Samuel L Jackson Still Isn't Sure About being in Thor

Samuel L Jackson Still Isn't Sure About being in Thor

Samuel L. Jackson talks with Access’ Scott “Movie” Mantz about his role as Nick Fury in “Iron Man 2,” and addresses whether or not he will be making an appearance in the upcoming 2011 movie, “Thor.”

News
By DCMarvelFreshman - Mar 16, 2010 04:03 PM EST
Filed Under: Thor
Source: Acess Hollwood



The 2010 Sundance Film Festival is getting alot of steam. Now Samuel L Jackson, again, still isn't sure about being in Thor. Check out the vid from Acess Hollywood



It's pretty obvious that Nick Fury won't be in the actual film, but maybe after the credits. It's really smart Marvel didn't try to force the character in the film, just cause the the 9-pic deal.
THOR 5: Chris Hemsworth Addresses His MCU Future And Says That There's Nothing Official (Yet)
Related:

THOR 5: Chris Hemsworth Addresses His MCU Future And Says That There's "Nothing Official" (Yet)
RUMOR: THOR 5 Scheduled To Film Next Year; Writer And Director Currently Being Sought
Recommended For You:

RUMOR: THOR 5 Scheduled To Film Next Year; Writer And Director Currently Being Sought
DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Do you have what it takes to write for us?
Want to contribute?
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 3/16/2010, 4:35 PM
Lets hope he isn't in it!

The less ULTIMATE FURY the better!!! ; D
IronClad
IronClad - 3/16/2010, 4:35 PM
Sammy! He has to be in it!
HelaGood
HelaGood - 3/16/2010, 4:36 PM
yeah im with LEEE... too much Nick would be a bad thing...
Phinehas
Phinehas - 3/16/2010, 4:37 PM
I bet they will waste one of the nine films for a walk on.
That's big money to get nerdgasms.
DCMarvelFreshman
DCMarvelFreshman - 3/16/2010, 4:38 PM
I'm really sure he won't be in the film. Leave that up to Clark Gregg
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 3/16/2010, 4:44 PM
HelaGood @ YAY! : D

FRESHMAN @ Fingers crossed lol!
Urban8er
Urban8er - 3/16/2010, 4:44 PM
They have two films down already what other ones would they have him in.
McLovin
McLovin - 3/16/2010, 4:46 PM
His presence would not be needed. If anything, they need just a few Shield agents to maybe address the Thunder God into possibly joining their initiative.
DCMarvelFreshman
DCMarvelFreshman - 3/16/2010, 4:47 PM
Marvel doesn't exactly have 9 future films planned. "nine" is at least the amount of films he could make an appearance in.

Joe6Pack74
Joe6Pack74 - 3/16/2010, 4:51 PM
Mabey they could have Nick Fury in Asgard but played by David Hasselhoff. It could be an epic failure on a whole new plane of existence. :)
OdinsBeard
OdinsBeard - 3/16/2010, 4:55 PM
coolest dude alive.
rkeyes
rkeyes - 3/16/2010, 4:59 PM
What an awkward and socially...inept dude interview them
RedDevil
RedDevil - 3/16/2010, 5:03 PM
I say have shield agents get him not Fury. Frequent Fury appearances can get annoying a bit.
Ranger14
Ranger14 - 3/16/2010, 5:13 PM
I don't have an issue either way as long as there is a tie-in to the Avengers.
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 3/16/2010, 5:17 PM
tea: LMAO, hilarious as always man! :)

I hope he's in it - it'll be cool to see him approach Thor in some way! As long as it doesnt feel forced then I think that the more Nick Fury the better! Good stuff MF!

Guys, check out my SQUADRON SUPREME Fan Cast!!! Just click the link!!!
DogsOfWar
DogsOfWar - 3/16/2010, 5:24 PM
The nine pic deal is for sequels as well guys. If everything goes off you could see another IM movie, maybe 1-2 more solo Thor or Cap movies, Ant-Man, Avengers sequels and so on and so on.

Marvel is looking at things with a 10 year plan
bleedthefreak
bleedthefreak - 3/16/2010, 5:25 PM
@LEEE777 i may not hate ultimate spider man but i agree the less ultimate fury the better and i am gonna muder someone(CBM murder=sit in my computer chair and talk about how im gonna or how much i want to murder someone)if they even come close to the ultimate thor costume
InFamouslyCool
InFamouslyCool - 3/16/2010, 5:41 PM
cool. not sure why people need to see him in EVERY single CBM.
WOLVERINEDECADE
WOLVERINEDECADE - 3/16/2010, 5:42 PM
@ teabag:

that's so sick!! now im always worried every night i go to sleep he might pop in beside me!! LOL!!! :D
Ryden
Ryden - 3/16/2010, 5:44 PM
Sam makes a good point, they would want to waste one of Sam's roles by having him walk in and say a few lines. I like Sam as Fury, Ultimate or not I think eh;s gonna do a good job and I'd actually like to see more of him...just as long as everyone else is 616 it's kusty :)
whatsinthebox
whatsinthebox - 3/16/2010, 5:47 PM
If you have him contracted for 9 movies. Use him. how sweet would it be if he just "Popped up" in the WW2 portion of Captain America. Remember just a little Sam goes a long ways. Maybe just long enough to say Mother Fricker and tie some woman to a radiator
selinakyle
selinakyle - 3/16/2010, 5:52 PM
I dont think he needs to be in it.
selinakyle
selinakyle - 3/16/2010, 5:54 PM
9 picture deal. How much money is that? He needs to adopt me like yesterday.
supermarioworldE
supermarioworldE - 3/16/2010, 6:15 PM
The dude is in his 50's and he still looks like he could kick my Ass.

selinakyle
selinakyle - 3/16/2010, 6:27 PM
juggy4711
juggy4711 - 3/16/2010, 6:33 PM
He really needs to be in it. He is the center piece of the Marvel Movieverse, the glue that binds the other films together. He should be in IM2, Thor, and Cap to cement the idea that these flicks take place in the same world. Sure fanboys and girls already know that but his appearances are going to be the most obvious link for general movie audiences rather than SHIELD alone.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 3/16/2010, 7:46 PM
hahah, every time I see it, its still funny:)

"HOWS IT TASTE MOTHER[frick]A"
selinakyle
selinakyle - 3/16/2010, 8:51 PM
YEA THEY DESERVED TO DIE AND I HOPE THE BURN IN HELL!
EditNinja
EditNinja - 3/16/2010, 10:28 PM
Yeah, Nick Fury after the credits, maybe two lines - bring that on!
cologne
cologne - 3/17/2010, 2:47 AM
If they are using any of the Straczynski stuff from the comics (where Asgard is relocated to Oklahoma) I think a Fury appearance really makes sense, since someone has to make contact with the Asgardians on earth
SolidSnake
SolidSnake - 3/17/2010, 4:50 AM
I do like the ultimate Sammy but anyone reading "Secret Warriors' most underrated book out. Fury is one awesome special op character not to put on screen!
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 3/17/2010, 5:23 AM
i guess people forget that he wasn't in the Incredible Hulk??? they can still tie Thor in with the other movies without Fury, Incredible Hulk found a way to do it just fine...
LuckyKyd
LuckyKyd - 3/17/2010, 8:17 AM
I think it is nice that they are saving him for more important cameos and possibly a Nick Fury and the Howling Commandoes film. ;)

@Corndog: Hey buddy, How's it goin'? - And you hit the nail right on the head there!
They can still tie it in beautifully, perhaps with Coulson or maybe Hawkeye, as some was talking about...

Remember guys, Nick Fury is the head director, he has people, who can attent to the things he doesn't have the time to get around to.
Mari
Mari - 3/18/2010, 9:43 AM
As much as I hate him as Nick Fury, he needs to at least make a cameo in the film. He ties all the superheros together to ultimately show the Avengers as a unit.
Related Headlines
Latest Headlines

Hot Headlines Hot Headlines

Sci-Fi & Fantasy

Anime & Manga

Gaming

Horror

Cartoons & Animated Features

Action Movies & TV

Pro Wrestling & MMA News
View Recorder