THE BRAVE AND THE BOLD Director Andy Muschietti Confirms Robert Pattinson Will NOT Be The DCU's Batman

THE BRAVE AND THE BOLD Director Andy Muschietti Confirms Robert Pattinson Will NOT Be The DCU's Batman

Andy Muschietti, who will helm The Brave and the Bold for DC Studios, has put any speculation that The Batman star Robert Pattinson will be the DCU's Dark Knight to rest...

By MarkCassidy - Jan 08, 2025 01:01 PM EST
Filed Under: The Brave and the Bold

Just after Christmas, we got the disappointing news that Matt Reeves' The Batman sequel - which no longer seems to be titled "The Batman - Part II" - had been hit with a major delay, and won't arrive in theaters until October 1, 2027.

Despite DC Studios co-head James Gunn taking to social media to state that the delay was simply down to the fact that the script hasn't been finished, speculation mounted that some recent rumors relating to Gunn wanting to bring star Robert Pattinson in as the DCU's Dark Knight might be the real reason.

Gunn has previously admitted that he did consider keeping Pattinson on as Batman, and insider Jeff Sneider is still adamant that this is the course of action the Superman director wants to take.

Even if there is some truth to this, we have now heard from the director of The Brave and the Bold, Andy Muschietti, who made it abundantly clear that Pattinson will not be the DCU's Caped Crusader during an appearance on the Radio TU show.

Translated from Spanish (via Reel Anarchy).

"As everyone knows, the Batman featured in The Brave and the Bold will belong to the new DC universe. It’s quite obvious that Matt Reeves’ Batman is not part of this new universe. However, DC and Warner Bros. are moving forward with the second part of Reeves’ Batman series, which, as widely reported, is expected to release around 2027. This means the next Batman movie will take some time before it sees the light of day."

"Releasing two Batman films simultaneously would be counterproductive," The Flash director continued. "What DC is doing is creating a strategy to ensure these two films don’t conflict with each other. Regarding my involvement in the project, there are good intentions for now. They want to do the movie with me, and I want to do it as well. I’m eager to work on the film. We are talking about the story and the tone."

Though the ultimate decision isn't Muschietti's to make, he would know if a new Batman actor was going to be cast for the movie he's set to direct, so we can probably go by what he says and put any rumors about Reeves' BatVerse being folded into the DCU to bed.

We can also take this as confirmation that Muschietti is still attached to direct Batman: The Brave and the Bold despite rumors to the contrary.

“We saw The Flash even before taking the reins at DC Studios, and knew we were in the hands of not only a visionary director but a massive DC fan,” Gunn and Peter Safran said in a joint statement at the time. “It’s a magnificent film – funny, emotional, thrilling – and Andy’s affinity and passion for these characters and this world just resonates through every frame.

So, when it came time to find a director for The Brave and the Bold, there was really only one choice. Luckily, Andy said yes. Barbara signed on to produce with us and we were on our way. They’re an extraordinary team, and we couldn’t have better or more inspiring partners as we embark on this thrilling new adventure in the DCU.”

Along with a new take on the Dark Knight, The Brave and the Bold will introduce a very different Robin in the form of Damian Wayne, a "murderous tween raised by assassins who also happens to be the son Batman never knew he had."

Batman Should Appear In Other Character's DCU Movies Before His Own
Related:

Batman Should Appear In Other Character's DCU Movies Before His Own

James Gunn Talks BATMAN's DCU Introduction And Skipping The Origin Story; Teases WORLD'S FINEST Plans
Recommended For You:

James Gunn Talks BATMAN's DCU Introduction And Skipping The Origin Story; Teases WORLD'S FINEST Plans

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
OptimusRhyme
OptimusRhyme - 1/8/2025, 1:21 PM
Good...
The1st
The1st - 1/8/2025, 1:37 PM
@OptimusRhyme - Yes...gooood.

User Comment Image
DrDReturns
DrDReturns - 1/8/2025, 9:45 PM
@OptimusRhyme - Agreed.
But also, he still could be (unfortunately). He's speaking way out of turn. These projects haven't even started yet.

Also, this is coming from the clown that attempted to explain away the bad effects in his "The Flash" as intentional...
sully
sully - 1/9/2025, 3:44 AM
@OptimusRhyme - It is good news. Sadly the bad news is Andy Muschietti is still directing this film.
Huskers
Huskers - 1/8/2025, 1:24 PM
Good! Not a fan! Christian Bale back in the day would’ve been great!
BillyBatson1000
BillyBatson1000 - 1/8/2025, 1:24 PM
A stretch of credibilty no one could believe.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 1/8/2025, 1:24 PM
Is he hinting at the DCU's Batman movie not releasing until after Reeves is done with his version of the character ? It kind of comes off that way. As for his involvement in the movie's development, I honestly can't see it happening. Notice how he says "there are good intentions for now". The movie is so far out from release that there's no reason to announce his departure, but I think he himself knows he's out.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 1/8/2025, 2:28 PM
@TheJok3r - Reeves recent comments come off that way too. Also like you say, Muschietti might not end up even doing his version, so he's probably not the best authority on who will end up being Batman right now.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 1/8/2025, 2:57 PM
@TheJok3r - no Batman 2. Batman 3 is forever away. Reeves hasn't even finished writing part 2.
TrentCrimm
TrentCrimm - 1/8/2025, 3:12 PM
@TheJok3r -

The part where he talks about good intentions stood out to me, that whole couple sentences sounds like someone trying to give the most diplomatic answer possible.

I'd say there's a 98% chance Muschietti ditches this movie before it goes into production.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 1/8/2025, 10:43 PM
@TrentCrimm - I think he was out the minute Flash flopped at the box office. Considering how important Batman is to the success of a shared DC universe, I wouldn't be surprised if Gunn ends up directing the Batman movie like he did with Superman. You can get many things wrong and not have them impact your shared universe, but a bad Batman and/or Superman movie can tank it completely.
BraveNewClunge
BraveNewClunge - 1/8/2025, 1:24 PM
Gunn is gonna debunk this by being extra vague 😅😬
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 1/8/2025, 3:30 PM
@BraveNewClunge - It will sound something like this: "Look we love Matt Reeves and what he has done for our Batman universe. But Brave and the Bold is still happening and our Batman will be in the same sandbox as Superman. And Pattinson will portray Batman in Batman 2 and Brave and the Bold will follow after."
BraveNewClunge
BraveNewClunge - 1/8/2025, 3:39 PM
@SonOfAGif - 😅🤣🤣🤣

100%
Izaizaiza
Izaizaiza - 1/8/2025, 1:25 PM
I'm glad about that.

In my opinion, the only good casting ever to date for Batman was Ben Affleck, and sadly he was never allowed to be in a good film
CaptainFlapjaks
CaptainFlapjaks - 1/8/2025, 1:32 PM
@Izaizaiza - i actually think george clooney was a good batmam casting. Problem is he was cast in a comedy farce. I think if he did what they got keaton or bale to do (much more serious), he would have done much better. He was literally real life bruce wayne. Rich bachelor. And he was a good actor. If keaton doesnt do batman beyond, i would love to see clooney as a bitter pissed off old man bruce.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 1/8/2025, 1:38 PM
@Izaizaiza - A Man of Steel sequel in 2015, followed by a Ben Affleck directed solo Batman movie in 2016 would've been a far better choice for DC on film than what we got with BVS.
Izaizaiza
Izaizaiza - 1/8/2025, 1:42 PM
@CaptainFlapjaks - those are some good points! I agree, Cooney could have killed it in a different film
Izaizaiza
Izaizaiza - 1/8/2025, 1:43 PM
@TheJok3r - Yep. I agree with that. I would have liked to see a Man of steel sequel 2. That kind of fixed the problems with the first one, instead of doubling down on them like they did with Batman versus Superman
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 1/8/2025, 1:27 PM
good, now if only he can confirm that he will not be directing the film then we'll all be happy.
Earleverlasting
Earleverlasting - 1/8/2025, 1:28 PM
I would rather hear it from Gunn or Reeves not for Andy he has not much to say eventually he’s gonna want to quit superhero
THEKENDOMAN
THEKENDOMAN - 1/8/2025, 1:30 PM
whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy??

Man, I'm pissed but I rather hear it from Gunn.

This is when his big mouth matters
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 1/8/2025, 1:38 PM
@comicfan100 - agreed

I have been a big fan of Reeves take on these characters thus far but I still don’t think that stylized yet grounded universe fits in with the DCU we have seen as of now.

