Will Sony Pictures Introduce Its Own Version Of SPIDER-MAN In Future Non-MCU Movies?

Will Sony Pictures Introduce Its Own Version Of SPIDER-MAN In Future Non-MCU Movies?

With rumblings online that Sony Pictures may introduce its own Spider-Man in future movies not set in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, we're exploring whether there's any truth to that and what it means...

By JoshWilding - Dec 15, 2024 07:12 AM EST
Filed Under: Spider-Man
Source: Variety

Like the X-Men, Fantastic Four, Blade, Daredevil, and more, Spider-Man was always off-limits to Marvel Studios. There had long been chatter about the web-slinger appearing in the MCU - who could forget that fake "leaked" post-credits scene for Avengers: Age of Ultron - but it never seemed likely.

In the mid-2010s, Sony Pictures had its own plans for Spidey, including at least two more movies in The Amazing Spider-Man franchise and a Sinister Six project from Drew Goddard. 

However, when The Amazing Spider-Man 2 underperformed and leaked "Sony Hack" emails revealed that Kevin Feige and Amy Pascal had at least discussed the possibility of a crossover, the decision was made to bring Peter Parker into the MCU. 

That happened with 2016's Captain America: Civil War, with Spider-Man: Homecoming, Spider-Man: Far From Home, and - following a brief spat which saw the Russo Brothers and Tom Holland get involved - Spider-Man: No Way Home. Since then, a new deal has been reached to extend this partnership. 

Despite the massive success of those Spider-Man movies, Sony forged ahead with its own universe inhabited by Venom, Morbius and, in supposedly "standalone" tales, Madame Web and Kraven the Hunter. There have been a couple of box office hits but the rest have failed and all were mostly hated by fans and critics. 

Recently, Variety explained that Sony could have used Spider-Man at any time in those movies; the reason that didn't happen is because Venom's success in 2018 gave the studio false confidence and executives were aware fans would reject seeing Spidey in non-MCU projects. 

While Sony now intends to shift focus to Spider-Man 4, Spider-Man: Beyond the Spider-Verse, and Spider-Noir, you may have seen chatter on social media about there being plans to use a new version of the wall-crawler in future movies. That appears to be based on comments from Exhibitor Relations analyst Jeff Bock who told the trade, "You could hire a different Spider-Man. It doesn’t have to be Tom."

He's not wrong and it's hard to figure out why Ben Reilly, Miles Morales, Spider-Gwen, or any number of Peter Parker Variants haven't been used in these movies. After all, we'll soon get The Brave and the Bold and The Batman Part II in close proximity to one another and no one was confused by Tom Holland's Peter Parker not factoring into the animated Spider-Verse movies. 

Of course, there are two compelling and likely possibilities for Sony moving forward: Tobey Maguire's Spider-Man or, even more likely than that, Andrew Garfield's. Alas, it's impossible to imagine either actor being willing to return without a major improvement in creative (which would surely require Avi Arad's departure).

What do you think? As always, you can let us know your thoughts in the comments section.

New Report Reveals Real Reason Sony Never Used SPIDER-MAN In Movies Like VENOM, MORBIUS, And KRAVEN THE HUNTER
Related:

New Report Reveals Real Reason Sony Never Used SPIDER-MAN In Movies Like VENOM, MORBIUS, And KRAVEN THE HUNTER

SPIDER-MAN 4: Willem Dafoe Reveals Whether He Could Return As Green Goblin In Spidey's Next MCU Movie
Recommended For You:

SPIDER-MAN 4: Willem Dafoe Reveals Whether He Could Return As Green Goblin In Spidey's Next MCU Movie

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Razorface1
Razorface1 - 12/15/2024, 7:18 AM
They cant. Hence the movies they are making.
Nonameforme
Nonameforme - 12/15/2024, 8:34 AM
@Razorface1 - they can because they own the rights.
marvel72
marvel72 - 12/15/2024, 7:23 AM
Put Miles Morales in the Spider-Man Super villain universe.
BraveNewClunge
BraveNewClunge - 12/15/2024, 9:02 AM
@marvel72 - nah he deserves better than that trash.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 12/15/2024, 7:23 AM
Still think they should've already. Even if it's just for short scenes where it's just Spider-Man. That way they can get Andrew Garfield just to voice him, or maybe even Josh Keaton
Godzilla2000Zer
Godzilla2000Zer - 12/15/2024, 7:29 AM
They missed that boat completely
JustAWaffle
JustAWaffle - 12/15/2024, 7:43 AM
User Comment Image
Feralwookiee
Feralwookiee - 12/15/2024, 8:11 AM
It's another one of these articles where the headline poses a question that could be answered with a single word:

User Comment Image
Superspecialawesomeguy
Superspecialawesomeguy - 12/15/2024, 8:27 AM
Fire Avi Arad first before you make any other hasty decisions Sony. #fireaviarad

User Comment Image
Superspecialawesomeguy
Superspecialawesomeguy - 12/15/2024, 8:46 AM
@Superspecialawesomeguy - That being said if they are getting another Spidey (and Garfield isn't available) I always thought Charlie Rowe would make a great Peter Parker back when he was in the running to play him in the MCU.

User Comment Image

User Comment Image

(Also he very much looks freakishly like the Peter in The Spectacular Spider-Man tv show).

User Comment Image

User Comment Image
RegularPoochie
RegularPoochie - 12/15/2024, 9:53 AM
@Superspecialawesomeguy - Good choices!
OptimusCrime
OptimusCrime - 12/15/2024, 8:39 AM
Ofcourse they are.

Same horrible movies but now with a rushed added Spider-Man to get people into those seats
GrilledLove87
GrilledLove87 - 12/15/2024, 8:46 AM
I’ve been saying this for years! I’m sure I’m not alone, especially after reading this! Avi Arad needs to GO! Shoot take Drunk Amy with you! Those two haven’t done shit for this character. It was the directors and the actors playing the character that make these movies so special. Those two knuckleheads put their damn two cents in everything and ruin it time after time! Apparently Sony has liked losing money for so long with these stupid ideas, they kept running with it! Time for it to stop and to FINALLY course correct. Let a company who knows how to handle these things, handle it. Sit back and make money!
Ha1frican
Ha1frican - 12/15/2024, 9:13 AM
As long as it’s not Tom I’d say it’s fine. Keep him in the MCU and then have you own variant I guess
Forthas
Forthas - 12/15/2024, 9:24 AM
There are two options that I think would work for both studios

1 Sony could make streaming shows that feature Holland's Spiderman in street level adventures only! While Marvel uses him in features films only. Sony could still have the animated universe that features Miles Morales. Both would have access to Spidey supporting characters.

2) Find some reasonable combination of money and IPs that Disney can fork over and return Spiderman to Marvel.
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 12/15/2024, 9:53 AM
Holy heck, I’m guessing IQ tests were never performed on Amy Pascal and Sony execs.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder