ROGUE ONE: A STAR WARS STORY Editor Confirms Reshoots Made Massive Changes To 2016 Blockbuster

ROGUE ONE: A STAR WARS STORY Editor Confirms Reshoots Made Massive Changes To 2016 Blockbuster

We've known for some time that Rogue One: A Star Wars Story underwent extensive reshoots, but the scale of those has now been explained by editor John Gilroy. Find more details on what happened right here!

By JoshWilding - Nov 02, 2022 06:11 AM EST
Filed Under: Star Wars
Source: The Playlist (via SFFGazette.com)

Rogue One served as the first of what was intended to be many "A Star Wars Story" spinoff movies, and with positive reviews and over $1 billion at the box office, it was definitely a hit. Solo would later underperform, of course, bringing an end to a slate that was supposed to include big screen adventures for characters like Yoda and Boba Fett. 

While everything looked rosy for Rogue One on the surface, behind the scenes, things didn't go quite so smoothly. While Godzilla director Gareth Edwards was tasked with helming the movie, Tony Gilroy (who now serves as Andor's showrunner) was brought in to oversee extensive reshoots that made sweeping changes to the blockbuster. 

Some of those changes are evident from Rogue One's trailers, with scenes featuring characters who should already be dead still alive and well or Jyn Erso squaring off with a TIE Fighter. Now, editor John Gilroy has shared new details with The Playlist (via SFFGazette.com) about how he and his brother Tony completely reshaped an entire movie. 

"I don’t know how much I’m supposed to say about that, but...it was really changing things and using all the tricks in your bag as an editor to make things work however you need to make them work, you make them work."

"The basic plan was very simple," he continued. "They had the movie that they had and they called Tony in. And Tony huddled for a while with another editor, who was on already, Colin Goudie, and used a lot of the things that he had discovered when we were working together and just basically made a new story. It was quite a different story."

"And then [he] convinced Disney to invest in that story, which was a sizeable investment in time and money. And then it was just realizing what that was. So, it’s a new plan. You’re not just going in and experimenting. No, we had a new blueprint."

Gilroy would go on to explain that he never really paid much attention to what the other version of Rogue One looked like and noted that the "trajectory" of the story needed to be heavily altered. As suspected, though, it sounds like the biggest issues were with Rogue One's third act.

"A lot of big features, they go in, they have a weak third act, and then they shoot it, and then they see what they have, and then they go back for all these gigantic reshoots, and yeah...that’s a very expensive way of working. I mean, you can’t do that in television."

Edwards hasn't spoken too openly about his Rogue One experience, but it's apparent the movie was taken out of his hands and transformed by another filmmaker. That has to sting, but this was just the first of what's proven to be many creative differences Lucasfilm has had with directors over the years (Phil Lord & Chris Miller, Colin Trevorrow, and Patty Jenkins, for example). 

Will we ever learn what Rogue One originally looked like? Probably not, but seeing as the plot of Trevorrow's Duel of the Fates later leaked online, it may well happen. 

STAR WARS: THE RISE OF SKYWALKER Unused Posters Are Better Than The Movie; New Rumor Teases Rey's Future
Related:

STAR WARS: THE RISE OF SKYWALKER Unused Posters Are Better Than The Movie; New Rumor Teases Rey's Future

STAR WARS: Henry Cavill Rumored To Have Had Talks About Potential Role In Simon Kinberg Trilogy
Recommended For You:

STAR WARS: Henry Cavill Rumored To Have Had Talks About Potential Role In Simon Kinberg Trilogy

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

JustAChillFan
JustAChillFan - 11/2/2022, 7:10 AM
It's still one of my favorite star wars films. It's funny I know a lot of people liked the blind force sensitive monk (keruit? Can't remember his name) but I think he was overused and took away from the stuff I liked more.
DanFlashesShirt
DanFlashesShirt - 11/2/2022, 7:28 AM
3rd best Star Wats film
WarMonkey
WarMonkey - 11/2/2022, 8:36 AM
Weird for him to say this since the movie is known only for it's third act and specifically for Vader showing up with a boring first and 2nd act. It's not a very good movie or an exciting SW story up until that point. I like the movie BTW as a side story to the greater story of Star Wars.
L0RDbuckethead
L0RDbuckethead - 11/2/2022, 10:58 AM
No shit... Didn't we already know this?
mastakilla39
mastakilla39 - 11/2/2022, 3:09 PM
This is pretty much Tony Gilroy's film. Despite grossing 1 billion there's a reason Gareth Edwards didn't return to direct another Star Wars franchise. KK basically had Gilroy butcher his film thats why the marketing was so terrible and showed a bunch of unused scenes, but the version we got probably worked better for the studio and moviegoers cause it did make 1 billion.
View Recorder