X-MEN '97 Will Be Rated TV-14 On Disney+; One Key Member Of The Team Will Be Portrayed As Nonbinary

X-MEN '97 Will Be Rated TV-14 On Disney+; One Key Member Of The Team Will Be Portrayed As Nonbinary

It appears Marvel Studios' approach to X-Men '97 will be a little darker than X-Men: The Animated Series, while it's also been confirmed that one key member of the team will be portrayed as nonbinary.

By JoshWilding - Feb 19, 2024 07:02 AM EST
Filed Under: X-Men '97
Source: Toonado.com

X-Men: The Animated Series remains beloved among comic book fans and we'll finally return to that world in Marvel Animation's upcoming X-Men '97. Among the biggest surprises in the new trailer was the retro animation style, but that's not the only major change. 

The homepage for X-Men '97 on Disney+ reveals that the show is going to be rated TV-14; the small screen equivalent of PG-13, this is a fairly noteworthy difference when compared to X-Men: The Animated Series' TV-Y7 rating. 

"This program contains material that most parents would find unsuitable for children under 14 years of age," reads an official description which strongly seems to suggest X-Men '97 will explore slightly more mature and hard-hitting themes. The original did that too but the world is a different place now and we expect the show to be particularly timely.

The latest issue of Empire Magazine (via Toonado.com) also includes an interesting update on the shapeshifting Morph, a character who we've now learned will be portrayed as nonbinary.

According to the publication, X-Men '97 will feature a "lighter take on the character, who is nonbinary and has an interesting buddy relationship with Wolverine." Morph wasn't portrayed in this manner in X-Men: The Animated Series or the comics, so it appears to be a shakeup made to further increase the revival's level of diversity. 

It's noted that Morph's history with Mister Sinister will also "come into play" throughout the series. 

X-Men: The Animated Series saw Morph, a mutant who can transform into both male and female characters, seemingly die in a battle with the Senintels. He survived and fell under Mister Sinister's influence, later parting ways with the X-Men due to that brief change in allegiance. 

"He really set the stakes, and he had a very interesting relationship with the team because of trauma," X-Men '97 showrunner Beau DeMayo said of the character who will now be voiced by J. P. Karliak. The original Morph, Ron Rubin, is taking on the role of President Robert Edward Kelly.

"X-Men'97 revisits the iconic era of the 1990s as The X-Men," reads a brief synopsis, "a band of mutants who use their uncanny gifts to protect a world that hates and fears them, are challenged like never before, forced to face a dangerous and unexpected new future."

X-Men '97 is set to premiere on Disney+ on March 20. As always, stay tuned for updates as we have them!

X-MEN '97: Beau DeMayo Says Marvel Scrapped His Plans For Onslaught And AGE OF APOCALYPSE Season 3
Related:

X-MEN '97: Beau DeMayo Says Marvel Scrapped His Plans For Onslaught And AGE OF APOCALYPSE Season 3

STAR WARS: Simon Kinberg Reportedly Seen As Safe Choice To Develop New Trilogy Despite Past Flops
Recommended For You:

STAR WARS: Simon Kinberg Reportedly Seen As "Safe Choice" To Develop New Trilogy Despite Past Flops

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Arthorious
Arthorious - 2/19/2024, 7:45 AM
Morph
Conquistador
Conquistador - 2/19/2024, 7:51 AM
@Arthorious - or mystique! otherwise i'd hope they pick a mutant who actually identifies as that from the comics...if they're making it up, then shame on Disney for forcing it.
jst5
jst5 - 2/19/2024, 5:36 PM
@UniqNo - It's Morph...and it's said in his backstory than he has an "interesting" relationship with Wolverine.
Matchesz
Matchesz - 2/19/2024, 7:45 AM
Called it
Matador
Matador - 2/19/2024, 11:26 AM
@Matchesz - I remember how they were going for the woke treatment before it was made and made that comment. And the sheep jumped me for it as well.

To all those that doubted me eat it.

SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 2/19/2024, 11:41 AM
@Matador - You clearly don't know who or what the X-Men are at all. They were always an allegory for what you call "woke".
McMurdo
McMurdo - 2/19/2024, 12:37 PM
@SonOfAGif - they were culturally diverse. They didnt utilize gender ideology or pronoun usage. Huge difference.
Vigor
Vigor - 2/19/2024, 12:51 PM
@Matador - haha i dont think you made as revelatory as a statement as you think. The xmen were always woke
Vigor
Vigor - 2/19/2024, 12:53 PM
@McMurdo - xmen represented those that were different. They were literally mutants. And normie humans in the stories hated them and made laws persecuting their kind

Sound familiar?

If in 100 years we have literal robots seeking equality in our society, the messaging behind xmen would represent them too
McMurdo
McMurdo - 2/19/2024, 12:58 PM
@Vigor - I'm not disagreeing about what the X-Men is about. I'm disagreeing that the X-Men were woke. They werent. They were simply diverse racially and culturally and literally zero of that had anything to do with post millennial gender ideology and pronoun usage. That ain't in the books. I'm a huge X Men fan. I like my Ororro black and my Bishop black and my Kurt Catholic and my Jubilee Asian. Etc etc. but this quite literally is pandering. If you're cool with it that's fine just at least be willing to admit what this is and not delude yourself into what it isn't.
Vigor
Vigor - 2/19/2024, 1:03 PM
@McMurdo - I don't know when pandering ever became a bad thing. It sounds like you guys are making something good into something bad. Like the word woke
HulkisHoly
HulkisHoly - 2/19/2024, 4:40 PM
@SonOfAGif -

Nope. I have the receipts right here from Stan Lee’s mouth…

?si=RyMcZINHa7Af4wo2
cubrn
cubrn - 2/19/2024, 7:34 PM
@McMurdo - Native Americans have had the belief in the "two spirit" for thousands of years. It's not something new. The only thing that is new is the language used to describe it.
cubrn
cubrn - 2/19/2024, 8:37 PM
@HulkisHoly - All Stan Lee says in that video is that didn't originally intend for the X-Men to become that, but he never shied away from it becoming that over time.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 2/19/2024, 8:50 PM
@Vigor - at least you do not deny this is pandering. I give you immense credit there as it shows good faith. You have my respect.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 2/19/2024, 8:51 PM
@cubrn - lol you went with NATIVE AMERICANS for this one. You did that.
HulkisHoly
HulkisHoly - 2/19/2024, 9:46 PM
@cubrn -

Way to change the author’s intent. The argument has always been that, Stan Lee wrote the X-men as social commentary and I just proves that’s false and you can’t seem to accept that.
cubrn
cubrn - 2/19/2024, 10:41 PM
@McMurdo - You know that Native Americans still exist, right?
cubrn
cubrn - 2/19/2024, 10:44 PM
@HulkisHoly - The author clearly doesn't have a problem with it. Just because he stated it wasn't the original intent doesn't mean he had a problem with it.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 2/19/2024, 10:48 PM
@cubrn - are you asking or telling?
cubrn
cubrn - 2/19/2024, 11:15 PM
@McMurdo - Either/or. Your ignorance on the human condition outside of your limp dicked existence is showing.
cubrn
cubrn - 2/19/2024, 11:17 PM
@McMurdo - And speaking of original intent, viagra was developed to treat blood pressure but you can also use it to treat your limp dick
HulkisHoly
HulkisHoly - 2/19/2024, 11:50 PM
@cubrn -

Whether he has a problem or not is not the point. The point is when people say “the X-men have always been woke” isn’t true. Sure, perhaps maybe by the 2010’s you can say there have been “woke” writers but you can’t say the X-men have ALWAYS been “woke”. It’s just not true.
End of discussion. Everything else you are adding is a diversion from the main point that you fail to concede on.

In fact, I myself that also that Stan Lee based Prof X off of MLK but I was wrong and this video proved that. Why can’t you admit the same?
cubrn
cubrn - 2/20/2024, 12:40 AM
@HulkisHoly - It was also a failing title under Lee. Chris Clairemont made the X-Men what they are still seen as to this day. Even if Lee is the creator, his opinion on the matter or what they began as means nothing to me. And he certainly took zero issue with what Clairemont ran with.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 2/20/2024, 2:21 AM
@cubrn - did you get this insight from your fortune teller mail order bride Olga? When will you update the stock photo? We all are so excited to see more!
Matador
Matador - 2/20/2024, 7:48 AM
@SonOfAGif - Not when you are forced to use pronouns to identify someone that's not what they really are.

X-Men are have never been woke but they are from different countries, culture, and races only thing that separates them from humanity is being homo superior.
Matador
Matador - 2/20/2024, 7:51 AM
@Vigor - Not when current culture is pushing a different agenda in today's culture forcing someone to be recognized for being identified as a Unicorn. Then getting angry because they're not accepted into normal society or being wanted by the opposite sex.
LordCanterbury
LordCanterbury - 2/20/2024, 8:46 AM
@McMurdo - the only thing I would say though is, in 1962 a culturally diverse comic book was probably, overall, far more controversial in 1962 than a single nonbinary character in X-Men is in 2024.

When you say “huge difference”, yeah, in 2024 terms.

But nonbinary wasn’t an acknowledged “thing” in 1962 and racism was still rampant. It was radical for its time.
HulkisHoly
HulkisHoly - 2/20/2024, 1:10 PM
@cubrn -

Again, we aren’t talking what other writers have done with the X-men and whether you care or not. We are talking facts here and the FACT is the the X-men we’re NOT written as social commentary. Period.
You still fail to admit this reality and use diversion tactics which is disappointing.

If you like woke writers’ versions of the X-men, sure, that’s fine. You can like whatever im you want, but that’s not the point of the discussion.

I’d also argue that Claremont wasn’t “woke” either but that’s still a diversion from the premise that the X-men have always been woke, which we have clearly proven is not true.

Have a good day.
archiballz
archiballz - 2/20/2024, 3:51 PM
@Vigor - Well the word pander itself has negative connotations. From online: To pander is to appease or gratify, and often in a negative, self-serving way.
So yeah, pandering is bad, because the intention behind it isn't necessarily good.
That being said, Morph is non-binary anyhow, so whatevvs
Vigor
Vigor - 2/20/2024, 4:50 PM
@archiballz - "often in a negative, self-serving way"
Has anyone ever determined what self serving benefit a company has adding diversity? Or are they all theories for now

Companies don't seem to make money off the DEI movement, so it seems like pandering is a word people are using because they can't find a negative way to redefine a good action
cubrn
cubrn - 2/20/2024, 11:09 PM
@HulkisHoly - I already said I don't care that the original writer didn't intend it as a social commentary. I also know that Stan Lee embellished a lot of things and didn't credit all involved appropriately. I have always taken anything he has said with a grain of salt. The reason why X-Men caught on 12 years after they were created and were a failing title mainly printing reprints to gain any traction is because a later writer made them who they are still seen as today. They have been a social commentary FAAAAAAAAAAR LOOOOOOOOONGER than the initial 12 years of not being one. IF you actually read interviews of Chris Clairemont, he goes into detail of all the ways he tried to make characters gay, trans, mulitracial etc.
HulkisHoly
HulkisHoly - 2/21/2024, 12:26 PM
@cubrn -

“Trans” wasn’t even a word in the 70s when Clairemont was writing. Dude, read a history book.

“ I already said I don't care that the original writer didn't intend it as a social commentary.”

Yeah, and that’s the problem. You don’t care and still won’t admit that the narrative we’ve been discussing was false, you keep diverting.
LyleNorg
LyleNorg - 2/21/2024, 5:49 PM
@HulkisHoly - The idea that the X-Men haven't always been "woke" is.. ridiculous. It's been openly about racial discrimination, women's issues, gay rights, HIV/AIDs, fanatical religion, bigotry.. There are countless issues that are pure examples of this. The fact that you haven't read X-Men much or ever read God Loves, Man Kills or the death of Larry Bodine or the fact that a black woman was made leader of the X-Men, looked at the fact that Mystique and Destiny were lesbians since the 80s or that spin-off titles like Alpha Flight had gay characters like Northstar or that the Legacy Virus was used for a long time to be a mutant stand in for HIV/AIDs.. well.. then that's on you.

As for the idea that the X-Men have never been about gender issues, well.. that's not entirely true either. Artie and Leech regularly pushed gender norms and boundaries and there have been a number of mutants through out history that haven't always been obvious. Heck, Mystique regularly shape shifted into Uncle Same for.. no freaking reason other than to look like Uncle Sam. It wasn't a disguise or anything and it's not like Uncle Sam was a big heroic character like in DC. Besides that, the New Defenders, which had 3 of the original X-Men on it and was lead by Angel, who ya know, was an original X-Man (Jean was dead at this time and Cyke was retired so.. that's pretty much all of the OG X-Men operating at the time), had Cloud who was.. both male and female and was a love interest FOR Iceman.

But SUREEEEEEEEE comics NEVER dealt with anything remotely "woke" before 2010s.. except all the comics you clearly never read or have any knowledge of since.. it's pretty clear you don't read comics. Let the real fans talk about it.. cause you don't have a clue.
HulkisHoly
HulkisHoly - 2/21/2024, 6:47 PM
@LyleNorg -

I clearly stated there have been X-men writers who have introduced topics you mentioned years after the original runs of X-men. But to say that the X-men have always been “woke” is factually untrue as spoken by their creator.

So, please learn some reading comprehension and then we can have a discussion on how the X-men BECAME “progressive” or “woke” over time and with certain writers and runs.

You just come across as mad that you can’t factually say anymore that they’ve “always been woke”
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 2/19/2024, 7:47 AM
14?! BOOOOOOOO.

Couldn't at least been like a tv-17 or something. we need grittier x-men tales and for Wolverine to actually stab people instead of just robot sentinals and carving fences up.
OmegaDaGrodd
OmegaDaGrodd - 2/19/2024, 9:43 AM
@lazlodaytona -
@DrReedRichards

Lack of media literacy is such an underrated source of our societal headassery
DrReedRichards
DrReedRichards - 2/19/2024, 10:08 AM
@OmegaDaGrodd -
Why are you still surprised, mate? That's the norm here.

@lazlodaytona -

dragon316
dragon316 - 2/19/2024, 10:47 AM
@lazlodaytona - X-men anime is good choice for it
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 2/19/2024, 7:00 PM
@OmegaDaGrodd - WTF is that supposed to mean? Using big words alienates you; does not show you off. What's the word.... ah, SMUG. Nobody likes that kind of person.

and I'm pretty sure your highest published pieces are, well ... on this very site. Hanging with the loonies to help yourself feel superior.

?si=EQ-_8HWzVBSpJxAB
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder