THE WALKING DEAD Actor Jeffrey Dean Morgan Thinks That Zack Snyder's WATCHMEN Was "Ahead Of Its Time"

THE WALKING DEAD Actor Jeffrey Dean Morgan Thinks That Zack Snyder's WATCHMEN Was "Ahead Of Its Time"

Rampage actor Jeffrey Dean Morgan recently admitted that he thinks director Zack Snyder's 2008 live-action adaptation of Watchmen was "ahead of its time." More information after the jump...

By Nebula - Apr 05, 2018 07:04 PM EST
Filed Under: Watchmen
Source: Variety
It has been 10 years since the release of Zack Snyder's Watchmen. Some fans praise the director's visionary take on the classic comic book while others point out a variety of the film's shortcomings.

The director’s take on the material may not have totally understood what Alan Moore was trying to say in his popular comic, and gave us too much distractingly gory action -  not to mention one of cinema's most absurd sex scenes - but it wasn’t all bad by any means. Jackie Earle Haley played Rorschach exceptionally and Dr. Manhattan's origin scene was pure brilliance. It was consistently beautiful to look at, which was unsurprising given that Snyder always infuses his work with gorgeous visuals.

Now, looking back at the film; one of its stars thinks that its most crucial downfall was that it was "ahead of its time."

Here's what Jeffrey Dean Morgan said to Variety at the premiere of his new film Rampage:

I'm very proud of that movie. People are still finding it and watching it and I think it'll have fans forever. I think it was ahead of its time. I don't know what else to say, other than I'm extremely proud of it. Not long ago, I caught the second half of the film, just flipping channels, and loved it. It was great.

In hopes of capitalizing on the story's potential, Damon Lindelof is developing a Watchmen series for HBO, with a longer total runtime allowing the series to explore a variety of elements more thoroughly. Perhaps now is the right time for a live-action adaptation.

The original book from Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons was considered one of the most difficult stories to adapt in any live-action medium, given the dense themes and mature subject matter, yet the success of Christopher Nolan's Batman Begins helped confirm that audiences were ready for more adult-oriented superhero stories than fans had previously seen. Hot off the success of his 300 adaptation, Snyder was tapped to bring the film to life with his compelling visual style, delivering to audiences the epic tale.

Snyder certainly tried his hardest and perhaps delivered the best live-action take on the Watchmen we could've gotten. It's up to you to decide whether you think his efforts paid off.

What do you think about Morgan's hypothesis that the film was ahead of its time? What's your opinion of the film? With David Lindelof's attempt to adapt Watchmen just around the corner; do you think now is the right time? Will you be watching the Watchmen (once it arrives on HBO)?

WATCHMEN PART II Trailer And Cover Art Tease The Epic Conclusion To Animated Adaptation Of Classic Story
Related:

WATCHMEN PART II Trailer And Cover Art Tease The Epic Conclusion To Animated Adaptation Of Classic Story

WATCHMEN CHAPTER I Clip Recreates Two Big Scenes From Alan Moore And Dave Gibbons' Iconic Graphic Novel
Recommended For You:

WATCHMEN CHAPTER I Clip Recreates Two Big Scenes From Alan Moore And Dave Gibbons' Iconic Graphic Novel

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4
Roodi
Roodi - 4/5/2018, 8:01 PM
First, I don't think so.

I really enjoyed it though.
Kevwebsz
Kevwebsz - 4/5/2018, 8:02 PM
Idk about all that but I like it. The cast was really great too (except for malin akerman)
word1one
word1one - 4/5/2018, 8:03 PM
That movie was definitely ahead of it's time. Had it barely came out today, people would've been raving about it.
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 4/5/2018, 8:06 PM
I thought Watchmen was awesome, and I thought the change of ending from space octopus to Doctor Manhattan made more sense.

JustAChillFan
JustAChillFan - 4/5/2018, 8:10 PM
breaking news, actor says movie he was in was ahead of it's time.
Nebula
Nebula - 4/5/2018, 8:19 PM
@JustAChillFan -
LoganMjolnir
LoganMjolnir - 4/5/2018, 8:10 PM
Watchmen is an exquisite experience to watch.

DSAC294
DSAC294 - 4/5/2018, 8:15 PM
Loved the movie; not so sure about the “ahead of its time” part. The comic was published in 1986.
ThatAlexDude
ThatAlexDude - 4/5/2018, 8:17 PM
@DSAC294 - The original comics changed the way comic were viewed as if anything.
DSAC294
DSAC294 - 4/5/2018, 8:21 PM
@ThatAlexDude - yea the comic came out at exactly the right time for the impact it had.
ThatAlexDude
ThatAlexDude - 4/5/2018, 8:15 PM
James Earl Jones had me SOLD.
MarsivNayr
MarsivNayr - 4/5/2018, 8:57 PM
@ThatAlexDude - ..............Jackie earle Haley?



Or am I missing a joke.....
ThatAlexDude
ThatAlexDude - 4/6/2018, 3:27 AM
@MarsivNayr - FFFFFUUUUUUUU-

Hahahaha. Glad you corrected me.
Nightmare
Nightmare - 4/5/2018, 8:16 PM
It was ahead of its time in some aspects. But it was more the source material itself. Nowadays darker graphic novels are being adapted left and right.
HannibalLecter
HannibalLecter - 4/5/2018, 10:04 PM
@Nightmare - Agreed, compared to the source material it left more to be desired to me.
MUTO123
MUTO123 - 4/5/2018, 8:18 PM
I don’t know about that, but I do really like it.
GhostDog
GhostDog - 4/5/2018, 8:20 PM
The only real issue I had with it is that it frames the main characters as action heroes which they never were in the novel. Even the best of them (Dan and Laurie) have hugely suspect motives and psychology. The movie kind of softened that so we had those characters presented in an unambiguously heroic way. Moore was never interested in kick-ass fight scenes but Snyder very much is.



And Snyder flubbed the Nite Owl / Silk Specter II sex scene. 
Kryptonmatters
Kryptonmatters - 4/5/2018, 8:29 PM
@BlackBeltJones - From the perspective of Moore who is far Left, these characters who are "Parodies" of Charleston comics, were meant to be a somewhat Satirical look at what heroes would really be like if they existed in the real world. Snyder who is in my opinion a little further Right, saw it as Moviebob quoted, "A Manuel".
GhostDog
GhostDog - 4/5/2018, 8:37 PM
@Kryptonmatters - You're right on the nose. He views it as a manual. I've seen Bob's analysis of the film and he definitely hits a lot of good points regarding how Snyder interpreted the graphic novel.
Kryptonmatters
Kryptonmatters - 4/5/2018, 8:44 PM
@BlackBeltJones - Don't get me wrong, I love the movie. Granted, it's been several years since I've watched it, but I think it is indeed really good movie, and visual adaptation. And I will be the first to admit that I too misinterpreted the story, back in 2009 when I was still going through my "Dark Knight" phase. But I have gotten older, started reading more comics than just Frank Miller Batman comics, and I have a much better appreciation for other heroes. Hell I even became a fan of Aquaman again. I hadn't been a fan of Aquaman since the SuperFriends
1 2 3 4
View Recorder