SALEM'S LOT Leaked Image Reveals First Look At Head Vampire Kurt Barlow - SPOILERS

SALEM'S LOT Leaked Image Reveals First Look At Head Vampire Kurt Barlow - SPOILERS

Gary Dauberman's Salem's Lot is now streaming on Max, and if you still haven't watched the movie but want to know what this latest take on Kurt Barlow looks like, right this way...

By MarkCassidy - Oct 04, 2024 07:10 AM EST
Filed Under: Horror
Source: Via FearHQ

After a series of lengthy delays, Warner Bros. and New Line's remake (or re-adaptation) of Stephen King's Salem's Lot is now streaming on Max, and a first look at this latest take on the novel's head vampire, Kurt Barlow, has leaked online.

In the book, Barlow was described as a fairly ordinary-looking middle-aged man, but the character was reimagined as a bald, pale Nosferatu-inspired monster for Tobe Hooper's '70s miniseries. Then, in the 2004 adaptation, the late Rutger Hauer played an interpretation of the evil vampire that was a lot more faithful to the source material.

As you can see from the image below, this new Barlow takes at least some inspiration from the creature we met in the original miniseries - though this version is even more monstrous-looking. 

Barlow is utilized in much the same way as he is in Hooper's film, but does have a little more screen-time (he also speaks), and plays a larger role in the movie's final act than he does in previous adaptations. For more, be sure to check back for our full spoiler breakdown later today.

In the meantime, have a look at Barlow in the post below and let us know what you think of this new take on the vampire in the comments section.

Lewis Pullman, Makenzie Leigh, Alfre Woodard, Bill Camp, John Benjamin Hickey, Nicholas Crovetti, Jordan Preston Carter, William Sadler, Spencer Treat Clark, Cade Woodward, Debra Christofferson, and Pilou Asbæ star in New Line Cinema’s film adaptation of Stephen King’s 1975 bestselling novel Salem’s Lot.

The movie reunites the producing teams behind the record-breaking horror franchises The Conjuring universe and the It films. Gary Dauberman writes, directs, and executive produces the film. Producers are James Wan and Michael Clear for Atomic Monster; Roy Lee for Vertigo; and Mark Wolper.

"Haunted by an incident from his childhood, author Ben Mears returns to his hometown of Jerusalem’s Lot in search of inspiration for his next book, only to discover the town is being preyed upon by a bloodthirsty vampire and his loyal servant."

M3GAN Returns In A New Body In First Official Look At Next Year's Sequel
Related:

M3GAN Returns In A New Body In First Official Look At Next Year's Sequel

FROM: Acclaimed Sci-Fi Horror Series Renewed For A 10-Episode Fourth Season
Recommended For You:

FROM: Acclaimed Sci-Fi Horror Series Renewed For A 10-Episode Fourth Season

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
tylerzero
tylerzero - 10/4/2024, 7:46 AM
User Comment Image
AllsGood
AllsGood - 10/4/2024, 7:46 AM
Gary Dauberman's Salem's Lot is Another Huge Rotten Tomatoes with a 50% Critic Score and a 37% Audience Score.

User Comment Image
MarvelousMarty
MarvelousMarty - 10/4/2024, 7:54 AM
I looked forward to this for 2 years and it was very disappointing. A pretty cheesy TV movie at best. Straker was terrible.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 10/4/2024, 8:00 AM
@MarvelousMarty - agreed... Pretty bad. I was gonna review it but it's not even worth the effort.
MarvelousMarty
MarvelousMarty - 10/4/2024, 8:04 AM
@MarkCassidy - 2004 version is better.
Demigods
Demigods - 10/4/2024, 8:28 AM
@MarvelousMarty - wow you think the 04 version was better?!? I mean, they had a lot more time to get the minute detail in and all, but I thought it was a passable version for the amount of time they had to tell the story. You're not capturing the same feel as the book, just but I thought it was decent enough.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 10/4/2024, 8:32 AM
@MarvelousMarty - Don't know if I'd go that far! But the '70s version is so much creepier and atmospheric, with actual character development. Cast did their best in this new one but they were let down by a dreadful script. It felt like half the movie was cut.
Izaizaiza
Izaizaiza - 10/4/2024, 8:50 AM
@MarvelousMarty @MarkCassidy Damn! That's disappointing. I was really looking forward to checking it out 🫤
Tpo81
Tpo81 - 10/4/2024, 1:19 PM
@MarvelousMarty - me too. I was pumped there was going to be a new Salem's lot but then all the delays I was skeptical and apparently I was right to be so. Movie was horrible. Good cast too it's a shame
Demigods
Demigods - 10/4/2024, 1:54 PM
@MarkCassidy - to be fair, there's a LOT more that you can do with an entire hour of runtime more.

I get that this is a bit a shallow rendition of King's novel, but I really didn't hate it. Maybe I just like that they tried to make Vampires straight up monsters again. But I love the Nosferatu design (reminds me of a mix between the original Barlow from the 79 show and the vampires from 30 Days of Night, which is another design that loved). I dunno, I'm just not getting the amount of disdain everyone's having for it. I thought it was an entertaining enough movie. No masterpiece but not horrible
dragon316
dragon316 - 10/4/2024, 8:17 AM
Looks good need see original before pass judgment on remake
jst5
jst5 - 10/4/2024, 9:02 AM
@dragon316 - You're in for a huge letdown if you go into this expecting it be good...it's bad.
Demigods
Demigods - 10/4/2024, 8:32 AM
I actually liked the Barlow design. It was a more modern take on the creepy Nosferatu design from the 79 version. I actually liked it. It was a vampire horror movie, and one of the best parts of the book was the feeling of inevitability that Barlow was taking over the town, and there was nothing anyone could do to stop it. I feel like this movie captured that creepy feel better than either of the other two adaptations.

That feeling of growing uneasiness as he worked his dealing behind the scenes of the book is the reason that Salem's Lot is my favorite King story, and like I said, this did that better than the other two by a lot. I really liked the designs of the vampires, the creepy ass eyes, the swarming effects they used, and the fact that they made a genuine attempt to make every vampire freaky.

I watched it while I was pretty exhausted, and maybe part of it was the excitement of finally seeing this movie, BUT I liked it. It wasn't some masterpiece by any means, but it was a fun vampire movie.... id put it slightly better than the (grossly underrated) remake of Fright Night.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 10/4/2024, 8:36 AM
Leaked Image = Screenshot of a movie that has been streaming for several days.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 10/4/2024, 8:39 AM
@Clintthahamster - It's still a leak... WB hasn't shared an official look at Barlow yet.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 10/4/2024, 8:56 AM
@MarkCassidy - User Comment Image
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 10/4/2024, 9:04 AM
@MarkCassidy - I guess for me, "Leaked" has a connotation that it was snuck out from within the production prior to release. IMO, something can't be leaked if it's available to the general public. But, hey, semantics, amirite?
MuadDib
MuadDib - 10/4/2024, 8:48 AM
Kinda reminds me of Buffy a little
Rosraf
Rosraf - 10/4/2024, 8:51 AM
Hey, hit and miss halloween content is the new mediocre christmas movies. I'll watch it at some point this month regardless of any reviews/scores.
DocSpock
DocSpock - 10/4/2024, 8:52 AM

I loved the book. I thought the 2004 series was pretty good.

I know a friend who's a big King fan, and he said this is awful in every way. I'm gonna pass and maybe read this great book again some 48 years after I first experienced it.

I'm old. I do that kind of sh!t. And get off my lawn.





Demigods
Demigods - 10/4/2024, 1:55 PM
@DocSpock - King himself liked this adaptation.
DocSpock
DocSpock - 10/4/2024, 3:43 PM
@Demigods -

They all do that.

He gets back-end money plus bonus money-based box office/streaming views.

Demigods
Demigods - 10/5/2024, 9:00 AM
@DocSpock - maybe, but of all the authors, King isn't quiet about disliking adaptations of his work. He vehemently loathes Kubrick's The Shining (mostly because Jack was a representation of King's struggle to get sober, and Kubrick thought of the struggling abusive alcoholic with zero redeeming qualities and made the movie accordingly). But I don't think he'd be arguing quite some vehemently for the movie to get released like he did if he didn't genuinely enjoy it.
DocSpock
DocSpock - 10/5/2024, 10:17 AM
@Demigods -

Perhaps so. That's a good point.
Demigods
Demigods - 10/5/2024, 10:43 AM
DocSpock
DocSpock - 10/5/2024, 10:50 AM
@Demigods -

That's interesting. I'm going to reread the book before watching any other Salem's Lot movies/shows. It's been almost half a century since I read it. Ouch.
Demigods
Demigods - 10/5/2024, 1:17 PM
@DocSpock - haha that's awesome! So you must have read it when it first came out!
DocSpock
DocSpock - 10/5/2024, 1:26 PM
@Demigods -

About a year after, yes.

I'm older than dirt. Oh yeah, depending on your age, tell yer Granny/Mom/both? I apologize for my behavior.
Demigods
Demigods - 10/6/2024, 7:56 AM
@DocSpock - ha I wasn't talking shit when I said that btw... but they're both dead, so I'll grab an ouija board and hop right on that.
But you couldn't have landed my mom lol
DocSpock
DocSpock - 10/6/2024, 10:51 AM
@Demigods -

I'll drink 2 extra shots of tequila in honor of yer Mom & Grandmother while hoping they don't remember anything and come ghost slap the crap out of me.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 10/4/2024, 9:03 AM
Did anyone else watch Season 2 of Castle Rock? That whole season was Salem's Lot adjacent, and pretty good if memory serves . . .
Demigods
Demigods - 10/4/2024, 1:56 PM
@Clintthahamster - but no real vampires... undead things but not vampires. The show Chapelwaite was pretty good if you want to revisit vampires in Salem's Lot (albeit in the early 19th century)
Nightmare
Nightmare - 10/4/2024, 11:06 AM
Drive-in scene was pretty good, but the movie felt rushed. No character development.
abd00bie
abd00bie - 10/4/2024, 3:35 PM
@Nightmare - Rushed, which is weird because Ryan from The Boys still looked like he was 9
UpeepleRsick
UpeepleRsick - 10/4/2024, 11:41 AM
I am sorry but this was bad, i mean, really bad and nonsensical. This movie or whatever it was, almost drove me crazy. I mean what a bunch of idiots these protagonists were. Not one person had a necklace cross around their neck. You suspect somebody who just died might come back as a vampire, so you go and wait and watch them come back from the dead without any preparation just in case your theory might be right? and these were supposed to be educated smart people like a novelist and a doctor? let me stop, that little black kid had more heart than most of the grown-ups in this movie, what? Enough...
Demigods
Demigods - 10/4/2024, 1:57 PM
@UpeepleRsick - haha yeah.. maybe because I'm rereading the book right now, but Ben and Susan did NOT believe Mrs Glick was going to come back from the dead. They essentially went to disprove the vampire theory, didn't they? I haven't gotten back to that part yet, but I feel like they didn't believe at that point in time in the book.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 10/4/2024, 12:27 PM
It was disappointing, for sure. I can give a pass to a first time director for some of it, but a screenwriter who's already successfully (Mileage may vary) adapted a much longer Stephen King Novel, should have at least been able to deliver on what's important in the story. I can understand budgetary constraints on the ability to pull off certain things, But this felt like half the story. If you've never read the book or seen either of the previous adaptations, some of this won't make logical sense. Both a love letter and pale imitation of the shots people remember from Hooper's mini series. Less interested in telling a great story, than capturing screenshots. Not entirely devoid of entertaining moments, but completely lacking in any type of emotional engagement. To the point that even though some of the cast was well chosen and good in the roles, who cares?
One of, if not my favorite of King's novels, I so badly wanted to love this. And I tried, I really did. If I could make excuses for it, I would. I'm sure at some point, I'll watch it again, hoping I was wrong on first viewing - I'm pretty sure I wasn't.
Demigods
Demigods - 10/4/2024, 2:01 PM
@Patient2670 - that's probably the best explanation that I've read for someone not enjoying the movie. I kind of went into this looking for things to enjoy, rather than picking it apart for the discrepancies and omissions with the book, and I actually enjoyed it. I'm not saying you didn't want to enjoy it, as you've clearly stated you did, but for some reason I just didn't hate it. It was flash over substance, for sure, but I thought the vampire scenes were entertaining enough. Salem's Lot is my favorite King Novel as well, so I get it. I honestly just wanted a movie where vampires were straight up monsters, adapting the main plot points, with some entertaining scares along the way. I don't really think it was scary, but I did enjoy it.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 10/4/2024, 2:18 PM
@Demigods - Thanks. I did the same, and there were a few things I liked. I just wish they didn't entirely ignore the importance of the Matsten house, or the history that brought Ben back to the lot. I'm always going to find enjoyment in vampire movies - especially those that try to make them scary. I guess it's just knowing the source material that exists, and was not taken advantage of, that disappointed me. I felt the same way about the last adaptation of I Am Legend (another all time facorite book of mine). I really liked the movie, just felt like it missed a lot of the opportunities of what made the original story so special. On their own, they're both fun enough watches.
Demigods
Demigods - 10/5/2024, 10:44 AM
@Patient2670 - Just saw this on Bloody Disgusting and figure'd I'd share it. I'm curious if this version would have been better

https://bloody-disgusting.com/movie/3834421/gary-daubermans-initial-salems-lot-cut-was-three-hours-long-and-included-marsten-house-opening/
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder