JLA #1 REVIEW

JLA #1 REVIEW

...Jim Lee and Geoff Johns...Do they deliver?

Review Opinion
By ComicFan69 - Aug 30, 2011 10:08 PM EST
Filed Under: DC Comics

Jim Lee has been vastly spot-on, especially given some amazing books such as HUSH and X-MEN, and he seems to be subtending on modern evolution, as his current art shows. He does well in the JLA #1 issue, as he paints a brooding Gotham City, as it eyes the capture of the vigilante Batman. Johns paints a simplified Batman, and this is eerily similar to that Grayson version seen recently, and while this may not be a copacetic plan, somehow it bumbles to work out. Batman comes off a bit amateurish and sometimes loopy, mistake-ridden, and fumbling...but that blends nicely with the person who saves him, in an arrogant Hal Jordan.


Green Lantern is overpowered and vain...a nice combo, as he shows Batman the depths of true heroes...in a world that doesn't readily accept them as yet. Both are in disbelief of the other and Hal showboats a lot. There is no clear villain in the issue but for a lackey that sews some impressive plot threads with a harsh threat soon to come...very enormous indeed. The action is spot on as Scott Williams on inks highlights Lee's grit and unbridled penchant to show battle and demolition.

The roster is not seen for the JLA as it is an intro into the team's origins...with some cynical aspersions cast on the Guardians as well. Johns also does well to separate this Hal from the regular Hal we know...and it isn't a shocker to see this is 5 years ago in terms of 'hero-time and continuity.'
Whether this ties into Grant Morrison's MULTIVERSITY, who knows, but seeing a tease of Vic Stone paints a bigger plot thread as Johns usually does well with smaller characters that need exposure such as Mera, Orin and Deadman.
The last page shows some unsuspecting heroes what amazing art looks like...and true power seems to be...Zack Synder would be taking note of this final page...
BLACK CANARY: BEST OF THE BEST Interview: Tom King & Ryan Sook Discuss Their WWE-Inspired Comic (Exclusive)
Related:

BLACK CANARY: BEST OF THE BEST Interview: Tom King & Ryan Sook Discuss Their WWE-Inspired Comic (Exclusive)

ZATANNA: DC Comics' Mistress Of Magic Returns In New Series From Writer/Artist Jamal Campbell
Recommended For You:

ZATANNA: DC Comics' Mistress Of Magic Returns In New Series From Writer/Artist Jamal Campbell

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

NERO
NERO - 8/30/2011, 10:48 PM
Still see the DCnewU as a cop out. It just feels, I don't know, lazy somehow. I'll give it a read, but it's really going to take a lot to sell me on this all being a good idea.
KALel3412
KALel3412 - 8/30/2011, 11:00 PM
picking it up tomorrow
TheBatman1
TheBatman1 - 8/31/2011, 12:17 AM
Can't wait to get it tommorow.
superman7
superman7 - 8/31/2011, 3:42 AM
are the digital copies out?
fergfurious
fergfurious - 8/31/2011, 4:11 AM
"Batman comes off a bit amateurish and sometimes loopy, mistake-ridden, and fumbling" The hell are you talking about?
bleedthefreak
bleedthefreak - 8/31/2011, 10:21 AM
This review is very short, seemed more like a summary.
bleedthefreak
bleedthefreak - 8/31/2011, 11:47 AM
Pull out your tampon, I'm an editor as Josh is, we both follow the rules we were asigned. You have campaigned to get this review on the main page in multiple articles, I came here to explain what's wrong with it, however bluntly I did it. You want to get work on main, its best not to treat your sub-par work like a godsend and up the quality. This review is a mess, with more pictures than paragraphs.

Also, we post news from other sites because this site is a [frick]ing news site too. Sorry we can't have every other bit of news be exclusive, we are just regular Joes who don't do this for a living. You want to attack us for out contributions than so be it, you will just get the same backlash in return when you earn it.
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 8/31/2011, 12:01 PM
New username, same bad attitude I see. My guess is that this review isn't on the main page because like the comic book you're writing about, "it comes off a bit amateurish and sometimes loopy, mistake-ridden, and fumbling." Oh, and it's like 10 lines long.
fergfurious
fergfurious - 8/31/2011, 9:41 PM
@comicbookfan69 Not only did i read the book, I actually went back and read it a second time to try and figure out where all the "mistake ridden and fumbling" was, to see if MAYBE i'd just missed it. And I still dont see Batman "fumbling" around makeing "amateurish" mistakes.

1.Be precise. Maybe you can go into a little more detail and actually point out what in particular you are referring to.

2. Grow up. You really don't have to resort to name calling to get your point across, it's childish. You should be a BIT more mature when dealing with other people who have a difference of opinion with you and your "review".

3. Be prepared to actually DISCUSS things with people who disagree with you instead of resorting to calling them names, and insluting them. The only person you're making look bad here is yourself. And calling me a "cheap bastard" doesnt answer the question. It just makes you look like a jerk, who cant answer a very simple question.

Show a little bit of respect.
PaulRom
PaulRom - 9/1/2011, 8:37 AM
Too short, but nice nonetheless.
And I have to agree with Josh and bleedthefreak, too short to be put on main. Also too many pictures IMO.
View Recorder