Shailene Woodley Seems Pretty Sure That She Won't Be Back For THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 3

Shailene Woodley Seems Pretty Sure That She Won't Be Back For THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 3

Despite saying that "anything can happen", Shailene Woodley seems confident that her commitments to Divergent and the fact that she's heard nothing from the studio means that she won't be returning as 'Mary Jane Watson' in The Amazing Spider-Man 3. Check it out!

By JoshWilding - Jan 20, 2014 08:01 AM EST
Source: MTV News


For those of you unable to watch the video, the actress says: "Andrew kills it. I don't know anything, but seeing as how they picked up the next two Divergent films, I don't know how I'd keep my sanity with two big action films in one year. But, anything can happen, so..." What do you guys think? Be sure to let us know your thoughts in the comment section below!






In The Amazing Spider-Man™ 2, for Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield), life is busy – between taking out the bad guys as Spider-Man and spending time with the person he loves, Gwen (Emma Stone), high school graduation can’t come quickly enough. Peter hasn’t forgotten about the promise he made to Gwen’s father to protect her by staying away – but that’s a promise he just can’t keep. Things will change for Peter when a new villain, Electro (Jamie Foxx), emerges, an old friend, Harry Osborn (Dane DeHaan), returns, and Peter uncovers new clues about his past.


STARRING:

Andrew Garfield as Peter Parker/Spider-Man
Emma Stone as Gwen Stacy
Shailene Woodley as Mary Jane Watson
Jamie Foxx as Max Dillon/Electro
Sally Fields as Aunt May

RELEASE DATE: May 2nd, 2014.
Andrew Garfield Says He Has The Best Live-Action SPIDER-MAN Suit
Related:

Andrew Garfield Says He Has The Best Live-Action SPIDER-MAN Suit

Andrew Garfield Comments On His Spider-Man Possibly Returning To The MCU After SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME
Recommended For You:

Andrew Garfield Comments On His Spider-Man Possibly Returning To The MCU After SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5
marvel72
marvel72 - 1/20/2014, 8:32 AM
she ain't that bad looking,not really mary jane quality but i would still give her a length of my man meat.
JJJameson
JJJameson - 1/20/2014, 8:37 AM
I think she is a talented actress, but I do think she was miscast as Mary Jane. It's better for both parties if she doesn't come back. There are a lot of talented actresses out there that would suit the part of MJ better IMHO, and I feel it was for the best that the character MJ didn't show up in TASM2, especially if they are going to follow Gwen Stacy's 616 storyline.
r3negade
r3negade - 1/20/2014, 8:39 AM
Please come Back Shailene! Don't leave us!

M3T4LL0
M3T4LL0 - 1/20/2014, 8:40 AM
I still think that the big uproar on this site which led to that dumbass "satire" piece on her played a bit of a role to her being cut. Webb & Co. would never admit it, but I'm sure it was a factor.
GreenLantern519
GreenLantern519 - 1/20/2014, 8:42 AM
I'd like to see her scenes, maybe as an extra on the blu-ray or something. I'm sure she would've done well in the part.
GreenLantern519
GreenLantern519 - 1/20/2014, 8:43 AM
@MEtallo I really don't think that Marc Webb and Co. give two shits about a comicbookmovie forum site
marvel72
marvel72 - 1/20/2014, 8:49 AM
the users on this site criticizing the way she looks probably haven't a girlfriend or even been near a woman.
Ranger14
Ranger14 - 1/20/2014, 8:50 AM