Let Matt have his version as well as the DCU which will likely be more comic book-y anyway which is good since it will give variety…

Plus I like the idea of the DCU Batman already being established and have a Bat Family to an extent with Damian being introduced which could give us a new angle for that character we haven’t seen on screen which is as a father.

The audiences are smart enough to figure out that they would be watching 2 different versions of the character.
BlackStar25
BlackStar25 - 1/8/2025, 2:26 PM
@THEKENDOMAN -

User Comment Image

Thought you of all people would have loved hearing this from someone else other than Gunn
THEKENDOMAN
THEKENDOMAN - 1/8/2025, 2:35 PM
@BlackStar25 - 😂. You got me. Very true.

I guess I just don’t want to believe it. 😩

I want Pattibaby as our Batman🥹

And I did say this is when Gunn’s big mouth matters, so you got cut me some slack there. 😏
BlackStar25
BlackStar25 - 1/8/2025, 2:42 PM
@THEKENDOMAN - Lol! Fair enough.
THEKENDOMAN
THEKENDOMAN - 1/8/2025, 2:53 PM
@BlackStar25 - 👊🏾
comicfan100
comicfan100 - 1/8/2025, 1:30 PM
Duh. Matt would have to sacrifice so much creative freedom to have his Batman tied to a cinematic universe. And we know that the DCU is a universe that we're being dropped in the middle of.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 1/8/2025, 2:39 PM
@comicfan100 - Not really. The Batman takesd place in 2021/2022 and The Batman part II is said to take place later that year. If Part III takes place soon after part II and Matt Reeves already has an idea of what happens, then I can't see it being a problem to work around continuity wise.

His script for The Batman part II will probably be finished before Brave and the Bold and he already has a clear idea of how his trilogy and story wraps up, so he'd get to set the pace on this Batman.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 1/8/2025, 2:42 PM
Worst thing I can think of that might be restrictive to him is that he might not have thought of who he wants as the villain for Part III and the DCU might get there first. Then he'd have to think of another villain (or just do another version of that villain, as might be the case with the Clayface movie).
McMurdo
McMurdo - 1/8/2025, 3:01 PM
@comicfan100 - so would Gunn. You'd have a emo kid who can hardly handle a group of teenagers and who waltzes in to bullet fire as your Batman....that guy can't stand amongst the Justice League
Shivermetimbers
Shivermetimbers - 1/8/2025, 1:32 PM
So if they are waiting for Reeve's films to finish, wouldnt that be a while? I thought there was supposed to be a third movie planned in the Reeves Batman story.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 1/8/2025, 1:40 PM
@Shivermetimbers - Yep, there's a 3rd film and at least two series in the works (Penguin and rumored Joker). If I had to guess, I'd say the DCU's Batman will be limited to showing up in other projects, such as JL before getting his solo outing once Reeves is done.
Shivermetimbers
Shivermetimbers - 1/8/2025, 2:15 PM
@TheJok3r - I could see that being the case. Kind of hard to have a successful DCU without Batman, so if they are going to wait for Reeves, they need to do something.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 1/8/2025, 3:02 PM
@Shivermetimbers - just Batman part 2. Part 3 isn't happening until after 2030 bud. If it happens at all.
Shivermetimbers
Shivermetimbers - 1/8/2025, 4:09 PM
@McMurdo - seems like they are concerned with two Batman movies being around concurrently, so although the is talking about part 2 specifically, it stands to reason that logic would apply to a 3rd reeves film. However, I agree that there is a good possibility that movie never happens as you mentioned.
Superspecialawesomeguy
Superspecialawesomeguy - 1/8/2025, 1:33 PM
Good. Now way i'm buying that the wildly incompetent Reevesverse Batman is the same one taking on Clayface and Dr Phosphorus in the DCU.

User Comment Image

Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 1/8/2025, 1:57 PM
@Superspecialawesomeguy - I liked the movie but yeah that Batman lost to the Riddler throughout the enitre movie, couldn't solve one riddle in time. Greatest detective my ass.
ElJefe
ElJefe - 1/8/2025, 2:39 PM
@Urubrodi - He’s the only Batman that was committed to getting 10,000 steps a day.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 1/8/2025, 2:52 PM
@Superspecialawesomeguy - Reeves Batman was Year 2 Batman.

If DCU Batman is Battinson then he would already be Year 5 Batman by now and would therefore be a different, more experienced Batman who would be able to take down Clayface and Doctor Phosphorus.
1 2 3

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder