Comic Book Movies on the Decline

Comic Book Movies on the Decline

New contributor examines the spreading belief of audiences' comic book withdrawal

Editorial Opinion
By SeaSpider - Jul 02, 2011 12:07 AM EST
Filed Under: Other
Source: SeaSpider

My first article on this site starts out with an admission: I’ve dreamt of writing about Cookie Crisp. Not because I am obsessed with the cereal, but rather because my desire to get my voice out there somehow manifested into strangely comforting—and awfully realistic—dream in which ascendancy to stardom is precipitated by writing about miniaturized versions of unhealthy sugary delights. In this dream, the Nostalgia Critic became my financier after having been introduced to me by the discoverer of my talents, the Cinema Snob—a strange mental movie from which I quickly snapped back to reality, with a promptness to rapidly take to the keyboard and write this article, which I have delayed doing since I realized Comicbookmovie is a user generated site.

I’m not sure where my paralysis came from, though it probably has something to do with a desire to appease and garner a fan base. I realize my job is not easy given that my press access at the moment does not extend to industries outside the NYC fashion world. And news is what most of the people on this site want. But after having a designer ask me whether I like the fashion industry, and to that sheepishly responding that I like to write, I realize I need to do what I love. And that is writing about what I actively search for obsessively on a daily basis: comic book and comic book movie updates, along with analyses of those slivers of information. I hope to also acquaint you to my own character—SeaSpider—at some point. This is of course taking our relationship too quickly to the next level. For now, I just want to slowly ease myself into this yet to be defined role (though I hope critic and storyteller are a part of it) and hope that you will accept me as a fellow contributor and hopefully guide me to things that you would want to read and that I being in NYC could deliver.

For now, I pose a question that seems to be on the minds of many this summer. Is the shine of comic book movies wearing thin? The performance of the comic book blockbusters—Thor, Green Lantern, X-Men First Class—is out of step with what many in movieland expected from them in ticket sales. Green Lantern, even with its 53 million opening, massively underperformed and, with the second weekend’s precipitous drop, all but sounded the death knell to a potential sequel. X-Men: First Class was outperformed by the movie with Barakapool. And Thor has made much of its money overseas. Is this not a clear indication of fading interest? The short answer, no. The question I posed at the beginning still needs answering, but these examples are not indicators of decline.

Let’s take a brief look into why.

Thor, according to Box Office Mojo, has made $176,410,181 in the U.S. and Canada and $259,103,354 in international markets for a total of $435,513,535 worldwide. The sequel is certainly coming, but the performance shows a large drop from the $318,412,101 the first Iron Man earned domestically. Now granted Thor’s theatrical run has not yet ended, but the receipts in the end will hardly change the fact that even with all the hype of Avengers, Thor was not able to reach the same sized movie base as did the armored warrior.

What surprises me though is not its inability to perform like Iron Man, but its ability to perform as well as it did. Thor is a non-traditional comic book character who is obscure to the mainstream audience (the after credit scene in Iron Man 2 not withstanding) and whose very premise both potentially challenges moviegoers’ religious notions and pushes them away from the firmly rooted realism that has been trending in comic books. When many look to Dark Knight as the greatest comic book movie, it is difficult to go the other way and expect a great crowd behind you. Yet there was a sizable turnout. Partly that’s a product of good reviews, partly a strong marketing campaign by Marvel. The truly amazing thing is that we are at a point in comic book movie history where movies like Thor can be greenlit, and can find success. And with this movie, we have opened up the possibility of setting a movie on other planets, focusing on other races.

Of course, Green Lantern is the counterargument to that. But then again, that movie is actually worse reviewed than Mr. Popper’s Penguin. And from the grainy footage that I watched online—for I shall not fork over money to watch a movie worse than one starring CGI penguins—the direction is lousy: some things need more explanation like why is willpower green and fear yellow? Why is willpower the strongest energy in the universe? Why were the sectors divided into that particular number? Why does only one green lantern patrol each sector? Batman Begins spent an entire movie setting up why Bruce wears the suit. Even Smallville spent a good portion of its last season trying to explain why Clark needs a secret identity. Green Lantern thinks that it could just jump straight in and no one would mind. I minded—and I actually am a comic book fan—what can we expect from the more casual fans? A feeling by them of the silliness that they are watching, that’s what. And that silliness is presented in the first five minutes of the movie! Of course, the delayed marketing campaign and the CGI did not help either. With Dark Knight raising the expectation of quality from comics, moviegoers can’t be blamed for staying away from a movie that registered in the 20s on the Rottentomatoes meter.

And X-Men: First Class? Great Movie done in by its lackluster predecessors. When you’ve watched garbage before, it’s hard to get excited. I don’t doubt that many will discover this gem when it comes out on DVD, or whatever format people are watching things in nowadays. And we will get a sequel in the end.

Looked at in context, none of these films reflect a trend toward declining interest. If the argument is that before people would go see any garbage comicbook movie, I would argue against that. Elektra bombed. Fantastic Four 2 bombed. And those were bad movies. Yet those were made during the early years of this expanding genre. Granted, though, they were made before Dark Knight. Maybe what ended up happening is not that we stopped wanting comic book movies, but that the shine of just seeing comics on screen wore off and we began to clamor for quality. That’s not weariness. That’s common sense.

I look forward to hearing your comments.

SAG-AFTRA Slams Creation Of AI Actress Tilly Norwood: It Has No Life Experience To Draw From
Related:

SAG-AFTRA Slams Creation Of AI "Actress" Tilly Norwood: "It Has No Life Experience To Draw From"

Major Hollywood Talent Agencies Are Looking To Sign The First AI Actress Tilly Norwood
Recommended For You:

Major Hollywood Talent Agencies Are Looking To Sign The First AI Actress "Tilly Norwood"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Dmon
Dmon - 6/26/2011, 3:33 AM
OMG you need that much explanation really? I can understand some but come the [frick] on it is Sci-Fi. Did you need that much for Star Wars? And oh yeah how about X-Men why in the hell would humans evolve to have lasers shoot out their eyes or from their chest or in a modern world become more beast like? You are nitpicking.

Hell I could look at Thor the same way:
When you adopt a baby from another race, it loses all its racial characteristics and features...but slightly gets them back when it is angry. So either Loki never got mad before the events of the movie, or no one noticed his skin change color when he did.

Loki freezes Heimdall but does not kill him. Afterwards, Loki tries to kill Thor but does not freeze him. An interesting fact to know is that if Loki killed Heimdall or froze Thor, he would have won.

Odin protects the Frost Giants' casket by puting it on display in a treasure room with the Destroyer hiding behind a wall instead of being in front of it. Even better yet, why not put the casket inside the Destroyer ?

1000 years ago, the Gods of Asgard fought against the Frost giants of Jotunheim and seized the source of their power, the Casket of Ancient Winters. In present time, the Frost Giants still look as menacing and strong as before even with the lack of access to their source of power for more than a milleninum. Why ?

Also this flash back it showed was 1000 years ago and sometime between then and now Thor and Loki are born yet in Norse mythology tales of Thor and Loki existed before then. WTF?

And another thing at least in GL they stated that the ring translates other languages in your head. But in Thor you mean to tell me on Asgard they speak modern English and even if they knew it in addition to their own language then should not Thor as soon as Jane Foster said her first word to him know that he was on Earth?
GLfan
GLfan - 6/26/2011, 8:58 AM
Let me get this straight - you just wrote ONE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-ONE WORDS just to pile negative criticism onto a movie (Green Lantern) that you will not lower yourself to actually spend a few dolars to go & see YOURSELF, just repeating the hearsay of others?

You have NO right to express an opinion when you have no EXPERIENCE to base it upon. If you had bothered to go see it, then yes, you may fairly say yea or nay, but til then:
STFU, pissant!
SeaSpider
SeaSpider - 6/26/2011, 9:08 AM
GLFan--you misread my statement. I did watch it, just not in theaters.
HaroldOfGalactus
HaroldOfGalactus - 6/26/2011, 1:42 PM
Dmon Loki didnt turn blue when he was angry, it happened whenever he touched the casket, and when he tapped into its power and used it. So yes, it is safe to assume he never touched it before that point in the movie
Dmon
Dmon - 6/26/2011, 1:59 PM
@HaroldOfGalactus Ok but what about that other stuff? Those are even worse. And also Odin is a real dick. Why would he adopt Loki and make him think he could be King when the whole time his intention was to only give it to Thor which it's only result could be Loki going crazy with jealousy?
HaroldOfGalactus
HaroldOfGalactus - 6/27/2011, 6:16 AM
oh the rest i agree with you, its all very redundant, i was just pointing out the blue skin thing was about the only thing that partially made sense.

The thing that bugged me the most about Thor was how quickly nd uneventfully he learned humility.

Tries and fails to retrieve his hammer, then he gets drunk and all of a sudden is a much better person and is now worthy to retrieve Mjolnir?
View Recorder