The Avengers: The Missed Opportunities (Warning Contains Spoilers)

In this article, I will go over some of my disappointments with The Avengers.

Editorial Opinion
By Ashes2Phoenix - May 02, 2012 07:05 AM EST
Filed Under: Avengers

Well, I have now seen The Avengers twice and have come out of the film with some mixed feelings. While there is no doubt it is a great film there were somethings that really bugged me. During this article I will breakdown my problems and explain why I think The Avengers is great, not amazing.

Captain America and Iron Man:

Whilst it was certainly interesting to see Tony Stark and Steve Rodgers lock horns, I feel they missed an opportune moment between these two characters. In The First Avenger, Howard Stark is a prominent character throughout the film but is hardly touched upon in this movie. What I was waiting for was Steve and Tony to have a little heart to heart about his father. I just found it odd that Tony was not particularly curious about what his father was like when he was younger. I know it is something that would intrigue me.

During Steve and Tony's argument, I was expecting Steve to say something along the lines of " you are not half the man your father was". This I feel would have worked better as way of causing some serious friction between the two characters. These two in particular are connected to each other, via Howard and I just thought that could have been featured during the building of their relationship.

Weak on Emotional Depth:

Before I begin with this problem, I am fully expecting someone to say "well you don't go to an action movie like The Avengers and expect emotional depth". To this I strongly disagree. No matter what the film is, if it lacks emotional depth it makes it harder to get behind the characters. Now I can appreciate that is what the solo films are for but I was just a bit disappointed that there was nothing that really pulled me in. The characters came off a bit hollow at times because of this. There was no moment in the film where I was particularly worried about the characters well being because I was not emotionally invested.

For example: When Agent Coulson dies I was shocked but I wasn't particularly sad. It all happens so quickly that you almost forget he has been killed. I wanted more from his last words with Nick Fury. Something to make me sympathise with the character because he has been one of my favourites in the MCU. Unfortunately that didn't happen and made his death very lacklustre.

Hawkeye ? :

This was one of my biggest disappointments with the film. Hawkeye was unfortunately completely under-used and as a result felt very disconnected from the team. For over half the movie he is Loki's zombie/slave, which unfortunately gave the character no real time to develop. It was very important for us to see and understand Hawkeye as a character because he is only featured as a cameo in Thor. You have to remember whilst there are many of us who will know who Hawkeye is, the majority of the general public won't. I personally feel that Hawkeye's time could have been used much more effectively in telling the audience who this guy is and what his own motivations are.

Is The Hulk a good guy or villain? :

Hulk was a fantastic addition to this film but there were some really wishy-washy moments with his character. During the helicarrier sequence he loses control and attacks everyone. The in the final battle he can control it. Now I know in the helicarrier he was most likely under Loki's mind control. This however, was not particularly clear and made it a bit confusing. Then in the final battle he can completely control his transformation and helps out his team mates. Also I felt there was no real motivation for him to help his fellow colleagues. Yet he turns up in the nick of time and rescues them. It was very glossed over unfortunately.

However I would just like to add, The Hulk had some of the best moments in the film. His action-sequences were top-notch and was one of my favourite characters.


I have removed The Tesseract point in this article because it has been cleared up by some of the commenters ! So instead I will add in a couple more things I feel prevented the film from absolutely amazing status.

Loki's Army ? :

This was quite a small gripe for me. Now I know the film already has enough to cram into it's 2hr 22 minutes time slot, but I feel it would have been nice to elaborate on them a bit more. They were pretty much an expendable army and had no development. They were also not much of a threat to The Avengers and that is why I feel it made it difficult to become worried for them. There was nothing that made me think The Avengers could be defeated, which unfortunately took away some of the tension.

Where was The Red Skull ?:

This I found disappointing because at the end of The First Avenger, we see The Red Skull teleported by the Tesseract. On immediately seeing this scene, the first thing that came to my mind was, he will be in The Avengers. Now I know the trailers leading up to The Avengers, didn't give any indication that Red Skull would be appearing but I was hoping this would be a surprise in the movie. He would have fit into this film perfectly, in my opinion. His goal is the same as Loki's, which is to dominate the World.

Too Fast Paced At Times:

At some points in this film it is just gunning it to the finish. It never really uses anytime to connect with the characters. Every time something happened that did not fit into The Avengers favour it moved so quickly you never had time to establish it.. This also was one of my problems when the heroes were all arguing in Banner's lab. The majority of the argument does a good job of building tension but then moments later it pushes straight passed it and is practically forgotten, for the rest of the film's entirety. It is moment's like these that really count in a stories development and I felt it pushed passed issues way too fast at times.

Very Bland Story:

The story in general is pretty much the film's weakest link. It acts as a device to get to the spectacle basically. It was very generic. Villain comes. Heroes have to stop him. They do. End of film. I mean an example of a story that becomes more complex over time is TDK. The initial story is to stop The Joker but it develops into much more than that. We soon find out that he can't stop Joker and actually loses at the end of the film, he didn't win.

The Avengers never really takes a risk in terms of the story. It is very safe and whilst it isn't necessarily a bad thing, I just thought it made the impact of the film a bit weak. It doesn't try to give older audience members something to chew on. Spider-Man 2, TDK, BB, did and in my view that is why they are the better movies. Even X-Men managed to give the more mature audience members, something to relate to.

The Avengers falls short on this but as I have said what it does well, it does phenomenally, which makes up for some of the weaker points.


All in all, it was a very enjoyable film but it was no way near what many are claiming it to be. The action is the real highlight of the film and can't be matched by most films. It was just a shame that not all of the film was perfect. Is it an incredible experience? Absolutely. Did I enjoy it? Definitely. Was it the best CBM ever? It is debatable but for myself, no. Were there some problems? Yes.

I would like to add this is not me taking a dig at the film. There are just somethings I feel that could have been better.

If there is anything you guys would like to add or believe I am wrong about feel free to inform me.
What were your highlights of the film and what do you feel could have been done better ?

About The Author:
Ashes2Phoenix
Member Since 3/19/2012
THE AVENGERS: LEGO Marvel S.H.I.E.L.D. Helicarrier And Minifgures Officially Revealed
Related:

THE AVENGERS: LEGO Marvel S.H.I.E.L.D. Helicarrier And Minifgures Officially Revealed

THE AVENGERS: Lego Helicarrier Leaks Online - First Look At Massive 3057-Piece Set Revealed
Recommended For You:

THE AVENGERS: Lego Helicarrier Leaks Online - First Look At Massive 3057-Piece Set Revealed

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
R888
R888 - 5/2/2012, 8:23 AM
I watch this film 7 times, I just enjoy it that is the best marvel film up to date, I enjoy for what it is. A fun superhero action adventure

The only down part for me was I want to see thanos more
Ashes2Phoenix
Ashes2Phoenix - 5/2/2012, 8:23 AM
@Squish People like you are painful. Stop being such a fanboy. These were the problems I saw with the movie no need to get defensive at all. Some of you guys can be very odd on this site. Ok that would be correct about Dr. Selvig but was Loki using the portal to return the tesseract or to start a war ?

Hawkeye was completely under-developed. They should have not had him in the film to be honest. The guy barely had any screen time and when he did, it did nothing to develop an understanding of the character.
Ashes2Phoenix
Ashes2Phoenix - 5/2/2012, 8:26 AM
@R888\: Completely agreed. It should definitely be appreciated for what it is worth. It is the first of it's kind in the cbm front and the action is phenomenal. I don't know, I just went into the film expecting more from the characters.

It is a great time but maybe I raised my expectations a little too high.
Ashes2Phoenix
Ashes2Phoenix - 5/2/2012, 8:37 AM
@Squish: Yes the dialogue was fantastic, Joss is very talented. This is not a review by the way because if it was I would have mentioned these elements. The good: great dialogue, epic action sequences, six superheros in one movie. The bad: weak story, lacking emotional depth and at some points confusing. This is my interpretation of the film. I am not biased about the film at all. I am a film student myself so I go into films with an analytical mind. This article is some of the points I was a bit disappointed with. I do not once say it is a bad film, I think it is great but just not as amazing as some people have made it out to be. Simples.
SUPERSP00NS
SUPERSP00NS - 5/2/2012, 8:45 AM
You raise a few valid points that I entirely agree with (Hawkeye's lack of an arc and being posessed for half the film was definitely the biggest annoyance for me), however I hope/believe that a lot of this stuff will be addressed in the deleted scenes/potential director's cut of the film.

Like you said yourself, this film is for the majority of the public - not just for us - and Whedon has been recently (jokingly?) quoted as saying that he 'shot a 5 hour film', so a lot obviously ended up on the cutting-room floor so as to keep the masses entertained.

