MADAME WEB Star Dakota Johnson Addresses Movie's Negative Reviews: "I Will Never Do Anything Like It Again"

MADAME WEB Star Dakota Johnson Addresses Movie's Negative Reviews: "I Will Never Do Anything Like It Again"

Madame Web star Dakota Johnson has shared her take on the movie's negative reviews, confirming she's done with superhero roles while acknowledging that she isn't surprised the movie was torn apart...

By JoshWilding - Mar 05, 2024 11:03 AM EST
Filed Under: Madame Web
Source: Bustle

Madame Web was released on Valentine's Day to overwhelmingly negative reviews and, as we write this, it ranks among the worst superhero movies ever made according to its 12% Rotten Tomatoes score. 

Its box office takings haven't been any better and despite Kraven the Hunter and Venom 3 being on the horizon, it's hard to imagine Madame Web's failings not pushing Sony to go back to the drawing board with its live-action Marvel offerings. 

Bustle recently caught up with lead star Dakota Johnson and asked if the past few weeks have been "weird" for her. 

"Yeah. I had the LA premiere for Madame Web and then went to Mexico City. I had pneumonia and was on steroids and the nebulizer and doing all these little things, and I was really, really sick and felt horrible. I looked horrible," the actress says. "I was like, 'Ugh.' And then the movie came out and it was... [Pauses.] Like, I can’t take any of it seriously at all. I dunno."

The site wondered whether it bothers her to see people write what they described as "nasty" reviews to which she replied, "Unfortunately, I’m not surprised that this has gone down the way it has."

Johnson proceeded to suggest that the version of Madame Web we saw in theaters wasn't the movie she signed up for and appeared to blame the studio for making decisions which alienated moviegoers. In fact, she addressed the movie's failings head-on and confirmed this is likely it for her and superhero projects as "I don't make sense in that world."

"It’s so hard to get movies made, and in these big movies that get made — and it’s even starting to happen with the little ones, which is what’s really freaking me out — decisions are being made by committees, and art does not do well when it’s made by committee. Films are made by a filmmaker and a team of artists around them."

"You cannot make art based on numbers and algorithms. My feeling has been for a long time that audiences are extremely smart, and executives have started to believe that they’re not. Audiences will always be able to sniff out bullsh*t. Even if films start to be made with AI, humans aren’t going to f*cking want to see those."

"But it was definitely an experience for me to make that movie. I had never done anything like it before. I probably will never do anything like it again because I don’t make sense in that world. And I know that now. But sometimes in this industry, you sign on to something, and it’s one thing and then as you’re making it, it becomes a completely different thing, and you’re like, 'Wait, what?'"

"But it was a real learning experience, and of course it’s not nice to be a part of something that’s ripped to shreds, but I can’t say that I don’t understand."

We've heard rumblings that Madame Web once tied directly into Spider-Man (whether it was Andrew Garfield or Tom Holland's respective Variants is unclear), but having watched the movie, it's hard to believe there's a version out there which is that different. Morbius, on the other hand, showed blatant signs of reshoots.

What we do know is Madame Web underwent many last-minute changes, with Claire Parker and SJ Clarkson rewriting Matt Sazama and Burk Sharpless' script and Lorenzo di Bonaventura randomly coming on board to produce in place of divisive Sony/Marvel exec Avi Arad. Perhaps Johnson was sold on a very different movie? Either way, she seems to be on board with the criticisms. 

Madame Web is now playing in theaters.

Sydney Sweeney Reportedly Agreed To Make MADAME WEB To Convince Sony To Greenlight ANYONE BUT YOU
Related:

Sydney Sweeney Reportedly Agreed To Make MADAME WEB To Convince Sony To Greenlight ANYONE BUT YOU

MADAME WEB Star Sydney Sweeney Reveals Impressive Transformation For Upcoming Role As Boxer Christy Martin
Recommended For You:

MADAME WEB Star Sydney Sweeney Reveals Impressive Transformation For Upcoming Role As Boxer Christy Martin

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
Usernametaken
Usernametaken - 3/5/2024, 11:23 AM
kudos for her honesty
KennKathleen
KennKathleen - 3/5/2024, 12:04 PM
@Usernametaken - seriously. I hope she does revisit the genre once the bulwhit is fully diminished.
incredibleTalk
incredibleTalk - 3/5/2024, 5:08 PM
@Usernametaken - She should have known when she saw the word "Sony"!

Unites
Unites - 3/5/2024, 11:23 AM
She is already dragging it lol
WhatIfRickJames
WhatIfRickJames - 3/5/2024, 11:23 AM
She at some point read this script and said this was a good idea. Her team should have steered her away from this from the beginning
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 3/5/2024, 11:35 AM
@WhatIfRickJames - Exactly. Part of these poor decisions come from actors/teams who know absolutely anything about the character they're playing. They don't pay attention to what the general audience is saying and sign up blind. Then when the negative reception comes in full for e they try to gaslight the general audience into believing it was everyone else's fault but their own for signing on.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 3/5/2024, 11:40 AM
@WhatIfRickJames - as she said , it seems like she liked the original idea or script but as they were making it , it became the movie we got .

I don’t entirely blame her then from signing on , plus you never know if direction or something could elevate it too once it all comes together

FinnishDude
FinnishDude - 3/5/2024, 12:24 PM
@WhatIfRickJames - Actors sign up for projects based on a draft or story pitch, which get disregarded after they are legally bound to see the project through all the dang time. Not to mention that with today's spoiler culture actors aren't even always given the full context for everything.
WhatIfRickJames
WhatIfRickJames - 3/5/2024, 12:28 PM
@FinnishDude - I can see what you’re saying. We don’t know how the movie unfolded during production, even unedited it may have felt that they were creating something great. It’s a shame. I would have loved to see them succeed.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 3/5/2024, 2:36 PM
@WhatIfRickJames - And that's why she fired them the day after the trailer hit.
eagc1995
eagc1995 - 3/5/2024, 3:43 PM
@FinnishDude - Yeah lets take Iron Man 3 for example, Rebecca Hall signed on because at one point she was gonna be the main villain of the film. but then Ike Perlmutter came in and said that kids won't want to buy Maya Hansen toys, make the big bad Killian (and they still never made toys out of him) much to her dissapointment, but she already had her contract in place and had to do it.
newhire13
newhire13 - 3/5/2024, 11:55 PM
@WhatIfRickJames - Sometimes the script the actor gets isn’t what ends up being shot for various reasons, like rewrites. And they’ve already signed on so there’s nothing they can do. For example, Bill Murray felt burned by GB2 because the script they shot wasn’t the script that got him to sign on.
WhatIfRickJames
WhatIfRickJames - 3/5/2024, 11:25 AM
Also, is she hinting that the script was AI written or am I reading that wrong?
Polaris
Polaris - 3/5/2024, 11:50 AM
@WhatIfRickJames - I got that feeling, and it's not the first time she mentions ai when talking about this movie, so it's certainly suspicious
BobbyDrake
BobbyDrake - 3/5/2024, 11:55 AM
@WhatIfRickJames - That’s what I’m thinking. She keeps mentioning AI in all her interviews for no apparent reason.
Nightwing1015
Nightwing1015 - 3/5/2024, 12:09 PM
@WhatIfRickJames - I took it to mean certain creative decisions were made on the film probably on the basis of AI audience analytics/statistics.
SATW42
SATW42 - 3/5/2024, 1:00 PM
@WhatIfRickJames - Based off of her joke o SNL, I think she's basically saying either AI threw this together for the "perfect date movie your boyfriend will take you to". or AI through viewing algorithms lead essentially to the making of this movie.

I don't think she's saying it was written by ai. I could be wrong though.

Personally I think shes just saying "you can't throw a bunch of shit together in a board room and expect it to work and be art" and ai is like the new buzzword for everything bad lately.

Like I could say Vice: Project Doom for the NES seems to be what a computer would regurgitate what it thinks a video game is, but we all know ai didn't exist when that game was made so it was probably just cocaine.
Origame
Origame - 3/5/2024, 11:25 AM
What a mature and responsible decision.

Take notes, mcu! Maybe do this instead of screaming people are racist and sexist for not liking it!
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 3/5/2024, 11:38 AM
@Origame - Nobody screamed that people were racist or sexist for not liking Love & Thunder, Quantumania, The Marvels, The Eternals, and others. But it was people like you who shouted WOKE every opportunity that came about. But it's in your nature to gaslight and slander.
AmazingFILMporg
AmazingFILMporg - 3/5/2024, 11:43 AM
@SonOfAGif -


Don't engage. The dude has Disney/MCU derangement syndrome. Any article not MCU he still brings them up for some reason🤡💁
EskimoJ
EskimoJ - 3/5/2024, 3:02 PM
@Origame - Now reference the comments (yours included) on this very site -- from announcement of the movie through the release.
Origame
Origame - 3/5/2024, 3:23 PM
@EskimoJ - ...you mean the comments where I pointed out the double standards of people on this site? God forbid I expect people to maintain the same standards when it comes to anything.

So I'll ask you here, as I've asked many others (including you). Why is it sexist to not like the marvels but it isn't sexist to not like madame web?
Origame
Origame - 3/5/2024, 3:23 PM
@AmazingFILMporg - it's called double standards.
Origame
Origame - 3/6/2024, 7:42 AM
@EskimoJ - @@SonOfAGif and of course none of you have anything to say about the facts I laid down to you two. Your attempts to deny reality and undermine them with ad hominem attacks won't work anymore.
GeneralChaos
GeneralChaos - 3/5/2024, 11:25 AM
Chris Evans did say it's not easy.
marvel72
marvel72 - 3/5/2024, 1:04 PM
@GeneralChaos - If you hire decent writers,directors and actors. Also if you actually read some comic books it will be a lot easier making comic book movies.
GeneralChaos
GeneralChaos - 3/6/2024, 10:20 AM
@marvel72 - comic books are 16 pages of suggested review material. I want them to be better than a page by page interpretation of comics because let's face it, comic book writing is awful. Some of the worst expository dialogue in all of fiction.
Spoken
Spoken - 3/5/2024, 11:25 AM
I do think it had more of a Terminator plot before-hand, but of course when you have someone like Tom Rothman around, problems like this are going to happen.
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 3/5/2024, 11:41 AM
@Spoken - This is what happens when Sony doesn't work with the one studio who has made billions in a shared universe. Had they worked with Marvel Studios, Madame Web could have been the Multiversal clairvoyant coming to warn various Spider-Men in different universes about the oncoming Secret Wars. Where every universe will collide and she must warn and prepare the Spiders of what's to come. Maybe Loki could have been a major cameo thanking her for her help in preparing parts of the Multiverse.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 3/5/2024, 11:41 AM
@Spoken - yeah, the initial premise did make it sound a lot like that.

Having Ezekiel come from the future to murder Mary, with Cassie then recruiting the three Spider-Women and Ben to protect the unborn Peter Parker sounds so much more intriguing.
Vigor
Vigor - 3/5/2024, 11:25 AM
Sony needs to be stopped. They're bordering on Uwe Boll levels of sabotaging the genre they're operating in
JuanRGuijarro
JuanRGuijarro - 3/5/2024, 11:33 AM
@Vigor - just like Disney Marvel
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 3/5/2024, 11:35 AM
@JuanRGuijarro - because Disney Marvel sucks! right?
Not like WB just bombed 5 movies in the past couple years.
Vigor
Vigor - 3/5/2024, 11:38 AM
@JuanRGuijarro - of all the studios that make comicbookmovies, Disney marvel is the least offender. But sure secret invasion and Thor 4 were damaging enough that I can see why one would feel that way
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 3/5/2024, 11:41 AM
@Vigor - say what you want about those 2 but even those had things I enjoyed about them (though were definitely flawed)
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 3/5/2024, 11:42 AM
@Vigor - Because Thor 4 and Secret Invasion speak for the entirety of the MCU. As if the general audience burned their copies of Endgame because of how bad those two projects were. Grow up.
Vigor
Vigor - 3/5/2024, 11:45 AM
@SonOfAGif - you're talking to the wrong guy. I absolutely adore the MCU
JuanRGuijarro
JuanRGuijarro - 3/5/2024, 11:45 AM
@Vigor - And the Marvels, and Quantumania, and Multiverse of Madness, and Loki S2.
This site has a clear love for Disney stuff but in reality people are just tired of a lot of bad content
Vigor
Vigor - 3/5/2024, 11:45 AM
@TheVisionary25 - agreed
1 2 3

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder