Is Captain America the most realistic superhero ever created?

Is Captain America the most realistic superhero ever created?

At first glance Captain America is a pretty silly creation. But if you examine him closely, you may be surprised.

Editorial Opinion
By SpiderFrank4 - Apr 05, 2014 08:04 AM EST

“Realism” is a word that’s thrown around a lot in the world of movies, and especially when talking about superhero films. There was a time when no one, not even the makers of the films themselves, took the genre seriously and this is probably because on the surface, superheroes are pretty silly. They wear brightly colored, skintight outfits and display outlandish powers and gadgetry far beyond the realms of physical possibility. It can be argued that this is what has always drawn people to them however, as I think most comic book fans will agree that they read these stories to escape from reality. Despite this, recent movie adaptations have attempted to ground the characters in what moviegoers perceive as the “real world”. The reason for this could be that the filmmakers have come to understand that their audiences will only accept these characters if they are presented in a way that they can find relatable and believable, and that is not (in most cases) the way that they were presented in the original comics.  

The way the filmmakers have done this is not to make the characters themselves more realistic in terms of their appearance and skillset, but rather to make the world they inhabit seem more real by filling it with places and objects from the real world and making the regular people in this world react as real people would if they saw someone in a silly outfit flying/swinging around battling evil. But at the end of the day, you still couldn’t really imagine most of these characters actually existing could you? I mean come on, a virtually invulnerable humanoid alien who can fly, shoot lasers from his eyes and lift a bus as if it were as light as a feather? A billionaire at the peak of physical fitness who dresses as a bat to fight crime at night with an arsenal of futuristic technology? A guy who sticks to walls and shoots webs from his wrists? I don’t think so. 


On the other hand we have Captain America. At first glance, he is one of the most ridiculously named and costumed characters of them all. But let’s examine his origin story: he’s a guy who was picked off the street and chosen to become an icon for people to look up to, molded and branded by a big name corporation. Doesn’t this make him sound like the winner of a talent show like X-Factor (or American Idol depending on which side of the Atlantic you’re on)? When you really think about it, isn’t this what a real life superhero would be?
 
I know a lot of you out there probably think Batman’s the most realistic superhero because he has no powers; he’s just a normal guy who trained himself physically and mentally and therefore he’s a hero anyone can aspire to be. But really think about that statement: “anyone can be Batman”. You’re basically saying that anyone can have a genius level intellect, a mastery of martial arts and a huge cave under their house with all manner of cool s**t in it. Doesn’t sound too feasible when you say it out loud does it? In my opinion, Batman is not a “regular guy” by any stretch of the imagination. On another note, the world Batman inhabits may be visually more dark and gritty than the worlds of other heroes such as Superman or Spider-Man, but it’s still a world where people can have the ability to morph into clay monsters, make freeze guns and control plant life (and I’m also not entertaining the bulls**t argument that Batman’s world is the only one in which characters can get injured and/or die, because it’s just not).


 
Captain America may technically be a super-powered hero, but his powers aren’t really that extravagant. He just has enhanced strength and speed that he gained from being pumped with super steroids (and of course that never happens in real life does it?). On top of that he never travelled the world to master every kind of fighting style (as far as I know, correct me if I’m wrong), he just has the regular military training that any soldier would receive. His equipment isn’t even all that fancy, all he uses are a shield and regular firearms: I’m pretty sure people use those in real life (granted his shield is made out of a fictional metal alloy that absorbs kinetic energy like a sponge and is virtually indestructible, but that’s a detail).
 
Speaking of firearms, this brings up another very interesting fact about Captain America that sets him apart from a lot of other superheroes: he isn’t above killing. Superman? Batman? Spider-Man? None of these guys would ever take a human life; this is the defining principle of each of their heroic personas. Captain America? If you’re one of the bad guys, he will shoot you, blow you up or throw you off of the SHEILD Hellicarrier to meet a sticky end without even a second thought. Why? Because he’s a soldier, and that is what soldiers are taught to do. That’s what a soldier in the real world would do. So yeah, evildoers beware! And while we’re on that subject, who are the evildoers that like to oppose the Cap? In his solo stories, he mostly fights terrorists and fascist warmongers so there’s even more “real-world” credit for the character.
 
When it comes to realism, audiences also like their movie superheroes to be relatable. They want to identify with these people in order to be invested, and in order for them to do that the heroes must be forced to deal with the same everyday problems many of them face. A classic example of this is Spider-Man; when he’s not doing the hero thing he’s just a normal everyday guy who has to deal with making ends-meet, relationship issues and all of that soul crushing crap we all have to go through from time to time. He’s not a billionaire, he can’t just sit in his mansion and brood, he’s a society drone like everyone else. However, when he’s swinging around as Spider-Man he takes on a very different persona. The power and anonymity he has gives him confidence and some might say a slight arrogance.



 
Captain America was also an everyday guy before he became a superhero, but when he does become a superhero it doesn’t change his personality. He takes his everyman persona into his superhero role and you could argue that this is what makes him such a champion of the people, unlike Spider-Man who’s always been a sort of underdog. I don’t know about anyone else but I found Captain America to be the most relatable character in the Avengers (not that I didn’t enjoy the other characters, because I did, and they're awesome). You always got the impression that he was just an ordinary guy who’d been dragged into this world of spies, gods and monsters. He’s been thrown into a situation he never imagined and all he’s concerned about is doing his duty to protect his nation (and his planet). I don’t pretend to be an expert on this subject, but I imagine this to be a similar feeling to that experienced by many real-life soldiers.
 
So we all know (hopefully) that superheroes don’t actually exist, and will more than likely never exist. But it’s my personal opinion that if there was a real-life superhero, chances are he would be like Captain America. What are your thoughts?

CAPTAIN AMERICA Actor Frank Grillo Explains Why Marvel Almost Fired Me 36 F*cking Times
Related:

CAPTAIN AMERICA Actor Frank Grillo Explains Why "Marvel Almost Fired Me 36 F*cking Times"

Anthony Russo Reflects On CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE WINTER SOLDIER's Legacy And Teases Next Comic Book Movie
Recommended For You:

Anthony Russo Reflects On CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE WINTER SOLDIER's Legacy And Teases Next Comic Book Movie

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

MrCBM56
MrCBM56 - 4/5/2014, 9:28 AM
Without reading the article, no.
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 4/5/2014, 9:36 AM
Great article! You obviously put a lot of thought into this and it shows.

But I think the basic premise of this editorial is a bit off (Although I do get what your article is going for, don't get me wrong). You hit on it a little bit at the end, but IMO it would've been better off being the main point of the article: "When it comes to realism, audiences also like their movie superheroes to be relatable."

That's the key. People will readily buy into the most extravagant, unrealistic superhero, regardless if the rest of the world is grounded in reality or not, or if people react as they would in real life or not. That part really doesn't matter as much as one might think.

It all depends if the characters are relatable or not. If they actually FEEL like real, living, breathing, 3-dimensional characters, then audiences will be that much more likely to just go with whatever else happens in the story. The character himself is what grounds the audience in reality, despite how crazy his powers may be.

And let's face it: Cap's powers are pretty crazy. A magical shield composed of a made-up element that somehow returns to him like a boomerang every time he throws it. Genetically enhanced so he can run laps around others at unnatural speed. Super strength to literally break through walls and doors. Even his core beliefs and personality are completely unusual: no one is as good a person as he is anymore.

But none of that matters because he's so fully-developed as a character. This whole "realism" stuff is a bit overblown IMO, since we should really be focusing on 'realistic' characters...rather than the world they live in. Those are just extra details, and should never really be the focus IMO. The character should be. If that part is done right, everything else will fall into place.

This was a great read though!
MrCBM56
MrCBM56 - 4/5/2014, 9:50 AM
Just finished reading. Great article. Thumbs up!
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 4/5/2014, 10:07 AM
@Nubase, This is exactly what I was speaking out against in my comment. The Dark Knight trilogy was "realistic"? I'm not too sure about that at all. I know fans like to attach that label to Nolan, but just think about it. Two-Face was realistic? Ra's al Ghul was realistic? Scarecrow? Batman himself? Bane? A nuclear reactor turned into a bomb? Come on.

Sure, they came up with so-called "realistic" explanations for things like the Batmobile and stuff, but that's it. I would never go so far to say that the trilogy was a huge success because it was "realistic". Really?

No, it was a success because the characters were so well-defined, fleshed-out, and well-written, and THAT is what audiences respond to. The Dark Knight trilogy isn't the ONLY CBM that "crossed over to the general public not just comic book fans." Um, The Avengers? Iron Man? Thor? Hell, The Winter Soldier?? I wouldn't call ANY of these realistic. The thing they have in common is their focus on characters, not "realism".
thedarkestknightzt
thedarkestknightzt - 4/5/2014, 10:17 AM
I agree with what you are saying.
tonytony
tonytony - 4/5/2014, 10:25 AM
cap america 2 is not realistic. did you not see him bursting through walls chasing the winter soldier?
the most realistic is TDK by a country mile and that to me is still the pinnacle of cbm films.
Klone
Klone - 4/5/2014, 10:30 AM
Didn't read, but no.
MrCameron
MrCameron - 4/5/2014, 11:14 AM
You know, I think you might be onto something here.
Alphadog
Alphadog - 4/5/2014, 12:21 PM
Yeah good article and a very interesting point but if you consider Kick ass a superher (which you shoul) than he's the most realistic of all. If not than The Panthom I guess. It's not soemthing that happened in reality but it could totally happen. I don't know if I'm going to read the other comments but right now I have to say SauronsBANE1 that a 3d dimensional character has nothing to do with being relatable. There are tons of comedies for example with relatable characters that are one dimensional and you can understand and feel for a character even if you haven't gone through those experiences. We just need to see why a character acts a certain way and see him respond to situation realistical. The character has to react to situation as she woulod if she existed in the real world.
@SauronsBANE1
Alphadog
Alphadog - 4/5/2014, 12:35 PM
To me realistic means science fiction and acting like someone actually would under those circunstances. Wolverien for example. His powers are science fiction but aren't even that far away from our technology. The only unrealistic thing to em about him is his mask. He's not the kind of guy that puts on a mask. A dark yellow and brown special suit sure but a mask absolutely no. He's not playing dress up. He doesn't follow fashion or trends. He's not a pop culture lover, he's fricking Logan. Someone like Hawkeye makes a lot more sense because of his more easy going personality and his carnaval past but Logan doesn't have any reason to use it. I have found a reason to give him a mask but it would be a mask closer to his original design. It's actually logical for him to wear a mask but we would need to write a whole story to give him that. It would be a very good story though. It would be something like Origin but only a few years in the past.
Alphadog
Alphadog - 4/5/2014, 12:44 PM
Really dragged away from the subjet with my last comment but just focus on the first half.
Pedrito
Pedrito - 4/5/2014, 1:10 PM
To people saying TDK was "realistic"... Did you forget Joker magically placing bombs anywhere he damn pleased in a matter of hours?
Not that it matters. Realism isn't a requirement to make a great CBM.

If you want realism, watch the first few scenes from Kick-ass. Getting your ass kicked is the only realistic outcome of dressing up and fighting crime.
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 4/5/2014, 1:24 PM
Exactly what Pedrito said. He gets it.

@Alphadog, We might just have to agree to disagree here, because I think you may have misunderstood me. My larger (and main) point is that we shouldn't obsess over everything being "realistic" and think that that's the only way to enjoy movies and that's the only way general audiences will connect with a comic book character. That's bull. Audiences connect over great characters, and THAT is what allows them to suspend their disbelief at anything otherworldly, unrealistic thing that happens.

But I think you're trying to say that "Realism doesn't equal Relatability", and that's a bit different from what I'm saying. But I'll bite. To say that "a 3d dimensional character has nothing to do with being relatable" and then use comedies as your example...that leaves a lot to be desired, IMO.

For one thing, most comedies are notorious for not exactly being the pinnacle of good writing, good stories, or good characters. They do have flat, 1 dimensional, terrible characters, but personally I can't say I've ever related to them, or empathized with them. If they're not written and portrayed well, why should I care about them? And, though you may feel differently, the vast majority of audiences feel that way as well.

Movies need to do more than just why a character acts a certain way, then have them react to situations like people would in real life. That's an incredibly lazy way to make them seem "relatable." Who cares how people act in real life? We need to know whether that particular character acts in a way that's faithful to how they themselves would act, given their past history. That's called having a 3 dimensional, fully fleshed-out character. In my experience, comedies don't go the extra effort to show that.
Alphadog
Alphadog - 4/5/2014, 2:31 PM
@SauronsBANE1 What I'm saying is that you can make a character relatable and face the same problems that we do but that doesn't mean that they are 3d dimensional. A 3d dimensional character, at least from my perspective, is someone that acts like she would actually act. I don't mean that she acts like we do, I mean that if we had her life how would we act. It's not about how we act with our personalities it's how people would actually act in real life. Look at my comment about Wolverine. In real life he wouldn't wear the mask because he's personality contradicts that but cartoons and comics don't portray him like that. Tv shows make it as if he would dress up as a comic book character even though his personality completely contradicts that without a good explanation. For me that's realism. It's not about physics but about psychology.
Alphadog
Alphadog - 4/5/2014, 2:39 PM
Comedies for the most part are an example of characters that go through situations similar to ours but aren't real. A 3d dimensional character isn't one that acts like she acted before, it's a character that based on those characteristics and experiences would continue from that. Sometimes that means acting in a very different way than they did when we first met them but that can't just be a random thing. Black Widow is a good example of what I'm refering to. In the winter soldier she suddenly became sarcastic the whole time. After New York it makes sense for her to act like that but the writers should've somehow let us know that it was a natural transition instead of just changing the character.
Alphadog
Alphadog - 4/5/2014, 2:46 PM
A person's personality changes throughout her life. A three dimensional character should change or stay the same depending on her personality and the events that she goes through but you can't just pick one. You have to put yourself in her place (again, try to picture what she went through so you understand her personality) and see how someone like that would act. It has nothing to do with being relatable. It's about you treating a character like she existed and see how she would act.
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 4/5/2014, 3:57 PM
@Alphadog, Yeah I'll have to respectfully disagree on this point. To me, a 3 dimensional character is someone well-written, someone who's personality and core beliefs are firmly established right from the start, someone who's motivations are clearly defined and make perfect sense given that character's history. You can argue that a 3 dimensional character just "acts like she would actually act" but that's simplifying it a bit too much, IMO.

I totally get what you're saying, especially with the Wolverine example, and maybe that does help a bit with realism, but I don't think that in and of itself meets the requirements of a 3 dimensional, fully fleshed-out character. I think we sort of agree here, but still I think we're saying two different things.

I totally get that characters' personalities change throughout their life (indeed, character arcs are CRUCIAL in creating strong characters). No disagreement here.

But I'm not so much arguing that being relatable automatically means he/she is realistic (although now I see how my 1st comment implied that, so my bad!), I'm mostly saying that audiences will not complain about any lack of realism if the characters are as well-written as they possibly can be.
TheYoungMan
TheYoungMan - 4/5/2014, 6:48 PM
@SauronsBANE1 Realism, in the movie world, does not mean that everything in the movie could happen in real life. Are you saying that because Harvey Dent would not be able to function with those injuries in the real world, that Two-Face wasn't presented realistically in TDK? Realism in cinema is about feeling and presentation, not technicalities. TDK trilogy adheres to a "cinematic reality" (Chris Nolan's own words, by the way), but most people here just don't understand why it works.
Greengo
Greengo - 4/5/2014, 7:13 PM
The realism from this movie stems from the story line... The police state and targeted killings which is a very modern and current theme in the political realm.

LEEE777
LEEE777 - 4/6/2014, 12:46 PM
No, there's many more realistic than Cap ; D

Was gritty tho, real grit super style and super cool ;)


I think Punisher so far the most realistic on film, not Warzone crap ofc.

But CAP 2 is far (inc Avengers) is one of the best Marvel movies ever made.
Lhornbk
Lhornbk - 4/6/2014, 9:34 PM
Is he really realistic? No. But if your argument is that compared to other comic heroes Cap is more realistic, then yes. Some are bringing uo the Cube and Red Skull and so on to argue against you, but I don't think your point was that the movies were more realistic, just that Cap himself is more realistic.

As to those saying Batman and Nolan's films are more realistic, yeah, sorry, but that's just stupid. A lot of his equipment is simply impossible. The Batpod coming out of the Batmobile, using the same tires? Yeah, not happening. The cannons in due Batpod, where exactly do you load them? How do they reload? The Bat aircraft was totally unrealistic. Controlled nuclear fusion still isn't possible, especially in some little sphere that could fit in the back of a small truck. His cape that turns into a glider, yeah that's not happening either. Someone having half their face burned away so that you can actually see into their jaw is not walking out of the hospital just a few days later, especially while refusing pain meds like Harvey did (quite frankly, the hospital would probably give him pain meds anyway, because that much pain in and of itself would slow the healing process, or would at the very least cause the patient to lose consciousness to protect himself from the pain.) The armor he wears is, at least for now, also unrealistic. A super knee brace that allows you to kick a hole in concrete, yeah, that's not happening either.
kong
kong - 4/8/2014, 5:26 PM
So a dude that survived in ice for DECADES is more realistic than this dude...

View Recorder