KICK-ASS the movie ...Is it REALLY "KICK ASS”? A Review & Editorial

KICK-ASS the movie ...Is it REALLY "KICK ASS”? A Review & Editorial

Reviewing KICK-ASS the movie while simultaneouly taking a look at the property as a whole.

Review Opinion
By dageekundaground - Aug 15, 2010 12:08 PM EST
Filed Under: Kick-Ass
Source: Original Content


KICK-ASS the movie ...Is it REALLY "KICK ASS”?

Back in April of 2008, I picked up the first issue of “Kick-ASS” because prolific and controversial writer Mark Millar had engendered a lot of good will with me because of his initial run on “THE ULTIMATES” which is a modern day take on Marvel Comics Avengers property.
I read the first issue which really left little to no impression on me other than feeling it was some sort of vanity project for Millar and endless pontification on why he chose John Romita Jr. as the book’s illustrator.
I found Kick-ASS to be one of the most nihilistic comics I’d ever read. I’ve read the final issue a number of times to make sure I wasn’t just angry at the expansive delays that plagued it’s initial run … but, NOPE, it’s as sh**ty as ever from my point of view. I mean, I’ve read more than my fair share of SIN CITY, Millar’s excellent Authority run and other nihilistic comics over the years, but reading this comic actually left me feeling “empty” on the inside.
Today, I REALLY get KICK-ASS as a comic (I believe). It mirrors the REAL WORLD esthetic of the eternal stereotype of the perpetual loser and I even get why John Romita Jr. had been chosen as the book’s artist. His lazy, homogenized, dirty art style suits the sleazy world Millar created for his Un-Hero Dave Lizewski.

Well, that being said … let’s talk about the movie adaptation of KICK-ASS.



KICK-ASS the movie
RELEASE DATE: March 26, 2010-08-15
Featuring: Aaron Johnson, Chloe Moretz, Nicolas Cage, Christopher Mintz-Plasse, Lyndsy Fonseca & Mark Strong
Director: Matthew Vaughn
Screenwriter: Jane Goldman & Matthew Vaughn
Note: The rights to a film version of the comic book were sold before the first issue was published.
When this film adaptation was announced, I was a little weirded out at the timing. The first issue of the comic had recently hit the shops and stands. I was sure this was just a part of the big studios bull run on all things “comic book” in lieu of the success of properties like Batman and more recently the advent of the Iron Man film. I was like F**k the suits; they don’t even wait for the thing to have a proper run before snapping it up into their greedy clutches. So, “Kick-Ass” was the equivalent of a cinematic dinkleberry to me from that time on.

About four months before the movie was to open, I happened to be surfing these very internet pages when I happened upon two or three rough scenes from the rough cut of the movie.

Hitgirl being “trained” by her father & the subsequent rampage at the apartment of some unfortunate street types.

Dave’s initial unsuccessful foray into crime fighting.

These scenes really won me over and I researched the film joyfully discovering that the director had initially raised much of the movie’s cost alone to retain as much artistic control as possible. I literally felt like this could be the Pulp Fiction of Comic book movies. Kick-Ass was added to my list of summer movie excursions.

The film was picked up by Lion’s Gate and after viewing the posters and one of the trailers, I was worried once again. The posters were decidedly splashy with the characters leaping out of CGI looking dashes of color.
I was worried about the amount of violence that would be excised from the studio print of the movie. How would the critics respond to Hitgirl? Would the entire film be given a Daredevil “studio re-edit” to make it more mainstream i.e. marketable to kids?

Suffice it to say that I was one of the first to see the film on its release date and it won me over. Cuts to the film and material appear to be minimal and it retains the spirit of the comic and flashy homemade looking costumes.

As some of you know, KICK-ASS tells the story of average joe Dave Lizewski who decides iladvisedly to become a “super hero”. In the comics it appears that this decision comes as a result of his non-existent social status and being basically a latch key kid left to his own devices by his hard working single parent. The film posits alternate views of his motives after Dave and associate experience what appears to be a routine mugging by street toughs.
Basically Dave gets his ass “seriously” handed to him when he attempts to deter the same two street toughs from brazenly stripping a car in broad daylight.

What I like about this adaptation is that Matthew Vaughn wisely decided to make the movie an ensemble piece. No disrespect to Aaron Johnson’s heartfelt portrayal of Dave Lizewski, but splitting the films focus allowed more character development for the cast as a whole. The audience is privy to the private lives of not just the protagonist, but supposed peripheral characters and the villain as well. Mark Strong services the role of Mob Boss Frank D’ Amico well with a balanced portrayal of the crime lord as a family man first. Not something we haven’t seen before in other gangster movies, but Strong just approaches it like “crime is just my job”.

Big ups to Vaughn for finally finding a character that Nicolas Cage can portray that doesn’t make me wanna claw my eyes out after five minutes (Ghost Rider anyone?). Cage does justice to the character of Big Daddy wisely choosing to make alter ego “Damon Macready” little more than a chyper of Robert Reed’s Mike Brady while creating a creepy version of Adam West’s Batman to use for crime fighting purposes.



And while I’m speaking of creepy turns for established actors, Christopher Mintz-Plasse has proved to be a comer as Chris D’ Amico / Red Mist. Yes, he is a villain, but Plasse gives him plausibility as a son seeking the approval of his father (by any means necessary as it seems).

Chloe Moretz has the acting chops for bigger things, but presented here as a living special effect and used wisely in three BIG SET PIECES that definitely demonstrate and make the heart ache for what could have been Vaughn’s version of X-Men 3. (I’m not going to spoil the impact of these scenes by detailing them here. You will just have to rent a copy to enjoy them as they were intended. Moretz demonstrates the ability to go from saccharine sweet to Vaughn’s version of Marvel’s X-23 in a matter of seconds. Much has been made of Hitgirl’s excessive profanity, but I simply took it as part of the character. I don’t see it causing Moretz to rob a 7-11 down the line somewhere.



Much has been made of the fact that KICK-ASS the movie has a different ending that KICK-ASS the comic. People will be wise to note that the comic was still in production when the film was being made.

Ultimately, I feel that Matthew Vaughn and Jane Goldman among others have made the movie a SUPERIOR version over its source material.

This is NOT a KNOCK on MARK MILLAR; he is a superb comic book writer.

It is however a knock on the mean spirited comic he and Romita Jr. created and peddling to comic reading minority. I believe that Millar might have been a little pissed at the film’s ending due to the angry, spit-in-your face way he ended his first volume of KICK-ASS.


SPOILER ALERT- (Wikipedia)

Big Daddy reveals he is not an ex-cop at all but an accountant frustrated with his marriage, who took his daughter and left his empty life to create a new one, financing himself through selling comic books. He chose Genovese as a target because he and Hit-Girl "needed a villain". The gang kills Big Daddy and tortures Kick-Ass, but Hit-Girl, revealed to be alive, arrives at the scene and kills several of the gang members, saving Kick-Ass from meeting the same fate.[7] Hit-Girl and Kick-Ass attack Genovese's headquarters. Hit-Girl kills most of the henchmen, while Kick-Ass beats Red Mist unconscious. Genovese and his remaining thugs manage to capture Hit-Girl, but Kick-Ass comes to the rescue armed with a gun and shoots off Genovese's penis. Hit-Girl finishes off Genovese with a meat cleaver and guns down the remaining henchmen.[8]
Lizewski helps Hit-Girl go back to a normal, calm life with her mother - who had never been murdered, unlike what Big Daddy had made her believe - and stepfather, but his own life is no better than before. He revealed to Katie Deauxma that he is not gay, confessing his love for her, but rather than return the feelings, she is outraged at him lying to her. In retaliation, Katie induces Carl, her new boyfriend, to thrash Dave before sending him a picture of herself performing oral sex on Carl. When he comes home, he walks in on his father having sex with Eddie Lomas' ex-girlfriend Lucille. Despite all of this, he remains optimistic, as he has gone from a loser to a cultural phenomenon over the course of the story.


SUMMARY

I recommend a least one viewing of this film for those of you who haven’t seen it yet and as a collection item for anyone attempting to collect only “GOOD” comic book related films.

This movie makes me feel that perhaps Vaughn and Co. are perhaps wasting their talents on X-Men: First Class and maybe, just maybe he should have pursued the Re-Boot of the Spider-Man franchise instead. KICK-ASS definitely makes a good case.


*Take care everyone. Shadowgeek returns to the darkness once more.*
KICK-ASS 3: More Confusing Details Emerge About Matthew Vaughn's New Trilogy Plans
Related:

KICK-ASS 3: More Confusing Details Emerge About Matthew Vaughn's New Trilogy Plans

DC Studios Co-Chair Explains Why James Gunn's SUPERMAN Won't Be At Comic-Con
Recommended For You:

DC Studios Co-Chair Explains Why James Gunn's SUPERMAN Won't Be At Comic-Con

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Rhys
Rhys - 8/15/2010, 1:34 PM
It was truly "KICK-ASS" :D
KeithM
KeithM - 8/15/2010, 7:00 PM
I agree. The movie is better than the comic in nearly every way. Including the jet pack. The movie has heart and humanity where the comic is, as you say, mean spirited and lacks humanity.
Stumblin
Stumblin - 8/16/2010, 8:30 AM
This movie was hardly as awesome as a lot have said, but good review though.

The comic didn't lack humanity, it was realistic and personally I enjoyed a lot more. The movie dumbed down the characters, made them overly generic and one dimension, unlike the book. And Cage needs to stop making movies, at least comic book movies.
KeithM
KeithM - 8/16/2010, 12:51 PM
@Stumblin: Are you joking?

Damon Macready's reason for doing what he did was so one-dimensional and unbelievable in the comic that it was just plain stupid. The movie made him a much more multi-dimensional and believable character.

Also, Katie's reaction to Dave's reveal and 'text' in the comic was so unbelievably nasty and mean spirited that Millar was clearly doing it just to shock. And it almost ruined the book (scratch that - it DID ruin the book).

Big Daddy was also Cage's best performance in years.

And realistic? Now you ARE joking. Or delusional.

The comic was extremely uneven in quality and tone - from really good to really, really bad, whereas the movie was consistently brilliant and far more satisfying as a whole.

I rate Millar at his best, but I personally think that Kick-Ass the comic is probably his weakest work in years (that I've read). Which is ironic really, because the movie is one of the best cbms around.



Stumblin
Stumblin - 8/16/2010, 8:32 PM
Are you being rhetorical? I kid.

Look, the characters in the movie had one personality, Hit Girl was bad ass no matter what, Big Daddy was...acting, Kick-Ass did fine actually him and the actors that played his friends did a fine job I think. The weakest to me was definitely Hit Girl and Big Daddy.

Hit Girl for one never had a 10 year old moment in the movie like she did in the book. She finds her father is dead and after her killing spree she simply asks Kick-Ass for a hug with tears in her eyes. That was an awesome scene in the book. In the movie she basically shrugs it off, hardly any emotional attachment it was bull shit.

I really can't believe you think this is Cage's best performance...Big Daddy was definitely more complex in the book, but Cage basically made him a dad from Leave it to Beaver besides his terrible impression of Adam West's Batman. It was very uninspired and bland, I understand why he did it, but I still didn't like it. He forced his acting, I could tell he was acting I didn't believe his character for one second.

Mindy Macready I think did what she could do with the roll, I think she did a fine job it was the writing for her character that sucked.

The super happy ending was a cop out too, complete and utter crap to me and incredibly predictable and that's why I enjoyed the almost depressing ending of the book more it was raw and less expected.

This movie being considered brilliant is an incredible overstatement, but eh we can go on back and forth about this I will never change your mind and vice versa.

I'm just explaining why I thought this movie was not the "epic" movie everyone claimed it was. It was a mediocre action flick with a superhero theme, yay. Don't get me wrong I loved the action, but that's it, the rest was crap to me. Though definitely had sick cinematography.

Now when I say realistic, do I mean that it's ultra realistic as in I expect to see what I read in the book in life? No. What I mean is it was more grounded in realism in terms of character's personality, the premise no, but characters I enjoyed a lot more. So think I'm joking or being delusional or my opinions are stupid, I think the exact same for anyone that puts this as the greatest CBM, because it wasn't to me so please get over the fact not everyone thinks like you.

By the way I'm not at all advocating that Kick-Ass book is the greatest of all time, I'm merely pointing out that I enjoyed it more than the book. I could care less what you think of Millar or what his worst or best is, that irrelevant to what we are debating about.
KeithM
KeithM - 8/17/2010, 5:14 AM
@della: I don't bother reading posts which have caps lock on (which equates to SHOUTING ON THE INTERNET), so whatever you said is irrelevant. Calm down, stop shouting and maybe people might start listening to you.

Just a suggestion.

@Stumblin: If everyone agreed with me, it would be boring, so that's not an issue. :)

The book has more time to delve into the characters, of course, so I'll agree that Big Daddy was more 'complex' in terms of the details of his story, but personally I thought his reasons for behaving the way he did was very 'uncomplex', one dimensional, not very believable and poorly thought out, whereas the movie gave him a far more believable and relatable reason for doing what he did. I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on that one.

In the movie, Hit Girl certainly had her 'child' moments - the excitement over her birthday present and wish to impress her daddy to name but two - and that was what made Chloe Moretz's performance so good - her ability to switch from childlike innocence to bad-ass killing machine and make both believable (in context).

I don't think the movie had a 'super happy ending' either - yes it was 'happier' than the book in many ways, but Mindy had lost her dad in traumatic circumstances and her 'new normal life' is clearly not going to be normal as she's going to have time to deal with the trauma of her loss and inability to relate to other kids, so even though it seemingly ended on a positive note, clearly 'there will be trouble ahead' - and Dave's innocence was shattered for good now he'd taken lives, which, if they explore that in the sequel must have a psychological effect on him. And what effect that will have on his relationship with Katie remains to be seen too, so I'd say any 'happiness' was temporary at best.

I never said you were 'stupid' by the way. :) I just don't agree that the book was very realistic in how it portrayed some of the characters reactions, emotions and behaviour (relatively) compared to the movie, which, imo, made the characters far more believable and 'human' (in the limited time it had compared to the book).

I also don't think calling the movie 'brilliant' is an overstatement at all. It was by far the most refreshing, funny, fun and thrilling movie of the year so far. IMHO of course. :)

Stumblin
Stumblin - 8/17/2010, 7:31 AM
KeithM I know you weren't calling me stupid buddy, I'm just saying that insulting an opinion is just silly. I don't care what anyone calls me specifically here because not a single soul here knows anything really about me except that I like beer, and that's the most important part.

Regardless though I see your points I just can't bring myself to agree. I really did look forward to this movie, I mean the fight sequences were amazing but that's all I guess deep inside I was looking for something more.

The ending was way too happy for me, I liked that Kick-Ass got spat in his face by his dream girl, I liked that he had this trauma in his life. It reminded me of Spider-Man, sort of a real life going through some shit kind of thing. Not to the extent of Spidey but for a teenager, sure.

View Recorder