Zack Synder's Vision

Zack Synder's Vision

What a "Realistic" Superman Movie means

Editorial Opinion
By Tenaciousbt - Apr 03, 2011 01:04 PM EST
Filed Under: Superman

First of all I just want to say that I am not affiliated with the Superman movie, Warner Brothers or in any way associated with the film. This is all my pure speculation, and educated guessing.


I “think” I have an idea of what the vision is for Superman. People are misunderstanding Zack Snyder’s explanation of what “realistic” means, so I will try to clear things up.


Now, let’s talk about the cool part about being more realistic. Superman’s abilities make him very powerful but also very smart. A being that can move as fast as he does must be able to think faster as well. So Superman is much smarter than he is ever been given credit for on screen. Next, since the audience is getting smarter I think they can handle knowing more about how his powers work and that will open up some interesting avenues of vulnerability. For instance how he gets his great strength and speed and of course how he fly’s. A sophisticated enemy could use this knowledge against him without always resorting to Kryptonite. Of course he would overcome attempts to interrupt his abilities with his formidable and quite intact intellect. Also when fighting a Super-powered enemy; Superman, being a smart and compassionate Alien would at least make an attempt to lead the fight out of the city. I never get why the “entire” fight always occurs within the city. Sure it looks cool, but Superman would know that this puts him at a disadvantage. Even if he isn’t entirely successful he would at least attempt to move the fight out to a more secluded place where he could really cut loose with his powers. For instance he could use his heat vision with suggest intensity that it would be like a Nuclear bomb.


Next, realistic doesn't mean that Superman can't pick up a car or use his Superpowers; it means that he can't pick a car up from the bumper. The bumper will break first. It means that no matter how strong he is, the weakest link will always break first, so when Superman wants to save the day he has to be careful. If he wants to pick the car up and not damage it, he has to do it from an angle that works. He can't fly in at 300mph and move someone out of the way of a bullet or other peril because if you fly into someone at 300mph it will kill them. So instead he would need to huddle over them or stop the materials from falling on them, that sort of thing.


Also, he could not run Superfast into the middle of the Daily Planet or leave the Daily Planet at super speed without causing a huge air displacement that would be like 50kt winds (enough that everyone would notice). You can't do that 10 times a day everyday without someone noticing. So the real "Physics" have to be considered. It doesn't mean that he can't run superfast or fly superfast or be super strong. He just has to be more careful, where, when, and how he does it. And that is pretty cool. Remember, he lives in a world made of "cardboard" he is always constantly considering how to maneuver in a very brittle world.


Lastly and briefly, don’t forget about the realistic side of the mental state of a being with the Powers of Superman. How much does he enjoy it and struggle with the powers and responsibility respectively. How often does he think about how easy it would be to stop all the Wars and just take over the whole thing? Even though he is the Boy Scout and is incorruptible he must still occasionally struggle with the brutality of the world and must harken back to his human upbringing in order to convince himself that it isn’t his place to be a ruler. He is surrounded by a whole world full of people but must feel totally alone, separate, alien. People are so unbelievably fragile to him that, even though he makes it look easy, he can never forget that he is different and that he can’t make mistakes.

We May Know Who The First Big Threat To The DCU Is Already And How They Play Into SUPERMAN
Related:

We May Know Who The First Big Threat To The DCU Is Already And How They Play Into SUPERMAN

SUPERMAN Director James Gunn Responds To Rumor He Fired VFX Team And Reveals Hidden Cameo In Trailer
Recommended For You:

SUPERMAN Director James Gunn Responds To Rumor He Fired VFX Team And Reveals Hidden Cameo In Trailer

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Exiles
Exiles - 4/3/2011, 1:37 PM
he didn't say the movie was going to be "realistic", he meant it was going to be the most "realistic" looking movie for him its not going to be as heavily stylised like some of his previous work.
Ethic
Ethic - 4/3/2011, 2:02 PM
Great read, well thought out.
I actually hadn't considered some of what you said.

Seeing as the script came from the Nolans and Goyer I'd imagine you're spot on with your guess.
Less "TA-DAA! SAVED!"
More of a realistic physicality dictated by physics, and a man who knows the destructive ability of his powers.
Tenaciousbt
Tenaciousbt - 4/3/2011, 2:21 PM
@ Exiles,

You are right he has said that, but more than that he has said more than once that this will be the most "realistic" film he has ever done. I don't think he means just stylistically but also literally. Also Henry Cavill has made mention to the realistic nature of Superman in the film.
KeithM
KeithM - 4/3/2011, 2:56 PM
Well written article - and how I see it too. :thup:

All the powers, but in a realistic looking and feeling world.

I wrote an article about that kind of thing a while back, so that's exactly the kind of interpretation I'd like to see.
Tenaciousbt
Tenaciousbt - 4/3/2011, 3:05 PM
Thanks Keith. I am glad you liked it.

I can imagine a Superman movie in my mind that is TOTALLY and COMPLETELY different from anything that has ever been done, and it jives with this more "realistic" move Snyder talks about. If he makes anything like what I imagine, this movie will go down as the Greatest Superhero movie of all time. And I suspect he is, and it will.
Knightstalker
Knightstalker - 4/3/2011, 3:24 PM
Excellent read. I'd be interested in your thoughts on why he would wear the costume that he does, then maybe all the hissy fits about changing the costume would go away.
deathoncredit
deathoncredit - 4/3/2011, 4:17 PM
This is by the far the most insightful and well-written editorial that I've seen on this website. I tip my imaginary hat to you, good sir.
Tenaciousbt
Tenaciousbt - 4/3/2011, 4:46 PM
Thanks, Deathoncredit!
Tenaciousbt
Tenaciousbt - 4/3/2011, 4:53 PM
Well the costume is tricky in a way, but is also simple. It has undergone relatively very little change since the late 30’s. And most of the changes were to the symbol itself. The mythology around the suit says that Superman got it from his Mother or as in Superman the movie when he simply came back from training with his father wearing it.

Changing the suit is tricky, while there are plenty of literary ways of justifying it; it will be controversial depending on the depth of the changes. It would be best not to make significant changes to the suit but instead to focus on the function of the suit.

It would need to be form fitting with no 3D shaping coming off of it. The closer it is to his skin the better. This is because his body generates a kind of bio shielding several millimeters off the surface of his skin which extends his invulnerability to tight fitting cloths. That’s why other than his cape there is rarely if any damage done to the suit except in the most serious and highly energetic events. Speaking of the Cape; it is of almost zero help to Superman but is arguably just as recognizable as the symbol on his chest. So the Cape stays. The explanation is simply that it’s Kryptonian style. Now back to the function of the suit. It’s like I said, Superman is smart and he knows that he is going to be exposed to fires, explosions, gun fire, to say the least and he knows that walking around potentially naked isn’t exactly going to give him the image he is looking for. So the tights make since in order to stay decent. The tights being so… “Tight” and with decency in mind, the groin area becomes a concern so an additional layer of clothing is added to that area to preserve modesty.

Another aspect to the suit is the colors which are purposefully bright. Bright colors are pleasing to human eyes and when you are trying to establish yourself as a symbol of hope and goodness but not the divine you would want to choose bright colors not dark and stay away from white.

Lastly, the brighter and more loud the colors on the suit are the more they can distant people from seeing how much Superman looks like Clark Kent.
LP4
LP4 - 4/3/2011, 5:07 PM
@tenaciousbt- Nice article bud. Things are looking up for this film- Snyder has been making all the right decisions thus far! ;D
JDUKE25
JDUKE25 - 4/3/2011, 5:36 PM
@tenaciousbt very nice article there, and also a very good explanation of the suit.
Tenaciousbt
Tenaciousbt - 4/3/2011, 6:06 PM
@LP4, and jduck25,

Thanks guys!
supermyass
supermyass - 4/3/2011, 6:27 PM
Ok, good, I agree, BUT, how can you explain the underwear. I am one of those who think that in spit of how iconic is the costume, its time for a change. Dont get me wrong, i love superman and i love the costume, but in order to bring new generations to understand how important it was and how important still can be, you have to adapt it to the new age, and from my point of view, there's no way you can take serious a superhero with red undies.
Tenaciousbt
Tenaciousbt - 4/3/2011, 6:32 PM
@ Supermyass

Please see my comment above about the suit. I specifically talk about why an extra “layer of fabric, in this case” underwear would be used.

Now that being said, it doesn't absolutely have to be underwear, but something needs to be over the tights in that area to preserve modesty.
mastarockafella
mastarockafella - 4/3/2011, 9:35 PM
Very good article. I am exactly thinking of the same thing. Also, the previous mistakes in the law of physics in the previous Superman movies are subject to be corrected by Zack Snyder in his Superman films. A lot flaws in the past, but like the article said, people are getting smarter and smarter and Zack needs to consider that in this upcoming reboot. His super powers should correspond to the law of motion.
TMNTDude
TMNTDude - 4/4/2011, 12:43 PM
I think people want to see Superman keep his iconic suit, but don’t see how it would make sense or be believable. Superman’s suit has nothing to do with functionality and never will. You have to establish why he would wear it and that would be a connection to Krypton. The original idea behind the design was to make it a space suit. Do just that. Jor-El can place the suit in the spaceship that Superman arrives on earth in. Jor-El explains that this suit represents Krypton and that Superman should act as protector of the people of Earth. Make it become part of his identity. He realizes that he is different and wants to connect with people, not as Superman, but Clark Kent. He puts this suit on to establish that he is an alien, he is different, he is Superman and is identifiable for that reason. Changing the suite does nothing to make him seem more modern. Why would anyone where a costume that didn’t protect them or cover their face? Identity is the only reason.
bubba27
bubba27 - 4/4/2011, 9:59 PM
@tenaciousbt

I think you've been reading my mind especially about how to explain red underwear/trunks and o yeah great article
View Recorder