yeah that would have been nice. In the movie game he does actually wear it for a moment.
Karib
Karib - 5/11/2009, 11:41 AM
I too agree that the only thing good about this movie were some of the acting.

Gambit was disappointing. Hardly an accent and no franglais. No, mon ami!!! At that point of the movie, the movie completely lost me. I couldn't take anymore.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 5/11/2009, 12:33 PM
Longbowhunter @ Karib @ ; )

GUNSMITH @ The helmet was the least of its problems, though yeah it would've been nice! ... Guys, didn't it look so much better in flashbacks in X2 than it did in WOLVERINE when he got his metal bones n claws!!! Damn.
longbowhunter
longbowhunter - 5/11/2009, 12:43 PM
I agree with you guys, the helmet & tubes & junk hangin' off him would have been sweet. Not to mention a nice P.O.V. shot through the lens in the helmet would have been a great touch!

Hey LEEE777 yeah the flashbacks were better in X2. It seemed to portrait the proceedure as being alot more traumatic, as I'm sure it would be!
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 5/11/2009, 2:00 PM
Yeah it would be big time more traumatic!!! @ Longbow @ There's so many things wrong with WOLVIE i still don't get why people are defending that Abomination of a comic book movie???? Do people not want better comic book movies??? Because they won't get them if they accept crap like this!! THE BAR HAS BEEN RAISED!!!
THEHAWK
THEHAWK - 5/11/2009, 2:08 PM
@LEEE. I don't think its fair to be bashing peoples opinions dude, I mean I actually enjoyed Wolverine. Yes it had some flaws, but with the exception of Cyke, Emma, and Xavier, the movie was a pretty good ADAPTION.

An ADAPTION takes liberties so the people who are not fans of the comics will understand it, rather than translate it to a film for the fans like Watchmen. I enjoyed both Watchmen and Wolverine, but look at which one did better at the box office, Wolverine, because it was more friendly to those who were not as familiar with Wolverine like we are.

HAWK out.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 5/11/2009, 2:28 PM
Lol HAWK!!!

Im not bashing anything bud heh heh, an the ADAPTION card is getting a lil old. If FOX done it more true to the character of WOLVERINE it still would be making the same amount of money if not more, its WOLVERINE !!! Everyone an their dog loves WOLVERINE like SPIDER-MAN!!! The whole movie was a watered down waste of space. So what your saying is anyone who don't read the comics wouldn't get the movie if it was more true to the character??? So everyone's thick outside of the comic book reader??? (Staying true or just having the basics would be less confusing than what they did). Why can't people see it would've been a 9 or 10 out of 10 movie if it was more closly to the actual character??? People would love it no matter what! Its WOLVERINE!!! .... Why should us fans say yeah it was okay??? After all if it wasn't for us lot buying the comics for years there would be no WOLVERINE movie!!!

Bottom line is FOX don't give a rats a$$ about WOLVERINE or anything, just money, why should we settle for a second rate movie!

By the way DARTH VADER's Logans and Creeds Father!!! : D

MAY THE FOX BE WITH YOU!!! ; )
longbowhunter
longbowhunter - 5/11/2009, 2:52 PM
Its plain and simple. The general population will accept what there given whether its a botched adaptaion or true to the material. Watchmen did not fly because it was about plot and charater devlopment, not action!

The real reason we see changes in story, costumes, ect..is the Hollywood shit whistles behind comic book movies have egos that will not let them make someone else's vision. Recognize people!!!
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 5/11/2009, 3:03 PM
100% @ Longbowhunter @ !!!

An....

HOLLYWOOD sh!t whistles! I like that lol!!! : D
adamant877
adamant877 - 5/11/2009, 3:52 PM
Although I agree, there was some artistic license taken, I have to say I did enjoy the movie (lol, now hold er' back LEEE, I'm not done). I do understand the mindset of the comic purest, even to the degree of (sigh) those like Hyson, who spend WAY too much energy complaining about the absence/inclusion of giant alien squids (groan)... We do want to see our beloved characters and stories told in such a way that they are entertaining AND true to the source material. But...

You have to remember, as a realist, that there are certain things, certain stories that cannot be told within the short amount of time that films allow, and that certain things do NOT makes sense (ie. costumes, capes, and masks) to the general audience out there.

Most lay people see these things and get turned off by the sheer lack of realism. I myself COMPLETELY understand why someone like Wolverine would NOT run around in yellow spandex, or brown spandex, or ANY spandex. It's just not realistic. And that goes against the whole principal of adapting these characters/stories onto the screen.

Now with that, I do agree that every once in a while, writers of certain movies want to omit or add certain things that could easily have been explained within a short period of time staying within the guidelines of ACTUAL comic book continuity, but often, even THESE small tidbits, if indeed added, would interrupt the flow of the story and cause confusion. And that's just poor storytelling.

