Why The Watchmen Movie NEEDS the Giant Alien Squid Ending

Why The Watchmen Movie NEEDS the Giant Alien Squid Ending

After the secret Portland screening, a great debate has raged over the alternate ending. Our friends at WatchmenComicMovie.com have given the best arguement yet. Click here to see...

By ComicBookMovie - Oct 30, 2008 06:10 PM EST
Filed Under: Watchmen
Source: WatchmenComicMovie.com

"The news that Zack Snyder was changing the ending to his version of Watchmen came more than a year ago when leaked drafts of David Hayter’s, and then later Alex Tse’s, screenplays hit the Web. Both scripts had an ending very different from the original comic series where Dr. Manhattan is framed for an energy beam attack on multiple cities around the world killing millions. This event frightens the US and Russia into ceasing the Cold War, and ushers in a new era of global peace — the intended outcome from the party that perpetrated this elaborate hoax.

"From day one, fans (and I’m one of them) voiced their opinion that this new ending completely undermined the actual ending Alan Moore so carefully crafted back in 1985. Moore’s ending consisted of an elaborate hoax that would force the world into an era of peace as well, but did not involve Dr. Manhattan. What it did involve was a genetically engineered giant monster that's teleported into New York, instantly dies from the trip, and in it’s death throes broadcasts a psychic wave that kills millions. Fans endearingly call that monster “the squid.”

"Now, I’ll be the first to admit that on the surface, Moore's ending seems a bit, well, ridiculous. But anyone who has actually read Watchmen and has absorbed all of nuances of character and subtext will tell you - it's freakin’ brilliant. I mean, Watchmen is on the list of Time Magazine's “Top 100 Best English-language novels from 1923 to the present” for crying out loud.

"So, what’s wrong with the “Dr. Manhattan/Energy Beam” ending, then? Glad you asked. Here is the biggest problem most fans have with this “new” ending — framing Dr. Manhattan."


CLICK HERE to get the rest of the argument.


WATCHMEN CHAPTER I Clip Recreates Two Big Scenes From Alan Moore And Dave Gibbons' Iconic Graphic Novel
Related:

WATCHMEN CHAPTER I Clip Recreates Two Big Scenes From Alan Moore And Dave Gibbons' Iconic Graphic Novel

WATCHMEN CHAPTER I Red-Band Trailer Released Along With Full Cast List And Blu-ray Cover Art
Recommended For You:

WATCHMEN CHAPTER I Red-Band Trailer Released Along With Full Cast List And Blu-ray Cover Art

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

ThisFan
ThisFan - 10/30/2008, 9:20 PM
As a big fan of watchmen i think the "squid" is needed. dr. Manhattan can be the one to do the explosion because it doesnt seem like the world would care to go into peace but everyone i have asked including myself has said it seems more like it would cause more war on the US.
Scottymagic
Scottymagic - 10/30/2008, 9:27 PM
Ill admit to the logic that material needs to be adapted to be more cinematic and its harder to suspend belief when watching certain films than certain graphic novels but seems abit criminal to run around comforting fans saying how faithful it is then completely change the ending which out of everything id say is the biggest thing you can change. Still excited by the flick and will judge it on its merits as a piece of cinema rather than devout adaptation but if they change it and it fails i fear the backlash theyll get.
webhead31
webhead31 - 10/31/2008, 8:59 AM
My primary problem with the ending change is this - it takes the visceral and makes it cerebral. It takes an ending - a story, really - that takes place at the "gut" level and attempts to intellectually wrap it all up. It's a level change/switch that just doesn't fly.

Audiences need to have an emotional, visceral, gut-wrenching reaction to the story and the ending. It must touch/access something within the fan that is intellectually inaccessible. Without the key ending stipulations laid out at watchmenmovie.com, that reaction simply is not possible. It lets audiences off the hook. It allows them to escape the reality and "mess" of the situation and the story by fleeing into a puzzle solution rather than being dumped into the intestines of the world created by The Watchmen.

Look at it this way...if a fan watches the movie and has to ask him/herself the question "Does this ending work?" - especially if they have to sit down and analyze the factors, storylines, and characters in the movie in order to answer said question - then it doesn't work. Period.

If it works, the fan will know immediately. Otherwise, it's just wishful thinking.
warpath15
warpath15 - 11/5/2008, 3:56 PM
Good video Quagmire. I really hope they don't screw this up. The whole idea behind Watchmen was to create something completely different, something unexpected, something that doesn't appeal to the masses that want to watch a bunch of superpowered heros fight a bunch of superpowered villains. The point of Watchmen is that everything is meaningless and that these characters are trying to pin some meaning on the donkey. They're trying to create meaning for themselves in some twisted way by becoming crime fighters. They are ordinary people, with ordinary problems put in extraordinary situations... and in those situations they ALL fail. That message doesn't go over well with anyone. So if you are going to do a Watchmen movie DON'T EXPECT IT TO GO OVER. JUST MAKE IT. IF IT FAILS... WELL THEN IT'S WATCHMEN. Stop sticking to the formula. Watchmen didn't stick to the formula and that's what makes it so great. Greatness is not measured in popularity, it's measured in objective profundity.
View Recorder