My Issue With The DC Cinematic Universe

My Issue  With The DC Cinematic Universe

After having Batman v. Superman disappoint me, and Marvel continue success with Captain America: Civil War has allowed me to point out where the DC Cinematic Universe went wrong.

Editorial Opinion
By SherronWatson - May 18, 2016 06:05 AM EST
Filed Under: DC
Since the release of Iron Man in 2008, I've always dreamed of a fully realized Marvel Cinematic Universe. A universe where, not only the Avengers and the characters from the current line of Marvel movies existed. A world that also included Spider-Man, the Fantastic Four, the X-Men and the other characters Marvel sold the cinematic rights for. With Captain America: Civil War, it shows it was possible since Spider-Man managed to make the jump from Sony Pictures and, in return, Iron Man’s gonna help out the Web-Head in his next film!

I'm Now, the biggest reason why I would want this to happen is because, simply put, Marvel movies are probably the most entertaining superheroes movies today. So, of course, DC is going to try their best to play catch up and produce their own slew of mega-blockbuster films starring their characters. Unfortunately, after seeing the rather uninspired and lifeless Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice, I can’t say they’re doing a good job. You would think it would be easy for DC to make fantastic films based on their superhero properties. They have the more iconic heroes in my opinion. They’re already proven that they could make a Justice League; if you seen the animated series of the same name (like I have,) you’ll know putting up the team on the big screen has a lot of potential. Yet, it doesn’t seem to be going so well. But why does it seem like DC’s superhero movies are just not as good as the Marvel film? Well, there’s probably a laundry list of issues true fans have with them but I can tell you my two main issues with the current DC Movie Universe. 
 



First is the lack of joy and happiness from their heroes. I can understand why Batman is so sad and angry all the time. His parents were murdered in front of his eyes and he never really got a chance to be a kid. Bruce Wayne essentially grew up into an adult in that instant. So what’s Clark Kent’s reason? Why is he so sullen exactly? Oh, sure, he’s the ultimate outsider as he’s not from this planet. But, in Man of Steel, it looks like he was raised by loving adoptive parents and he actually got a chance to go out and socialize with other kids. He, from what I’ve seen, had a pretty decent childhood. He still had a chance to experience the joys of being a kid. Yet, throughout Man of Steel, he just focuses on being an alien and never really experiences any joy except for that one scene where he realizes he can fly. That was my favorite scene of Man of Steel because it actually shows that Clark Kent/Superman is more than just a superhero. He’s actually a person with emotions. Who knows the thrill of doing something amazing.  
 

 The second thing is actually the bigger reason of the two: the DC Movie Universe looks like they don’t have a clear direction on what to do. They’ve got the general vision of what to do: make a series of movies based on their superhero properties. But how to actually do it? I don’t think they have a plan on how to get there. And I think this is because they don’t have a visionary like Kevin Feige moving all the pieces from behind the scenes. I did a bit of research on the character and it seems like he knows his Marvel history. He got his big break when he was hired to be an associate producer for the first X-Men film because of his apparent vast knowledge of the comics. He then pretty much helped out on practically each and every movie dealing with Marvel characters since then! Essentially, he’s the one who’s holding the entire Marvel Cinematic Universe together and giving it a specific direction.


Now, I don’t think there’s someone like Kevin Feige who has an overall view of where all of these movies will lead to. They know they want a Justice League movie so they know they’ll need to introduce all the characters eventually. But it seems like they’re rushing everything. Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice is just their second film in their entire Universe. Yet they already introduced Wonder Woman, who hasn’t gotten her own movie. But, after they do make the Wonder Woman film, apparently, the next film slated is gonna be the Justice League! Only after that time, they’ll release a standalone movie for The Flash, Aquaman and Shazam.. and then another Justice League film that slated for release in 2019! I don’t get why DC is going to give us a Justice League movie before even introducing the other members! Why will I care for The Flash if he teams up with Batman and Wonder Woman when I don’t even know who he is?


Marvel took their time to make us care for these characters so, when they did come together in The Avengers, we knew each and every one of their personalities. I don’t think we’ll get the same thing when the Justice League does form next year. DC’s movie future is looking to be as dark as their films. They’re moving too fast for us to properly introduce characters and DC probably think we like it because all their movies are going to make money no matter what. I have the sneaking suspicion DC already knows we’ll go watch all their upcoming movies no matter the level of quality. Heck, I wouldn’t be surprised if they made Aquaman a 2-1/3 hour loop of Rick Ashley’s “Never Gonna Give You Up” and people would still go watch it even though they know it’s just a huge rickroll. 

Thankfully, there is one upcoming DC movie that actually looks like it could break their dark and gritty mold. And I’ll talk more about my expectations for Suicide Squad next time.

What’s your opinion on the direction DC is taking with their movies? Let me know in the comments section below!


 

ZATANNA: DC Comics' Mistress Of Magic Returns In New Series From Writer/Artist Jamal Campbell
Related:

ZATANNA: DC Comics' Mistress Of Magic Returns In New Series From Writer/Artist Jamal Campbell

RED HOOD FAN SERIES Exclusive: Martial Artist Ian Lang Says WINTER SOLDIER Is More Believable Than DAREDEVIL
Recommended For You:

RED HOOD FAN SERIES Exclusive: Martial Artist Ian Lang Says WINTER SOLDIER Is More Believable Than DAREDEVIL

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Forthas
Forthas - 5/18/2016, 9:33 AM
Warner Brothers and by extension DC screwed up ROYALLY when they said goodbye to the world that Christopher Nolan introduced through his Dark Knight films. There was NOTHING that prevented WB from incorporating Man of Steel with the Dark Knight films which would have put them light years ahead of where they are now. Both film franchises (especially the origin stories) complemented each other in the way they were filmed (look) and in the way the stories were told - in a nonlinear fashion. The nonsense that the Batman movies are “too realistic” doesn’t hold water unless you believe in : a microwave emitter that turns water in to gas instantly; a bat-mobile (which is essentially a tank) that can jump from building to building; a device that can summon swarms of bats; a gadget that can reconstruct shattered bullets; a man who walks around with half his face burned off; a sonar device that takes over peoples cell phone to create a sonic image of anyplace in the world; a mercenary who is able to punch through concrete pillars without breaking his hands; or a program that can wipe out your entire existence from every computer on earth.

Just like Iron Man did with the Marvel Universe, the Dark Knight films could have laid the ground work for a shared universe. What’s more, marketing wise it would have been the gift that keeps on giving for WB. Since Batman Begins predates Iron Man, it takes away Marvel's claim that they were the first to start their shared universe. If the Dark Knight films were incorporated with Man of Steel, three of their first four films in the DC universe would have been among the most critically acclaimed. The combination of the actors from both franchises have collectively more critical praise than that of Marvels and in fact an onscreen meeting between Christian Bale’s Bruce Wayne and Amy Adam’s Lois Lane could have been a marketing bonanza for WB since both actors are well known for playing opposite one another in celebrated films such as "the Boxer" and "American Hustle." Furthermore, you would already have four super heroes established (Batman, Superman, Catwoman, and a variation on Nightwing from the Dark Knight Rises). In addition to that, the next film would be the studio's fifth movie in the shared universe as opposed to what is now only it’s second (Batman v Superman). WB has bungled this so badly, it is worse than how they trashed the Batman movies in the 1990’s. The reason that WB is in such a weak position when it comes to its DC properties is because of bad decisions plain and simple. They had (and still have) opportunities but some idiot (read Zack Snyder) has steered them in the wrong direction convincing people that the Dark Knight films do not mesh with the broader DC universe. I know for a fact that is not true. I have a series of fan made stories that do what Snyder claimed could not be done in an astonishingly clever way.

Marvel took a proven formula and ran with it. DC had a proven formula and flushed it down the toilet and everyone is worse off as a result including the studio.

Simply pathetic!
TheRockmore
TheRockmore - 5/18/2016, 9:44 AM
@Forthas -

"Warner Brothers and by extension DC screwed up ROYALLY when they said goodbye to the world that Christopher Nolan introduced through his Dark Knight films. There was NOTHING that prevented WB from incorporating Man of Steel with the Dark Knight films which would have put them light years ahead of where they are now. "

So you would have wanted a terrible adaptation of Batman to serve as Batman in the DCEU? lol pass
Forthas
Forthas - 5/18/2016, 11:14 AM
@TheArrowverse - Ohh...that's right! A "terrible adaptation" of Batman:

1) Whose movies twice cracked $1 billion worldwide (without the use of 3D screens);
2) Whose second outing is arguably the best comic book movie ever made;
3) Whose trilogy has earned more than any other thus far including Iron man and Spider-man; and
4) Whose movies average RT critic scores AND audience scores are higher than any other comic book trilogy ever made!

I will take that ANY and EVERY day!!!!
GreenLantern519
GreenLantern519 - 5/19/2016, 8:41 AM
Clark is so sullen in BvS because he's being protested in the streets by the people he's trying to protect, he feels like more of an outsider than ever.
GreenLantern519
GreenLantern519 - 5/19/2016, 8:42 AM
@GreenLantern519 - I do think they should have shown more of Clark's side of things in the film though. Something as simple as him saving a cat out of a tree for a child but their parent being uneasy/scared around him would've been enough to highlight this point.
ThunderKat
ThunderKat - 5/19/2016, 3:42 PM
@Forthas,

How would you continue with a closed chapter that was 'Dark Knight Rises?' I mean that in terms of content, not actors and director.
Forthas
Forthas - 5/20/2016, 6:39 AM
@ThunderKat - The EXACT way they did with Iron Man. As you may recall...at the end of Iron Man 3 - Tony Stark removed his Arch reactor and blew up his suits suggesting a "closed chapter" to the Iron Man story. But because he is not dead, he is always available to return in the team up movies and co-starring roles.

Such is also the case with the Dark Knight. Ironically the situation that Bruce Wayne is in at the end of the Dark Knight Rises - living overseas, presumed dead, and all of his fortune given to Alfred is exactly the situation he was in when he started as Batman. Which means there is nothing that would prevent his resuming his role once again.

Even the current film Batman v Superman or the graphic novel "the Dark Knight Returns" has Batman coming out of retirement not to mention he was retired at the end of the Dark Knight and came back when he was needed.
ThunderKat
ThunderKat - 5/19/2016, 3:48 PM
@SherronWatson ,

You are correct. You can have melodrama and lots of development. Your characters (not the properties the actualized characters) need to be likable.

For instance, I liked the intent of MoS, not the execution. I blame writing and directing. This is an easy slope to slide down. "Smallville" is the perfect example. Without delving to far in to that, I was tired of Clark being miserable. He had to "drug" himself with Red K to enjoy his powers. The show was palatable largely due to the other characters.
Sure, Bats is miserable. But you have to make us sympathize. In fewer than thirty years, we've seen his parents killed before him numerous times. Okay, but make it personal or show how he is compensating for a lack of true vengeance.
SherronWatson
SherronWatson - 5/21/2016, 11:15 PM
@ThunderKat - I really appreciate your kind words, I also hope that you're able to read and comment on more articles of mine in the future.
TomSolo
TomSolo - 5/20/2016, 12:11 AM
I think DC's main issue is that, while all of their properties are under 1 roof, they are not an independent studio. Yes, I know Marvel Studios is owned by Disney, but, like LucasFilms, they are their own operation, with little intrusion from the Mouse, so long as they keep making the Mouse tons of money.

DC is somewhat being treated as a film franchise now, but not as a studio. It seems their films go through a similar process as the other WB properties. If the DCCU fails, WB will just go make other movies. So this is not an all-or-nothing deal for WB.

Marvel has nothing but superhero movies to make. If they fail, they aren't going to start making rom-coms or pirate flicks. They are done. They pressure to make this cinematic universe work drives them to put out films that will sell. WB has other options, Marvel does not.

I'm not saying 1 is better, I'm just saying that Marvel's entire studio team is behind making certain this works, whereas this is not the case with WB. If the DC franchise fails, it will, to them, be like any other brand they own that might fail.
View Recorder