Do Supervillains Need Gimmicks?

Do Supervillains Need Gimmicks?

Why can’t villains just be villains? Do they really need gimmicks and themes? Should they or shouldn’t they? I’m here to find out.

Editorial Opinion
By comiccow6 - Jul 06, 2013 08:07 AM EST
Filed Under: Other

Let’s talk about the Penguin. He’s obviously called that because of his stature. However, why the umbrellas? Yes, in past years he has become more of a crime boss and not a ‘supervillain’, but why did he have those umbrellas in the first place? Did they ever serve a purpose?

To answer this question, we’ll have to go back. Way back. Batman #1.



This has the Joker, who has an obvious gimmick. He’s a clown. He uses clown things. Now why the clown appearance? Most people would say that it’s because he’s the polar opposite of Batman. But Batman #1 came out in 1940. This was when campiness was high. There wasn’t much seriousness in comics back then. Which brings me to my next point.

This was 1940. There was World War II. It was terrifying. We were just getting out of the Great Depression. So we needed escapism. And perhaps we needed a bit of campiness.

Perhaps this is why DC succeeded more than Marvel back in the day. DC went for the escapism. Marvel went for the hero punching Hitler. Yes, the patriotism was fun, but it only reminded us of the dangers and those who were losing lives. But I digress.

Let’s not forget that this was a different time, a time where campiness was common. We had different views, and different standards. So we would have different definitions as well. There were many crime bosses in the time of Batman’s first publication. So could the writers have had a fear of these gangsters? Them being mocked and dumbed down to simple, corny villains who are easily defeated wouldn’t be taken very well. Or I could be crazy. Either way, instead, we got the supervillain.

So why the gimmick? Do we really need a supervillain to be based around one certain ability or thought? An easy to understand trick. Did we really need these? Or were they another part in the silliness and fun of comics?

I would say that they were needed and encouraged, considering the time. They were fun to read, and gave us a feeling of non-seriousness in evil and villains. The gimmicks allowed us to escape from the harshness and cruelty of the world.

But when it comes to today, I would say that the gimmicks are not needed, and are slowly dying out. Yes, the Penguin still has his signature umbrella, but he is much more a crime boss. Yes, the Joker has kept his appearance , but he is much more psychological and dangerous. So the gimmicks of supervillains have worked in the past, and some, for example, the Riddler, even today. But it is slowly leaving us, and sometimes, this is for the best, leaving campiness and fun to the seriousness and and psychology of today.

Until next time,
Comiccow6.
SOUND OF HOPE: THE STORY OF POSSUM TROT Interview With Stars Demetrius Grosse & Nika King (Exclusive)
Related:

SOUND OF HOPE: THE STORY OF POSSUM TROT Interview With Stars Demetrius Grosse & Nika King (Exclusive)

IF Interview: Cailey Fleming On First Lead Feature Role, Working With Ryan Reynolds, And More (Exclusive)
Recommended For You:

IF Interview: Cailey Fleming On First Lead Feature Role, Working With Ryan Reynolds, And More (Exclusive)

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

tonytony
tonytony - 7/6/2013, 9:53 AM
its not a gimmick its like saying every hero should be the same. They arent and thats what makes it fun.
tonytony
tonytony - 7/6/2013, 9:55 AM
your thread refers to villains being modernised and not being so silly. Case in point nolans batman or bane. But they are still unique and inherently the core is intact.
Shaggy
Shaggy - 7/6/2013, 10:16 AM
heroes have gimmicks too

"Spider-Man, Spider-Man, does whatever a spider can"
thenerdicon4
thenerdicon4 - 7/6/2013, 12:02 PM
Why are people so against FUN and Fun in comics in CBM's. Idk. You can be both serious and fun at the same time. Look at Avengers. So colorful and goofy, but still serious enough to take a serious film.
thenerdicon4
thenerdicon4 - 7/6/2013, 12:04 PM
Are people Good by default? If we are all capable of evil, how can we all be good by default?
CPBuff22
CPBuff22 - 7/6/2013, 1:23 PM
So not lets ask the same questions about the Superheroes. Batman is a gimmick. Dresses as a bat, hides in shadows, glides in and attacks, only comes out at night, has batarangs, batmobiles, etc. Spider-Man is a gimmick. Hell his theme song even admits it, "Spider-man, Spider-man does what ever a spider can". Green Lantern isn't really a gimmick, until you realize he recharges his powers from a Green Lantern.

Okay maybe we shouldn't focus on the well known heroes. What about the more obscure heroes like Daredevil. Not really a gimmick to be a blind lawyer.... who runs across roof tops dressed as a devil... never mind. Okay but what about the X-Men? Because Wolverine... is a hairy guy with claws, damn. Fine but Cyclops... wears a visor with one "eye", hell.

So I guess most of the popular Comic Characters are gimmicks. :P
RobGrizzly
RobGrizzly - 7/6/2013, 3:34 PM
The gimmick is sort of the DNA of comic books. They grab your attention. It was an easy way to identify a character, and with comics being a variant on archetype storytelling, it helped writers and readers both in fueling the imagination. So yes, they are needed. This was/is a medium that is all about colorful characters.

The real question you should be asking is which gimmicks work and which ones don't? Sticking with the Batman front, Light and dark, double or nothing, Two-Face has endured because you can do so much with the concept of 2. You know who hasn't endured? Kite Man.

So no, not all gimmicks work, and you can always tell which ones were lame when you see drastic re-inventions of certain characters. Like The Penguin. Who kinda sucked.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 7/7/2013, 7:16 AM
Batman was originally based off of Sherlock Holmes. In each Holmes story, there's a quality that gives each villain away - although from a narrative standpoint, there really are no other suspects - it's just a matter of Sherlock tracking down killers/thieves/extortionists based on what they leave and don't leave behind at the crime scene.

Remember, comics were intended for kids back then. In addition, the stories were not LONG, and they were self-contained.
Joker had a clown theme. Two-Face had an obsession with the number two. Catwoman had a fixation on felines. Poison Ivy was nuts about plants. Penguin liked birds.
It identified those villains to the readers.

Do they need gimmicks today? YES! Especially in comics. It makes the characters interesting.
RobGrizzly
RobGrizzly - 7/13/2013, 8:31 AM
Lol, Tainted87 basically said what I was trying to, but better.

But Two-Face is a gimmick, just as Penguin was. They've devolped more over the years, and writers have taken these quirky triats and blended them into their personalities, but any character that is defined or identified by a motif of ANY kind, in any way, is using a gimmick. It's not a bad thing. It just is what it is.

http://www.chacha.com/gallery/1847/laughably-lame-batman-villains
View Recorder