BABY DRIVER Director Edgar Wright Explains Why He Felt He Needed To Depart From Marvel's ANT-MAN

BABY DRIVER Director Edgar Wright Explains Why He Felt He Needed To Depart From Marvel's ANT-MAN

In the wake of Phil Lord and Chris Miller departing Han Solo, Edgar Wright shares some new details on his decision to walk away from Marvel's Ant-Man, which he spent a very long time working on...

By MarkCassidy - Jun 22, 2017 06:06 PM EST
Filed Under: Ant-Man
On the heels of the news that Phil Lord and Chris Miller had been fired from the young Han Solo movie for not seeing eye-to-eye with Lucasfilm's Kathleen Kennedy, we have some new details on another infamous incident of a director clashing with a studio.

Edgar Wright hadn't actually begun shooting Ant-Man when he departed the project, but that doesn't mean he hadn't dedicated a massive amount of time and energy to the film. In fact, Wright had reportedly spent years working on the script alongside Attack the Block creator Joe Cornish, and had even begun to cast some of the main roles before things began to go pear shaped.

At the time, we were hit with the standard citing of "creative differences", but during an interview with Variety Wright opened up a little more about what went down:


“I think the most diplomatic answer is I wanted to make a Marvel movie but I don’t think they really wanted to make an Edgar Wright movie. It was a really heartbreaking decision to have to walk away after having worked on it for so long, because me and Joe Cornish in some form—it’s funny some people say, ‘Oh they’ve been working on it for eight years’ and that was somewhat true, but in that time I had made three movies so it wasn’t like I was working on it full time. But after The World’s End I did work on it for like a year, I was gonna make the movie.

But then I was the writer-director on it and then they wanted to do a draft without me, and having written all my other movies, that’s a tough thing to move forward thinking if I do one of these movies I would like to be the writer-director,” Wright said. “Suddenly becoming a director for hire on it, you’re sort of less emotionally invested and you start to wonder why you’re there, really.”

Peyton Reed stepped in and the movie turned out pretty good (I still maintain it's a little overrated, personally), but to this day fans still wonder what Edgar Wright's Ant-Man would have looked like.

What do you guys make of Wright's comments? Sound off below.
ANT-MAN Star Evangeline Lilly Says She Has No Contractual Obligations Following Decision To Quit Acting
Related:

ANT-MAN Star Evangeline Lilly Says She Has No "Contractual Obligations" Following Decision To Quit Acting

ANT-MAN Star Evangeline Lilly Confirms She's Stepping Away From Acting - What Does This Mean For The Wasp?
Recommended For You:

ANT-MAN Star Evangeline Lilly Confirms She's Stepping Away From Acting - What Does This Mean For The Wasp?

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
HulksPenis
HulksPenis - 6/22/2017, 6:26 PM
HULKS PENIS WAS VERY HAPPY WITH HOW ANT-MAN TURNED OUT ANYWAY.
BatmanxBatgirl
BatmanxBatgirl - 6/22/2017, 6:28 PM
I thought Ant-Man was a mediocre film saved by an exciting third act.

Would have loved to have seen Wright's version.
ThaIllest89
ThaIllest89 - 6/22/2017, 7:11 PM
@BatmanxBatgirl - I get the feeling that most of Edgar Wright's material appears in the first and third act.
AleSir19
AleSir19 - 6/22/2017, 7:42 PM
@BatmanxBatgirl - @ThaIllest89 All the Set Pieces were develop by Wright, a lot of the first Act was kept the same, they change how Hank Pym manipulates Scott Lang with presenting charges againts him if he doesnt help him to stop Cross.

They also did change how Scott and the Crew use the suit in a lot of different heists to steal money.

I suspect they rewrote Scott character from a stupid Criminal to that kind of Robin Hood we end up seeing in the movie, where he clearly isnt a criminal because the Company stole the money and he try to give it back to the people, instead of "I need money for my family, i will do anything in my power, even steal money".

So i would say all the good parts of Ant Man:

-The Action Set Pieces, the Visual Jokes, the Tone, The Genre, The Main Story and even the Casting were develop by Edgar Wright.

What Marvel did was:

-Make Scott less of a Stupid Criminal and more of a Robin Hood kind of hero who did nothing wrong, because the company was evil.

-Make Hank Pym less of an antagonist, who manipulates and uses Scott and who was a really bad father to Hope.

-Rewrite the part where Scott Lang saves the day, defeats Darren Cross and gets the Suit, but he becomes accidentally a villain, when we discover that the pym particles after prolonged use cause addiction and instability, the reason why Hank didnt wanted Hope to use the suit and he couldnt used anymore.

-Make Darren Cross the main villain, rewrite his character to take the role that Scott Lang had in the original film, where he feels that Hank use him and betray him, make him go crazy about power and control, respect and such things.

-Add at the end the "Quantum Realm" Set Piece...
EnergyVamp
EnergyVamp - 6/22/2017, 6:31 PM
Wait there was a Antman movie? I cant recall anything about it. Did i get neuralized like in Men in Black?
PsychoticSpaceRaccoon
PsychoticSpaceRaccoon - 6/22/2017, 6:46 PM
@JH24 -

Gmoney84
Gmoney84 - 6/22/2017, 6:31 PM
My feeling on this is if a director wants to write and direct and doesn't want to share credit or take input that relegates their process that's fine. But you can't have your cake and eat it to when it comes to these franchise characters especially considering he isn't the creator.
AleSir19
AleSir19 - 6/22/2017, 7:51 PM
@Gmoney84 - But this man is a mother [frick]ing Genius, it is Edgar Wright the best Visual Comedy writer-director in modern times, have some [frick]ing respect...

If i am a Producer i would give this guy free reign over the movie and i know that guy would have easily made Deadpool before Deadpool was Greenlight. Instead we had this mediocre bullshit were all the good parts were thanks to his writing and visuals...
TheRealTomServo
TheRealTomServo - 6/22/2017, 9:08 PM
@Gmoney84 - A quality, above-average film > franchise synergy.

If Marvel wants this cinematic universe to have staying power, to carry on post-Infinity War, they're gonna have to let directors tell the stories they want and learn to break the mol they set upon themselves.
pesmerga44
pesmerga44 - 6/22/2017, 9:42 PM
@TheRealTomServo - GOTG 1+2 James Gunn's movies all the way, Captain America 2+3 Russo Bros babies, hell even Iron Man 3 was a Shane Black film. Marvel lets their directors have their vision and leave their mark on their films but there is the overall universe it has to fit in. If Edgar Wright would have made and directed the movie back in 2008-2009 when it was originally suppose to come out he could be much more open and crazy because there was no set up world. We were at that point eleven movies in on number twelve with Ant-Man. He had to abide in the MCU with his movie. I am sorry to see both sides couldn't come to mutual grounds but overall I am happy with what we got. I probably would have loved Edgar Wright's vision because I love his work but I love the MCU and the continuity of their films. This isn't Fox where continuity don't mean shit in their films.
TheRealTomServo
TheRealTomServo - 6/22/2017, 9:47 PM
@pesmerga44 - I guess what I'm thinking is that they should have let Wright tell his own story regardless, and let Marvel figure out how to tie it together after seeing the final product.

Maybe it's my Wright bias, I dunno.
pesmerga44
pesmerga44 - 6/22/2017, 9:57 PM
@TheRealTomServo - Look I said I would have loved to see Wright's films because I love his work and Baby Driver looks amazing. I also believe that the MCU is bigger then Wright's vision and it has to fit in that universe. You can't blame only Marvel Studios and Feige Wright deserves some blame for walking away because he also refused to compromise. There is blame for this not working on both sides. Personally I liked Reed's version of Ant-Man and am excited to see his first complete vision in Ant-Man and the Wasp.
pesmerga44
pesmerga44 - 6/22/2017, 9:58 PM
@TheRealTomServo - I think there is something we can both agree on. We both want the new season of MSK 3000 on Netflix to hurry up and come out.
pesmerga44
pesmerga44 - 6/22/2017, 9:58 PM
@TheRealTomServo - ^MST 3000
TheRealTomServo
TheRealTomServo - 6/22/2017, 10:08 PM
@pesmerga44 - You're 100% right and I can't really argue otherwise. I think this whole shared universe boner Hollywood has is making me really bitter. I kinda miss superhero films not being linked so closely because it gives more freedom to the storyteller. Not only superhero films, but genre films in general. The amount of Star Wars we've been getting makes me wanna shoot myself. Not to mention this Dark Universe bullshit. I do understand that a filmmaker needs to compromise when doing work for a larger studio. But I just wish it were simpler for these movies, I guess. Call me nostalgic.

Also, I saw Baby Driver in an early screening. It kicked ass.
TheRealTomServo
TheRealTomServo - 6/22/2017, 10:09 PM
@pesmerga44 - Wright directed the living shit out of it. If you're a fan of his style, I recommend bringing a change of trousers.
pesmerga44
pesmerga44 - 6/22/2017, 10:13 PM
@TheRealTomServo - I can agree that all the studios trying to do shared universe movies is becoming ridiculous and a lot are doing it terribly. The Mummy movie wasn't terrible but wasn't good either and I have no desire to see a shared monster universe. Hasbro and Paramount are talking about making a Hasbro toyline shared universe with Transformers, G.I. Joe, Rom the Space Knight, etc... I also find how Disney is running Star Wars to be pretty aggravating. I really don't care about teenage or young twenty something Han Solo first flying the Millennium Falcon.
pesmerga44
pesmerga44 - 6/22/2017, 10:14 PM
@TheRealTomServo - I am super psyched for the movie. I am off next Thursday and will probably go see it before I go play MTG with my friends and the local comic book shop.
TheRealTomServo
TheRealTomServo - 6/22/2017, 10:20 PM
@pesmerga44 - I thought the Mummy was pretty terrible, honestly. Even if it was decent, I'd hate it solely for what it stands for. I just don't think studios realize they should be making 100 $1,000,000 films instead of 1 $100,000,000 film because they're guaranteed a bigger return.

Also yeah, MST3K was great this year.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
View Recorder