UPDATED:VOD Dispute Could Keep CBM's Like Green Lantern and X-Men:First Class Out of Theaters

UPDATED:VOD Dispute Could Keep CBM's Like Green Lantern and X-Men:First Class Out of Theaters

Some potentially huge summer blockbusters could miss their theatrical run due to a dispute between theater chains and the studios over Video On Demand.

By Hawksblueyes - Apr 14, 2011 10:04 AM EST
Filed Under: Action
Source: /film



The National Association of Theater Owners has threatened Universal, Warner Bros., 20th Century Fox and Sony that they will stop showing their potential summer blockbusters. The organization which represents national theater chains like AMC and Regal has taken this stance in response to the Studios agreeing to the new Premium Video On Demand service. The service will feature films 60 days after their theatrical release and goes into action this month on Direct TV.

From /film...

If films start showing up in the home 60 days after their theatrical release instead of 120 days later, which has sort of become the new standard, theater owners believe it will significantly cut into their grosses. The longer a theater holds a movie on their screen, the bigger percentage of the gross they get to keep and if they agree to 60 days, what’s to stop the studios from cutting it back to 30 days or day and date in the future? In the past, new films wouldn’t show up on video for 6-8 months but seemingly every year that window has begun to dwindle. That’s largely because the DVD market is a buy first platform, unlike VHS of the past, where rental was the thing. Studios believe people are more willing to buy a movie closer to its original theatrical window, so they’re working to dwindle that time frame down.

Paramount and Disney have not agreed to the premium video on demand service. Paramount has stated that one of their major concerns about the service is increased piracy.

If this "boycott" were to actually happen, what kind of effect would that have on the future of CBM's? With films like Warner Bros. Green Lantern possibly never seeing a theater, how would the film fare? And could this be a stroke of luck for Marvel and Paramount if it comes to pass?

Films that would potentially fall under this "boycott" would be Green Lantern, Harry Potter: Deathly Hallows II, and X-Men:First Class just to name a few.



UPDATE: It now seems that the report at /film was false. Deadline has posted the following release from NATO...

Washington, D.C. (April 14, 2011)—The National Association of Theatre Owners does not and could not encourage its members to engage in any boycotts of any movies distributed by any company. Recent press reports to the contrary are completely false.

In an article published on April 13 in The Guardian, it was suggested that NATO indicated that cinema operators were prepared not to screen movies, and specifically referenced the coming Harry Potter film. No one from The Guardian contacted NATO before the original article was published. At our request, The Guardian did later change the article to remove the erroneous reference to the Harry Potter film.

Then later on April 13, the blog “Business Insider” entitled “Harry Potter 8 Dropped From Theaters?” suggested that NATO “is threatening to drop some of this summer’s biggest blockbusters” and that “screens under NATO are threatening to boycott upcoming studio releases, starting with Warner Bros. sure to be box office-gargantuan Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2.” Again, these stories, and others that have followed, are completely false and no one from the organizations responsible for the stories contacted anyone at NATO.

NATO has often articulated our concerns about the possible release of “premium VOD” movies in an early window. Our association issued statements on June 16, 2010 and again on March 31, 2011 regarding those concerns. But as our 2010 statement made clear, “individual theater companies must and will make decisions about release window changes in their own company’s interest.” NATO cannot and will not make those decisions for them.

John Fithian
President & CEO
NATO


Hawksblueyes: Thanks to kurekurcubic and dnno1 for the heads up on the updated information at Deadline..

By: TwitterButtons.com

By TwitterButtons.com
GLADIATOR 2 Spoilers: Does Russell Crowe Return As Maximus In The GLADIATOR Sequel?
Related:

GLADIATOR 2 Spoilers: Does Russell Crowe Return As Maximus In The GLADIATOR Sequel?

GLADIATOR II Spoilers: Does Lucius Suffer The Same Fate As Russell Crowe's Maximus?
Recommended For You:

GLADIATOR II Spoilers: Does Lucius Suffer The Same Fate As Russell Crowe's Maximus?

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Hawksblueyes
Hawksblueyes - 4/14/2011, 10:11 AM
;P
DudeGuy
DudeGuy - 4/14/2011, 10:29 AM
Im not worried
WellDrawn
WellDrawn - 4/14/2011, 10:29 AM
I'd expect this kind of problem from a Fox movie, not DC.
CoolioVids
CoolioVids - 4/14/2011, 10:29 AM
wow
JackBauer
JackBauer - 4/14/2011, 10:31 AM
The studios will cave. They reach a bigger audience, i.e. more money, thru the movie theaters than they would if it only ended up on Direct TV.

I understand the studios pov on this. I didn't see Fantastic Four 2 until the very last day it was showing at my local theater. If it was forced out of the theaters sooner then I wouldn't have been able to see it on the big screen....hmm, come to think of it that wouldn't have been all that bad ;)
Mondragon
Mondragon - 4/14/2011, 10:32 AM
Sorry but they’re not going to do anything that could keep these huge potential blockbusters out of theaters.
ALmighty1080
ALmighty1080 - 4/14/2011, 10:32 AM
How would this help marvel, Xmen, spiderman would get screwed
jroka
jroka - 4/14/2011, 10:33 AM
So dumb.
nordberg
nordberg - 4/14/2011, 10:34 AM
No biggie, the owners can always just jack up the price of a small coke and popcorn combo from $50 to $200.
JackBauer
JackBauer - 4/14/2011, 10:40 AM
@Nordberg - LOL! You've got that right.
nordberg
nordberg - 4/14/2011, 10:42 AM
For what it costs to go to the f'ing movies these days, you should get a "happy ending" every time.

See what I did there? ;)
RedeyeJedi
RedeyeJedi - 4/14/2011, 10:43 AM
@Nordberg- LOL
kurekurcubic
kurekurcubic - 4/14/2011, 10:54 AM
this is false news.see deadline ...
Kurbbsyde
Kurbbsyde - 4/14/2011, 10:54 AM
The theaters wouldnt even have to worry about losing money if they didnt try robbing people all of the time. Isnt it like 8.50 for a ticket now, and then the concessions as Nordberg pointed out. And dont even try telling me its because of the economy anywhere because it isnt and the productions still make money if they are going too.
thekabsin
thekabsin - 4/14/2011, 10:55 AM
Funny you say that. I always try to get my happy ending in before the opening credits roll. I have heard a lot of people complain when they get fifteen minutes of previews, not me. I have a very nice girlfriend and we are sick people, what more can I say? Oh yeah and for the record, it has never been a solo act. Now that would just be wrong...
dnno1
dnno1 - 4/14/2011, 10:56 AM
That all depends on the film's first week gross. If a film like Iron Man, which took in over $123 million in it's first weekend, was taking in less than $1 million after two months ("Avatar" made $137 million in its first weekend and dropped to a little over $11 million after 60 days release). I seriously doubt you will find that many films that could still gross in the millions after two months of release.

@JackBauer - Don't knock Pay Per View (PPV). Folks like Mike Tyson, Hulk Hogan, and the lot made lots of money on it in the past. The UFC makes 75% of it's revenue (about $187 million) from PPV.
marvel72
marvel72 - 4/14/2011, 10:58 AM
x-men first class should be kept out of theaters. :D

if films like thor,captain america & green lantern come out on blu-ray a lot sooner.

whats the problem ?
SaintXHorseFly
SaintXHorseFly - 4/14/2011, 10:58 AM
Harry Potter will NOT be the highest grossing film of all time... seriously.

As for the rest, They will all work something out. No one wants this, it is just a money thing.
greyman200
greyman200 - 4/14/2011, 11:04 AM
Good then maybe they can just go straight to video. Then I don't have to spend 100 dollars to go to a movie and eat popcorn.
dnno1
dnno1 - 4/14/2011, 11:08 AM
@Hawksblueyes - The /film report is a bunch of BS. The National Association of Theater Owners released the following statement this morning basically debunking the rumored threats of a boycott:

For immediate release

THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THEATRE OWNERS
RESPONDS TO ERRONEOUS REPORTS OF THREATENED BOYCOTTS

Washington, D.C. (April 14, 2011)—The National Association of Theatre Owners does not and could not encourage its members to engage in any boycotts of any movies distributed by any company. Recent press reports to the contrary are completely false.

In an article published on April 13 in The Guardian, it was suggested that NATO indicated that cinema operators were prepared not to screen movies, and specifically referenced the coming Harry Potter film. No one from The Guardian contacted NATO before the original article was published. At our request, The Guardian did later change the article to remove the erroneous reference to the Harry Potter film.

Then later on April 13, the blog “Business Insider” entitled “Harry Potter 8 Dropped From Theaters?” suggested that NATO “is threatening to drop some of this summer’s
biggest blockbusters” and that “screens under NATO are threatening to boycott upcoming studio releases, starting with Warner Bros. sure to be box office-gargantuan Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2.” Again, these stories, and others that have followed, are completely false and no one from the organizations responsible for the
stories contacted anyone at NATO.

NATO has often articulated our concerns about the possible release of “premium VOD” movies in an early window. Our association issued statements on June 16, 2010 and again on March 31, 2011 regarding those concerns. But as our 2010 statement made clear, “individual theater companies must and will make decisions about release window changes in their own company’s interest.” NATO cannot and will not make those decisions for them.

This statement may be attributed to:

John Fithian
President & CEO
NATO

Contact:
Patrick Corcoran
Director of Media & Research
NATO
818-506-1778
[email protected]
Ceejay
Ceejay - 4/14/2011, 11:09 AM
Regardless of the other films not being shown or not in the theatres, Thor and Cap.A don't stand a ice-cubes chance in hell of making Avatar numbers!
nuck82
nuck82 - 4/14/2011, 11:12 AM
so there saying they would rather make no money then alittle less then normal? ha! there so full of shit, bad poker face : P .. and [frick] paying $15 for a small coke and a popcorn
Fogs
Fogs - 4/14/2011, 11:27 AM
It depends of the expected public. I can understand people rather buying a Toy Story 3 DVD for their children than taking'em to the teather, but I don't know if that's the case.
Fogs
Fogs - 4/14/2011, 11:27 AM
@Ghostfire welcome man!
selinakyle
selinakyle - 4/14/2011, 11:29 AM
haAAAAAAAAAAA DEMON EYES WITH EGG IN FACE.
jonedc
jonedc - 4/14/2011, 11:31 AM
I have directv and i still think that's fuq'd up. Let the movie theaters make their money...
Hawksblueyes
Hawksblueyes - 4/14/2011, 11:32 AM
Same here jonedc.
ManThing
ManThing - 4/14/2011, 11:44 AM
*agrees with Teabag* This is a lose-lose all around. They'll straighten it out. It would be insane not to. They would be throwing vast sums of money right out the window.
... kinda reminds me of the government. heh
nuck82
nuck82 - 4/14/2011, 11:46 AM
BOOM!!!
superdog
superdog - 4/14/2011, 11:51 AM
for those of you [female dog]ing about the price of popcorn and soda guesse what, nobody is making you buy it. your free to not buy anything from the concession stand or just sneak shit in like most of us do. And if your [female dog]ing about the ticket price that has nothing to do with the theatre. Theatres basically get nothing from the ticket price, usually less than 1%. The rest goes to the studios, which is exactly why the theaters charge so much for the concessions cause thats where all of their money comes from. If you wanna [female dog] about the high price of going to the movies you need to [female dog] at the studios not the theatre.
nuck82
nuck82 - 4/14/2011, 11:59 AM
@superdog lol i dont buy it but its fun to [female dog] about it ; ).... i have my old school fanny pack that i hide all my candy and soda in : P
nuck82
nuck82 - 4/14/2011, 12:03 PM
^^^^ puts his hands on my fanny
superdog
superdog - 4/14/2011, 12:10 PM
everything means vagina in the UK
nuck82
nuck82 - 4/14/2011, 12:11 PM
lol silly brits and your backwards english : P
1 2
View Recorder