Fanboys: With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility

Fanboys: With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility

The future of comic book movies is in our hands. It's time we stand up as a community and show some respect.

Editorial Opinion
By KalElDorado - Jul 11, 2011 03:07 PM EST
Filed Under: Other

Fanboys are getting a bad name, and for the most part it’s justified.

I have been a CBM reader for a long time but I’ve never been a contributor. I’ve never participated in the relentless arguments taking place in the comment sections of almost any article on this site. Reason being: I refuse to be badgered, ridiculed, and harassed by the usual suspects who berate anyone with an opinion that differs from their own.

Why write this now? To be honest, I’ve had enough. I come to this site to read exclusive (and YES ‘spoiler’) content about the future of a world that fuses two forms of media that I hold dear to my heart: film and comics. I usually read the comment sections as well because it’s quite possible that the theories and insight of other readers like me can be fun. But it isn’t fun anymore. More often than not, I end up reading some stubborn blowhard going back and forth with another ignorant ‘crusader’ about how the film-makers are ‘raping’ source material, or how the character costumes are awful and therefore the film will be terrible. Then you have intelligent, well-read comic aficionados whose knowledge of the comic world is so in-depth, that they’re obsession has blinded them to the simple truth that: comic book movies are NOT comics. Translating any work from page to screen is ALWAYS a compromise. Period. It also needs to be said that these films are made for EVERYONE and not just people who read comics. Just like movies where the source material is a best seller isn’t made for only those who have read the books. These movies are made for broad audiences. What filmmaker sets out to alienate people who don’t revere the source material?

So why is it that the self-proclaimed ‘fanboy’ and online communities who so obviously love and respect the stories and origins, and the style of these wonderful fantasy worlds set out on these missions to doom and limit the possibilities of future crossovers and a the broadening of exposure? It may not be your intention to hinder progress, but I assure you – that’s exactly what you’re doing.

Take Green Lantern: From day 1 there were those out there who had a chip on their shoulder in regards to Ryan Reynolds; an actor of sufficient caliber and talent whose films and performances have had big box office draw for the last few years. I’m going to let you in on a secret: for actors, every film is a chance to reinvent themselves; a chance to grow as an artist; and also a chance to ruin their career. Certain stubborn individuals on this very site were hell-bent on Reynolds failing before they had even shot one frame of film – and they were going to be ‘right’ no matter how well he performed. They were flat out campaigning to destroy a film over their own tastes and opinions. And they did. Then there was the costume. Jesus. White gloves or no white gloves; cheesy PRE-VISUAL CGI or not – this film was to be crucified before it even had a chance. I just want to point out one thing to those who were up in arms over the costume: X-MEN 1, 2, and 3. Had this ‘fanboy’ community been as big and strong (essentially the bully that it is today) then, we would’ve never seen the evolution of that franchise. No Wolverine. No First Class. Give them a break people. This is where I reassert my previous statement: Translating any work from page to screen is ALWAYS a compromise.

Some people are impossible to please. The problem here is that when certain ‘crusaders’ aren’t pleased they go on a warpath. It’s vile; it’s disgusting, and its just plain disrespectful to anyone in the industry who strives to make good work. The studios are scared of us – and they should be. Green Lantern is a prime example of what can happen when the studios are pulled in every which direction throughout their process by online posts and the campaigning of belligerent blowhards.

So how do we fix this? For one, why don’t we let studios make their films and us (as movie watchers) watch the films. No more toting online ‘this film is going to be garbage’ campaigns when we haven’t even seen the first trailer. Our money, reverence of the source material, and devotion to these fantastic characters led to the wealth of films out there that aim to please the comic book nerd in all of us – don’t let those same things be the ruin.

Secondly, I urge every studio out there that is making a comic book movie to IGNORE US. Make your films with integrity, passion, and class and you’ll do right by most of us. Not every movie will be The Dark Knight or Superman II. In which case, you (the studio) will get back up, dust yourself off, and do what you do best: make movies. If that means ‘re-boots’ ‘re-imaginings’ ‘re-tooling’ ‘re’ whatever the hell you want to call it next time – then so be it. I’ll be glad to see my heroes get another chance to thrill and inspire as many people as they can.

SAG-AFTRA Slams Creation Of AI Actress Tilly Norwood: It Has No Life Experience To Draw From
Related:

SAG-AFTRA Slams Creation Of AI "Actress" Tilly Norwood: "It Has No Life Experience To Draw From"

Major Hollywood Talent Agencies Are Looking To Sign The First AI Actress Tilly Norwood
Recommended For You:

Major Hollywood Talent Agencies Are Looking To Sign The First AI Actress "Tilly Norwood"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

LP4
LP4 - 7/11/2011, 5:01 PM
Wow...this editorial pretty much sums up my never-ending feud with "Superman Returns"

;P
tamap
tamap - 7/11/2011, 5:07 PM
Finally, a voice of reason, for one whole year the so called fans have complained about everything from the actors, director, CGI, costumes, the tone and the budget has there ever been a movie with this much input by fans and at the end of the day they asked "Why all the negative views?
KalElDorado
KalElDorado - 7/11/2011, 6:21 PM
I certainly agree with you yossarian. I don't believe that anyone could argue a movie is bad for any other reason than the filmmakers missed their mark. I only wanted to draw attention to the nature of our community. Never underestimate the power of word-of-mouth. Good and Bad alike. When you hear enough people saying how bad something is based on how bad somebody else said that so-and-so said it was (and so on) - we are all less than enthusiastic to give it a chance. Green Lantern was not a horrible movie. It was amazing either, but all I hear over and over again is that it's 'the worst comic book movie ever'. Really? And this is from people who probably never even saw the movie.

The growth of online fanboy communities over the last 3 years or so has been so strong that I promise you: film-makers are paying attention - and I'm sure they will be paying much more attention now. If we find that we are even a fraction of the reason studios are struggling to make films 'good', it needs to be addressed.

I agree with you that directors, studios, actors, etc. aren't solely basing their decisions and film-making based on message board threads, but we have more influence than you think.
KalElDorado
KalElDorado - 7/12/2011, 10:31 AM
If you think a movie looks bad, and you're going to see it anyway, why not wait until you've actually SEEN it to boast your opinions? Just makes sense to me. It's like saying a band's album sucks when you've only heard the single.
BIGBMH
BIGBMH - 7/12/2011, 11:57 AM
You make a good point about how many of us tend to jump to conclusions and are too stubborn to accept necessary changes for adapting comics to film.

However, I agree with yossarian. I think you're greatly exaggerating this "Great Power" that fans have. We're not responsible for something like the failure of Green Lantern. Fanboy complaints aren't the reason that they didn't focus on the GL corps or that Parallax sucked.

Most fanboy desires fall on deaf ears once a studio makes up its mind about what it wants to do. I think the difficult part is really finding the balance in the creative team. Many fanboys (and girls) tend to be too loyal to the source material to know what to change to make a good movie. Movie makers often don't have the passion for the source material to understand what really makes a character and franchise great.

GL baffles me because I believe Geoff Johns had some role in its development. He should have been able to see where things were going wrong story-wise.
CraptainAmerica
CraptainAmerica - 7/12/2011, 11:59 AM
Great article. I, and many others, have posted similar articles in the past. I try to remain impartial and have only disliked a handful of CB films (Elektra, Catwoman) but that was after watching them. I HATE Cage in the Johnny Blaze role but I will reserve my judgement for viewing time in regards to 'vengeance'.

I also agree with tea's last two paragraphs (especially the "low expectation" part) and Kal's reply ("why not wait"). Both very fair points.

I don't blame filmmakers for getting frustrated at this gaggle of opinionated upstarts or for actors to feel the pressure of such a scrutinised role (Evans' did so although I realise it was also to do with the magnitude of the deal). I mainly believe that the editing of such movies as GL fall mainly with the distributers. They put the money up, they have to please the fans, they press for change to meet the demands of the people who will most likely part with their money (fanboys) and thus we end up with a damaged product sometimes. But these changes cant be hammered until after the product has been tested and thats why I agree with the article...it deserves to be heard and processed.
KalElDorado
KalElDorado - 7/12/2011, 5:24 PM
By all means, please share your opinions teabag. But show your fellow man respect. The hostility and snide remarks are just rude and inappropriate. Show some class in how you discuss your apparently strong feelings. Not necessarily in regards to this post in particular, but in general. And not necessarily you, but everyone.

In response to not expressing yourself before you've seen the film- that's not exactly what I meant. More that you be responsible about how you express yourself.

If someone's opinion is that a trailer for a movie is bad, by all means say so. They have every right to defend their case regarding how a 90 second cutting, that generally has little to do with the director, indicates completely that a film is terrible. Word of mouth is a powerful thing and you can't deny that certain individuals will comment on every post relating to whatever film they're rooting to fail - just to spread their poison.

All I really wanted to do was point out how out of hand it has gotten. To remind everyone that we are here because we love comic book movies and we should root for them to be successful - not to fail.
CraptainAmerica
CraptainAmerica - 7/13/2011, 2:28 AM
At the end of the day I'll reiterate my response I put into most comments sections. This by no means indicates that we should just accept any old trash because it's a CBM (step forward Ghost Rider, Elktra, Batman & Robin and Catwoman) but...

I'm just generally happy to see all of my favourite heroes make a live action appearance on the big screen. It's exciting times for CB fans and I intend to continue to embrace it positively
View Recorder