STAR TREK Cinematographer Daniel Mindel To Reteam with J.J. Abrams For STAR WARS

STAR TREK Cinematographer Daniel Mindel To Reteam with J.J. Abrams For STAR WARS

Today at a film industry event in Los Angeles, it was apparently revealed that Mindel will once again join Abrams on his upcoming Star Wars flick. Plus, the director is said to be shooting the movie on 35mm film. Read on for more..

By MarkCassidy - Aug 22, 2013 04:08 PM EST
Filed Under: Star Wars
Source: Boba Fett.com



Although we are very much in the digital age of movie-making, it seems J.J. Abrams is continuing resist the changeover from film and will shoot Star Wars: Episode VII on 35mm -- Kodak film stock 5219 to be precise! This was Announced today (via Bobba Fet.com) at a film industry event in Los Angeles, where it was also revealed that Abrams would reteam with his Star Trek/ Mission Impossible 3 cinematographer, Daniel Mindel. Midel was on hand to discuss his work with Abrams, and told an interesting story about the director's penchant for lens flares. Apparently a mistake flare caught Abrams' eye, and Dan showed him how they are created, and the rest is history! None of this has been officially confirmed just yet, but many reports are coming in from the event so it looks like a sure thing.


STAR WARS: THE RISE OF SKYWALKER Unused Posters Are Better Than The Movie; New Rumor Teases Rey's Future
Related:

STAR WARS: THE RISE OF SKYWALKER Unused Posters Are Better Than The Movie; New Rumor Teases Rey's Future

STAR WARS: Henry Cavill Rumored To Have Had Talks About Potential Role In Simon Kinberg Trilogy
Recommended For You:

STAR WARS: Henry Cavill Rumored To Have Had Talks About Potential Role In Simon Kinberg Trilogy

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

3DWitchHunt
3DWitchHunt - 8/22/2013, 4:33 PM






DaenerysTargaryen
DaenerysTargaryen - 8/22/2013, 4:41 PM
Thats good to know I guess. How long till we get casting news?
JDUKE25
JDUKE25 - 8/22/2013, 4:42 PM
I really hope JJ looks at the original trilogy for reference for pacing/character dialogue (not everyone trying to do a bad British accent/cinematography/amount of time a lightsaber is being used/and amount of CGI vs practical effects (models)

And the opening better remain the same. Have the crawl and slowly pan down to a planet or ship.
JDUKE25
JDUKE25 - 8/22/2013, 4:51 PM
And yes, less flares. VERY less flares.
ManofSteel23
ManofSteel23 - 8/22/2013, 4:53 PM
[frick]ing hate lens flare
AnAvenger
AnAvenger - 8/22/2013, 4:53 PM
Lol. You people an your stereotypes.
TheSoulEater
TheSoulEater - 8/22/2013, 4:54 PM
BRILLIANCE :D
ndwwrestler2
ndwwrestler2 - 8/22/2013, 5:02 PM
I like Lens Flares. I think it give Abrams movies sort of his own little signature.

That is right haters, bring it on.





Tony93
Tony93 - 8/22/2013, 5:07 PM
whats the difference?
TheOneAboveAll
TheOneAboveAll - 8/22/2013, 5:09 PM
Lensflare time
ALegendaryPanda
ALegendaryPanda - 8/22/2013, 5:20 PM
Holy shit who cares about the [frick]ing lens flare?! I swear you shitbirds are like 20 broken records going off at the same [frick]ing time.
CuddlyCereal
CuddlyCereal - 8/22/2013, 5:29 PM
Everyone bitches about Abrams and his lens flares. Why does no one bitch about Spielberg and his obsession for spotlights.
ndwwrestler2
ndwwrestler2 - 8/22/2013, 5:34 PM
@darkmetal Comparing those guys to Abrams? Are you high?
Facade
Facade - 8/22/2013, 5:35 PM
Lens flares will be natural now...much love for Abrams!
ndwwrestler2
ndwwrestler2 - 8/22/2013, 5:38 PM
"grif will not be pleased..."

Minato
Minato - 8/22/2013, 5:39 PM
This is very uninspired. Why get the same people from your rival instead of trying to differentiate yourself. This is the reason GOTG will rule. It will be different and fresh
ndwwrestler2
ndwwrestler2 - 8/22/2013, 5:42 PM
@2Challa He also worked with Abrams on MI3. He's just using one person who he's familiar with.

If he really wanted to bring everyone from Trek, John Williams wouldn't be doing the score.
ndwwrestler2
ndwwrestler2 - 8/22/2013, 5:50 PM
@Darkmetal George Lucas made one good film, Shyalaman has made two good films, and Schumacher has made one ore two good movies.

Abrams has made four good movies. And that doesn't even count the TV shows, which are pretty fricking great as well.

prettynucIear
prettynucIear - 8/22/2013, 6:14 PM
Abram doesn't know how to film action. He actually doesn't even try.
Minato
Minato - 8/22/2013, 6:17 PM
@ndwwrestler
Im still upset that they are using Abrams to begin with after he use directed 2 Trek films.
DetBullock
DetBullock - 8/22/2013, 6:38 PM
No, not the lens flares again, please.
ndwwrestler2
ndwwrestler2 - 8/22/2013, 7:22 PM
@darkmetal Maybe it's just me, but I enjoyed Into Darkness more than I did Wrath of Khan.

Super 8 was a beautiful film to me. The dialogue was well written, it was surprisingly well acted (surprising because it was kids) and it had heart. Things that I look for in a movie.

Lucas made a New Hope, and that was the only good movie he made. The other Star Wars movies were directed by someone else.

Honestly I can't put the GI Joe and Transformers, and Lone Ranfer Movies with War of the Worlds, The Mission Impossible Series (minus the second one).


@2Challa I don't see Star Trek and Star Wars the way I see DC and Marvel.

The only thing Star Wars and Star Trek have in common is that they both have 'star' at the beginning of their titles.

Bojac
Bojac - 8/22/2013, 9:37 PM
I think the biggest news is that Star Wars 4 is being shot on film. Pretty big middle finger to Lucas and his space battles films.
Grayson7954
Grayson7954 - 8/22/2013, 11:37 PM
the news here is its being shot on 35 mm, THANK GOD, digital is shit and you can in ep 2 and ep 3 its shit.
nach1wan
nach1wan - 8/23/2013, 4:59 AM
leave the lens flares for star trek.

thank you
gaikinger
gaikinger - 8/23/2013, 10:51 AM
lens flare...no lens flare...whatever Abrams wants to do......cant wait to see what he does.
AutobotCommander84
AutobotCommander84 - 8/23/2013, 11:07 AM
35mm film looks so much better than digital. I hope that if and when the day comes that I become a director, the producer or the studio will let me shoot 35mm anamorphic instead of digital.
ablee337
ablee337 - 8/23/2013, 3:55 PM
Blackmatter
Blackmatter - 8/23/2013, 9:04 PM
@dark metal...why are you so serious?

@alegendarypanda...just what I was thinking. it's like they have nothing else.
YaBoyRD
YaBoyRD - 8/24/2013, 2:14 PM
I like the JJ Abrams Trek movies, and I have enjoyed most of his past work. To each their own. But in case all the fanboys forgot, when the sequel was announced a large number of people on this very site were posting their desire for JJ to use Kahn as the villain. Personally, I dug his take... aside from Spock screaming "Kaaahhhhnnn!" You can respectfully borrow from the past but you can't out-Shatner Shatner.
ablee337
ablee337 - 8/24/2013, 2:31 PM
@ sethasa

Agreed, you can't out-Shatner Shatner.
View Recorder