Totaly Unlikely Theory for the Andy Serkis character in Avengers: Age of Ultron

Totaly Unlikely Theory for the Andy Serkis character in Avengers: Age of Ultron

There have been a number of theories, both good and bad on who Andy Serkis could be portraying in Avengers: Age of Ultron; here's another (bad) one.

Editorial Opinion
By WorstUserNameEver - Jul 27, 2014 05:07 AM EST
Source: ComicBookMovie.com
Okay, so I have read a few theories on who the great Andy Serkis could be portraying in the next installment of the Avengers and who knows, maybe further episodes of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Theories on the subject have narrowed over the last twenty-four hours, since Ultron actor James Spader and Serkis motion-capture protege, suggested those present at the Avengers: Age of Ultron panel would have already viewed Serkis during the preview, sporting a beard. So the theories I have read since range the real Mandarin to the X-Man Beast.

The real Mandarin seems a great idea in my opinion, obviously the beard is the clue here and when you consider it alongside the many rumours involving the real Mandarin appearing in the movie at some point. The Beast theory is more unlikely, first off the rights issue is the major stumbler. Yes Beast has been a long-time Avenger ala Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch, where he differs though is he is a MAJOR member of the X-Men. QS and SW are in my opinion considerably more important components of the Avengers than the X-Men. Then there's the beard reference, Beast doesn't have a beard as much as he's just plain furry. The one point I would give in the beast theory though is the motion-capture element. The Mandarin would be a perfunctory acting role while Beast would make the fullest use of Serkis repertoire. When you consider that Peter Jackson cast Serkis as both the titular ape and Lumpy the chef in King Kong, its clear that Serkis could feel a tad under appreciated as an actual on-set performer, in which case the Mandarin character (or any other human character for that matter) would play to any supposed ambitions.

Onto my highly unlikely theory, what if Serkis is playing Doctor Strange? Timing: check, beard: check, rumours that Strange could appear in A:AOU: check, bad-ass character that Serkis would own: check, fan-pleasing casting: check. I know it is unlikely, given that Feige has already stated that if he had nailed down the casting of Strange by Comic Con, he would have announced it but maybe they want to surprise us?

Regrettably, the most likely outcome is that of an inconsequential character that has no actual comic-book counterpart and will not appear again... but we can dream until we see the movie right? Anyone else have any theories regarding the Serkis character, no matter how terrible, I'd be interested to here them \/.

All site complaints should be sent directly to [email protected]

MARVEL'S AVENGERS Will Finally Add Spider-Man To The Game This Month In With Great Power Hero Event
Related:

MARVEL'S AVENGERS Will Finally Add Spider-Man To The Game This Month In "With Great Power" Hero Event

THE FLASH Star Grant Gustin On Why He Was Unsure About Playing Barry Allen And His Talks With James Gunn
Recommended For You:

THE FLASH Star Grant Gustin On Why He Was Unsure About Playing Barry Allen And His Talks With James Gunn

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

PymParticle
PymParticle - 7/27/2014, 6:45 AM
He's clearly playing the Mandarin. We have heard rumor for months of Ultron and Mandarin working together.

Spader said that Serkis was ON SET IN A DISGUISE AND LONG BEARD

(!!!)
PymParticle
PymParticle - 7/27/2014, 7:15 AM
@AlexanderLykins Heard it through the grapevine. I'll cite the controversial Wardell as another source.

But really, Serkis on set (no mocap) in long beard and disguise? Kevin Feige coming out recently saying we haven't seen the last of Mandarin?

Take from that what you will.
WorstUserNameEver
WorstUserNameEver - 7/27/2014, 7:33 AM
I agree that the Mandarin is the most likely (and most cool) option but had an epiphany while thinking about the casting of Doctor Strange and thought I'd see what people thought about it.
Interestein
Interestein - 7/27/2014, 9:12 AM
The Mandarin feels very likely, he could play an integral part to the story, which will seemingly involve the time gem. Could there be a time travel to the story in which the Avengers die and Tony has to go back in time and save them after defeating the Mandarin for the gem alone. Then having to travel back in time to plan the proper strike with the Avengers.
thunderpun573
thunderpun573 - 7/27/2014, 10:24 AM
Or maybe, listen this one, kinda crazy. Maybe, he's just a normal citizen standing up to ultron? Remember the scene in the first one, where that old German man stood against Loki? Couldn't it just be a similar situation? I think you all might be over thinking this all. I could be wrong however. I just kinda doubt he's a major character.
Ackja
Ackja - 7/27/2014, 10:40 AM
Here are 5 reasons I think Andy Serkis is portraying the Beast.

1. Like Quicksilver, Beast is one of a handful of “grey area” characters – both an X-Man and an Avenger. The legal rights are therefore arguably shared between 20th Century Fox and Marvel, as they are with Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch, and marvel has a strong incentive to assert its rights.

• As Kevin Feige said in November 2013: “There are only a handful of characters that occupy that middle ground. Iron Man is not going to show up over there and Magneto is not going to show up over here. But there are a few gray points even after many years of negotiations … and that only happens with a character like Quicksilver, who has been a part of the X-Men, the son of Magneto in those comics, but also a primary Avenger.” (http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/kevin-feige-says-quicksilver-in-the-avengers-2-will-be-very-different-from-the-one-in-x-men-dofp#pAQ2EqrWRDUu6jDb.99)

2. Hank McCoy is clearly an Avenger.

• Hank McCoy joined the Avengers in 1975, “and remains a member for many years, becoming a close friend of Wonder Man. He leaves the team periodically to rejoin the X-Men during times of need. He returns to the Avengers each time.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beast_(comics)).

• He is number 7 on IGN’s list of the Top 50 Avengers, ahead of Hawkeye, Scarlett Witch, Quicksilver, and Vision.

• In Avengers vs. X-Men, he lined up on the side of the . . . Avengers (“I am a Secret Avenger”).

• Beast is a playable character in the Facebook game ‘Marvel: Avengers Alliance.’

3. The Beast is perfect for motion capture, and would be well suited to the beard Andy Serkis is said to be sporting. None of the other options mentioned (with the exception of Abomination) requires motion capture. Why hire Andy Serkis for anything other than mo-cap.?

4. Joss Whedon has shown an interest in the character in the past.

• Beast featured prominently in Joss Whedon's ‘Astonishing X-Men: Gifted’ story arc.

5. Beast is featured prominently in the upcoming graphic novel ‘Rage of Ultron,’ which is intended to establish the continuity for the movie.

• The preview “showed the classic era Beast when Hank was an Avenger in the late 70′s and early 80′s.” (http://www.comicsblend.com/avengers-rage-of-ultron-announced-at-marvel-axis-sdcc/#sthash.BKEDtdji.dpuf)

kinghulk
kinghulk - 7/27/2014, 10:56 AM
why would it be the mandarin if they are having him also do motion capture? the mandarin doesent need motion capture.
kong
kong - 7/27/2014, 11:37 AM
@Ackja

That convinced me more than the article did.
sk8rboi1218
sk8rboi1218 - 7/27/2014, 3:51 PM
but why would Serkis be Mandarin when we already have Ben Kingsley has him? It was stated in the movie that Trevor was given extensive plastic surgery to make him an exact copy of what the Mandarin looked like. I like the Serkis/Strange idea a lot better. I feel he could bring some serious charm to that character
sikwon
sikwon - 7/27/2014, 7:19 PM
I'm sold. Bring on beast!! It's to bad Joss didn't direct Xmen. The panel of kitty in the bullet brought tears to my eyes. I would love to see that movie!
superherofan21
superherofan21 - 7/27/2014, 8:19 PM
He's probably playing some members of Ultron's robot army. He could even portray a significant one, i.e. if Ultron has a "right-hand man" that isn't Vision.
MrLoki
MrLoki - 7/28/2014, 5:07 AM
I don't think Beast is an option.

Beast is an X-man, he's been with them since the start and he's always been an X-man, he has many complicated relationships with everyone on that team and has been in three X-men movies already.

Wanda and Pietro may be mutants, but they have never been a part of the X-men. They've fought with the X-men on some rare occasions, but they are far more connected with the Avengers then they ever were with the X-men. I don't think Beast is a "grey area" character, despite his many adventures with the Avengers.
tvor03
tvor03 - 7/28/2014, 6:39 AM
I think y'all are really over reacting to Serkis being in the movie. He's more likely just playing "Random Ultron Bot #3". This is just like when we found out Fillian was in Gaurdians and everyone started saying "He's obviously Nova!", "He's gonna voice Cosmo!", "Maybe he's Mephisto!". And what happened? He's a generic thug in prison. Serkis isn't playing any type of significant role.
View Recorder