Batman Retrospective Review Part 2: Batman Returns

Batman Retrospective Review Part 2: Batman Returns

Here we take a look at Tim Burton's second Batman film and see if it can hold up by today's standards.

Review Opinion
By googleplex - Jul 16, 2012 11:07 AM EST
Filed Under: Batman

Now we're on to part 2 of my look at the theatrically released Batman films leading up to my review of the new movie The Dark Knight Rises. For those of you who have just started here please take a look at my first retrospective review for the 1989 Batman movie before reading on. So without further ado, here's my review of Batman Returns.

HISTORY

After the monumental success of the original Batman, Warner Brothers gave full creative control of the sequel to Tim Burton. Now while this may have seemed like a great idea at the time it ended up proving to be a very controversial film. It took several liberties with the source material and took the franchise in a distinctly dark area. These dark changes included changing the Penguin into little more than a deformed monster and giving us a rather bittersweet ending many viewers weren't too fond over. I'll get more into the issues with the film people had but it lead to parents boycotting Mcdonald's who carried the toy line for the movie, leading to Tim Burton being taken out of the franchise. Since this eventually lead to Schumacher taking over one could say that this was the beginning of the end of this Batman franchise.

But despite all the controversy, the question remain. How does this film hold up today? Well let's take a look.

1) THE PLOT

The plot revolves around the emergence of a mysterious man named Oswald Cobblepot (The Penguin for those of you not up in the knowledge of the comics). He starts off as a beloved figure in the public eye after saving the mayor's baby. With the help of corrupt business man Max Schreck Oswald eventually runs for mayor himself. However Batman believes the Penguin is up to no good and attempts to deal with him while also trying to take out another mysterious villain, Catwoman, as well as taking on a circus themed gang that appeared around the same time as Cobblepot.

If the story sounds kind of confusing for a superhero movie, believe me when I say that's the least of this film's worry. As mentioned before this movie gets extremely dark extremely fast. In fact the movie starts off with a couple abandoning their newly born baby into the sewer system. I'll get more into that when I talk about the characters but I will say that Batman creator Bob Kane personally stated that this movie was way too dark for a Batman story.

2) THE HERO

Again Micheal Keaton returns (no pun intended) for the title role of Bruce Wayne/Batman. It's pretty much the same performance as in the original film so turn into my last review for more of my opinion. As for this movie my main issue comes in the form of Batman's new policy against killing people...in that he has none. While in the first movie Batman's actions could have been considered that he only accidentally killed certain criminals and that he mostly tried to avoid it, here I think he's going out of his way to kill the criminals of the city. One criminal he just outright killed with the tail end of his Batmobile and another he straped a bomb to his chest and simply walked away from the inevitable explosion. In fact a point is made that one of Catwoman's lives was taken from Batman himself. Aside from that, it is still the same performance as before and my only problems are based around the story itself.

3) THE VILLAIN

In this movie we have our first major change in villains until the reboot by Nolan (until then we just had carbon copies of the Joker). Enter in the Penguin played by Danny DeVito who's a radical departure from the Penguin from the comics. Instead of being a sophisticated criminal who just mildly looks like a penguin, here we have a gross deformed monstrosity who knows little about how social interactions work. This would be fine except this is where most of the dark and disturbing aspects of the film comes from. Naturally we all know about the scene where the Penguin bit that one guy's nose off and gave our entire generation nightmares to this very day but there's also his final evil scheme which involves...killing all the first born children of Gotham. Geez, and we say Nolan's Batman gets dark. But despite the obvious writing problems Danny does make this an enjoyable character to watch. It might not be his best performance but you can tell he's having fun with the character and that translates to us having a good time watching him...you know, when he's not killing children and biting people's noses off.

4) THE LOVE INTEREST

Just like in the first movie which introduced us to a love interest that was able to avoid many of the idiotic cliches of other superhero stories, here we get Selina Kyle A.K.A. Catwoman. On top of being significantly more developed than the average love interest Selina is also given a lengthy subplot, though one that is also a great departure from the comics. The story involves Selina as a nerdy secretary for Max Schreck who learns about her boss's evil doings. After an attempt on her life Selina gains cat powers and seeks revenge on her boss by adopting the persona of Catwoman. While the story does take liberties with the source material the film as well as the actor, Michelle Pfieffer, take great care and respect with the character. For one thing the fact that this Catwoman has powers is largely ignored. Another point is how after transfering into Catwoman she's very close to the classic femme fatale that we all know and love. Just like in the comics she uses her sexuallity to her advantage to both distract male adversaries and to fool others into thinking she's not as skilled as she really is. Not to mention but Michelle was also very determined to get this role right which is reflected in her performance (as an example of her determination, they didn't fake that scene where she ate the bird and spat it up). There's also a strong chemistry between her and Keaton that's definitally stronger than the one between Keaton and Basinger which makes the tragic ending all the more depressing. This is definitally the breakout performance of the movie and Anne Hathaway has some big shoes to fill in order to live up to what Pfieffer did.

5) THE SUPPORTING CAST

As mentioned before the supporting cast is mostly made up of Alfred and Gordon, but again not much has changed with them. Max Schreck however is a new addition, played by Christopher Walken. Being played by Walken you can tell his role in this is to be an awesomely creepy and akward man, which he naturally succeeds. Many of you may be wondering why I didn't include him with the villain section since he does work closely with the Penguin and is also the villain in the subplot with Catwoman. However i felt in the main narrative he could easily be taken out while just changing it so that the Penguin tried to kill Selina instead. Despite his superfluous nature in the story he's still got the likeability of Walken that we all love. The Penguin's gang also has a few interesting side characters but it still feels like a step down from the original for one reason...NO BOB!

6) FINAL VERDICT

All in all this is an okay edition to the franchise. With it's effects and dark storyline it actually hold up pretty well by today's standards. For fans of the comics i'd say it's more of something to avoid because of the changes from the source material and I wouldn't advise it for a family night as it can get pretty dark. But if you enjoyed Burton's first Batman movie it's at least worth a look.

So there's my review of Batman Returns. Please like if you liked this article and post a comment on your views on this movie. Tomorrow I will take a look at the next in the franchise which hopefully won't take Forever (I apologize for that terrible joke). See you next time.

The Obscure And Messed Up BATMAN Villain DC Wants You To Forget
Related:

The Obscure And Messed Up BATMAN Villain DC Wants You To Forget

Brandon Sklenar Comments Again On BATMAN And Reveals His Favorite Bat Actor
Recommended For You:

Brandon Sklenar Comments Again On BATMAN And Reveals His Favorite Bat Actor

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Rambaldi47
Rambaldi47 - 7/16/2012, 12:33 PM
Returns used to be my favorite, but looking back, I think that was just because of my obsession with Michelle Pfieffer as Catwoman. Burton's original Batman was far superior. His Gotham was larger and more realistic. In Returns, it feels small and too gothic. Take Catwoman away and it's not that good. Although Nolan did the same thing: the Gotham from Begins is so different from the Gotham in TDK. Begins was better.
googleplex
googleplex - 7/16/2012, 1:12 PM
good points guys. and just wait for me to totally destroy schumacher before TDKR comes out.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 7/16/2012, 9:14 PM
First movie I ever saw in a movie theater.

I watched it a year ago, and realized that it was actually here, not Batman Forever, that the Batman movies started their 90s decline.

For the record, I love intentionally campy movies. The Princess Bride and Ghostbusters are among my favorite movies of all time, with the latter actually being MY FAVORITE.

Trouble is, these characters can't even take themselves seriously, and while amusing, it actually does a disservice to CBMs and the fans of the genre who still defend it.

When you look at Burton's first Batman movie, you see aspects of his style, but the story is not HIS. It was decades in the making, and various drafts were thrown in the mix over the years, some actually making it into the final product.

Then you look at Batman Returns and think: "does Burton even KNOW what he's doing?" The movie has nothing to do with Batman, in fact. The first you see of him in the movie is nearly an hour into it.
anannya
anannya - 7/16/2012, 11:39 PM
This is my favourite movie to date. Apart from a few clunkers, I think the script is pretty sharp and there is some characterisation and development of Bruce by the end of the film (i.e. he develops his moral code, which is continued in Forever) and the sacrifice he makes to reach out to Selina and bittersweet ending make it a masterpiece to me.

Oh, and a couple of things, the fun fact above is not about Mia Sara but Sean Young who was prancing about in a Catwoman suit asking for the part. Burton never actually saw her, but said that if he did, he would probably cower in his office. Someone else told him about the incident.

And Catwoman was never supernatural or had cat powers or was even revived by cats. She falls 6 floors through 2 awnings into a mound of snow. Jackie Chan did a similar stunt for real in Project A. The fall caused a psychotic break and her Catwoman persona emerged, a force of raw nature no longer bound by morals or society. She is unleashed to strike back at all the men who seem to run the world and push people around with little consequence.
Burton said in the DVD she was never supernatural but was going for the whole '9 lives' themes and motifs that were displayed in the 50s comics. All her survivals can be explained apart from the shots at the end, although the graphic novel shows Max to be a poor shot and missing her vital organs. This begs the question of how she can be standing at the end looking at the batsignal but this was never Burton's intended ending. He didn't want to showcase her and this would have given more credence to her being normal and not supernatural as no-one can recover that quickly from gunshot wounds. However, the studio insisted on that final shot and Burton complied, it isn't even Michelle in the costume, but a double.
googleplex
googleplex - 7/17/2012, 6:32 PM
@anannya, actually the movie Catwoman, which is technically in cannon, states quite clearly that it's based on supernatural powers. not saying that was ever Burton's intentions but it's more reasons why we should hate that movie.

also your explanation doesn't explain how she's all of a sudden extremely athletic and even managed to take batman on.
anannya
anannya - 7/17/2012, 7:24 PM
@JokerFanHaHaHa - thanks for the info, I didn't know that about the robotic mannequin!

@googleplex - I have not been able to sit through the whole of Catwoman so I just went by what Tim Burton said on the DVD extras.

As for her athletic ability and martial arts skills, that's explained in a scene from the early script which was never shot. Selina explains that she was very athletic as a kid, did a lot of gymnastics etc as her mother pushed her to do it. She also says she took martial arts classes but was never that good because her instructor kept telling her that her mind wasn't clear. In the conversation with Bruce (after she becomes Catwoman) she says 'it's clear now'.

Burton was never that good or interested in explaining every little facet on the screen, which can be annoying at times. But this was the late 80s / early 90s and studio pressure, film logic and running times were different back then.
View Recorder