HOUSE OF THE DRAGON: Was Aemond Trying To Kill [SPOILER]? Actor Ewan Mitchell Weighs In

HOUSE OF THE DRAGON: Was Aemond Trying To Kill [SPOILER]? Actor Ewan Mitchell Weighs In

This week's episode of House of the Dragon featured the fiery - and devastating - Battle of Rook's Rest, and actor Ewan Mitchell has now addressed his character's actions...

By MarkCassidy - Jul 08, 2024 02:07 PM EST
Filed Under: Game of Thrones
Source: Via SFF Gazette

Aemond Targaryen is really leaning into the whole kinslayer thing!

This week's fourth episode of House of the Dragon concluded with an aerial "Dance of the Dragons," and the devastating Battle of Rook's Rest claimed the life of one major character and severely injured (at the very least) another.

Riding Vhagar, the oldest and largest dragon alive, Aemond managed to take out Rhaenys Targaryen's dragon Meleys, sending beast and rider plummeting to a fiery death. King Aegon and Sunfye were engaged in battle with Rhaenys and Meleys when Vhagar attacked, and Aemond's first blast also hit his brother.

If the show follows George R.R. Martin's Fire and Blood, Aegon will survive (just about) with severe burns, but it certainly looked like Aemond was thinking about finishing the job back on the ground before Criston Cole interrupted.

During an interview with EW, actor Ewan Mitchell addressed his character's decision.

"It was no secret that he felt like Aegon was inferior to himself. He felt like Aegon lacked the perseverance to be a leader. Also, it's no secret that Aegon was almost the ringleader to a lot of Aemond’s childhood torment and trauma."

"I think that maybe Aemond would never have intended to burn Aegon," he added. "But it just so happened that Aegon was there tangled with Rhaenys and Meleys when he was on top of Sunfyre. It raises the question of whether or not he would've done that or if Aegon was just collateral damage. I think that's compelling. Maybe it was when Aegon brought in the Pink Dread [as children] when Aemond was like, ‘I'm going to burn him one day for this.’ Who knows?

Director Alan Taylor also weighed in: "We wanted to sustain multiple motivations that might have happened there. It's a battle move, but he did deliberately join the battle late, and he is being a little bit indiscriminate with how he's blasting fire. So I think you can believe whatever you want to believe about his motivations there.

Whatever Aemond's intentions, there's a good chance he will be crowned king - which would not be good for anyone involved in the war.

"The prequel series finds the Targaryen dynasty at the absolute apex of its power, with more than 15 dragons under their yoke. Most empires—real and imagined—crumble from such heights. In the case of the Targaryens, their slow fall begins almost 193 years before the events of Game of Thrones, when King Viserys Targaryen breaks with a century of tradition by naming his daughter Rhaenyra heir to the Iron Throne. But when Viserys later fathers a son, the court is shocked when Rhaenyra retains her status as his heir, and seeds of division sow friction across the realm."

House of the Dragon season 2 sees Matt Smith, Olivia Cooke, Emma D’Arcy, Eve Best, Steve Toussaint, Fabien Frankel, Ewan Mitchell, Tom Glynn-Carney, Sonoya Mizuno, and Rhys Ifans reprise their respective roles. Additional returning cast includes Harry Collett, Bethany Antonia, Phoebe Campbell, Phia Saban, Jefferson Hall, and Matthew Needham.

The directors for the new season are Alan Taylor (Episodes 1 & 4), Clare Kilner (Episodes 2 & 5), Geeta Patel (Episodes 3 & 8), Andrij Parekh (Episode 6), and Loni Peristere (Episode 7).

SNOW: There May Still Be Hope For HBO's Shelved GAME OF THRONES Sequel Series
Related:

SNOW: There May Still Be Hope For HBO's Shelved GAME OF THRONES Sequel Series

Warner Bros. Is Developing At Least One GAME OF THRONES Movie As Studio Looks To Expand Westeros Beyond HBO
Recommended For You:

Warner Bros. Is Developing At Least One GAME OF THRONES Movie As Studio Looks To Expand Westeros Beyond HBO

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 7/8/2024, 2:08 PM
Well...he kinda really was in the...crossfire (no pun inteded), ya know.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/8/2024, 2:19 PM
He burnt him and said

User Comment Image
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/8/2024, 2:53 PM
Aemond is waltzing up to Sunfyre and Aegon sword unsheathed before Criston catches him and hollers his name. He was going to finish the job.
Nomis929
Nomis929 - 7/8/2024, 2:57 PM
@McMurdo - I agree.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/8/2024, 3:03 PM
@McMurdo - 100%
Vigor
Vigor - 7/8/2024, 3:03 PM
@McMurdo - it would have been dumb. Forensics could show Aegon died by sword and not from blunt force or fire. He should have picked up a twig, lit it with some fire from the area, and set Aegon ablaze
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/8/2024, 3:09 PM
@Vigor - nah he is scorched from flames. A cut to the throat woulda been doable. Damage from falling through trees. Also I'm not sure Aemond was worried about getting caught. Everyone saw him blast his bro and Sunfyre
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/8/2024, 3:01 PM
This episode wasn't just arguably the best HotD episode yet, it was one of the greatest Game of Thrones episodes of all time. Ryan Condal is a brilliant showrunner and writer who thoroughly understands the importance of characterization, narrative build-up, and character motivation and restraint. This episode only hits as hard as it does emotionally because of all that comes before ...this season and last.

Star Wars fans deserve Star Wars content on this level. We deserve a series that has emotional parity with Empire Strikes Back. Andor is perhaps as close as we will ever get, and it's brilliant, but I want a series on that level that has the high fantasy dramatic stakes that Empire gave us. I want my SW version of House of the Dragon.
Nomis929
Nomis929 - 7/8/2024, 3:05 PM
@McMurdo - Again...I Agree!
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/8/2024, 3:14 PM
@McMurdo - We’ve never had Star Wars content on this level, and likely never will. It’s not a franchise that’s ever delivered prestige content, and since its conception, its only consistency is how inconsistent it’s all been.

If we’re lucky, we’ll get a KotoR adaptation that’s half as good as HoD’s worst. If we’re lucky.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/8/2024, 3:15 PM
@FireandBlood - we haven't had SW on this level since 1980's Empire. Andor is close but not quite there.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/8/2024, 3:18 PM
@McMurdo - Neither Andor or Empire holds a candle to House of the Dragon, c’mon. And I say this as a life long Star Wars fan, but you gotta take off the rose tinted goggles and be objective for a second. Star Wars is unequivocally inferior to ASOIAF even at its best.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/8/2024, 3:29 PM
@FireandBlood - buddy there is nothing rose tinted about Empire being brilliant. It's the majority opinion. Always has been and always will be. For someone who talks about Dune 2 like you .... Id think Nolan labeling Empire the standard would help to key you in. But you also think the Acolyte is genuinely a good show so I don't know. Youre entitled to like that series and not think Empire is great. But you're objectively wrong on both if you ask me my opinion. HotD is brilliant but Empire elevated what was pop space fantasy into becoming a cinematic cultural staple and the measuring stick by which follow up films are measured to this day. It took a very simple good vs evil story and elevated it into a family drama where the good guys all fail and the climax hinges on the emotional weight and stakes of that failure. Good luck arguing otherwise I mean I'm here for it. I'll never understand sequel lovers' needs to downplay Empire. It's okay to like the Last Jedi one doesn't need to become a full blown revisionist to do so. What's next you coming for the Dark Knight?
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/8/2024, 3:45 PM
@McMurdo - Empire is brilliant, but it’s still Star Wars. It’s a popcorn movie. A damn good one no doubt, but a popcorn movie all the same. It isn’t brilliant in the same sense Blade Runner is, just like it isn’t House of the Dragon. They belong to a higher echelon of entertainment.

Theres levels to this shit, and what we’re not going to do is put Star Wars on a pedestal it can’t even balance on. That’s how I can enjoy shows like The Acolyte, because I recognise Star Wars for what it is and don’t expect it deliver on a level it’s never been capable of delivering on.

If you took off those rose tinted classes, maybe you could too.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/8/2024, 3:50 PM
@FireandBlood - Empire is better than Blade Runner (a brilliant film nonetheless) side note- i laugh when people claim 2049 is in any way shape or form better lol. It's not as brilliant as Alien though. I also don't subscribe to the "SW has a ton of bad content (especially post acquisition) so it can never be great and i can totally pretend the OT wasnt overall truly fantastic and thus I can appreciate bad SW content because I've decided it was never great" attitude myself. But I'm someone who holds the opinion that the original SW is in and of itself brilliant for everything it did for the artform and simply as a fantasy story, tropes and all, and thus its sequel is absolutely on that pedestal for how it evolved that original concept dramatically. Chris Nolan, Spielberg... really so many of the greatest filmmakers of all time also put Empire on that pedestal. Deservedly so. Suffice to say youre of course quite welcome to attempt to remove it but... good luck. The culture is the culture.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/8/2024, 4:01 PM
@McMurdo - I never said Star Wars wasn’t great. I just recognise that Star Wars is Star Wars. Empire is the classic example of a sequel exceeding the original. That’s why so many filmmakers look to it as inspiration when making their sequels and you’ll notice, it only ever gets mentioned in reference to sequels. But it’s a Star Wars movie, and because of that, it lacks the narrative richness, deeper character work and superior performances so many better movies do, like Blade Runner or even its sequel, 2049. That’s not a slight against it, but it limits how good it can when held up against better works.

Nobody’s going to hold it against you if you think Empire is the best movie ever made. A lot of people love that movie. But objectively speaking, it falls short in so many departments that, when comparing it to objectively better made movies, the statement within itself that it’s ‘the best’ just rings hollow.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/8/2024, 4:12 PM
@McMurdo - Go back to the other thread, we was talking how awful it actually was to watch the dragons fight. And we’ve heard from the characters for four episodes that this is to be avoided at all costs and they actually showed us why. It’s wasn’t a cool fight scene. It wasn’t some popcorn flare. It was catastrophic and we felt that.

There’s nothing like this is Star Wars, not even Empire. Luke and Vader fighting? That shit was cool in the purest blockbuster sense, and that’s what I’m talking about. Star Wars lacks the richness other franchises like House of the Dragon do.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/8/2024, 4:57 PM
@FireandBlood - Welp...wouldn't be the film I would use to argue "deep characterization" considering Deckard's arc is that of a cynic who finds empathy. Deckard is initially self-involved and doesn't seem to value android life. He is a jaded, silent man who struggles with the moral implications of killing Replicants, even though they are inhuman. Deckard's experiences lead him to develop empathy for androids and all living things. He also feels guilt and regret as he retires more androids. That's Blade Runner. It's honestly uncanny how similar his arc is to Han's and Ford has mentioned as much in the past.

But character development is quite literally the primary reason Empire elevates above the original. Han Solo, the the self centered maverick in the first film, is now a general in the rebellion. He no longer only cares solely about the skin on his back. Throughout the film he risks his life not just for his friends, but for the cause itself. Selfishness to selflessness. He is very similar to Rick in Casablanca. His change occurs at the end of Star Wars, when he helps Luke during Death Star run. However, his selfless heroics are fully realized when he goes into the carbon freezing chamber. He goes from leader of the rebellion to martyr for the cause....doesn't try to fight anymore and he doesn't have any sarcastic licks. He just gives Chewie advice and tells Leia NOT that he loves her (because it's clear that he does), but that he knows she loves him. Han Solo officially becomes self-sacrificing in that carbon freeze chamber.....quite the change of heart from the man we first meet on Tatooine. The brilliance of Lando Calrissian is that he represents Han before his character development. Lando quite intentionally functions as the reflection of the old Han Solo, and this only helps to reinforce the full transition for Han's character during Empire's climax.

Luke begins the movie the hero of the rebellion and is REDUCED back to "the boy", a failure.....Something that moviegoers in 1980 did not expect and a narrative move that really ensured its legacy as one of the most defining arcs in cinema history, one that has been utilized in other films since, such as Nolan's The Dark Knight. The wide eyed farm boy who becomes the hero of the rebellion leaves the only known remaining Jedi, Yoda, ignoring his advice to complete his training and as a result loses to Vader, the major cost being Luke’s arm and the loss of his best friend. He fails. Honestly the icing on the cake is the familial reveal-

Luke the farm boy isn't as well-versed in galactic politics as Luke the Jedi, so he sees the problem with the Galaxy as a huge, systemic problem- This Imperial Empire. After he's somewhat familiarized himself with the details of the political landscape, he blames Vader, the most visible and powerful enforcer of the Empire. Then in Empire he learns how powerful and seductive the Dark Side really is through his training with Yoda....
and this leads to some actual sympathy for Vader. When he finds out Vader is his FATHER during the climax, it's that much easier for Luke to put himself in Vader's shoes and realize that Vader was led astray...which leads into Return of the Jedi, a film that is all about rescuing and redeeming Vader and recognizing the true evil of the galaxy: the Emperor who hungers for power over others.

I've just typed out a Bible for two protagonists......but this film woulda had to go way over your head to not see that the characterization was why the film is as relevant as it is.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/8/2024, 4:59 PM
@FireandBlood - I also never said Empire Strikes Back was the best film ever made....I said it's top tier brilliant content on par with top tier content of today....like House of the Dragon. The difference is that House of the Dragon will never leave the cultural and historical mark on the map that the Empire Strikes Back did. That's objective.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/8/2024, 5:02 PM
@FireandBlood - "It wasn’t some popcorn flare. It was catastrophic and we felt that.

There’s nothing like this is Star Wars, not even Empire. Luke and Vader fighting? That shit was cool in the purest blockbuster sense, and that’s what I’m talking about. Star Wars lacks the richness other franchises like House of the Dragon do."

It's literally as if you missed the entire climax of the Empire Strikes Back. That or it simply went over your head. Either way...I dunno man I can't help you here. They teach about what it means to have an emotional climax rather than an actual climax in film class and Empire is how they do it lol.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/8/2024, 5:16 PM
@McMurdo - Yeah, man. I don’t know what to tell you if you think Star Wars is the pinnacle of entertainment. Honestly.

But then again, we’re on a CBM site, so this type of fanboyism is to be expected, I guess.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/8/2024, 5:19 PM
@McMurdo - “The difference is that House of the Dragon will never leave the cultural and historical mark on the map that the Empire Strikes Back did. That's objective.”

Game of Thrones already did, and its prequel, House of the Dragon, is actually beloved, unlike Empire’s.

I mean you’re sitting here asking for Star Wars to be more like House of the Dragon, not the other way around, because one is evidently superior, even if you don’t want to admit it due to some child like attachment to a movie that’s not even the best in its genre, be that fantasy or sci-fi.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/8/2024, 5:38 PM
@McMurdo - “It's literally as if you missed the entire climax of the Empire Strikes Back. That or it simply went over your head.”

What, this?

User Comment Image

Corny dialogue and overacted reactions works for Star Wars charm, but let’s not pretend it isn’t what it is; corny and overacted. And this is what I’m talking about when I say you’re putting Star Wars on a pedestal solely due to its cultural significance and nostalgia. You don’t even give other Star Wars projects this same leniency for the exact same thing.
Fogs
Fogs - 7/8/2024, 5:52 PM
@McMurdo - Damn, that's some good ESB assessment right there. Kudos for that one, sir.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/8/2024, 5:59 PM
@FireandBlood - yeah there's nothing corny about that dialogue. I think you have a significant amount of recency bias when it comes to your opinion on modern day cinema and television. I love HotD.....but you won't find anyone in any forum arguing it's better than Empire Strikes Back outside of yourself. But you are entitled to that.

"You don’t even give other Star Wars projects this same leniency for the exact same thing"

You're refutation essentially comes down to "new SW sucks but people who say Empire is great don't hold it to the same standards". It's just old hat post-Last Jedi internet debate culture at its finest. It's a desperate need to revise what's been set in stone for decades in a futile attempt at raising what the large majority of the fandom (and the outside cinema going audience) decried the greatest artistic disappointment of the modern cinematic age. You're rebuttal is literally what-about-ism because in the face of someone needing to literally break down characterization for you ....you simply have nothing to say. You have to skirt around any actual argument. You're entire argument above is "it's corny and overacted" lol. Utilizing "No, I am your father" as your personal thesis.

Id love to hear you break down why Paul is a deeper character in Dune 2 vs Dune 1 next. You can't.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/8/2024, 6:16 PM
@FireandBlood - no one said SW is the pinnacle of entertainment. You simply have gone from one, in my opinion, not-so-hot take to the next whilst utilizing Straw Man arguments in an attempt at both savoring and bolstering your position (never works out well). My stance, and I've reiterated this several times now within this very thread, is that Empire is brilliant and it's always been brilliant, and will remain such as history in cinema continues to write itself.

You literally went from "not deep characterization" whilst referencing Deckard from Blade Runner (lol) to now relying on "corny dialogue and overacted".

I suggest committing and following through rather than utilizing logical fallacies in an attempt to upend whomever you are having a debate with next go round.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/8/2024, 6:17 PM
@Fogs - thanks brother. It's not as if any one who actually enjoys Star Wars and paid the slightest bit of attention wouldn't or couldn't have come to this exact assessment. It's why people love Empire....it's all about the characterization.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/8/2024, 6:22 PM
@McMurdo - I love Star Wars and I defend it a lot more than most on this site, including yourself. I just don’t suffer from primacy bias like you do. The dialogue is corny. The acting isn’t that good. Star Wars is infamous for this. But it’s a popcorn movie. Nobody was expecting anything more. Well, up until now, but that’s only because you put a popcorn movie on the same level of high art, when it’s not.

Remember you’re here expecting House of the Dragon level material from a franchise made to sell toys. And you’re asking for House of the Dragon material from Star Wars and not Empire material from House of the Dragon for a reason, because you know just as well as I do, there is no Star Wars on that level, not even Empire.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/8/2024, 6:30 PM
@FireandBlood - so no argument at all. Let's just leave this one right where it's at. Let the argument itself be the judge. This has been fun though.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/8/2024, 6:36 PM
@McMurdo - There’s nothing to argue about. You hold Empire to higher regard than it can actually measure up to, and I respect that. But objectively, me and you both know that it’s not what you’re trying to make it out to be and you proved that by coming to this article wanting Star Wars to be more like House of the Dragon, and that from the get killed any argument you ever had because nobody’s asking for House of the Dragon to take a leaf out of Empire’s book.

It’s the exact same thing you all do with Thor and LotR. Thor just isn’t protected by the same primacy bias you hold for Empire, but we all know LotR is better than Thor. Shit, it’s better than Star Wars, too.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/8/2024, 6:45 PM
@FireandBlood - lol. No for real. This has been great. I can argue Fellowship is in fact better than Empire. I can't do that for House of the Dragon or Blade Runner. It's all about characterization and it always will be. You'll sit tight on "primacy bias" and I'll just live in recency bias. It's not a great way to win an argument. One needs to actually break down and argue there points rather than rely on sweeping generalizations. I'm confident I did that above. I'm also quite confident you did not.

When do we discuss Paul is Dune 2 vs Dune 1?
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/8/2024, 6:53 PM
@McMurdo - ”I want my SW version of House of the Dragon.”

This was you, right? This is what you said?
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/8/2024, 7:02 PM
@FireandBlood - correct. And I broke that down as thoroughly as I think humanly possible. Your issue is that you are conflating my comment with all of Star Wars historically rather than conflating it with the current Star Wars content airing as we speak. And I can't help you there but I think you HAVE articulated, albeit unintentionally, why you came to such a conclusion. But I wasn't the one who felt threatened by said comment in the first place. Really I should be thanking you for the opportunity to bolster my case openly. You've done a service here for the sake of such a discussion even if you didn't intend to.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/8/2024, 7:16 PM
@McMurdo - Bro, c’mon. I’m not going to sit here and write an essay about why House of the Dragon is narratively richer and has better written character work than Star Wars when I know you know it does, especially when we’re both know you’re just going to disagree and double down on your belief that Empire is better just because its Empire.

But the fact remains you’re quite literally asking for what you get from House of the Dragon from Star Wars. That’s as good as admitting it’s better without outright admitting it, which is why I said, there’s no argument to be had. You did the work for me before I even replied.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/8/2024, 7:27 PM
@FireandBlood - it's not that you don't want to write an essay on it....it's that you can't write an essay on it. You're also still projecting and utilizing straw man takes.

I'm asking for current SW content to be on par with House of the Dragon in the writing dept. That's a direct dig at current SW. It has nothing to with Empire because why would it? Empire had great characterization itself. I quite literally argued that above. You haven't been able to refute it outside of dodging it with "corny dialogue and over acting" whilst referencing "No, I am your father". The only work you've done is give me the opportunity to make my case.

Also "Bro, Come on" should be your tagline for every time you have nothing new to say. You use it all the time.
Nomis929
Nomis929 - 7/8/2024, 3:03 PM
Vhagar is bascially Godzilla with wings!

User Comment Image
Vigor
Vigor - 7/8/2024, 3:04 PM
@Nomis929 - I haven't read the books. So I'm just dying to see how they take down this giant beast
Nomis929
Nomis929 - 7/8/2024, 3:10 PM
@Vigor - Same.

I only read early portions of it and then when I learned it was going to be made into a show I stopped becasue I don"t like being spoiled anymore when it comes to shows and movies.And I even avoided all the videoes online that goes throught the whole thing.

And while I rememeber the little girl talking about the "Dance of the dragons" on GOT, i don't remmeber how she said it ended and I don't want to look back at any episode that might give it away.

McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/8/2024, 3:11 PM
@Nomis929 - she's the last of the dragons who was alive during the reign of the Conquerer. She's seen some crazy shit
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/8/2024, 3:14 PM
@Nomis929 - I only read up to House of the Dragon timeline. So Aegon's Conquest essentially. I didn't wanna be spoiled either and it's definitely paying off. I'm on the edge of my seat.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder