Retrospective Review: The Dark Knight

Retrospective Review: The Dark Knight

With the current influx of editorials related to Nolan's epic Batman trilogy and with the final chapter just a few months out, maybe it's time to revisit the movie event of summer 2008

Review Opinion
By cself85 - Feb 08, 2012 11:02 AM EST
Filed Under: Batman
Source: reviewself.blogspot.com



What I first noticed as "The Dark Knight" opens is how different the city looks than it did in "Batman Begins." If for no other reason than the fact that it is daytime, where much of "Batman Begins" existed at night. The cinematography of the first film used muted tones; browns and greys and blacks. We saw the seediest parts of Gotham City enveloped in a shroud of steam from vents that provided an overall sense of menace and fear. This was a Gotham in desperate need of a hero. Some early scenes of "The Dark Knight" show a city that has its hero, two of them in fact, with the addition of the gung-ho District Attorney, Harvey Dent; and Gung-Ho he certainly is. I can't remember a courtroom scene in any film where a District Attorney gets away with physically assaulting a hostile witness, but here it is.


As for the Batman, he has been cleaning up the streets for the last six months, and when we first see him, he is tying off one of the final loose ends of the last movie by putting a stop to the Scarecrow (reprised by Cillian Murphy) and his illegal drug pedaling. Some have complained of his brief appearance but he made more than a formidable villain the last time around, so why is it necessary for him to be on screen any longer than to be taken down? Especially when the Joker has come onto the scene. Obviously the most anticipated performance of the year by the late Heath Ledger, the Joker is without a doubt the most dominant force in this movie. He creates something far beyond a character and his ferocity even determines several other key players' motivations. Anyone who thinks the oscar win for his performance was "sympathy" is seriously mistaken. No greater performance was delivered that year.


The Joker is a force to be reckoned with indeed; after stealing a healthy chunk of the mob's money to finance his terrorism (and that's not an overstatement) he barges in on the mob and turns them against their money manager, Lau (Chin Han). With all the money launderers behind bars thanks to Dent, Lau is the last best hope for the mob keeping their money safe. The Joker knows that Dent and Batman will come after Lau, and uses this information to gain a volitile reputation. This reputation brings a new fear to Gotham as the Joker calls for the Batman to reveal himself or else! The 'or else' I will leave for you to discover, but needless to say, it sets the stage for several sequences of breathtaking action. This film has made history by being the first feature film to have entire scenes shot using an IMAX camera, and those sequences are nothing short of jaw-dropping on the IMAX screen.


Action aside, this film is largely character driven, which is what contributes to the series "realism." Harvey Dent's character arc is easily the most tragic of the film, thanks mostly to the performance of Eckhart using the writing of the Nolan brothers, so by the time he meets his inevitable fate, the audience has seen his point of view and shared his frustration. The grotesque details of his face are perhaps a touch too implausible but either way, it looks painful and adds to his menace. Returning are Gary Oldman as James Gordon, Michael Caine as Bruce Wayne's counterpart Alfred, Morgan Freeman as Wayne Enterprises CEO Lucius Fox and of course the man of the hour, or in this case, two and a half, Christian Bale as Bruce Wayne/Batman. Rachel Dawes is back as well, only this time portrayed by Maggie Gyllenhaal; and her storyline provides a pivotal turning point.


In fact, each of the supporting characters is vital to the narrative of the entire series, but perhaps none more than Jim Gordon, whose private alliance with Batman undermines the Corruption of the Gotham Police and also ends the film with a strange sense of hopeful forboding. The way Oldman plays Jim with experience and instinct makes him almost unrecognizable in a performance that is extremely focused and underrated. Especially this time around, it'd be nice to see him recieve an oscar nod. Of course we know how important Alfred and Lucius are; Alfred provides Bruce and Batman's inner conscience and solace in desperate times and without Fox, Bruce Wayne would not have access to the materials that allow him to be Batman. The question of whether anybody ever notices or recognizes this equipment from Wayne Enterprises recieves an answer in this film that is handled humorously by Fox only to later re-surface and jump start the last act of the movie.


In its two and a half hour length, it is impressive how many characters are juggled and handled rather effectively, each given an appropriate amount of time to arc and fall. "The Dark Knight" in many ways succeeds where "Spider-Man 3" failed. The latter film had too little time to accomplish far too much. "The Dark Knight" sets out to accomplish just as much or more, but succeeds. If at times it all feels a little chaotic, it's because it is meant to, as highlighted by Heath Ledger's Joker. The plot drives forward, connecting each strand with a series of large, often tragic events. The title is piercingly appropriate given how the audience watches a hopeful city descend through chaos into a broken city. In one of the film's late scenes, Dent says 'the night is darkest just before the dawn.' By the film's conclusion, we haven't yet seen the dawn. I am certain though, that by the time the third film hits theatres in July, no matter what Gotham city looks like, I'll want to be there.
RUMOR: The BATMAN-Adjacent Script Zach Cregger Hopes To Pitch To DC Studios Is A JOKER & HARLEY QUINN Movie
Related:

RUMOR: The BATMAN-Adjacent Script Zach Cregger Hopes To Pitch To DC Studios Is A JOKER & HARLEY QUINN Movie

BATMAN BEYOND Voice Actor Confirms He Will Not Reprise The Role Of Terry McGinnis Anytime Soon
Recommended For You:

BATMAN BEYOND Voice Actor Confirms He Will Not Reprise The Role Of Terry McGinnis Anytime Soon

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

JackDexx
JackDexx - 2/8/2012, 2:39 PM
i didn't find it all that life changing
Supes17
Supes17 - 2/8/2012, 2:57 PM
JackDexx! You ignorant slut:P
Supes17
Supes17 - 2/8/2012, 3:02 PM
I thought you left this site for good?
orpheus
orpheus - 2/8/2012, 3:08 PM
TEAM CYCLOPS!
RobGrizzly
RobGrizzly - 2/8/2012, 3:36 PM
I like the observation about the 2 Gotham Cities. Begins' Gotham seemed a bit more stylized, where TDK's Gotham was literally just a normal city.

What's interesting about The Joker praise is he isn't even in the movie all that much compared to other characters. Yet the consensus is that he "dominates" the film. He does, so its a testament to Ledger's performance, and an excellent story plot from the writing team.

I'm glad you mentioned them, because I find Ekhart's performance to be very under-appreciated. This was never a Joker movie. It's barley even a Batman movie. It is The Fall of Harvey Dent. And anyone who feels Two-Face was tacked on to the last act of the film, doesn't understand how story arcs work. IN 2008, I wanted both he and Gary Oldman's Jim Gordon considered for Supporting Actor nods right along with Heath.

This is a great re-view. I'm curious if watching the movie, you liked it a little bit more, less or still the same. Strangely, the last time I watched both Batman Begins and TDK, it was Begins' I enjoyed more!

TDK is still a 5-star masterpiece, but I noticed that the first time, not knowing what happens next made the tension and unease throughout the picture was almost unbearable. But that gets lost on repeated viewings.
But seeing the Batman origin (handled so well) never loses its novelty, and can be watched over and over. And forgive me, but I miss Katie Holmes. Not having her back for the sequel loses the connection the two actors built up the first time around. (I had the same issue with War Machine in the Iron man flicks)
But it stands that Begins still has the DNA of a 'superhero' movie, where The Dark Knight is pure crime drama all the way. I guess my final conclusion is, in the past, I thought TDK blew Begins out of the water, but on re-watching them both, they are total equals. Begins still has some stuff on its predecessor.

Great write up!
cself85
cself85 - 2/8/2012, 3:49 PM
@RobGrizzly-Thanks for the comments. It is hard for me to determine what I prfer more. I will say that I think 'Batman Begins' has perhaps DEEPER thematic undertones to it as far as a man struggling to find purpose and the fear of what his life will become. 'The Dark Knight' plays with more themes but they are more subtle and I belive the tonal shift was genious.
I think 'The Dark Knight Rises' is going to find the balance of both and will make a perfect close to the story arc as a whole.
I agree about Katie Holmes. Maggie is perhaps a better actress hit for hit, but Holmes was actually subdued and very capable in 'Batman Begins' so that continuity is missed.
Everytime I go back to see these, I watch them back to back. I find I have more giddy moments with 'Batman Begins' that give me goosebumps. Yet, 'The Dark Knight' is an experience I will never forget in the theatre. The IMAX footage was incredible. 'The Dark Knight Rises' has big shoes to fill when put up against both of its predecessors, but this is Nolan we're talking about, and I have complete faith.
cself85
cself85 - 2/8/2012, 3:52 PM
@RobGrizzly-A quick comment on your tension comment. Jim Emmerson did a piece not too long ago tearing to pieces the key chase sequence in TDK. While I disagreed with most of his opinions, one thing I did agree with is that at the beginning of that chase sequence, with the first aerial shot of the convoy escorting Dent, it should have continued right on through to them approaching the flaming fire truck. By not cutting away to Joker shooting the cop from inside the semi, it would make that shot so much more forboding for what is about to happen.
Minotauro
Minotauro - 2/8/2012, 6:33 PM
@Intruder - You need a big sign around your neck, saying Marvel "toolish" fanboy. ;)
cself85
cself85 - 2/8/2012, 6:50 PM
What I don't understand is why this has to be about "fanboys"? I like BOTH DC and Marvel movies. I'm just a movie person, period and if it is well-made, it deserves praise. Why would anyone automatically hate Batman movies just because they love the Marvel ones? No logic....
thewonderer
thewonderer - 2/8/2012, 7:08 PM
I don't understand Marvel fanboys

Marvel fans have all these great movies to appreciate because Marvel is actually smart with getting their properties into film

DC only has Batman so let us fans adore TDK and BB for what they were, damn excellent films.

Its Quality over Quantity here, and though TDK/BB are the better films, Marvels got more great films
TheBigBoss917
TheBigBoss917 - 2/8/2012, 7:45 PM
Who let the trolls in?
95
95 - 2/8/2012, 9:36 PM
Nicely written @cself85.

Exactly, @thewonderer!

Jefferys
Jefferys - 2/8/2012, 10:48 PM
Its Quality over Quantity here, and though TDK/BB are the better films, Marvels got more great films thewonderer


All to their own opinion, aren't I right? For I hardly think that Nolan is better than any of Marvel's films but I hardly think that Marvel's films are even the slightest bit fantastic.
Ha, in my opinion, they're both boring and suck.

But each to their own opinion, right?
fedup
fedup - 2/9/2012, 2:00 AM
@Intruder Why do you enjoy making inflammatory comments? And this isn't me attempting to start an argument. I honestly want to know why you find it amusing to post stuff like that. I just don't see where you get satisfaction out of it.
Squaremaster316
Squaremaster316 - 2/14/2012, 5:33 PM
@Intruder

Oh, yes, because Marvel's overblown fanfic this May is in no way, shape or form a "circle jerk".
Squaremaster316
Squaremaster316 - 4/21/2012, 5:50 PM
An absolutely phenomenal experience, topping anything Whedon or Burton have ever had their names attached too.
View Recorder