Matthijs van Heijningen Says The Thing Prequel is Close to John Carpenter's Classic!

Matthijs van Heijningen Says The Thing Prequel is Close to John Carpenter's Classic!

The director of the new version of The Thing recently sat down to a new interview, where he says that his version has lot in common with the John Carpenter movie from 1982.

By LucasMend - Oct 08, 2011 06:10 PM EST
Filed Under: Horror
Source: Collider


Matthijs van Heijningen, the director of the The Thing prequel, recently sat down with Collider to discuss his new movie. Heijningen says that the movie has a lot in common with Carpenter’s 1982 film of that this movie is based on. He also talked about the cultural divide that really makes up the heart, of the film.








Directed by Matthijs van Heijningen Jr., The Thing is a prequel to the John Carpenter movie from 1982 and it has on the cast Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Joel Edgerton, Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje, Joel Edgerton and Ulrich Thomsen, the movie is set to come on October 14th!

By: TwitterButtons.com


DEXTER: ORIGINAL SIN Trailer Features Michael C. Hall's Return As Dexter Morgan In Prequel Series
Related:

DEXTER: ORIGINAL SIN Trailer Features Michael C. Hall's Return As Dexter Morgan In Prequel Series

SCREAM Star Melissa Barrera Opens Up On Being Fired From The Horror Franchise And Reaction From Fans
Recommended For You:

SCREAM Star Melissa Barrera Opens Up On Being Fired From The Horror Franchise And Reaction From Fans

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
StuckInPanels
StuckInPanels - 10/8/2011, 7:24 PM
SO HE BASICALLY ADMITTED ITS A RIPOFF!!!! HOW DARE THEY!!!! SERIOUSLY WHY A PREQUEL!!!! if you seen the original then guess what SPOILER ALERT the Norwegian crew DIES!!!!! and one "dog" gets away that soon infects the American Crew
StuckInPanels
StuckInPanels - 10/8/2011, 7:47 PM
@Nail...thats exactly what happens in the movie. This is like Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning, theres no suspense, you know they get away with it
RyanLantern77
RyanLantern77 - 10/8/2011, 8:02 PM
She's practically babelicous. If she were a president she would be Baberaham Lincoln
BabyGroot
BabyGroot - 10/8/2011, 8:06 PM
Here's what I think will become of this movie...



Love Mary though ;)
Coloso
Coloso - 10/8/2011, 8:07 PM
@nail, it is pretty clear in Carpenter's film. The movie ended with Kurt Russel and Keith David shown as the last two survivor's and suspicious of each other not knowing if one of them is the thing. That ending would not have worked if one of the Norwegian's had survived making that ending moot.

@comiccritic I agree we know what happens to the Norwegians, but I am curious to see the discovery of the Thing. I am disappointed that they didn't film this with the actors speaking Norwegian because when they run into the Americans that's what they spoke, not english.
headlopper
headlopper - 10/8/2011, 8:26 PM
Am I not getting this?
First of all, it's not orange. Secondly, it doesn't have a rock exoskeleton and thirdly...were's Johnny?
checkmate3010
checkmate3010 - 10/8/2011, 8:30 PM
dont care for the movie, but I'd love to see Mary Elizabeth Winstead as MJ
Coloso
Coloso - 10/8/2011, 8:30 PM
@nail no need to make it "clearer", nor was I questioning your love for the film. Carpenter showed no one survived when the destroyed Norwegian camp with their dead was investigated by the Americans. Now if this new film shows a survivor or two, then that is a new plot element added that was not present in Kurt Russel's version. But that would take away from Carpenter's because the ending of his film made it clear they were the last two survivors and could be infected.
headlopper
headlopper - 10/8/2011, 8:37 PM
@Coloso- So it's possible these two shlubs bowling in the alley next to me could be...infected?
By the looks of em', I'm pretty sure they are.
Who dunks pizza in their beer?
Coloso
Coloso - 10/8/2011, 9:02 PM
@headlopper one of the symptoms of infection is the pizza beer dunk. The Thing has no concept of human eating and techniques hence the failure of proper pizza-to-beer consumption.
MaddMonkk
MaddMonkk - 10/8/2011, 9:05 PM
We don't know what happened at the Norweejuns base. All we have is speculation. An alien was found, freed and killed a bunch of people then escaped and was chased. That's why this movie is important. We will get background on the alien and we will know what really happened. MacCready and Childs were the only 2 alive at the american base, we don't know about the norweigans base. I seen the original remake (Carpenter's version) around 30 times and it's in my top 3 favorite movies. All I want out of this beside scared shirtless, is to find out if Childs was an alien.
CaptainDC
CaptainDC - 10/8/2011, 9:13 PM
Seriously what do you think she's going to say? It's not, obviously she's going to say it is. She wants more people to see it
RyanLantern77
RyanLantern77 - 10/8/2011, 9:27 PM
@Bastard - You say too many, I say the adequate amount
headlopper
headlopper - 10/8/2011, 9:31 PM
@Coloso- Ha! I knew it!
Oh sh**, there looking at me!
croniccris
croniccris - 10/8/2011, 9:54 PM
Im seeing this fur sure on devils night
Vital
Vital - 10/8/2011, 10:47 PM
Nail has a point, we saw...

A dog.
2 men speaking Norwegian chasing said dog in helicopter, very clumsy man.
A few burnt bodies outside the camp (could have been anybody or more Things from a pen of dogs trying to change).
And a man who supposedly committed suicide (could be a plot twist in this prequel).
That the research done was in Norwegian.
And we saw the space ship and the empty space of where (presumptively) the Nor. people cut out the alien frozen in ice.

So we have literally no answers to the majority of what went down other from than they find the ship (from the trailer). We also saw the block of ice in the trailer, that explodes when the Thing wakes up. But the rest of it, is a mystery, sure, there will be a lot of death, but we don't know if somebody else at the end of the movie goes another route, let's say there are more than one "things" at the end, and one of the "things" (as the dog) goes a different direction because it's being chased by humans/survivors.

Hell, I think it'd be a cool twist if the people in the helicopter thought the dog was a "thing" but at the time of the chase scene, it wasn't. Right now you're like 'but we saw it take out the other dogs so clearly it was an alien'. Well, what IF one of the "survivors" from the Norw. camp made it to the American camp during the night, and turned somebody (whoever was in that room when the dog walked into it but you could only see a shadow on the wall). It's kinda far-fetched and doesn't add up as well as the dog originally being the infected alien, but I think it'd be a huge twist to the ending, if the dog wasn't one, and they showed that entire opening scene again, near the end of the film, but with clearly more information this time around. What do you think?
Ceejay
Ceejay - 10/9/2011, 12:15 AM
Stupid film just shoe-horns pretty young Americans into the whole thing just to make it a popcorn prequel. The original movie had men who were out on a lengthy placement in the Arctic, barely any young people because intelligent bosses hire for experience. This new movie gives us a bunch of practically teenagers all fresh faced, young and beautifully manicured. What is this the CW network? What happened to seasoned scientists of years of experience, how is this fresh out of college babe being thrown amongst sex starved men in the Arctic for any reason other than to get screwed?

And continuity, all the notes and vhs tapes they found in the Norwegian camp in the original were written and spoken in Norwegian. How is any of that possible if an American woman speaking English was documenting the entire first discovery? Contrived sequel made only to showcase CGI FX and nothing else!
AlexDeLarge87
AlexDeLarge87 - 10/9/2011, 5:04 AM
ncreb@ Seriously she would be perfect Mary Jane! :P
ROMACK
ROMACK - 10/9/2011, 5:13 AM
What I have seen looks pretty good so far. It makes sense to tell this story. We know very little about the ship the Norwegians found, almost nothing about their struggle with the creature, or how it came down to two men in a helicopter chasing the creature (in the form of a dog) across the ice.
AlexDeLarge87
AlexDeLarge87 - 10/9/2011, 5:18 AM
Ceejay@

"Stupid film just shoe-horns pretty young Americans into the whole thing just to make it a popcorn prequel. The original movie had men who were out on a lengthy placement in the Arctic, barely any young people because intelligent bosses hire for experience. This new movie gives us a bunch of practically teenagers all fresh faced, young and beautifully manicured. What is this the CW network? What happened to seasoned scientists of years of experience, how is this fresh out of college babe being thrown amongst sex starved men in the Arctic for any reason other than to get screwed?"

