POLL: How Would You Rate THE HOBBIT: THE BATTLE OF THE FIVE ARMIES?

POLL: How Would You Rate THE HOBBIT: THE BATTLE OF THE FIVE ARMIES?

Peter Jackson's finale to his Hobbit trilogy is now in theatres, but was The Battle of the Five Armies a worthy send off to the filmmaker's adaptation of the classic J. R. R. Tolkien novel? Here's your chance to share your thoughts on the movie and to share your rating...

Feature Opinion
By JoshWilding - Dec 23, 2014 06:12 AM EST
Filed Under: Fantasy

Peter Jackson's big screen adaptation of The Hobbit was originally meant to be just two movies, but it was later decided that it would be a trilogy. Some argued that a third instalment was unnecessary when it was first announced, but now that you've seen the movie, do you still feel the same way?

My take? I really enjoyed The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies, but the movie does feel a little too light on Martin Freeman's Bilbo Baggins. As epic and exciting as it was, it's also hard not to escape the feeling that you're watching just one big battle sequence. The biggest surprise for me however was the appearance of some noticeably dodgy CGI here and there, a first for this series.

What did YOU think of the movie? Was it everything you were hoping for, or did it fail to live up to the first two insalments and Jackson's work on The Lord of the Rings trilogy? Cast your vote below!
About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
Comic Book Reader. Film Lover. WWE and F1 Fan. Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and ComicBookMovie.com's #1 contributor.
Link Revealed! Legend Of Zelda Movie Image Leak Sends Fans Into A Frenzy
Related:

Link Revealed! Legend Of Zelda Movie Image Leak Sends Fans Into A Frenzy

New The Mandalorian And Grogu TV Spot Sees Beskar-Clad Father & Son Rip Through The Galaxy
Recommended For You:

New The Mandalorian And Grogu TV Spot Sees Beskar-Clad Father & Son Rip Through The Galaxy

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
unclejeffshow
unclejeffshow - 12/23/2014, 7:00 AM
First.
Rothwilder
Rothwilder - 12/23/2014, 7:01 AM
As stated before,

They put in so much extra crap just to extend time, it was painfully obvious. All the little "gimmicks" they used in the original trilogy, became full blown face palm moments. PMS Galadriel anyone?


The only good parts were any interaction between Thorin and Bilbo. Some were word for word from the book. It's the only thing that saved the movie.
tokens
tokens - 12/23/2014, 7:01 AM
nobody mind me..

I just came for the comments..
Rothwilder
Rothwilder - 12/23/2014, 7:02 AM
Freeman was awesome as Bilbo though.
unclejeffshow
unclejeffshow - 12/23/2014, 7:06 AM
I enjoyed the films but I went into it knowing there would be issues. Outside of the stretching of the story, the main problem is that the Hobbit was written as a children's story and written before the Lord of the Rings was thought out and expanded. It is a much smaller world. Ideally, they should have filmed the Hobbit first and then build up to the Lord of the Rings. They did not have the rights so they had to do it backwards. The Lord of the Rings wowed the world when it came out over a decade ago. Jackson has found himself with a smaller story set in a world that we have already seen. Having said this, I still enjoyed it (Although I miss the practical in camera effects found in the first film).
GinjaNinja
GinjaNinja - 12/23/2014, 7:12 AM
loved the easter eggs to the similarian in it. Thought it was well casted and funny. Just should have made it into 2 books not 3
Scarilian
Scarilian - 12/23/2014, 7:14 AM
Personally i value the second as the best film in the series, given it had more of a structure to it than the others. We followed the characters, saw more of their development and had a conclusion that didnt involve a deus ex machina. The conclusion also being a much darker one, hinting that perhaps they've failed the mission.

The first one had terrible pacing but good character development, there was a lot more practical effects. Though far too much of the story was spent trying to stretch itself out which didnt help when only four of the Dwarves were given any character development. Granted thats more than the single Dwarf with character development in the book, but it just isnt enough to carry the story.

The third personally felt like just one anti-climactic battle scene after another. We get the Smaug fight, except it has no build-up and is over before the credits. Then the film just pads itself out until the battle, which is badly shot and repetitive (Cutting between action and the weak comedy relief character) Not helped by the logic defying actions of several characters, specifically Legolas defying gravity...
GreenLantern519
GreenLantern519 - 12/23/2014, 7:15 AM
I thought it was a mess
ALegendaryPanda
ALegendaryPanda - 12/23/2014, 7:17 AM
It's a solid 4/5 for me. Not perfect, but it was a very satisfying ending to this series.
TheClemster
TheClemster - 12/23/2014, 7:18 AM
@Gusto
@Mercwithmouth

I haven't seen it but I bet it's better than Gusto and Merc's 8mm holiday hometape in Coshocton, Ohio...

Or maybe not.

JoJo1982
JoJo1982 - 12/23/2014, 7:19 AM
I thought it was just a fun action movie, got what I wanted

Sorry for others that was expecting more
SuperCat
SuperCat - 12/23/2014, 7:20 AM
Saw it yesterday. Loved it!





Welcome back, @ Clemster!
blackandyellow
blackandyellow - 12/23/2014, 7:23 AM
TheClemster
TheClemster - 12/23/2014, 7:25 AM
@Supercat

I missed you too my friend

Invictor
Invictor - 12/23/2014, 7:29 AM
@Jollem

Obvious troll is obvious.
SuperCat
SuperCat - 12/23/2014, 7:40 AM
@ TheClemster

Same here, my man. Right in the feels!
P862010
P862010 - 12/23/2014, 7:42 AM
it was a solid movie but imo probably the weakest of the 3 hobbit films

did love the action and battle scenes tho
TheClemster
TheClemster - 12/23/2014, 7:44 AM
@Supercat

How have you been sir?

I have no more time to spend on here with the new job so I am using a bit of my xmas holiday to treat myself and spread love to ya all :)
dgill
dgill - 12/23/2014, 8:01 AM
Here's my thought-
You can very definitively see where Tolkiens writing stops and Jacksons writing starts. Jackson's dialog feels forced and thin where as Tolkeins feels more fluid. The battle was interesting, I really enjoyed the dwarven phalanx. However, with so much of this movie cut from whole cloth, it is difficult to watch it in context. The entire Battle of Five Armies in the book was what? 20 pages?

That said, I am glad I watched it.
MercwithMouth
MercwithMouth - 12/23/2014, 8:07 AM
@TheClemster

That 8mm film was perfection! We had Nolan quality cinematography. Didn't hurt that we had @McGee's steady hands for the closeup shots.
TheClemster
TheClemster - 12/23/2014, 8:25 AM
@McGee with steady hands??? with all that oil???? I don't think so sir!!!!!

SuperCat
SuperCat - 12/23/2014, 8:27 AM
@ TheClemster

I'm good, man. On vacation wrapping Christmas gifts. Hate wrapping! Congrats on the new job. Sucks you can't spend more time on the site though :(
TheClemster
TheClemster - 12/23/2014, 8:34 AM
@Supercat

I still read most of that articles and have as many laughs in reading the comments but just cannot comment myself

oh well

I come once a year with xmas... wait... that could be interpreted wrongly !!!!

fotosbyjoshy
fotosbyjoshy - 12/23/2014, 8:47 AM
I went and saw it yesterday. Yet again it felt like 3 hours of fat little furry men running on stairs.
There was a dragon for about 5 seconds but then more running.
There was a war for 2 minutes but then more running.
They should call it "Hobbit: The running of the stairs, part 83"
WHy are they still fat little men? They don't eat and they run A LOT!
baszs
baszs - 12/23/2014, 8:53 AM
I think watching all three hobbit films after each other is going to be a blast!
Cant' wait for the blu-ray to drop!
HachibiTheMC
HachibiTheMC - 12/23/2014, 8:54 AM
3 stars and a small sigh of disappointment.

Went in expecting a battle b/w 5 armies...what we got was a battle b/w TWO armies (Elf and Orc) with a Dwarven garrison sprinkled on top and some complimentary humans and eagles on the side for garnish...

It didn't feel as chaotic as I'd expect from a 5 sided war. Like there was NOOOO friendly fire! Not even the cliched "two good guys back into each other and almost clobber one another before realizing they're on the same side" trope was used. You'd think in a war with 5 sides, your brain wouldn't be able to process much else besides which color armor to swing at.

I felt like there was a pretty decent build-up (considering you already know whats gonna happen) but then a complete cliff-like drop off in intensity when the war starts.

My last gripe? Tauriel...created for the movie...movie's over...kill the bird.

Don't get me wrong, I like E-Lilly, but her character should have been one of the first to go, not meander off to God-knows-where-with-Legolas-and-now-that-she-hasn't-died-where-was-she-during-that-whole-bit-of-nasty-One-Ring-business...

One Cool thing was the use of the prior Bolg concept art, but the coolness dipped cuz he was only there for like 20 seconds as just another nameless Orc...with a fancy headdress...smh...

PJax was kinda asleep at the wheel this go round.
TheNameIsBetty
TheNameIsBetty - 12/23/2014, 9:05 AM
I loved it, as a matter of fact, I'm going to see it a second time. I saw it in IMAX 3D first and I'm going to another large-format theater to see it in High Frame-Rate since 'The Desolation of Smaug' rocked in HFR last year.

As for my analysis/critique....well, I hate to sound so anti-freedom, but I don't care what anybody says about the Hobbit trilogy, just because a lot of people agree with you does not mean you are automatically correct. Peter Jackson recognized that The Hobbit was an eventful book even though it's a short one, and he took the whole scope of the story of Middle-Earth into account when he made this trilogy. I've read Tolkien myself, and I'm not drinking the Kool-Aid like everyone else; I do not subscribe to the theory that these movies are bloated, I would've made them the same way if I was in Jackson's shoes. That being said, my only true disappointment in this this trilogy was the superfluous use of CGI in lieu of practical effects, which in hindsight was likely a studio/money decision, but still I'm scratching my head wondering why Peter Jackson didn't step up and do what he did last time.
jCamer0n
jCamer0n - 12/23/2014, 9:23 AM
Better than Avengers for sure!
giannis
giannis - 12/23/2014, 10:05 AM
I loved the third installment.I give it 9/10.
EhMaybeSays
EhMaybeSays - 12/23/2014, 10:16 AM
Not excellent but better than any CBM this year.
Boehner
Boehner - 12/23/2014, 10:23 AM
Quit bitching people. If you liked the book, go back to it and stay there,no one will miss you or care. Book was fantastic and the movies were great, i dont care for the differences. Gtfo haters.
Rothwilder
Rothwilder - 12/23/2014, 10:45 AM
@Boehner

Thanks troll. I'm glad you spoke up in an article that actually asks for our opinions on the movie.
CapFan79
CapFan79 - 12/23/2014, 10:47 AM
I love these films but a lot of stuff that was added seemed to take away from the actual story.

I'm one of the few people that have almost no issues with An Unexpected Journey. The comic tone of the early chapters of the book were captured nicely. If anything I think the extra chase scene with Radagast before the dwarves get to Rivendell could've been omitted but otherwise it's very solid.

I thought Desolation of Smaug was very good, but I felt the elf action wasn't truly needed and I didn't like how Tauriel healing Fili was just a rehash of Arwen. That scene ended up just taking time away from the overall plot. I feel the same with the Dwarf fight against Smaug in Erebor. I believe they added action to create a finale since they made a decision to make a 3rd film.

Battle of the Five Armies is great for most of the running time and has the most emotion, BUT when the focus went to "Super Legolas Bros" it moved too far from the plot. I think since Azog was added late in production after Bolg was the original villain they needed to have an ending for Bolg and created an uneccessary scene.

The reason I feel it was uneccessary is because we did not get Thorin's funeral. No return to the Troll Cave on the way home. I'm sure it'll be in the extended version but I felt after so many hours they were necessary where the Legolas stuff was not. I think WB interfered with production on these where New Line did not 15 years ago.
1 2
View Recorder