I'm in no way saying that EVERY time someone changes an aspect of a story, that we should "sit down and shut up", I in fact encourage EVERYONE to let their voices be heard if they feel that they're beloved characters/stories are being grossly mistreated, but we have to remember that these movies are not ONLY made for us (the comic book fans), but for everyone else out there who may be interested in taking a short jaunt into our world. Hopefully they like it enough to check out more?
And what if they watch the movie, and then one of us happens to lean over to them and say "That's not how it really was." We all know what that leads to. ;-)
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 5/11/2009, 4:30 PM
Adamant877 @ Lol heh heh! Dude, im not a comic purest, not by a long shot but they messed up that movie from start to finish man! The plot, everything! You don't hav'ta have movies like 300, WATCHMEN, SIN CITY etc, (the BASICS would be nice), but come onnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn, WOLVERINE and CREED as brothers????? (actors, perfect for the parts), but that an so much more made WOLVIE stink! If the cinema had smell-a-vision id be outta there! Infact quite a few people left all the way through the showing! Never have i seen that before!!

They should've called it = X-MEN BORIGINS: TURDERINE!!!!

Anyway we can all argue about this till the cows come home, i just hope they don't mess up anymore! (Yeah like that wont happen lol).

End of the day, a movie that big and that hyped with all them millions put in it should've been a WOLVIE Epic, not bad plot, bad special effects, bad take on the characters have silly stupid stuff in it that makes no sense flaws everywhere etc etc ( i could go on), oh and bad origin!!!

Can't wait for the BR/dvd!!! : D heh heh heh.
GameAnime45
GameAnime45 - 5/11/2009, 4:33 PM
I liked the movie, but since they enjoyed their characters your opinions don't actually matter anymore since we heard from the makers.. LOL
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 5/11/2009, 4:42 PM
Im joking by the way! An whats spandex got to do with anything???

GameAnime45 = SHEEP! ; ) ( I could say alot worst heh).
adamant877
adamant877 - 5/11/2009, 5:42 PM
LEEE: You always crack me up with your die hard enthusiasm for (or I should say "against") this movie. Trust me, I understand what you're saying, but I think, when all is said and done, the only thing that people should have a full, justified complaint about this movie for, is the treatment of Deadpool. (But even that can, and will be addressed in the next X-Men Origins movie.)
About Sabretooth and Wolverine being brothers... Now this was one I wasn't expecting, until I read some early reviews of the screenplay, and discovered that that's how they were going to play out their relationship. But to be honest, that's EXACTLY how I would have played it, too.
In Origins, they pretty much elude to Creed and Howlett being brothers. (The character of "Dog" can pretty much be assumed to be a young Victor, without outwardly stating it, but then again, I think this could also turn out to be the mysterious "Romulus" that we keep hearing about. One never knows.)
I just hope that your dislike of how they handled the cannon of the story doesn't interrupt the possibility that you could (maybe eventually) enjoy the movie for what it was.
I know I did, and I certainly look forward to the sequal, especially if they go with the Japan story!
Thanks for an open mind, and an open ear, as always.
THEHAWK
THEHAWK - 5/11/2009, 6:01 PM
i like the Sabertooth/Wolverine angle. It was simple, and it saved them the trouble of introducing Creed in the movie. It made the plot progress faster, and it made since. They also hint that Dog may be Credd in Origin.
TheStranger
TheStranger - 5/11/2009, 7:02 PM
Because everyone bashing the movie knows soooo much more about X-men than Claremont and Wien. Len Wien who co-created Wolverine along with John Romita Sr. even says the characters and movie was done right. Oh but no you know so much more than the co-creator about wolverine lol and his origins and how accurate the movie was to the comics.

Do us all a favor and cruise by Myth's "True X-men fan" page so he can just prove you wrong on the spot. Oh or better yet send a letter to Len Wien and tell him you know the character better than he does, and that you thought the movie was crap. I'm sure he might get a good laugh that day at your expense.
SGA
SGA - 5/11/2009, 11:36 PM
AMEN Sortis.
JamesH
JamesH - 5/18/2009, 12:25 AM
Im a huge comicbook fan but i understand the liberties filmmakers do to make the film acceptable for a wide range of audiences. The did it in HULK, Batman, Ironman and other films but i still loved the movies coz they were simply great.

Wolverine is not a great movie not JUST because how different it is from the books. The special effects were lackluster. The fight scenes were mediocre and didnt offer anything fresh. The plot was so absurd that it had more plotholes and stupid antics than cool moments. Those are not opinions but are facts.

I dont give a crap if the original writers loved the film... why? i dont know what they like. Who knows? Maybe they loved Dragonball too and AVP:REquiem.

Scorpioxfactor
Scorpioxfactor - 5/21/2009, 12:38 PM
Don't do another Wolverine. IF you do, please tie it in with X-Men four where they come to bail Wolvie out. Have the Viper and Silver Samarai that would be great.
View Recorder