My post seems to have fallen in the abyss. This is great news as far as I am concerned. Too plain jane for Mary Jane.
Dish
Dish - 1/20/2014, 8:50 AM
She wasn't a good choice for Many Jane by any means but, AlphaFlexx grow the [frick] up.
CaptainAmerica31
CaptainAmerica31 - 1/20/2014, 8:55 AM
Nooooo I was looking forward to it. Oh well idk no who will take her place. Probably some bimbo with no acting experience like you assholes wanted
TelaVizion
TelaVizion - 1/20/2014, 8:55 AM
She was 100x better choice than Kirsten Dunst... plus she's cuter than Emma
santoanderson
santoanderson - 1/20/2014, 8:56 AM
She looks quite beautiful in the Divergent trailer, but I will agree that she looked really frumpy on the set of Spider-man. I'm not one who normally criticizes an actress' appearance, but yeah, there were lots of spy shots of Shailene walking to set looking like she had just rolled out of bed.
SuperCat
SuperCat - 1/20/2014, 8:58 AM
She looks good to me.
newhire13
newhire13 - 1/20/2014, 8:58 AM
@Alphaflexxxko let's see how you look!
Giznad
Giznad - 1/20/2014, 9:00 AM
i'm pretty sure the dudes who say she's ugly prolly have girlfriends that look like Violator from Spawn.
JasonGrayson77
JasonGrayson77 - 1/20/2014, 9:00 AM
@TelaVision
Correction. No one is cuter than Emma.
theowl
theowl - 1/20/2014, 9:02 AM
okei... that sucks!

Just DON'T cast Jane Levy as Mary Jane!!

She is basically Emma Stone's twin.
They look waaay to similar.
DamienA
DamienA - 1/20/2014, 9:02 AM
Some of you dickhead's need to get a life instead of calling some one ugly from your mother's basement. Get a life,get a girlfriend.
theowl
theowl - 1/20/2014, 9:04 AM
Mary Elizabeth Winstead
GeekyCheekyChic
GeekyCheekyChic - 1/20/2014, 9:04 AM
Ok so a group of nerds won that battle and pretty much convinced Sony to drop their choice for Mary Jane....that being said why is this sort of tactic not working when it comes to Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman ?
GeekyCheekyChic
GeekyCheekyChic - 1/20/2014, 9:05 AM
I do agree though Woodley is CUTE but Mary Jane Watson really should be SMOKING HOT. Like Alexandra Daddario hot.
Mysterion
Mysterion - 1/20/2014, 9:06 AM
what about Deborah Ann Woll?
Deborah ann woll photo: deborah ann woll deborahannwoll.jpg
HulkDraxGroot
HulkDraxGroot - 1/20/2014, 9:07 AM
she is cute but she sure aint in mj's league.
theowl
theowl - 1/20/2014, 9:09 AM
MrFridayNights

"You [frick]ing virgin"

are you thirteen years old?? haha, Who's a big boy!?
Kyos
Kyos - 1/20/2014, 9:13 AM
She's a talented actress, and really cute. Not sure about her as MJ, though.
CaptainJugular77
CaptainJugular77 - 1/20/2014, 9:13 AM
Whether the fan uproar had a part in it or not, it's a shame that people gave this girl so much shit based on photos of her GOING TO THE SET. Probably after having just woken up. You just can't go by those - set photos made Mila Kunis look ugly. The girl is pretty, as seen in any other pictures/films she was in. Regardless, the fact that people made such a big deal out of it is stupid. Fans need to choose whether they want some eye candy model/Megan Fox type who can't act their way out of a paper bag, or an actual actress who would do the character justice. And simply put, Shailene Woodley can act.
MsDarkPhoenix
MsDarkPhoenix - 1/20/2014, 9:13 AM
Gusto wants Miley for MJ but I think Bieber would be better to play her.
superan
superan - 1/20/2014, 9:14 AM
That's unfortunate...she's such a charming, charismatic actress. Hopefully she stays in the franchise.
DraculaX
DraculaX - 1/20/2014, 9:14 AM
Ah Woodley gate, such a crazy time.


theowl
theowl - 1/20/2014, 9:14 AM
MrFridayNights

haha, okay
DraculaX
DraculaX - 1/20/2014, 9:15 AM
I don't know which casting had the most uproar this year. MJ/Woodley, Gadot/WW or Batfleck. I guess Batfleck.
1 2 3 4 5
View Recorder