Joaquin Phoenix's JOKER "Definitely" Won't Meet Robert Pattinson's BATMAN, According To Todd Philips

Joaquin Phoenix's JOKER "Definitely" Won't Meet Robert Pattinson's BATMAN, According To Todd Philips

Fans hoping to see Joaquin Phoenix's take on the Clown Prince of Crime cross paths with Robert Pattinson's new Batman might be disappointed, as Joker director Todd Philips says it's not gonna happen...

By MarkCassidy - Sep 10, 2019 07:09 AM EST
Filed Under: Joker
Although we've always been told that Todd Philips' Joker movie was not going to be a part of Warner Bros.' current DCEU (or whatever you want to call it), many fans still hoped to see Joaquin Phoenix's acclaimed take on the iconic DC villain cross paths with our new Batman, Robert Pattinson.

Unfortunately, it doesn't sound like this is something that's currently on the cards - at least not according to Todd Philips.

The director didn't beat around the bush when Variety asked if these versions of the characters could appear in a future film together, stating "No, definitely not."

“Oddly, in the states, comic books are our Shakespeare it seems, and you can do many many versions of “Hamlet,” Phillips added. “There will be many more jokers, I’m sure, in the future.”

Honestly, after everything we've heard about Joker, a crossover with what is certain to be a more family-friendly incarnation of the Dark Knight was always going to be a long shot. That said, if this standalone origin story is as successful as it's expected to be, Warner Bros. may rethink their current strategy.

Tell us, are you disappointed by this update, or did you figure as much anyway? Drop us a comment down below, and you can also check out some excerpts from the first wave of reviews.

Image result for joker movie


This is a truly nightmarish vision of late-era capitalism – arguably the best social horror film since ‘Get Out’ – and Phoenix is magnetic in it. He runs Heath Ledger cigarette-paper close as the finest screen Joker.

SOURCE: Time Out

Having brazenly plundered the films of Scorsese, Phillips fashions stolen ingredients into something new, so that what began as a gleeful cosplay session turns progressively more dangerous – and somehow more relevant, too. Gotham City is aflame and they’re rioting on the streets. And a rough beast is slouching towards the TV studio to be born.

SOURCE: Guardian

It will be tempting for some to declare this the first art film based on a DC or Marvel property, but while it certainly represents a bit of a departure and something of a risk, “Joker” is ultimately grim-and-gritty comic book nihilism jacked up to the nth degree, wrapped up in a convincing but ultimately hollow simulacra of better, smarter movies.

SOURCE: The Wrap
 
Image result for joker movie


In Joker — playing in competition here at the Venice Film Festival — Phoenix is acting so hard you can feel the desperation throbbing in his veins. He leaves you wanting to start him a GoFundMe, so he won’t have to pour so much sweat into his job again. But the aggressive terribleness of his performance isn’t completely his fault. (He has often been, and generally remains, a superb actor. Just not here.)

SOURCE: Time

As social commentary, “Joker” is pernicious garbage. But besides the wacky pleasures of Phoenix’s performance, it also displays some major movie studio core competencies, in a not dissimilar way to what “A Star Is Born” presented last year. (Bradley Cooper is a producer.) The supporting players, including Glenn Fleshler and Brian Tyree Henry, bring added value to their scenes, and the whole thing feels like a movie.

SOURCE: RogerEbert.com
 
Image result for joker movie


"Joker" achieves two contradictory goals simultaneously, delivering a blockbuster that highlights what is eternally captivating about the character, while at the same time offering a sobering critique of the nihilism that has long been the Joker's M.O.

SOURCE: Screen International

Phoenix is all in and then some, a performance so dazzling risky and original you might as well start engraving his name on the Oscar right now. No joke, this is a movie — premiering today at the Venice Film Festival — unlike any other from the DC universe, and you will find it impossible to shake off. At least I did.

SOURCE: Deadline

In amongst “Joker’s” fire and blood and chaos and its blackest of blackhearted laughter, there is the sense of a grotesque, green-haired genie being let out of a bottle, and whether it wreaks havoc or not, we’re not going to be able to put it back in.

SOURCE: The Playlist
 

With the combination of talented actors, a well fleshed out script, and excellent direction, the audience doesn’t quite know who to root for. It’s traumatizing in a way because it causes a kind of morality battle. That sort of intensity weighs in on you once the film is over. It makes you think. The “funny” moments of the film are so strategic that they cause uncomfortable laughter.

SOURCE: Black Girl Nerds

In fact, that sympathy is where much of the film’s fear comes from. This is the Joker. We should not like this person. And yet, the movie tricks us into doing that time and time again. We frequently see things happening that aren’t actually happening. Information is given that isn’t quite accurate. Arthur’s point of view is mostly unreliable. And so the film swings you between sympathy and pity or humor and awkwardness, sometimes in a single shot. Not knowing what to believe and how to feel is one of the film’s most interesting and strongest assets.

SOURCE: i09

As the film goes on, it becomes increasingly a horror movie and the violence – although limited to a very few incidents – is portrayed as shockingly real. There are also moments of humour – as you’d expect from the director of The Hangover – but the “funny ha-ha” is definitely mixed in with funny peculiar so it’s impossible to say where one ends and the other begins. What it doesn’t feel like is a comic book movie.

SOURCE: CineVue
 
Image result for joker movie


The first big problem is that the film cannot decide whether it wants to keep its powder dry in terms of its relationship to the wider world of superhero lore. It opens on a classic 1970s Warner Bros logo in a misguided attempt to connect itself to one of cinema’s golden eras – making it appear even worse by comparison. It tries desperately hard to come across as edgy, but coldly refuses to swerve from the hard-painted lanes of templated Hollywood filmmaking. It ends up resembling nothing more than a Suicide Squad spin-off movie. Yet it’s ambitions are certainly more lofty.

SOURCE: Little White Lies

Superhero blockbuster this is not: a playful fireman's-pole-based homage to the old Batman television series is one of a very few lighthearted moments in an otherwise oppressively downbeat and reality-grounded urban thriller.

SOURCE: Telegraph UK
 
Image result for joker movie


Bold, devastating and utterly beautiful, Todd Phillips and Joaquin Phoenix have not just reimagined one of the most iconic villains in cinema history, but reimagined the comic book movie itself.

SOURCE: Empire

Joaquin Phoenix's fully committed performance and Todd Phillips' masterful albeit loose reinvention of the DC source material make Joker a film that should leave comic book fans and non-fans alike disturbed and moved in all the right ways.

SOURCE: IGN
 
Quentin Tarantino Responds To JOKER 2 Praise Backlash: What Do You Care What the F*ck I Like?
Related:

Quentin Tarantino Responds To JOKER 2 Praise Backlash: "What Do You Care What the F*ck I Like?"

JOKER: FOLIE À DEUX Finishes Theatrical Run With Just $206 Million Worldwide Ahead Of Max Debut
Recommended For You:

JOKER: FOLIE À DEUX Finishes Theatrical Run With Just $206 Million Worldwide Ahead Of Max Debut

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

bobevanz
bobevanz - 9/10/2019, 7:53 AM
I'm fine with that, he'll be great!
mastakilla39
mastakilla39 - 9/10/2019, 11:55 AM
@bobevanz - Is this a spoiler? I'm assuming he dies then?

I know this is the 1st of DC Black and not set in the DCEU but I guess all talks with WB about him reprising his role for more films are over. What a shame.
JohnnyAssCheeks
JohnnyAssCheeks - 9/10/2019, 1:12 PM
@bobevanz -
Kumkani
Kumkani - 9/10/2019, 7:57 AM
Good. I don't need overly reactionary WB again trying to make stuff happen that doesn't need to happen. Let them be separate things.

Although this does point to one reason why the Joker movie feels so fresh: no Batman. Just yesterday it hit me how much Batman and Batman-adjacent stuff we've had in recent memory. We might need to give the characters a rest after all of this.
tmp3
tmp3 - 9/10/2019, 7:59 AM
DC getting two of my favorite actors as two of my favorite comic book characters and then not letting them meet would have been pretty frustrating, but the press interviews so far have made it obvious that Phoenix wouldn't have done a role in a more conventional superhero film.
Also, I caved in and saw a bit of the leaked clip of this, and the violence looks genuinely horrific. So few R rated movies ever show violence in such an uncomfortable manner, where the gore isn't there to "look cool" or whatever, but to be disturbing on a deeper level. Also, Phoenix looks incredible
GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 9/10/2019, 8:05 AM
“No, definitely not,” he told Variety when asked if the pair would appear in a future film together.

Nebula
Nebula - 9/10/2019, 8:07 AM
I'm fine with this as long as it doesn't mean more Leto.
LordHarryLatts
LordHarryLatts - 9/10/2019, 8:10 AM
These DC Black label movies are meant to be standalone projects. Let them stay that way. DC needs to slowly and carefully build a connected universe...and learn from their failed first attempt to do so.
THEDARKKNIGHT1939
THEDARKKNIGHT1939 - 9/10/2019, 8:17 AM
Good. I couldn't care less about a DC shared universe at this point. I'm all in for the solo, elseworld stories direction. Sad how after 7 years, WB just wound up going back to the Nolan approach of making DC movies set in their own contained universes.
FleischerSupes
FleischerSupes - 9/10/2019, 8:18 AM
My concern is that Pattinson/Phillips' Batman will either:

Have to someday face yet another different Joker ( the 5th or 6th in 10 years counting TV shows?).

OR
never have the Joker as an antagonist at all.


GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 9/10/2019, 8:18 AM
@LordHarryLatts - emphasis on the "s l o w l y". At this glacial pace, it will be 2030 before DCEU (or whatever the f they call it) actually has a fully connected universe ... and by 2030, Marvel Studios will be triumphed with phases 4, 5 and 6 and topped it all off with 'Secret Wars' or some other grand finale that will top Endgame at the global box office.

I can see it now (fast forward to March 2020): Joaquin Phoenix wins the Oscar for best actor (Joker does the 'double,' after Heath Ledger's best supporting actor Oscar), 'Joker' wins the Oscar for best picture (because, let's be honest, this really isn't a CBM, Phillips has all but said as much), Joaquin drops the mic and throws the make-up away, and this is the last we ever saw of this Joker, never to fight Batman. Only for WB/DC to reboot him once again.
LordHarryLatts
LordHarryLatts - 9/10/2019, 8:37 AM
@GeneralZod- DC can't be concerned with what Marvel does anymore. Even the attempt to "chase" what they've done and will continue to do is pointless. If they carefully craft their own "universe", they'll have tons of their own success.
If they're going to build it into something (Darkseid War, for example)...let them do it right.
Webheaded225
Webheaded225 - 9/10/2019, 8:39 AM
I don't understand this whole connected universe fetish at this point. If they make good films, i guess that's what matters. We already have one sprawling gigantic cinematic universe and it has it's good sides and bad sides like any other cinematic project. In the end of the day all i care about are well made movies, and they seem to be on the right track.
GodHercules20
GodHercules20 - 9/10/2019, 8:42 AM
Good
I don't want to see Joker in the upcoming new Batman movie. Joker is overexposed and lame imo. Riddler is my favourite Batman villain and he should be the main villain in that movie.

So tired of Joker vs Batman. Total bs in the comics. Batman can make a plan and defeat Superman but can't do the same thing to lame af Joker
Comicbookart
Comicbookart - 9/10/2019, 9:21 AM
These comments are an example of the fact that DC and WB have no plan for their CBM's. People here mentioning "black label" and "DCEU" none of which is official, confirmed or even accepted by DC/WB.

I won't be supporting this movie regardless of the praise it'ss gotten because it has little to do with how Joker is in the comics, and one of the producers said she can't watch CBM's. How do you have someone work on a comic book character but hates comic book movies? smh.

Well I won't spend money on this movie.
VileBlood
VileBlood - 9/10/2019, 9:38 AM
So the DC Stans no longer want Joker and Batman in the same film cause Connected universes are a bad thing all of a sudden. Might as well give Batman a solo film with no villains at this point, Penguin should get his own film, Dr. Freeze also needs a film without any connection to Batman. Let's keep everything separated cause connected universes are BAD!!!!
GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 9/10/2019, 9:57 AM
obredaan - that's right. So all the fans last year frustrated that no Spidey in Venom, now upset Spidey going to Sony, but perfectly ok that this Joker will never see Batman.



Battabing
Battabing - 9/10/2019, 10:10 AM
It's hilarious seeing some of these man-babies stomping their feet because Battinson and Jo(ker)aquin won't meet even though EVERYONE said that this film takes place essentially under DC's Elseworlds line.

Forthas
Forthas - 9/10/2019, 10:47 AM



























Forthas
Forthas - 9/10/2019, 11:16 AM
BOTH The Batman and Joker should be one off films and should not be connected to any other films. The DCEU as it is currently should be ended!
hsanjose
hsanjose - 9/10/2019, 12:30 PM
A Joker without Batman It's not a Joker. No matter how many prizes win!
AwesomePromoz
AwesomePromoz - 9/10/2019, 3:17 PM
They should not have titled this Joker. That move was a cash grab, and I think they will be disappointed with the box office results of an R-rated art wank film.

I'll watch it on Netflix.
BlackStar25
BlackStar25 - 9/11/2019, 2:39 PM
REALLY?....Who would have thought...
View Recorder