This is one of the main reasons why i hate this prequel!

Also the norwegian´s doesnt need more exploring anyway. It comes very clear in the first film what happened in their camp and i dont think anyone needs to add anymore story to that.
I rather see a sequel. Which would focus on present day.
ROMACK
ROMACK - 10/9/2011, 5:21 AM
You know the could have brought Kurt Russell onboard for this one. Yeah but instead of him playing MacReady he could reprise his role of Snake Plissken and they title would have been "Escape from The Thing". :P
ROMACK
ROMACK - 10/9/2011, 5:22 AM
*they
sarahsatire
sarahsatire - 10/9/2011, 6:07 AM
I'll watch this movie regardless because of my undying love for Carpenter's The Thing. It's in my top three favorite horror movies of all time. I don't expect this to come anywhere close to it's predecessors level of epic, but I hope they at least give it the good ol' college try. P.S. More Kurt Russell makes anything better.
marvel72
marvel72 - 10/9/2011, 6:26 AM
@ sarahsatire

i agree with what you said,on the strength of carpenter's the thing that alone is enough for me to see this prequel.granted it'll take alot to be better than john carpenter's version but as long as its a very good movie i'll be happy.
StuckInPanels
StuckInPanels - 10/9/2011, 6:45 AM
@Marvel72....there is NO WAY this could be better than John Carpenters version, Practical effects will always be superior than CGI.

@Vital....its called ambiguity and being imaginative....and the dog was a "thing" the entire time, we follow the chase leading up to the American crew finding and saving it, so theres NO TIME for a switch like that.

Seriously like I said before, this movie doesn't need to exist since we seen what the aftermath was of the Norwegian crew, why would bother telling/showing us what we already now, something really dangerous took out an entire crew. This really gets to me, why couldn't they just do a modern day sequel where the Thing begins to infect a small town, using practical effects with a mixture of CGI for some other parts....oh wait they made THAT already too, called SLITHER. Leave the Originals alone. I'm making a stand to not see any 80s remade movies, they were classics and should remain so, Hollywood needs to stop taking stuff that I grew up with and ruin it
CaptainTall
CaptainTall - 10/9/2011, 10:21 AM
Really looking forward to this prequel.
LucasMend
LucasMend - 10/9/2011, 7:36 PM
well anyway
Blackmatter
Blackmatter - 10/10/2011, 6:46 AM
OK whats that dudes name again?
Blackmatter
Blackmatter - 10/10/2011, 7:38 AM
And he best not remake American Werewolf in London either

But that all said im ready for this movie
Optimist18
Optimist18 - 10/10/2011, 11:43 AM
#1. This is NOT a remake.
#2. If it follows the first script, there WILL BE PEOPLE SPEAKING NORWEGIAN, as it adds to the tension between the Americans at the camp and the Norwegians.
#3.@Ceejay, you continue to prove yourself a closed-minded idiot. Quit talking out of your ass.

Good Day to you all.
Vital
Vital - 10/10/2011, 10:19 PM
@ComicCritic, umm you must not have been following this movie, cause there are A LOT OF PRACTICAL EFFECTS, the cast even said so in their interviews, saying it was nice to see the grotesque (I can't spell that word) figures instead of trying to be afraid of a tennis ball (for cgi use). Get with the program man! Not to mention that somebody a while ago, posted pics of all the set prop Things and they'd looked creepy as hell.
1 2
View Recorder