I'm with the majority here that believe the hype and do highly praise the film, and its glaring weaknesses are not really enough for me to criticise it. Whedon did pull off the seemingly impossible with this one...

To perhaps counter-argue a few of your points...

"Is Hulk a good guy or a villain?"
My friend and I discussed this after my second viewing yesterday and came to the conclusion that Hulk's actions on the Helicarrier were most likely due to him picking up the staff (potentially getting slightly 'possessed' by its already established powers of possession) coupled with his general rage of being used/manipulated by S.H.I.E.L.D. I didn't think of it first viewing, but on the second time through it seemed more legit.

"Captain America and Iron Man"
I felt that there was also a missed opportunity that they never mentioned Howard for the most part. However, I feel it would've perhaps halted the pacing amongst all of the trading blows to suddenly break into a 'Who Do You Think You Are?'-esque Q&A with the two of them. I feel like this is perhaps the argument I feel isn't a major issue with the film, as Stark does say to Banner at one point, "That's the guy my Dad never shut up about!? I'm starting to think they should've left him on ice" (or something to that degree). Also, I noticed that when Fury mentions to Cap in the opening 20 minutes or so about the Tesseract and how it was 'fished out of the ocean whilst they were looking for him', to which Cap replies, 'They should've left it in the ocean'. Personally, I took it differently to you, I took that as Cap acquiring a certain amount of hostility towards Howard (perhaps he saw Howard as giving up on the search for him, at the off-chance of gaining true/unlimited power? Cap knows Tony was in the arms business and probably assumed that Howard was to use the Tesseract for weapons purposes...) as opposed to him thinking more highly of Howard over Tony.

Regardless, I personally feel that neither of them were particularly too eager to address Howard's presence in either of their lives, and the implied feelings towards him were much more powerful.

Feel free to read my points and counter-arguments are welcome :P
Ashes2Phoenix
Ashes2Phoenix - 5/2/2012, 9:00 AM
@SUPERSP00NS: Great counter explanation about my Hulk point. I didn't think about that. It does make complete sense thinking about it. My problem still is though that this was not made clear enough in the film. I didn't understand it on even my second viewing lol ! But this a great point and makes it a bit more excusable.

Another great point ,in regards, to the Captain America and Iron Man argument. It is still a gripe for me because I think it would have been interesting to see how their relationship grew because of the connection they both have with Tony's father. It would have solidified this films connection with some of the others (Captain America, Iron Man 2).

I completely agree, that this film does still deserve praise but there were just some points that could have made this film something really special to me. Maybe I am just being picky because it is surely special enough with six superheroes featured in one film. I just would have been slightly happier if some of the dialogue had been used to connect the previous films with this one. There were moments of it but they were glossed over pretty quickly.
Orphix
Orphix - 5/2/2012, 9:04 AM
I only had one real issue that I can think of - and that is Stark kind of took the whole idea of Thor, Loki, Asgard and the superadvance technology all in his stride.

This guy is one arrogant egotist. Suddenly he is not the superhero he thinks he is.

Stark: "Hey! I have invented a suit that can fly!"

Thor: "Big deal! I can easily access interstellar travel!"
Ashes2Phoenix
Ashes2Phoenix - 5/2/2012, 9:08 AM
@Squish: I do. Hell I am a big fan of Lost, which requires a huge amount of imagination and outside of the box thinking.

I do let go when I go to see a film but the way this film has been praised I expected it to be the second coming. For me it did not tick the boxes that I wanted. My favourite cbm's are Spider-Man 2, Batman Begins and Iron Man. Why? Because they balanced character progression and development, with some great action sequences. Those films were like a steak dinner for me. Great taste and full of substance. The Avengers was more of a Maccy D's. Again great taste, low on substance.
SUPERSP00NS
SUPERSP00NS - 5/2/2012, 9:10 AM
@Ashes2Phoenix: I also feel a lot was glossed over, but at 2 hours and 22 minutes it's a lot of time for the general public to fix their attention on. Many (although I couldn't disagree with them more) just want to go to the cinema, see flashing lights and explosions, then go home. I feel as if the film was any longer it may have grated on the audience in question...

I'm just reserving any solid judgement 'til the DVD/Blu-Ray release, that way you get people who aren't just the average cinema-goer and actually have a vested interest in the film. I'm sort of hoping this is the 'radio-edit' and hopefully the special features included on the home releases will reap the rewards that we seek :)
Ashes2Phoenix
Ashes2Phoenix - 5/2/2012, 9:14 AM
@SUPERSP00NS: Very level-headed thinking from yourself. It is refreshing to see. I too will wait for the BluRay to release and hopefully they will give us an abundance of deleted scenes and maybe even an extended addition to enjoy.

I am weird with films. For example: I prefer The Lord of the Rings extended additions to the theatrical versions tremendously. I like them more because there is more to sink my teeth into, in terms of plot, character motivations and development.
Ashes2Phoenix
Ashes2Phoenix - 5/2/2012, 9:20 AM
@Teabag: Ok that definitely makes more sense. I am obviously going to need to watch it again. Maybe it was because I was so blown away with the fact that I was watching The Avengers in a movie, I completely overlooked stuff. Lol !
Ashes2Phoenix
Ashes2Phoenix - 5/2/2012, 9:24 AM
@Teabag: Couldn't agree more buddy. I guess I was expecting the film to be more jam packed with content. I still think the film is great, I just wanted a bit more from it. I am going to go to the cinema again to watch it because the experience of it alone is enough to warrant a re-watch. That last thirty minutes of the film made my head almost explode it was that insane.
Ashes2Phoenix
Ashes2Phoenix - 5/2/2012, 9:30 AM
@Teabag: I really liked that scene between Widow and Hulk. That's what I feel the other Hulk films were missing. That tension and panic when he begins to transform. I thought Mark Ruffalo did a great job as Bruce Banner. I actually preferred him over Edward Norton.

Hope you enjoy your viewing tonight buddy !
Ashes2Phoenix
Ashes2Phoenix - 5/2/2012, 9:45 AM
@Teabag: Agreed. He didn't fit the role of Bruce Banner in my opinion. Mark Ruffalo is much better suited.
marvel72
marvel72 - 5/2/2012, 9:55 AM
i love the movie the critic's love the movie,i'll have to watch it again to see what the problems are,i think i must of been to excited because i couldn't see a problem with it.

maybe not enough of thanos. :D
KryptoGuy
KryptoGuy - 5/2/2012, 10:01 AM
"During Steve and Tony's argument, I was expecting Steve to say something along the lines of " you are not half the man your father was".

I really thought this would happen too.
Ashes2Phoenix
Ashes2Phoenix - 5/2/2012, 10:25 AM
@Squish: It will be my third time lol. I know these are nitpicks but I just wanted more content. I am just hoping there is an extended version released on Blu Ray or a Director's Cut. I always prefer those over the theatrical versions. From what I have been hearing there are some sequences that were cut out for the theatrical release, that contain so character building moments, so hopefully we will get them in the Blu Ray.

As a whole I thought this film was great. I loved the action, humour, and dialogue. I just wanted a bit more from it in terms of story and character development.
Whiteharted
Whiteharted - 5/2/2012, 11:49 AM
100% Agree! This article was spot on!

However even though they glossed over the motive of the hulk helping out, it sort of makes sense if you think along the lines of "he's doing it because he's part of the team"

Also the city action sucked COMPARED to say Transformers 3 Dark of the Moon, which was EPIC in everyway, I wish MB had directed that ACTION SCENE ONLY, as they all top the one seen in the Avengers,and Hulk losing control at first and then magically having it the whole time was wired.

AND it took far FAR too long for THOR too appear.
Gerrit
Gerrit - 5/2/2012, 11:57 AM
i don't agree with any of your points actually.

Tony and Captain- there was just not enough time to keep the focus on these two characters. Their disagreements escalate through the movie very well, with Tony messing with Cap at times, without taking away screen time of the other characters.

Weak on emotion- that point is the most valid of all, IMO, but the emotion of the film isn't just Coulson's death. The scenes with Loki and Thor, specially after Coulson dies and Loki drops Thor inside the cage, you can see on Hemsworth' expression the emotion, I mean it's a brother sending the other to death after killing one of the group's best friend. When Widow is chased by Hulk, try to put yourself in her shoes, it is a very terrifying scene if you pay attention. And in the final battle, by the end of it, Hulk is gunned down by several soldiers, Iron Man is trapped by soldiers too until he goes to stop the missile, Cap is shot and Hawkeye goes trhough a window and gets hurt badly (at least that's what would happen in real life and the movie kind of points to that way) so things were starting to get ugly for the heroes and you can sense the urgency to win the fight before the heroes die.

Hawkey- it was a great move to make Hawkeye a villain through out half the film. It takes of the pressure of having so many heroes at once in a team, and after all he is a secondary character.

Hulk. Friend or Foe?- People already adresed this issue nicely. He was influenced by Loki in the Helicarrier but not in the final battle.

Tesseract- they explain pretty clearly in the film that Loki would only give the Tesseract back to Thanos after he had the Earth under his control.
shwa77k
shwa77k - 5/2/2012, 12:01 PM
@Ashes, I would say that I totally agree with the article, for the most part. I am not a crazy comic book fan, but greatly enjoy the movies, and the MCU in the films, has lead me to start reading the comics etc.

Anyway, enough about me, I just wanted to point out that there was a big scene with Capt. and Iron Man that was left out of the movie. I believe I read the original article on this site where Joss explained he was disappointed that this scene had to be taken out. The scene 100% focused on Tony/Capt/Howard relationship.

I think the emotional depth of the film mostly worked well. I didn't feel we needed much more from Coulson, and I feel the emotional build-up was part of the solo projects. However, I do feel that Hawkeye did need a little more, I do understand its a group movie that can't focus on each character, but just a 5 minute flashback could have done the job.

I think Hulk was awesome! I totally agree with @superspoon, he told my thunder.

Overall pretty nice review, it's good to point out negative and positives, so the studio does better the next time.
Ashes2Phoenix
Ashes2Phoenix - 5/2/2012, 12:10 PM
@Gerrit:

Hulk and The tesseract point has been explained as you have said and seen. My problem with the emotion is the fact, it felt like these characters did not care for one another. They did not feel connected. They come together at the end but even during this, they don't feel like they are behind each other 100 percent.

I also disagree about Captain American and Iron Man. It would have not taken up that much screen time to have bits about his dad. Specifically the part when they are having the argument. They mention Howard twice in the film but not to each other and I found that strange.

Hawkeye could of still had more of a story to him. They managed to give Black Widow an explanation of her back story within 1 minute of dialogue. Considering he is a main character at the end and is part of the team, I feel there needed to be more of an establishment for him. It feels incredibly forced when he enters the team, in my opinion.
Gerrit
Gerrit - 5/2/2012, 12:23 PM
Well, than it is just a matter of opinion. I think they nailed the points that you think were disappointments.
When it comes to emotion, the only thing I wanted to see was civilians getting killed on screen. There were times when I thought "there is no way no one died there", e.g. when one leviathan goes through a building, but the chitauri never hit a civilian when they go through the streets blowing all the cars or when they enter the buildings. That's actually the only complaint that is still holding, all the others vanish the more I watch the movie.
Ashes2Phoenix
Ashes2Phoenix - 5/2/2012, 12:31 PM
I mean don't get me wrong Gerrit. It was a great film and I believe it to be one of Joss Whedon's greatest achievements, I just wanted more. I wanted to know a bit about the Chitauri (if that is how you spell it ?). I wanted to see more of a conflict with Thor and Loki. I wanted more of a motivation for Bruce Banner to join the cause after the way he had been treated in the hellcarrier. Maybe I am asking for too much but I just expected this to be full of content, like for example The Lord of the Rings. The Fellowship, had a big cast of heroes but it still managed to balance a large amount of emotional depth, with great action sequences.

One of my favourite moments in The Avengers, is when they are suiting up. The music is fantastic during that sequence.
Gerrit
Gerrit - 5/2/2012, 12:41 PM
I didn't man, don't worry. It's impossible to get things right for everyone at the same time, specially with a movie like this. People just want different things. And it's funny that we disagree again, in The Fellowship all the hobbits were friends, lived in the same place and they discover together all the other characters throughout the movie, I think that helps getting all the relations right. In The Avengers, we have characters that were already stablished in different movies and didn't know each other, people who watched all the MCU moviescould expec more since they already know each character, but the general audience doesn't. The Avengers really is a very tough movie to make.
Frogman
Frogman - 5/2/2012, 1:03 PM
I think Helicarrier Hulk was angry because he transformed due to Banner losing control rather than forcing himself to transform. Agree on Cap and Iron Man and Hawkeye. But Loki only wanted the tesserect to get the army so he could then take over the world while Thanos took the tesserect.
IRONRED
IRONRED - 5/2/2012, 1:35 PM
I just miss one thing: MORE OF THOR FLYING AROUND!i mean, he is the friking GOD OF THUNDER, but he looks such a pussy sometimes.. so....human. I would love some scenes with THOR levitating or slowly falling down street level, some thing like that, he is Marvel's Superman, he should be able to do this kind of thing!
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 5/2/2012, 1:55 PM
@ ashes

I can respect your opinions, but let me try to explain SOME of your issues. Maybe you'll feel a little differently. Maybe not, and thats fine too, bud.

1. I agree with Cap and Iron Man in the sense that I would have liked to see them talk about Father Stark. The fact that they didn't does not really change the tension between them though, because it was clearly there. And who knows, maybe they'll address it in a later movie. I can't hold that against the film itself though, as that is just kind of a fan's wish, y'know? It didn't effect the overall plot in the least bit.

2. Hawkeye's character was fleshed out enough for the sake of the film in my opinion. All that we really needed to know is that he's a SHIELD agent who is good with a bow and arrow. We really don't know any more about him than we do about Widow. Their both SHIELD agents. Other than that, we know nothing of their history or origins. Same can be said for Fury and Coalson. Y'know?

3. You kind of answered the Hulk thing yourself. Hulk was under the control of Loki when he rampaged on the Helicarrier. There isn't really any other explanation needed to explain why he was attacking everyone in that scene, but at the end he was in control. Loki had him in his control on the Helicarrier, period. That completely explains why he was a rampaging beast and attacking everyone.

4. Gaining the Tesseract was not Loki's ONLY motivation and plan. His plan was to use the Tesseract to trade for an army to invade earth with, so that he could subjugate the humans and become ruler of earth. Getting his hands on the Tesseract was only the first part of his plan. The second part was taking over Earth, so there was still plenty to fight over after he gained the Cube. Remember, gaining the Cube was not what he set out to do. His ultimate goal was to take over earth, the Cube was only a tool he needed to achieve the bigger goal. So i don't see that as a plot point at all, because again, gaining the Cube was not his ultimate goal.

Again, no disrespect, I think you just overlooked a few things. :)
Ashes2Phoenix
Ashes2Phoenix - 5/2/2012, 2:13 PM
@CorndogBurglar: No disrespect taken at all buddy. Most of your points I agree with. I can't work out what my problem is. The film moves so fast at times, I feel it doesn't really take a moment to slow down and catch it's breath. I think it comes down to personal taste. I like my films to have a slightly slower burn ( Spider-Man2, Batman Begins, TDK, Iron Man). I find it helps to soak up the atmosphere of the movie.

Now, I can appreciate one could argue that this is what the solo films were for but I just wanted the film to slow down for a moment and let me absorb it. Feel engrossed.

I mean I thought it was great and the action sequences, humour and dialogue were fantastic. I have said to other people I have spoken to, that I hope they release a directors cut or extended edition. I feel it would slow down the pace of the movie a bit and give me a chance to connect.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 5/2/2012, 5:19 PM
@ Ashes

I can definitely agree with that, it was very fast paced. The 2:20 rin time feels more like an hour, and they did just seem to go from ome fight to the next at times. However, I look at it like this. All of the solo films were building to this movie, and one of the biggest complaints was that all the solo films had somewhat anticlimactic endings. I cant disagree with that either.

So it was great to see the overall buildup come to a head and finally see every solo character have fantastic action scenes. Scenes that kind of seemed
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 5/2/2012, 5:20 PM
...missing from the solo films. So the actionfest in avengers was totally welcome for me!

Sorry for the double post, im on my phone, lol
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 5/2/2012, 5:22 PM
Also, Thor uppercutting the shit out of hulk with mjolnir was badass!
birdfists
birdfists - 5/2/2012, 5:49 PM
I found they made Thor a bit too.. 'not important'. Loki is his brother still, but it is really only focused on at all in one scene. And Thor reacts so much to Coulson dying, but there is like.. no interaction between th two since |Thor, and he reacts like it was a close friend.

And I agree about Coulson's death. It just kind of.. happened. Though they've been practically hinting that they'll bring him back somehow.

But my biggest issue is the lack of Thor in it, he just doesn't seem as invested as they made it sound about the whole 'brother' thing.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 5/2/2012, 8:17 PM
@birdfists

Thor reacted to Coulson dying I think was more due to the fact that loki murdered him in cold blood. I think tbe fact that it was loki is why he was so upset.

Plus, I thought the brother thing was done pretth well. He was jnvested in it, he's the one that fought loki one on one at the end...before hulk threw him around like a ragdoll of course lol. Which was hysterical.
1 2
View Recorder